Comprehensive Sexual Health Education for Youth Needs

Data Supporting a Comprehensive Approach to Reproductive and Sexual Health Education to Meet the Needs of Youth

Elissa Barr, PhD1,  Carmen Smotherman, PhD, MPH, MS2,  Michele Moore, PhD3, Zhigang Xie4, Emily Balaguer5,

Main Article ContentElissa Barr, PhD

 

OPEN ACCESS

PUBLISHED: 31 Decemner 2024

CITATION: BARR, Elissa et al. Data Supporting a Comprehensive Approach to Reproductive and Sexual Health Education to Meet the Needs of Youth. Medical Research Archives,  Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/6140>.

COPYRIGHT: © 2025 European Society of Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i12.6140

ISSN 2375-1924

 

Abstract

In the United States (U.S.), reproductive and sexual health education in middle school and high school is inconsistent across states and remains under scrutiny. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 22 critical sexuality education topics. Yet only 24% of middle schools teach grades 6-8 and 45% of high schools (grades 9-12) are required to address all 22 topics in 2022. Additionally, other states have laws requiring comprehensive sexuality education in all schools, 16 states provide abstinence-only sex education, and only 13 states require sex education to include information on consent. In Florida, the focus is on the prevention of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but the research documents a more comprehensive approach to reproductive and sexual health education is necessary for adolescents, particularly in the state of Florida. This paper aims to provide a comprehensive approach to reproductive and sexual health education that is relevant and responsive to the needs of youth.

Keywords: reproductive health, sexual health education, youth, Florida, comprehensive approach

Introduction

In the United States (U.S.), reproductive and sexual health education in middle school and high school is inconsistent across states and remains under scrutiny. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies 22 critical sexuality education topics. Yet only 24% of middle schools teach grades 6-8 and 45% of high schools (grades 9-12) are required to address all 22 topics in 2022. Additionally, other states have laws requiring comprehensive sexuality education in all schools, 16 states provide abstinence-only sex education, and only 13 states require sex education to include information on consent. In Florida, the focus is on the prevention of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted infections (STIs), but the research documents a more comprehensive approach to reproductive and sexual health education is necessary for adolescents, particularly in the state of Florida.

According to the Florida Department of Health, in this same year, the state of Florida was identified as one of eight states that accounted for 57% of all new HIV infections. According to the Florida Department of Health, one in every 154 adults in Florida were living with HIV in 2020.

Teens also experience high rates of unplanned pregnancy and teen births. Although on a downward trend since 2013, the teen pregnancy rate in Florida remains high, with 10% of teen moms (15-19 years) having had a child by age 19. In 2020, there were 16,000 births to teens aged 15-19, which represents a rate of 18.8 births per 1,000 females aged 15-19. The Florida Department of Health reported that 57% of all new HIV infections in 2020 occurred among young people aged 20 to 24, closely followed by those 15 to 19. Among the estimated 31,200 new HIV infections in 2022, persons aged 15-29 accounted for 6,400 cases, or 20% of these cases, and 42,200 young people in this age group were living with HIV.

DATA

Participants’ baseline characteristics were collected via a survey provided to educational administrators for individuals 25 years and older, to age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Demographic weights were calculated using the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey (ACS) 5-year estimates for the adult population of Duval County. Party registration information was obtained from the election authorities in each county. All weighted demographic variables were applied using the SPSS version 27 rate weighting function, which will not assign a weight if one of the weighting demographic variables is missing. Individuals with missing demographic data were manually assigned a weight of one.

DATA COLLECTION: Data collection took place over a 10-month period from November 2021 to August 2022. Participants were contacted by live callers via telephone. The survey was administered via telephone interviews with a 27-question survey regarding sexual health education.

Variable

Variable Category Count
Education Less than high school 13 (0.1%)
  High school graduate 539 (91%)
  Some college 60 (10%)
  Post graduate 213 (0.3%)

Overall, 86% of participants reported that learning about sex education to be important in high school, with a higher proportion reporting it as important among younger participants (from 95% among 18 to 24 years old, to 80% among 65 years old or older, p=0.04), minority participants (86% Hispanic, p=0.004), and those with less education (100% among those without a high school diploma, p=0.015) (Table 2).

Table 2: Support for Sexual Health Education and Education Types

Variable Category How important is sex ed in high school? How do you feel about sex ed in high school?
Gender Male 74% (84) 87% (92)
  Female 81% (93) 83% (91)

In general, the majority of participants support teaching all eight topics in both high school and middle school. In high school, support for teaching gender and sexual orientation to 93% for teaching human anatomy and reproduction (Table 3).

Table 3: Overall Support for Sexual Health Topics

Topic Support
How to talk with parents about sex education 74%
Anatomy & Reproduction 81%
HIV and STDs 87%
Abstinence from sexual activity 78%
Birth control methods 72%
Condom use 70%
Gender and sexual orientation 87%

Discussion

Results from this study add to the research documenting support for a more comprehensive approach to reproductive and sexual health education. Among participants, 83% prefer school taught abstinence, but only 11% prefer schools do not teach abstinence. This research indicates that sexual education received the least support yet was supported by well over half of respondents. The support for the need for sexual health education was significant among those aged 18 to 24 and those with a high school education (66%, p=0.050). There were no significant differences in support for topics taught in middle school by education (Appendix B).

The findings support the need for a comprehensive approach to sexual health education in Florida, recent state practice in Florida is not reflective. This relatively new direction is coming from the state level government to include the Florida Department of Education. House Bill 1069, approved by the State Board of Education in Florida, became effective in July of 2023. This bill now requires all materials used to teach reproductive health or any disease including HIV/AIDS to be approved by the Florida Department of Education. Prior to this bill, local districts had the autonomy to determine and select materials to meet the needs of their community. With the movement towards a more abstinence focused approach, Florida schools are becoming less inclusive in their content. Specific topics being excluded include sexual orientation, consent, and the importance of healthy relationships. This is concerning as the research indicates that the majority of youth are supportive of comprehensive sexual health education.

LIMITATIONS

The study had several limitations. First, the sample is representative of the residents of the United States (SIECUS). The SIECUS data cannot be generalized to other counties, states, or other regions. Second, for questions regarding support for each of the eight topics being taught in middle school and high school, only specific questions were used to imply the content of the specific topics to be taught. The support for the nature and depth of each topic was not known. Finally, only quantitative questions would have added to the richness and depth of the results allowing participants to explain why they support the specific topics and sexual health education in general.

Conclusion

Results from this study provide substantial support for comprehensive sexual health education in middle and high schools. The research indicates that youth in Florida are supportive of both comprehensive and abstinence-based education. The findings suggest that the current state level direction regarding sexual education in public schools, rests on the need for a comprehensive approach to sexual health education.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

1. Sexuality Information and Education Counsel of the United States (SIECUS). The SIECUS state profiles 2022. Published 2022. [online] Available: https://siecus.org/state-profiles-2022/.

2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of adolescent and school health, school health profiles 2022: Explore school health profiles questions – Nationwide, 2022, health education. [online] Available: https://profiles-explorer.cdc.gov/. Updated 2024.

3. Florida Department of Education. 2023. Approval of Health Materials per House Bill 1069. 2023; 1003.42(1)(b). Available: https://info.fldoe.org/docushare/dsweb/Get/Document-9960/dps-2023-167.pdf

4. Planned Parenthood, What U.S. parents think about sex education in schools, Published 2023 [online] Available: https://cdn.plannedparenthood.org/uploads/filer_public/f8/d6/f8d6439d-dbf2-4205-b447-cc9f70815f82/parent_data_fact_sheet_english.pdf?_gl=1*gxr81y*_ga*MTQ4Mjk0ODM3MC4xNzMxMjY5Njkw*_ga_ENXC8KHJL8*MTczMTI2OTY5MC4xLjEuMTczMTI2OTcwNS4wLjAuOTY5MzkzMzEy

5. Howard-Barr E, Moore MJ, Weiss JA, Jobli E. Public opinion toward sexuality education: Findings among one south Florida county. Am J Sex Educ. 2011;6(2):176–191. doi:10.1080/15546 128.2011.571955.

6. American Public Health Association Policy Statement. Sexuality education as part of a comprehensive health education program in K to 12 schools – Policy number 20143. Published November 18, 2014. [online] Available: https://www.apha.org/policies-and-advocacy/public-health-policy-statements/policy-database/2015/01/23/09/37/sexuality-education-as-part-of-a-comprehensive-health-education-program-in-k-to-12-schools

7. Moore P. Poll results: Sex ed. Published January 7, 2015 [online] Available: https://today.yougov.com/health/articles/11294-poll-results-sex-ed.

8. Power to Decide. Survey says. Published 2017. [online] Available: https://powertodecide.org/sites/default/files/resources/primary-download/survey-says-may-2017.pdf

9. Jones RP, Cox D. How race and religion shape millennial attitudes on sexuality and reproductive health. Published March 27, 2015 [online] Available: https://www.prri.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/PRRI-Millennials-Web-FINAL.pdf

10. Barr EM, Moore MJ, Johnson T, Forrest J, Jordan M. New evidence: Data documenting parental support for earlier sexuality education. J School Health. 2014;84(1): 10–17. doi:10.1111/josh.12112.

11. Szucs LE, Harper CR, Andrzejewski J, Barrios LC, Robin L, Hunt P. Overwhelming support for sexual health education in U.S. schools: A meta-analysis of 23 surveys conducted between 2000 and 2016. J Adolescent Health. 2022;70(4):598–606. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.016. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2021.05.016

12. Davis CJ, Cox D, Griffin R, Jones RP. Young People Set to Impact the Debate on Women’s Health Issues. Published April, 2018. [online] Available: https://www.prri.org/research/young-people-set-to-impact-the-debate-on-womens-health-issues/.

13. Barr E, Moore MJ, Wilson K, Parisi T, McCann H. Documenting support for ongoing and improved efforts in sexuality education. Florida Public Health Review. 2017;14: 45–55. https://scholars.unf.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/40651347/Documenting%20Support%20for%20Ongoing%20and%20Improved%20Efforts%20in%20Sexuality.pdf

14. Kantor L, Levitz N. Parents’ views on sex education in schools: How much do Democrats and Republicans agree? PloS One. 2017;12(7): e0180250. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0180250.

15. US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Healthy People 2030. Reduce pregnancies in adolescents – FP‑03. Published 2020. [online] Available: https://odphp.health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/family-planning/reduce-pregnancies-adolescents-fp-03

16. World Association for Sexual Health (WAS). WAS statement on comprehensive sexuality education. Published July 26, 2023. [online] Available: https://www.worldsexualhealth.net/statement-on-comprehensive-sexuality-education

17. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 1991-2021 High school youth risk behavior survey data. [online] Available: http://nccd.cdc.gov/youthonline/. Accessed October 11, 2024.

18. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Sexually transmitted disease surveillance. Published 2021. [online] Available: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/2021-STD-Surveillance-Report-PDF_ARCHIVED-2-16-24.pdf

19. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC). Sexually Transmitted Infections Surveillance 2022. [online] Available: https://www.cdc.gov/std/statistics/2022/default.htm. Updated 2024.

20. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, (CDC). Estimated HIV incidence and prevalence in the United States, 2018–2022. HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report, 29(1). Published May 21, 2024. https://www.cdc.gov/hiv-data/nhss/estimated-hiv-incidence-and-prevalence.html

21. Florida Department of Health. 2022. State HIV slide set: State of Epidemic, 2022. [online] Available: https://www.floridahealth.gov/diseases-and-conditions/aids/surveillance/epi-slide-sets.html

22. Power to Decide (formerly The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy). Fast facts: Teen pregnancy in the United States. Published April 2016. [online] Available: https://powertodecide.org/sites/default/files/resources/primary-download/fast-facts-teen-pregnancy-us.pdf

23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). About teen pregnancy. Published May 14, 2024. [online] Available: https://www.cdc.gov/reproductive-health/teen-pregnancy/.

24. Hendrick CE, Maslowsky J. 2019. Teen mothers’ educational attainment and their children’s risk for teenage childbearing. Dev Psychol. 2019;55(6):125 9–1273. doi:10.1037/dev0000705.

25. Osterman MJK, Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Driscoll AK, Valenzuela CP. Births: Final data for 2021. National Vital Statistics Reports. 2023;72(1). doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.15620/cdc:122047

26. Sedgh G, Finer LB, Bankole A, Eilers MA, Singh S. Adolescent pregnancy, birth, and abortion rates across countries: levels and recent trends. J Adolesc Health. 2015;56(2):223 – 230. doi:10.101 6/j.jadohealth.2014.09.007. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4852976/

27. Kirby D. 2007. Emerging answers 2007: Research findings on programs to reduce teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. Washington DC: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.

28. Goldfarb ES, Lieberman LD. Three decades of research: The case for comprehensive sex education. J Adolescent Health. 2021;68(1):13–27. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.036.

29. Eisenberg ME, Bernat DH, Bearinger LH, Resnick MD. Condom provision and education in Minnesota public schools: A telephone survey of parents. J School Health. 2009;79(9): 416–424. doi:10.1111/j.1746-1561.2009.00429.x.

30. Ito KE, Gizlice Z, Owen-O’Dowd J, Foust E, Leone PA, Miller WC. Parent opinion of sexuality education in a state with mandated abstinence education: Does policy match parental preference? J Adolescent Health. 2006;39(5):634–641. doi:10. 1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.022.

31. National Public Radio, Kaiser Family Foundation, Kennedy School of Government. 2004. Sex education in America general public/ parents survey. The Henry J.Kaiser Family Foundation. Published January 2004. [online] Available: https://www.kff.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/sex-education-in-america-general-public-parents-survey-toplines.pdf

32. Yarber WL, Milhausen RR, Crosby RA, Torabi MR. Public opinion about condoms for HIV and STD prevention: A midwestern state telephone survey. Perspect Sex Repro H. 2005;37(3):148–154. doi:10.1363/3714805.

33. Future of Sex Education Initiative. National sexuality education standards: Core content and skills, K-12. J School Health. 2012;43(1). https://healtheducationresources.unesco.org/sites/default/files/resources/ssr_tpg_1_sexualityeducationstandards.pdf

34. Kantor L, Levitz N, Holstrom A. Support for sex education and teenage pregnancy prevention programmes in the USA: Results from a national survey of likely voters. Sex Education. 2020;20(3): 239–251.https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2019.1652807

35. Kershner SH, Corwin S, Prince M, Robillard A, Oldendick R. Support for comprehensive sexuality education and adolescent access to condoms and contraception in South Carolina. Am J of Sexuality Education. 2017;12(3): 297-314. doi:10.1080/1554 6128.2017.1359803.

36. American Medical Association. AMA adopt new public health policies to improve health donation. Published June 15, 2018. [online] Available: https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-adopts-new-public-health-policies-improve-health-nation-1

37. Breuner, CC, Mattson, G. American Academy of Pediatrics, Committee on Adolescence, Committee on psychosocial aspects of child in the family health. Sexuality Education for Children and Adolescents. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20161348

38. World Health Organization, comprehensive sexuality education, May 18, 2023, Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/questions-and-answers/item/comprehensive-sexuality-education

39. Kaiser Family Foundation. Women’s Health Policy: abstinence education programs: definitions, funding, and impact on teen sexual behavior. Published June 1, 2018 [online] Available: https://files.kff.org/attachment/Fact-Sheet-Abstinence-Education-Programs-Definition-Funding-and-Impact-on-Teen-Sexual-Behavior

40. Future of Sex Education. 2020. National sex education standards core content and skills, K-12. 2nd ed. Available: https://advocatesforyouth.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/NSES-2020-web.pdf

41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV testing and youth. [online] Available: https://www.cdc.gov/healthyyouth/youth_hiv/hiv-information-and-youth.htm. Updated 2024

42. The Trevor Project. 2023 US national survey the mental health of the LGBTQ young people. Available:https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2023/

43. Chin, H, et al. Community Preventive Services Task Force. The effectiveness of group-based comprehensive risk-reduction and abstinence education interventions to prevent or reduce the risk of adolescent pregnancy, human immunodeficiency virus, and sexually transmitted infections: Two systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J of Preventive Medicine. 2012;42(3):272-94

44. Santelli JS, et al. Guttmacher Institute. Abstinence-only-until-marriage: An updated review of U.S. policies and programs and their impact. J of Adolescent Health, 2017;61: 273e280. [online]Available:https://www.jahonline.org/article/S1054-139X(17)30260-4/pdf

45. Trenholm C, Devaney B, Fortson K, Quay L, Wheeler J, Clark M. Impacts of Four Title V, Section 510 Abstinence Education Programs. Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. 2007. Published April 12, 2007. [online] Available: https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/impacts-four-title-v-section-510-abstinence-education-programs-1

46. Heritage Foundation (2010). Evidence on the Effectiveness of Abstinence Education: An Update. Available:https://www.heritage.org/education/report/evidence-the-effectiveness-abstinence-education-update

47. Stanger-Hall KF, Hall DW. Abstinence-only education and teen pregnancy rates: Why we need comprehensive sex education in the U.S. PLoS One, 2011;6(10): e24658 doi: 10.1371/journal. pone.0024658

48. Plastino K, Quinlan J, Todd J, Tevendale HD. Stakeholder education and community mobilization garner support for sex education. J Adolesc Health. 2017;60(3S):S24-S29. doi: 10.1016/j.jado health.2016.09.028. available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28235431/

49. Moore MJ, Barr E, Wilson K, Griner S. Support for offering sexual health services through school based health clinics. J of School Health. 2016;86(9): 660-668.
 
 

 

Interested in publishing your own research?
ESMED members can publish their research for free in our peer-reviewed journal.
Learn About Membership

Call for papers

Have a manuscript to publish in the society's journal?