Neuroinflammation and Vocal Biomarkers in Parkinson’s Disease
Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms and Vocalization Biomarkers in the Pink1-/- Preclinical Model of Parkinson’s Disease
Sarah A. Lechner1, and Cynthia A. Kelm-Nelson1*
- Department of Surgery, Division of Endocrine Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
OPEN ACCESS
PUBLISHED: 31 October 2025
CITATION:Lechner, SA., and Kelm-Nelson, CA., 2025. Neuroinflammatory Mechanisms and Vocalization Biomarkers in the Pink1-/- Preclinical Model of Parkinson’s Disease. Medical Research Archives, [online] 13(10). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i10.6972
COPYRIGHT: © 2025 European Society of Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
DOI https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v13i10.6972
ISSN2375-1924
ABSTRACT
Parkinson’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with an unclear etiology and a long preclinical phase. The multitude of challenges of studying this in humans highlight the need for robust preclinical animal models that accurately reflect the disease’s preclinical progression. While traditional neurotoxin models fail to capture the slow, genetic nature of PD, genetic models, such as the phosphatase and tensin homolog-induced putative kinase 1 (Pink1-/-) knockout rat, offer a preclinical, translational approach. This review synthesizes the current understanding of the Pink1-/- rat model, focusing on two key aspects: neuroinflammation and vocalization deficits. The Pink1-/- rat presents early non-motor symptoms, including vocalization deficits, which can serve as a non-invasive, objective, and longitudinal biomarker of disease progression. This review further proposes a direct link between the model’s neuroinflammatory profile, characterized by chronic glial activation and the upregulation of inflammatory pathways, and the observed vocal dysfunctions. By bridging these two critical areas, neuroinflammation as a pathological mechanism and vocalizations as a functional readout, this review provides a framework for future investigations into the diagnosis and treatment of Parkinson’s disease and suggests that targeting specific inflammatory pathways could be a viable therapeutic strategy.
Keywords:
Parkinson disease, rat, biomarker, neuroinflammation, ultrasonic vocalization.
1. Introduction
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the fastest-growing neurodegenerative disorder in the US, with an annual incidence of 60,000 to 95,000 new diagnoses. Accelerating prevalence is due to an aging population, increased longevity, increased awareness, and unclear environmental factors. PD places a substantial burden on the U.S. healthcare system; for example, the total annual economic burden is $51.9 billion. Traditionally, the disease is characterized by the selective loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta, the accumulation of misfolded proteins, primarily α-synuclein, into Lewy bodies, as well as the ascending spread of these pathologies throughout the CNS. While the cardinal motor symptoms, bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremor, are the most recognized features of PD in the mid-to-late stage, a wide range of debilitating non-motor symptoms, including vocalization and swallowing deficits, cognitive impairments, autonomic dysfunction, and mood disorders, often precede the limb motor deficits and are underdiagnosed yet significantly and negatively impact a patient’s quality of life. A growing body of evidence suggests that non-motor symptoms can serve as highly sensitive and early biomarkers of PD. Of interest in this review is vocal dysfunction (dysarthria) as an early, progressive preclinical biomarker. Vocal deficits manifest preclinically and affect nearly 90% of individuals with PD; negatively impacting social interactions and quality of life. These changes include hypophonia, reduced intelligibility, and dysphonic voice characterized by rough, breathy, and monotone qualities (hypokinetic dysarthria) and are difficult to treat.
The complex timeline and etiology of PD remains a subject of research, with evidence pointing to a convergence of genetic predispositions with environmental factors that drive disease pathogenesis throughout a long preclinical phase. Preclinical PD is inherently difficult to study in humans due to variable symptom manifestation, inconsistent age of onset, and environmental variability. Thus, genetic animal models offer homogeneity and superior experimental control, facilitating meaningful advancements to our understanding of PD along with the development of novel therapeutics that cannot be achieved in human studies alone. However, a significant challenge in the field has been the lack of a single research model that fully recapitulates the progressive early onset pathology, with neurodegeneration, and both the motor and non-motor symptoms of the human disease. Traditional neurotoxin-based rodent models, such as those using 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) or 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP), induce acute and rapid dopamine neurodegeneration but often fail to model the progressive nature and genetic complexity of PD. Genetic rodent models, on the other hand, can provide a more accurate representation of the disease’s slow progression, complex biology, and can be particularly useful for investigating early, preclinical pathological events. For example, mitochondrial dysfunction is a common feature of both sporadic and genetic PD and proteins encoded by PD-associated genes participate in molecular pathways that produce pathology indistinguishable from sporadic forms.
While much of the prior research has focused on dopamine-related pathophysiology and clinical time periods, there is a critical research need to better understand the mechanisms that contribute to preclinical behavioral signs. Ultimately, a genetic preclinical model advances scientific understanding that drives new devices, behavioral strategies, and drug therapies in humans. Inherited mutations have been found to account for 4%–9% of human cases with early onset PD. Yet, risk variants could explain up to 30% of the heritable risk of PD depending on prevalence. In the preclinical phase, individuals do not exhibit clinical signs or symptoms which makes studying this phase in humans nearly impossible. Among the current genetic models, the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN)-induced putative kinase 1 [PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homologue)-induced kinase1; PARK6] knockout (Pink1-/-) rat has emerged as a particularly valuable research tool to study preclinical PD and associated behavioral dysfunction. Loss-of-function mutations in the PINK1 gene are a leading cause of early-onset familial PD in humans, highlighting its role in mitochondrial quality control. Likewise, human PINK1 monogenetic variants appear similar to spontaneous forms of the disease in that they both exhibit a progressive loss of function and nigrostriatal dopamine cell loss in late-stage disease. They also present with other motor and non-motor deficits, such as early-onset bulbar sensorimotor issues like speech and swallowing dysfunction, that may be linked to non-dopaminergic mechanisms. Similar overlapping vagal-nerve behaviors including swallowing, chewing, and GI dysfunction with corresponding brainstem nuclei findings are also present in this model. Research demonstrates that the Pink1-/- rat model develops age-dependent mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and subsequent dopaminergic neurodegeneration, mirroring longitudinal aspects of the human disease.
Mitochondrial dysfunction, neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, and differential modulation of the CNS immune system, plays an important role in the initial insult, spread, and severity of PD and epidemiological studies suggest that anti-inflammatory drugs may be therapeutic and reduce the incidence of PD. For example, PD patients exhibit high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 in the brain and CSF, as well as microglia activation and peripheral immune cell infiltration. It is now understood that chronic activation of glial cells, particularly microglia and astrocytes, contributes significantly to neuronal damage and death. This review aims to synthesize the current understanding of the Pink1-/- rat model, focusing on the interplay between its specific neuroinflammatory profile and the potential of vocalization changes as a novel biomarker. By bridging these two critical areas of research, neuroinflammation as a pathological mechanism and vocalizations as a functional readout, we seek to provide a comprehensive framework for future investigations into the diagnosis and treatment of PD.
2. The Pink1-/- Rat: A Progressive Model for Preclinical Vocal Biomarkers
In humans, preclinical vocal deficits are difficult to characterize and nearly impossible to investigate due to factors like symptom manifestation, inconsistent age of disease onset, and environmental variability. And, research also shows a significant effect of sex in the incidence, clinical manifestation, and progression of PD signs, including these functional vocal changes. Developed over a decade ago, the Pink1-/- rat model has been a valuable tool for studying PD and vocalizations. The model closely reflects the preclinical pathology and behavioral dysfunction seen in human PD, including subtle limb motor deficits and other non-motor symptoms, described below. This wide range of observable signs makes it an ideal model for studying the full spectrum of preclinical PD pathology. While the Pink1-/- mouse model has also been studied, the rat’s larger size, longer life span, and ability to readily train to behavioral tasks make it a better analog for humans. Additionally, the primary advantage of a genetically engineered model is the homogeneity of the sample that cannot be assessed with human post-mortem tissue and the ability to control for environmental conditions with the effect of biological sex as variable. Thus, the rat provides superior experimental control and allows for meaningful contributions to our understanding of vocal communication and disease pathology. Specifically, over the last decade, the Pink1-/- rat has been valuable for PD-voice literature by contributing to the first characterization of vocal communication in the preclinical stage, longitudinal assessments, the development of an exercise training paradigm, all in combination with the investigation of the central nervous system pathological mechanisms.
2.1 RAT VOCALIZATIONS ARE ANALOGOUS TO HUMAN COMMUNICATION
Rats are social prey mammals that use ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs), occurring above the hearing range of many predators, to communicate with conspecifics. Rats generally use three classes of USVs depending on age and context. Among several call types, adult rat social USVs occur in the 50-kilohertz (kHz) range and are in many ways analogous and relevant to studying human vocal communication. These rat calls are affiliative and at least partially semiotic. For example, seminal literature demonstrates the rewarding and positive emotional significance of 50-kHz calls and have described how these calls are made in “appetitive” or “prosocial” situations that influence other rats’ behavior, causing them to approach. Moreover, the production of rat USVs shares several key characteristics with human vocalization. Rat USVs are generated within the larynx on an egressive airflow, the forced flow of air through the vocal fold, and modulated largely by the thyroarytenoid muscle. A shared feature between USV production and human vocalization is the generation of airflow through lung pressure, which then modulates the vocal tract during exhalation with the help of intrinsic laryngeal muscles. In rats, vocal frequency changes are attributed to manipulations of this laryngeal framework. Reide and others proposed an edge-tone mechanism via control of intrinsic laryngeal muscles (via a ventral pouch) which is the foundation for vocal variation. Recent work by Håkansson et al., however, has hypothesized that vocalizations are produced by a glottal jet impinging on the thyroid inner wall. Despite these differences between human and rodent laryngeal and aerodynamic vocal anatomical geometry, there is utility in using rodents for investigating the descending CNS motor pathway, specifically in disease. In both humans and rats, the brainstem vocal motor pathway, a highly evolutionarily conserved neural circuit, is mechanistically responsible for phonation and from a systems biology standpoint useful for studying mechanistic circuitry. As a result, this framework is used to link alterations in muscle and central nervous system transcriptomics and proteomics to USV vocal behavioral changes in the rat. Because of these anatomical similarities, the study of rat USVs then provides a valuable translational model for investigating vocal deficits that, addressed above, are a common sign of preclinical PD.
2.2 PINK1-/- RATS DEMONSTRATE PRECLINICAL VOCALIZATION CHANGES
Both male and female Pink1-/- rats exhibit progressive vocalization deficits compared to wildtype control rats and the age of onset and how the vocalization parameters change with age significantly differs between sexes. The first data published by Grant 2015 et al., showed that male Pink1-/- rats exhibit vocalization changes to intensity (loudness), peak frequency, and bandwidth and that these vocal deficits persist and worsen from 2 months to 8 months of age. Since then, these data have been replicated in additional studies and experiments. At 10 months of age, male Pink1-/- rats were tested in combination with respiratory measures and the data show that respiration is increasingly variable; variability in motor behaviors (a phenotype of this model) is increased in Pink1-/- rats. Lesser data exist in female Pink1-/- rats; however, Marquis 2018 et al. showed that from the onset of testing, these rats have reduced intensity but no significant differences in other acoustic and non-acoustic measures over time. In an ethological context, data suggest that wildtype female rats show decreased motivation to approach Pink1-/- vocalization stimuli, suggesting that these deficits impair the social purpose in this model and with our other data that they are measurably different. Male responses to female Pink1-/- rats have not yet been studied.
2.3 PINK1-/- RATS CAN BE VOCAL TRAINED AS A PRECLINICAL MODEL OF THERAPY
Once diagnosed with a voice disorder, humans are often offered behavioral intervention. LSVT LOUD® is the gold-standard, high-intensity vocal-exercise speech training in humans that focuses on improving vocal loudness by adjusting sensorimotor perception via retraining processes including sensory recalibration and training in self-cueing and attention. During training, 16 individual hour-long sessions are delivered over four weeks by a certified therapist with additional daily tasks for the patient to complete. The effects of training include increases in loudness (amplitude of respiratory-laryngeal movement) that can be maintained for 12-24 months. LSVT LOUD® also has some effects on pitch variability, articulatory precision, and intelligibility. Importantly, LSVT LOUD®, when successful, increases communication effectiveness, vocal ability, and participation in social conversation. We have mimicked this regime in the Pink1-/- rats which is especially relevant because it allows for simultaneous study of behavioral benefits with CNS mechanisms and alterations. This validated behavioral paradigm is systematic, repeated, and uses controlled activation of groups of muscles for sequences of goal-directed actions. Yang 2015 et al. first showed that Pink1-/- rats can be trained using a vocal exercise paradigm where rats are water restricted and trained to perform a socially motivated increase in vocalizations. Then, vocal parameters, such as loudness, are recorded and analyzed by researchers. The data show that there is a significant increase in loudness (intensity) and bandwidth (frequency range) with 2 weeks of training. However, despite continued daily training these effects do not last beyond 2 months and then decline. Thus, like in humans the responses can be heterogeneous and as the disease progresses non-responsive to sustained therapeutic levels of vocal training. More recently, Pink1-/- rats that were both vocal and tongue trained (a form of swallowing exercise) produced greater tongue forces, faster tongue contraction, as well as higher-intensity vocalization following exercise between 2 and 4 months of age. However, at 6 months of age, vocal exercise resulted in increased call complexity but did not change intensity. Then at 10 months, vocal exercise no longer influenced vocalization complexity. This suggests that there is potential to change behavioral phenotypes in the very early preclinical period but that adaptation or combination therapies in the later stages may be necessary.
2.4 PINK1-/- RATS HAVE PRECLINICAL BRAINSTEM PATHOLOGY THAT CORRELATES TO BEHAVIORAL DEFICITS
Much like humans, USV deficits in Pink1-/- rats appear independent of severe nigrostriatal dopamine loss and they do not respond to L-dopa or methylphenidate (noradrenergic) treatment. Yet, a limitation of this Pink1-/- rat model, in addition to increased variability in motor performances, has been the inconsistent reporting of nigral dopamine depletion. The first reports suggested male rats had a 50% reduction in dopamine cells by 8 months of age but this has not been replicated since. However, those first studies also investigated vocal parameters and limb motor movements in correlation with locus coeruleus tyrosine hydroxylase immunohistochemical cell counts and optical density measurements. Pink1-/- rats have a significant reduction in the number of noradrenergic cells in the locus coeruleus. This research also showed the presence of aggregated α-synuclein in locus coeruleus, nucleus ambiguus, substantia nigra, and the periaqueductal gray. And, [18F]NS12137 PET imaging has demonstrated a reduction in norepinephrine transporter binding in other brain regions including the thalamus and prelimbic area. Other research showed that along with vocal exercise intervention in Pink1-/- rats, there was correlational mesolimbic gene changes; for example, there is increased GABAergic gene expression within the ventral tegmental area of vocal-exercised Pink1-/- male rats directly suggesting that vocal training increases GABA mRNA expression. More recent studies have used other molecular assays including high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) to study the catecholamine neurotransmitter microenvironment of the CNS immediately after behavioral data collection which found a reduction in serotonin in the brainstem of Pink1-/- rats. Together, the catecholamine early pathology suggests a model which is more consistent with early Braak PD staging.
2.5 GENE TRANSCRIPTOME WORK CAN LINK BRAINSTEM BIOLOGICAL NETWORKS TO VOCALIZATION DYSFUNCTION
Finally, recent work shows that Pink1-/- vocal deficits are concurrent with gene transcriptional changes in head/neck muscles and lower brainstem regions (e.g. decreased norepinephrine, α-synuclein accumulation, increased inflammation) and brainstem cell loss. Current research used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to evaluate differences in gene expression and use statistical modeling to incorporate vocal behavioral datasets. For example, within the periaqueductal gray in male and female Pink1-/- rats compared to wildtype controls, we showed specific gene expression modules correlated with vocalization, particularly in female rats. Importantly, the identified differentially expressed genes in both sexes were found to align with data from human PD patients, highlighting the translational value of the rat model for studying the disease. This also sets the stage for the hypothesis that there are observable predictors of prodromal PD behavior. Since, RNA-seq has been used by Lechner et al. to evaluate blood, muscle, and brain transcriptomic changes. These findings led to the hypothesis that neuroinflammation is present in the Pink1-/- model, contributes to prodromal-like behaviors, and may serve as a therapeutic target. Supporting this, our transcriptome-based drug repurposing database identified mostly anti-inflammatory and antioxidant compounds, further corroborating the hypothesis.
3. The Role of Neuroinflammation in Parkinson’s Disease Pathogenesis
While the hallmark neuropathology of PD has been identified as the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, seminal literature has shown that preclinical PD is evident in lower brainstem regions prior to cortico-basal ganglia involvement and overtime the disease spreads rostrally. This pathology is widespread and includes the disruption of neurotransmitters and accumulation of abnormal α-synuclein protein aggregation which has been observed at multiple levels in both the central and peripheral nervous system. The mechanisms preceding aggregate formation and nigral neuronal cell loss are largely unknown but neuroinflammation is known to play a significant role in the neurodegeneration in PD, glia activation and upregulation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in the brainstem. Within the CNS, the two main drivers of early neuroinflammation, brain-resident microglia and astrocytes, undergo transcriptional reprogramming in preclinical disease. Over time, the new pathology associated with PD activates further microglia responses in a cyclical pattern; this has been reported within the substantia nigra of PD patients. In patients with early PD diagnoses, the midbrain is densely populated with activated microglia, and, in late PD, postmortem human brain tissue demonstrates elevated levels of IL-2, IL-6, and TNF-α as well as IL-1β in the substantia nigra. Moreover, single-cell RNA sequencing of nigral tissue also demonstrates neurodegenerative contributions of microglia as well as astrocytes. This is also replicated in animal models where injections of PD-like synuclein microfibers results in microgliosis. In the 6-OHDA rat lesion model of PD, reactive microgliosis precedes the onset of dopamine cell death. Similar findings in genetically modified mouse models expressing human wildtype or mutant α-synuclein demonstrate increased microgliosis and proinflammatory cytokine levels from astrocytes in the brainstem. Other Pink1/Parkin modeling has shown increased ROS and interleukins in the CSF in a stress/insomnia model suggesting that this pathway, while not unique to PD, has direct implications on mitochondrial autophagy in the CNS. Ultimately, abnormalities within the CNS lead to inflammatory responses which are likely to exacerbate early PD leading to disease progression over time.
3.1 NF-ΚB AND MAPK SIGNALING ARE UPREGULATED IN PD
The transcription factor NF-κB (nuclear factor κ-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells) and MAPK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) pathways have both been implicated in the neuropathogenesis of PD for their roles in innate immune responses, cell differentiation, stress response, autophagy, and neuronal death. A study by Saijo et al. suggested that the NF-κB pathway contributes to the enhancement of neurotoxic inflammatory responses resulting in increased toxicity and subsequent dopaminergic cell death. Together, in response to insult or PD disease properties, activation of these two pathways triggers the production of cytotoxic moieties and enzymes including reactive oxygen species (ROS), nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and pro-inflammatory cytokines, all of which contribute to neuronal dysfunction and ultimately cell death. Evidence from both human studies and animal models suggest that these inflammatory responses are cofactors in PD pathology and PD disease severity. For example, both NF-κB and MAPK have been linked to α-synuclein pathology in the early stages of PD and are hypothesized to form this positive feedback loop. In addition, MAPK inhibitors have demonstrated promising neuroprotective properties by restoring nonmotor symptoms of PD such as cognitive impairments and reduced α-synuclein aggregation and neuronal cell death. Mitochondrial dysfunction also occurs in other neurodegenerative disorders including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s, Huntington’s as well as eye diseases such as age-related macular degeneration and glaucoma with a common link being PINK1/PARKIN-mediated neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation.
3.2 LOSS OF PINK1 EXACERBATES NEUROINFLAMMATION
As discussed earlier, mutations in PINK1 cause a heritable form of early-onset PD. In normal functions, PINK1 accumulates damaged mitochondria acting as a flag for proteolysis; it regulates mitochondrial quality control via its ability to promote mitophagy of depolarized mitochondria. PINK1 acts in coordination with PARKIN, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, to label damaged mitochondria for degradation via fusion with lysosomes, forming autophagosomes. Research shows that impaired mitochondrial function contributes to the formation of protein aggregates, and accumulated aggregates damage mitochondria, forming a self-perpetuating, toxic cycle that ultimately leads to cell death. The PINK1/Parkin-mediated mitophagy contributes to PD and, again, increased inflammation is hypothesized to play a key role in the onset of the disorder by specifically leading to increased ROS, oxidative stress, and abnormal mitochondrial functioning and these byproducts of cellular metabolism cause significant cellular damage. For example, PINK1-/- cell cultures of mixed astrocytes and microglia have increased iNOS, NO, TNF-α, and reduced IL-1β expression. The loss of PINK1 in astrocyte cell culture increases ROS and induces NF-κB signaling. Additionally, rodent studies in Pink1-/- mice have shown that loss of Pink1 increases the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 compared to wildtype control mice. Another study also showed that Pink1-/- mice also had increased levels of IL-12 and IL-10 in addition to IL-1β in the striatum. It has been hypothesized that the early loss of Pink1 causes a severe disruption in expression of genes that regulate innate immune systems leading to inflammation-induced cell death with time.
3.3 NEUROINFLAMMATION MAY BE THE LINK TO PD BEHAVIOR
The link between neuroinflammation and behavior deficits in PD is largely understudied. However, some studies have shown that preclinical inflammation may modulate behavior. In humans, preclinical PD biomarkers of neuroinflammation are associated with non-motor behavioral changes including rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder (RBD) and cognitive function. Meanwhile, rodent models are an invaluable tool that allow for the sequential study of disease onset and progression via a plethora of behavioral outcomes as well as specific brain biology within the same individual. For example, mice deficient for the c-Rel/NF-κB transcription factor develop olfactory and gastrointestinal dysfunction and demonstrate preclinical Braak staging brain pathology. These data demonstrate that dysregulation in the NF-κB pathway may cause nonmotor PD deficits. Additionally, in rats, rotenone-induced PD causes increased ROS production which activates the MAPK signaling pathway leading to stress-induced dopaminergic cell death and impaired movement in behavioral assays (i.e. open field, rotarod). AAV overexpression of α-synuclein leads to activated microglia with preclinical behavioral deficits further demonstrating a PD: inflammation link. However, due to the systemic nature of immune progression in these models, it is particularly challenging to determine whether changes began in the periphery and progressed to the CNS or vice versa. And, to-date, no studies have examined brainstem inflammation in the context of preclinical vocal dysfunction.
The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, and their contribution to neurodegeneration is well studied. However, the use of the Pink1-/- rat model allows us to research the complex, bidirectional relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and the inflammatory cascade in a preclinical animal model. We propose that targeting these specific inflammatory pathways could be a viable therapeutic strategy for vocal deficits, specifically in the preclinical time period.
4. Linking Neuroinflammation to Vocal Dysfunction in the Pink1-/- Rat Model
We hypothesize a direct link between the neuroinflammatory processes in the Pink1-/- rat and the observed changes in vocalization behavior and acoustic parameters. The chronic inflammatory environment induced by the absence of Pink1, particularly in vocal-motor pathways, likely contributes to the neural circuit dysfunction that manifests as altered vocalizations.
4.1 PINK1-/- RATS HAVE UPREGULATED INFLAMMATION BIOINFORMATICALLY CORRELATED TO VOCALIZATION
A bioinformatic approach to analyzing gene expression pathways of mitochondria dysfunction, inflammation markers, and biological pathways associated with inflammation correlate to vocalization changes and vocal fold biology in Pink1-/- rats. Additionally, we have consistently demonstrated upregulated inflammation pathways in brain, blood, and muscle tissue, including TNF-α, NF-κB signaling and MAPK signaling in both male and female Pink1-/- rats. Peripheral changes in vocal fold musculature in Pink1-/- rats include increased centralized nuclei. Centralized nuclei in the vocal fold has been used to describe the nuclear positioning in muscle fibers and in adult PD, may be reflective of muscle regeneration and rearrangement and an ongoing biomarker for muscle health. While this measure isn’t a direct result of inflammation, it is an indicator of muscle involvement. Additionally, within the male Pink1-/- vocal fold, there were 134 annotated differentially expressed genes and observed enrichment in the biological pathways including Parkinson’s disease (Casp7, Pink1); Parkin-Ubiquitin proteasome degradation (Psmd12, Psmd7); MAPK signaling (Casp7, Ppm1b, Ppp3r1); and inflammatory TNF-α, NF-κB Signaling (Casp7, Psmd12, Psmd7, Cdc34, Bcl7a, Peg3). Casp7 was upregulated in the majority of these pathways and plays a significant role in the modulation of the cell cycle, specifically, apoptosis. In female Pink1-/- rats, significant upregulated pathways included fatty acid oxidation and muscle contraction, synaptic transmission, and neuromuscular processes. We use Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis (WGCNA) to construct gene co-expression modules to identify statistical correlations between biological gene networks with vocal behavioral data. A 2020 gene expression study in the PAG of both male and female Pink1-/- rats also linked co-expression modules to vocalization dysfunction. Pink1 itself was the central node with the highest number of interactions with other genes including solute carriers, glutamate metabotropic receptors, and genes associated with protein localization. In females several different gene modules (regulation of membrane depolarization; include monoamine transport; generation of neurons; dopamine transmembrane transporter activity; nervous system development; axon guidance; mRNA splicing; and neuropeptide hormone activity) were significantly correlated with vocalization traits including duration, intensity, bandwidth, and peak frequency. Using vocal fold gene data with drug repurposing databases, we found several drug treatment options including cetuximab, fluoxetine, and resveratrol are hypothesized to reverse observed genetic dysregulation; anti-oxidant, anti-inflammatory compounds also target the neuroinflammatory processes in the model.
4.2 YOUNG PINK1-/- RATS SHOW INFLAMMATION BEFORE BEHAVIORAL SIGNS
In the earliest timepoint examined, 3 months of age, we further show that inflammation and interferon signaling upregulation in the whole blood is present during early, preclinical PD. Specifically, this includes those related to type I interferon signaling (Ifit1bl; interferon-induced protein with tetratricopeptide repeats 1B-like), type II interferon signaling (Nos2; nitric oxide synthase 2), and apoptosis (Dedd2; death effector domain containing 2). The lack of Pink1 may cause an early disruption in interferon signaling that leads to downstream overproduction of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6) and worsen over time, leading to neuronal cell death.
4.3 TREATMENT DEVELOPMENT SHOULD FOCUS ON INFLAMMATION AND NEUROPROTECTION IN THE PRECLINICAL RAT
Genes and pathways identified with transcriptome studies are useful for evaluating the mechanisms of peripheral dysfunction including within the vocal fold muscle and have potential to be used as experimental biomarkers for the development of vocal dysfunction treatments. Alternative therapeutic interventions aiming to modulate PINK1/Parkin signaling might have the potential to treat preclinical PD. For example, AAV vectors and gene augmentation has been shown to reduce neuropathology, induction of overexpression of Parkin is neuroprotective, and there may be benefits of antioxidant supplementation-based strategies to combat Pink1-mediated gliosis. Previous RNA sequencing and bioinformatics analyses revealed that both male and female Pink1-/- rats exhibit significantly upregulated neuroinflammatory gene networks, strongly influenced by histone deacetylases, in the brainstem. Epigenetic alterations, specifically histone modifications, are implicated in human PD and PD animal models also show that HDAC6 plays a role in the pathogenesis of PD. Therefore, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi), such as Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA), may be promising as a therapeutic. SAHA is an epigenetic-modifying class I/class II HDACi and specific HDAC6 inhibitor that is neuroprotective, reduces CNS inflammatory responses, and induces epigenetic reprogramming. These therapeutic strategies merit further investigation in the Pink1-/- rat model.
5. Conclusions
Overall, preclinical animal models are necessary to study and evaluate inflammatory mechanisms, therapeutic treatments, safety, and efficacy to move the study of human disease forward. Genetic rodent models of PD, specifically the Pink1-/- rat, have been shown to be useful tools to study Parkinsonian genes and inflammatory networks, preclinical behavioral and functional vocalization changes to identify potential druggable targets for preclinical pharmacological treatments. Progressive vocalization changes in the Pink1-/- rat provide noninvasive, objective measures that can be correlated to neuroinflammatory damage and neurodegeneration. Moreover, the ability to collect large amounts of USV data from rats is ideal because it is non-invasive, objective with newer machine-learning based analyses, and can be used longitudinally to track disease progression using the Pink1-/- model. Repeated weekly, monthly, or bimonthly testing is feasible without negative habituation to the task, and as a progressive preclinical model, very useful to correlate behavioral changes to progressive CNS changes in the same subject. Importantly, repeated subjects’ statistics allow for rigor and reproducibility in these preclinical studies. Moreover, vocal data collection can generate very large datasets, which are ideal for statistical analysis with AI machine learning applications to find subtle patterns in combination with blood, muscle, and brain inflammatory transcriptomics. Ultimately, these data and this experimental framework support the view that neuroinflammation is an early driver of disease, and targeting specific inflammatory pathways may be a promising therapeutic strategy.
Conflict of Interest Statement: None.
Funding Statement: NIH NINDS 2R01NS117469-06 to CKN.
Acknowledgements: None.
References
2. Willis AW, Roberts E, Beck JC, et al. Incidence of Parkinson disease in North America. npj Parkinson’s Disease. 2022/12/15 2022;8(1):170. doi:10.1038/s 41531-022-00410-y
3. Dorsey ER, Bloem BR. The Parkinson Pandemic —A Call to Action. JAMA Neurology. 2018;75(1):9-10. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.3299
4. Dorsey E, Sherer T, Okun MS, Bloem BR. The emerging evidence of the Parkinson pandemic. Journal of Parkinson’s disease. 2018;8(s1):S3-S8.
5. Yang W, Hamilton JL, Kopil C, et al. Current and projected future economic burden of Parkinson’s disease in the U.S. npj Parkinson’s Disease. 2020/ 07/09 2020;6(1):15. doi:10.1038/s41531-020-0117-1
6. Braak H, Tredici KD, Rüb U, de Vos RAI, Jansen Steur ENH, Braak E. Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiology of Aging. 3// 2003;24(2):197-211. doi:10.1007/s00 441-004-0956-9
7. Braak RH, Ghebremedhin E, Rüb U, Bratzke H, Del Tredici K. Stages in the development of Parkinson’s disease-related pathology. Cell and Tissue Research. 2004;318:121-134. doi:10.1007/ s00441-004-0956-9
8. Hawkes CH, Del Tredici K, Braak H. A timeline for Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism & Related Disorders. 2010;16(2):79-84. doi:10.1016/j.parkrel dis.2009.08.007
9. Schapira AHV, Chaudhuri KR, Jenner P. Non-motor features of Parkinson disease. Nature Review Neuroscience. 2017;18(7):435-450. doi:10. 1038/nrn.2017.62
10. Ciucci MR, Grant LM, Rajamanickam ES, et al. Early identification and treatment of communication and swallowing deficits in Parkinson disease. Semin Speech Lang. Aug 2013;34(3):185-202. doi:10.105 5/s-0033-1358367
11. Cenci MA, Whishaw IQ, Schallert T. Animal models of neurological deficits: how relevant is the rat? Nature Review Neuroscience. 2002;3(7):574-579. doi:10.1038/nrn877
12. Kelm-Nelson CA, Lechner SA, Lettenberger SE, et al. Pink1(-/-) rats are a useful tool to study early Parkinson disease. Brain Commun. 2021;3(2) :fcab077. doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcab077
13. Jia F, Fellner A, Kumar KR. Monogenic Parkinson’s Disease: Genotype, Phenotype, Pathophysiology, and Genetic Testing. Genes (Basel). Mar 7 2022;13(3)doi:10.3390/genes13030471
14. Yamakado H, Takahashi R. Experimental Animal Models of Prodromal Parkinson’s Disease. Journal of Parkinson’s Disease. 2024;14(s2):S369-S379. doi:10.3233/jpd-230393
15. Bezard E, Przedborski S. A tale on animal models of Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders. 2011;26(6):993-1002. doi:10.1002/mds.23696
16. Campos FL, Carvalho MM, Cristovao AC, et al. Rodent models of Parkinson’s disease: beyond the motor symptomatology. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2013;7:175. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00175
17. Helley MP, Pinnell J, Sportelli C, Tieu K. Mitochondria: a common target for genetic mutations and environmental toxicants in Parkinson’s disease. Frontiers in genetics. 2017;8:301198.
18. Yu L, Hoffer A, Hoffer B, Qi X. Mitochondria: A Therapeutic Target for Parkinson’s Disease?[J]. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16:20704-20730.
19. Chai C, Lim K-L. Genetic insights into sporadic Parkinson’s disease pathogenesis. Curr Genomics. 2013;14(8):486-501. doi:10.2174/1389202914666 131210195808
20. Bonifati V, Rohé CF, Breedveld GJ, et al. Early-onset parkinsonism associated with PINK1 mutations: Frequency, genotypes, and phenotypes. Neurology. 2005;65(1):87-95. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000167546 .39375.82
21. Kawajiri S, Saiki S, Sato S, Hattori N. Genetic mutations and functions of PINK1. Trends in pharmacological sciences. 2011;32(10):573-80. doi:10.1016/j.tips.2011.06.001
22. Ibáñez P, Lesage S, Lohmann E, et al. Mutational analysis of the PINK1 gene in early-onset parkinsonism in Europe and North Africa. Brain. Mar 2006;129(Pt 3):686-94. doi:10.1093/ brain/awl005
23. Valente EM, Abou-Sleiman PM, Caputo V, et al. Hereditary early-onset Parkinson’s disease caused by mutations in PINK1. Science. May 21 2004;304 (5674):1158-60. doi:10.1126/science.1096284
24. Broadfoot CK, Hoffmeister JD, Lechner SA, et al. Tongue and laryngeal exercises improve tongue strength and vocal function outcomes in a Pink1-/- rat model of early Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. Mar 5 2024;460:114754. doi:10.1016/j.bbr. 2023.114754
25. Glass TJ, Kelm-Nelson CA, Russell JA, et al. Laryngeal muscle biology in the Pink1-/- rat model of Parkinson disease. Journal of Applied Physiology. May 2019;126(5):1326-1334. doi:10.11 52/japplphysiol.00557.2018
26. Glass TJ, Kelm-Nelson CA, Szot JC, Lake JM, Connor NP, Ciucci MR. Functional characterization of extrinsic tongue muscles in the Pink1-/- rat model of Parkinson disease. PLoS One. 2020;15 (10):e0240366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240366
27. Krasko MN, Szot J, Lungova K, et al. Pink1-/- Rats Demonstrate Swallowing and Gastrointestinal Dysfunction in a Model of Prodromal Parkinson Disease. Dysphagia. Oct 2023;38(5):1382-1397. doi:10.1007/s00455-023-10567-0
28. Grant LM, Kelm-Nelson CK, Hilby BL, et al. Evidence for early and progressive ultrasonic vocalization and oromotor deficits in a PINK1 knockout rat model of Parkinson disease. J Neurosci Res. 2015;93(11):1713-27. doi:10.1002/ jnr.23625
29. Cullen KP, Grant LM, Kelm-Nelson CA, et al. Pink1−/− rats show early-onset swallowing deficits and correlative brainstem pathology. Dysphagia. 2018;doi:10.1007/s00455-018-9896-5
30. Zhi L, Qin Q, Muqeem T, et al. Loss of PINK1 causes age-dependent decrease of dopamine release and mitochondrial dysfunction. Neurobiol Aging. Mar 2019;75:1-10. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiol aging.2018.10.025
31. Zhao J, Chen Y, Zhi L, Xu Q, Zhang H, Li C. Loss of PINK1 Causes Age-dependent Mitochondrial Trafficking Deficits in Nigrostriatal Dopaminergic Neurons Through Aberrant Activation of p38 MAPK. bioRxiv. 2025:2024.07.17.602426. doi:10.1 101/2024.07.17.602426
32. Wood-Kaczmar A, Gandhi S, Yao Z, et al. PINK1 Is Necessary for Long Term Survival and Mitochondrial Function in Human Dopaminergic Neurons. PLoS One. 2008;3(6):e2455. doi:10.1371 /journal.pone.0002455
33. Kannarkat GT, Boss JM, Tansey MG. The role of innate and adaptive immunity in Parkinson’s disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2013;3(4):493-514. doi: 10.3233/jpd-130250
34. Esposito E, Di Matteo V, Benigno A, Pierucci M, Crescimanno G, Di Giovanni G. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. Jun 2007;205(2):295-312. doi:10.1016/j. expneurol.2007.02.008
35. Tiwari PC, Pal R. The potential role of neuroinflammation and transcription factors in Parkinson disease. Dialogues in clinical neuroscience. 2017;19(1):71-80.
36. McGeer PL, Itagaki S, Boyes BE, McGeer E. Reactive microglia are positive for HLA‐DR in the substantia nigra of Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease brains. Neurology. 1988;38(8):1285-1285.
37. MacPherson MK, Huber JE, Snow DP. The intonation-syntax interface in the speech of individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR. 2011;54(1):19-32. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2010/09-0079)
38. Lyons KE, Hubble JP, Troster AI, Pahwa R, Koller WC. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1998;21(2):118-21.
39. Hertrich I, Ackermann H. Gender-specific vocal dysfunctions in Parkinson’s disease: electroglottographic and acoustic analyses. The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology. 1995;104(3):197-202.
40. Rahn DA, Chou M, Jiang JJ, Zhang Y. Phonatory impairment in Parkinson’s disease: evidence from nonlinear dynamic analysis and perturbation analysis. J Voice. 2007;21(1):64-71. doi:10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.08.011
41. Skodda S, Rinsche H, Schlegel U. Progression of dysprosody in Parkinson’s disease over time–a longitudinal study. Mov Disord. 2009;24(5):716-22. doi:10.1002/mds.22430
42. Holmes RJ, Oates JM, Phyland DJ, Hughes AJ. Voice characteristics in the progression of Parkinson’s disease. International journal of language & communication disorders / Royal College of Speech & Language Therapists. 2000;35(3):407-18.
43. Scott B, Borgman A, Engler H, Johnels B, Aquilonius SM. Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease symptom profile. Acta Neurol Scand. 2000; 102(1):37-43. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0404.2000.102001037.x
44. Gillies GE, Pienaar IS, Vohra S, Qamhawi Z. Sex differences in Parkinson’s disease. Front Neuroendocrinol. 2014;35(3):370-384. doi:10.101 6/j.yfrne.2014.02.002
45. Elbaz A, Bower JH, Maraganore DM, et al. Risk tables for parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Epidemiol. Jan 2002;55(1):25-31.
46. Shulman LM, Bhat V. Gender disparities in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Rev Neurother. 2006;6(3):407-16. doi:10.1586/14737175.6.3.407
47. Wooten GF, Currie LJ, Bovbjerg VE, Lee JK, Patrie J. Are men at greater risk for Parkinson’s disease than women? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(4):637-639. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.020982
48. Van Den Eeden SK, Tanner CM, Bernstein AL, et al. Incidence of Parkinson’s disease: variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity. American Journal of Epidemiology. 2003;157(11):1015-22. doi:10. 1093/aje/kwg068
49. Dave KD, De Silva S, Sheth NP, et al. Phenotypic characterization of recessive gene knockout rat models of Parkinson’s disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 2014;70(0):190-203. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2014.06.009
50. Kelm-Nelson CA, Brauer AFL, Barth KJ, et al. Characterization of early-onset motor deficits in the Pink1 -/- mouse model of Parkinson disease. Brain research. 2017;1(1680):1-12. doi:10.1016/j.brainre s.2017.12.002
51. Cenci MA, Whishaw IQ, Schallert T. Animal models of neurological deficits: how relevant is the rat? Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(7):574-579. doi:10. 1038/nrn877
52. Knutson B, Burgdorf J, Panksepp J. Ultrasonic vocalizations as indices of affective states in rats. Psychological Bulletin. 2002;128(6):961-977. doi:1 0.1037/0033-2909.128.6.961
53. Brudzynski SM. Communication of adult rats by ultrasonic vocalization: Biological, sociobiological, and neuroscience approaches. ILAR Journal. 2009; 50(1):43-50. doi:10.1093/ilar.50.1.43
54. Brudzynski SM. Ethotransmission: communication of emotional states through ultrasonic vocalization in rats. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2013;23(3):310-7. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2013.01.014
55. Brudzynski SM, Pniak A. Social contacts and production of 50-kHz short ultrasonic calls in adult rats. J Comp Psychol. 2002;116(1):73-82. doi:10.10 37/0735-7036.116.1.73
56. Brudzynski SM. Principles of rat communication: Quantitative parameters of ultrasonic calls in rats. Behav Genet. 2005/01/01 2005;35(1):85-92. doi:10 .1007/s10519-004-0858-3
57. Wöhr M, Houx B, Schwarting RKW, Spruijt B. Effects of experience and context on 50-kHz vocalizations in rats. Physiol Behav. 2008;93(4–5):766-776. doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2007.11.031
58. Wöhr M, Schwarting RW. Affective communication in rodents: ultrasonic vocalizations as a tool for research on emotion and motivation. Cell Tissue Res. 2013;354(1):81-97. doi:10.1007/s00441-013-1607-9
59. Kelm-Nelson CA, Lenell C, Johnson AM, Ciucci MR. Chapter 4 – Laryngeal Activity for Production of Ultrasonic Vocalizations in Rats. In: Brudzynski SM, ed. Handbook of Behavioral Neuroscience. Elsevier; 2018:37-43.
60. Riede T. Subglottal pressure, tracheal airflow, and intrinsic laryngeal muscle activity during rat ultrasound vocalization. Journal Article. J Neurophysiol. 2011;106(5):2580-2592. doi:10.115 2/jn.00478.2011
61. Riede T. Stereotypic laryngeal and respiratory motor patterns generate different call types in rat ultrasound vocalization. J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol. Apr 2013;319(4):213-24. doi:10.1002/jez.1785
62. Riede T, Borgard HL, Pasch B. Laryngeal airway reconstruction indicates that rodent ultrasonic vocalizations are produced by an edge-tone mechanism. Royal Society Open Science. 2017;4(11):170976. doi:doi:10.1098/rsos.170976
63. Håkansson J, Jiang W, Xue Q, et al. Aerodynamics and motor control of ultrasonic vocalizations for social communication in mice and rats. BMC Biology. 2022/01/07 2022;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12915-021-01185-z
64. Nunez AA, Pomerantz SM, Bean NJ, Youngstrom TG. Effects of laryngeal denervation on ultrasound production and male sexual behavior in rodents. Physiol Behav. 1985;34(6):901 -905. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0031-9384(85)90011-3
65. Riede T. Stereotypic laryngeal and respiratory motor patterns generate different call types in rat ultrasound vocalization. Journal of experimental zoology Part A, Ecological genetics and physiology. 2013;319(4):213-24. doi:10.1002/jez.1785
66. Sanders I, Weisz DJ, Yang BY, Fung K, Amirali A. The mechanism of ultrasound vocalization in the rat 2001:241.
67. Wetzel DM, Kelley DB, Campbell BA. Central control of ultrasonic vocalizations in neonatal rats: I. Brain stem motor nuclei. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1980;94(4):596-605.
68. McGinnis MY, Vakulenko M. Characterization of 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations in male and female rats. Physiol Behav. 2003;80(1):81-88. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(03)00227-0
69. Marquis JM, Lettenberger SE, Kelm-Nelson CA. Early-onset Parkinsonian behaviors in female Pink1-/- rats. Behavioural Brain Research. 2019; (112175)doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2019.112175
70. Stevenson SA, Ciucci MR, Kelm-Nelson CA. Intervention changes acoustic peak frequency and mesolimbic neurochemistry in the Pink1-/- rat model of Parkinson disease. PLoS One. 2019;14(8): e0220734. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0220734
71. Johnson RA, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Changes to Ventilation, Vocalization, and Thermal Nociception in the Pink1-/- Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease. J Parkinsons Dis. 2020;10(2):489-504. doi :10.3233/jpd-191853
72. Pultorak JD, Kelm-Nelson CA, Holt LR, Blue KV, Ciucci MR, Johnson AM. Decreased approach behavior and nucleus accumbens immediate early gene expression in response to Parkinsonian ultrasonic vocalizations in rats. Social Neuroscience. 2016;11 (4):365-379. doi:10.1080/17470919.2015.1086434
73. Fox C, Ebersbach G, Ramig L, Sapir S. LSVT LOUD and LSVT BIG: Behavioral Treatment Programs for Speech and Body Movement in Parkinson Disease. Parkinson’s Disease. 2012/03 /15 2012;2012:391946. doi:10.1155/2012/391946
74. Kleim JA, Jones TA. Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. J Speech Lang Hear Res. Feb 2008;51(1):S225-39. doi:10.1044/1 092-4388(2008/018)
75. Schmidt RA, Lee TD, Winstein C, Wulf G, Zelaznik HN. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human kinetics; 2018.
76. Hemsley B, Gregory C. People with Parkinson’s disease who succeed in the LSVT LOUD® treatment also report significant improvement in communication effectiveness, vocal disability, and communicative participation1. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention. 2022/01/02 2022;16(1):17-23. doi:10. 1080/17489539.2022.2060041
77. Bryans LA, Palmer AD, Anderson S, Schindler J, Graville DJ. The impact of Lee Silverman Voice Treatment (LSVT LOUD®) on voice, communication, and participation: Findings from a prospective, longitudinal study. J Commun Disord. Jan-Feb 202 1;89:106031. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106031
78. Kelm-Nelson CA, Trevino MA, Ciucci MR. Quantitative Analysis of Catecholamines in the Pink1 -/- Rat Model of Early-onset Parkinson’s Disease. Neuroscience. May 2018;379:126-141. doi:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2018.02.027
79. Lechner SA, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Methylphenidate differentially affects the social ultrasonic vocalizations of wild-type and prodromal Parkinsonian rats. Behav Neurosci. Feb 2025;139 (1):1-9. doi:10.1037/bne0000610
80. Broadfoot CK, Lenell C, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Effects of social isolation on 50-kHz ultrasonic vocalizations, affective state, cognition, and neurotransmitter concentrations in the ventral tegmental and locus coeruleus of adult rats. Behav Brain Res. Feb 2 2023;437:114157. doi:10.1016/j. bbr.2022.114157
81. Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Inhibition of signaling and metabolic pathways in the Pink1-/- rat model of early-onset Parkinsonism. 2019:
82. Hoffmeister JD, Kelm-Nelson CA, Ciucci MR. Quantification of brainstem norepinephrine relative to vocal impairment and anxiety in the Pink1-/- rat model of Parkinson disease. Behav Brain Res. Sep 24 2021;414:113514. doi:10.1016/ j.bbr.2021.113514
83. Kelm-Nelson CA, Gammie S. Gene expression within the periaqueductal gray is linked to vocal behavior and early-onset parkinsonism in Pink1 knockout rats. BMC Genomics. Sep 17 2020;2 1(1):625. doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07037-4
84. Barnett DGS, Lechner SA, Gammie SC, Kelm-Nelson CA. Thyroarytenoid Oxidative Metabolism and Synaptic Signaling Dysregulation in the Female Pink1-/- Rat. Laryngoscope. Jun 9 2023; doi:10.1002/lary.30768
85. Lechner SA, Welsch JM, Pahapill NK, Kaldenberg TAR, Regenbaum A, Kelm-Nelson CA. Predictors of prodromal Parkinson’s disease in young adult Pink1-/- rats. Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience. 2022;16:867958. doi:10.3389/fnbeh .2022.867958
86. Lechner SA, Kletzien H, Gammie SC, Kelm-Nelson CA. Thyroarytenoid Muscle Gene Expression in a Rat Model of Early-Onset Parkinson’s Disease. Laryngoscope. Dec 2021;131(12):E2874-e2879. doi:10.1002/lary.29661
87. Hirsch EC, Jenner P, Przedborski S. Pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders. 2013;28(1):24-30. doi:10.1002/mds.25032
88. Mu L, Sobotka S, Chen J, et al. Parkinson disease affects peripheral sensory nerves in the pharynx. Journal of Neuropathology and Experimental Neurology. 2013;72:614-623. doi:10.1097/NEN.0 b013e3182965886
89. Martirosyan A, Ansari R, Pestana F, et al. Unravelling cell type-specific responses to Parkinson’s Disease at single cell resolution. Molecular Neurodegeneration. 2024/01/20 2024;19(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13024-023-00699-0
90. Ma SX, Lim SB. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing in Parkinson’s Disease. Biomedicines. Apr 1 2021; 9(4)doi:10.3390/biomedicines9040368
91. Capani F, Quarracino C, Caccuri R, Sica RE. Astrocytes as the main players in primary degenerative disorders of the human central nervous system. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 2016;8:45.
92. Halliday GM, Stevens CH. Glia: initiators and progressors of pathology in Parkinson’s disease. Movement Disorders. 2011;26(1):6-17.
93. Smajić S, Prada-Medina CA, Landoulsi Z, et al. Single-cell sequencing of human midbrain reveals glial activation and a Parkinson-specific neuronal state. Brain. 2021;145(3):964-978. doi:10.1093/ brain/awab446
94. Kouli A, Camacho M, Allinson K, Williams-Gray CH. Neuroinflammation and protein pathology in Parkinson’s disease dementia. Acta Neuropathol Commun. Dec 3 2020;8(1):211. doi:10.1186/s4047 8-020-01083-5
95. Ouchi Y, Yagi S, Yokokura M, Sakamoto M. Neuroinflammation in the living brain of Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Dec 2009;15 Suppl 3:S200-4. doi:10.1016/s1353-8020(09)70814-4
96. Zeng Z, Roussakis A-A, Lao-Kaim NP, Piccini P. Astrocytes in Parkinson’s disease: from preclinical assays to in vivo imaging and therapeutic probes. Neurobiology of Aging. 2020/11/01/ 2020;95:264-270. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.07.012
97. Sun L, Shen R, Agnihotri SK, Chen Y, Huang Z, Büeler H. Lack of PINK1 alters glia innate immune responses and enhances inflammation-induced, nitric oxide-mediated neuron death. Sci Rep. Jan 10 2018;8(1):383. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18786-w
98. Martirosyan A, Ansari R, Pestana F, et al. Unravelling cell type-specific responses to Parkinson’s Disease at single cell resolution. Mol Neurodegener. Jan 20 2024;19(1):7. doi:10.1186/s13024-023-00699-0
99. Qian Z, Qin J, Lai Y, Zhang C, Zhang X. Large-Scale Integration of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data Reveals Astrocyte Diversity and Transcriptomic Modules across Six Central Nervous System Disorders. Biomolecules. 2023;13(4):692.
100. Garcia P, Jürgens-Wemheuer W, Uriarte Huarte O, et al. Neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation are linked, but independent of alpha-synuclein inclusions, in a seeding/spreading mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. Glia. May 2022;70(5):935-960. doi:10.1002/glia.24149
101. Na SJ, DiLella AG, Lis EV, et al. Molecular profiling of a 6-hydroxydopamine model of Parkinson’s disease. Neurochem Res. May 2010;35 (5):761-72. doi:10.1007/s11064-010-0133-3
102. Li Z, Shu Y, Liu D, et al. Pink1/Parkin signaling mediates pineal mitochondrial autophagy dysfunction and its biological role in a comorbid rat model of depression and insomnia. Brain Research Bulletin. 2025/01/01/ 2025;220:111141. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2024.111141
103. Plotnikov A, Zehorai E, Procaccia S, Seger R. The MAPK cascades: signaling components, nuclear roles and mechanisms of nuclear translocation. Biochim Biophys Acta. Sep 2011;1813(9):1619-33. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.12.012
104. Saijo K, Winner B, Carson CT, et al. A Nurr1/CoREST pathway in microglia and astrocytes protects dopaminergic neurons from inflammation-induced death. Cell. Apr 3 2009;137(1):47-59. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.01.038
105. Pajares M, A IR, Manda G, Boscá L, Cuadrado A. Inflammation in Parkinson’s Disease: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Implications. Cells. Jul 14 2020; 9(7)doi:10.3390/cells9071687
106. Park JS, Choe K, Lee HJ, Park TJ, Kim MO. Neuroprotective effects of osmotin in Parkinson’s disease-associated pathology via the AdipoR1/ MAPK/AMPK/mTOR signaling pathways. Journal of Biomedical Science. 2023/08/11 2023;30(1):66. doi:10.1186/s12929-023-00961-z
107. Narendra DP, Jin SM, Tanaka A, et al. PINK1 is selectively stabilized on impaired mitochondria to activate Parkin. PLoS Biol. Jan 26 2010;8(1):e10002 98. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000298
108. Matsuda N, Sato S, Shiba K, et al. PINK1 stabilized by mitochondrial depolarization recruits Parkin to damaged mitochondria and activates latent Parkin for mitophagy. J Cell Biol. Apr 19 2010;189(2):211-21. doi:10.1083/jcb.200910140
109. Clemente-Suárez VJ, Redondo-Flórez L, Beltrán-Velasco AI, et al. Mitochondria and Brain Disease: A Comprehensive Review of Pathological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities. Biomedicines. Sep 7 2023;11(9)doi:10.3390/biomedicines11092488
110. Quinn PMJ, Moreira PI, Ambrósio AF, Alves CH. PINK1/PARKIN signalling in neurodegeneration and neuroinflammation. Acta Neuropathol Commun. Nov 9 2020;8(1):189. doi:10.1186/s40478-020-01062-w
111. Gautier CA, Kitada T, Shen J. Loss of PINK1 causes mitochondrial functional defects and increased sensitivity to oxidative stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2008;105(32):113 64-11369. doi:doi:10.1073/pnas.0802076105
112. Herrero MT, Estrada C, Maatouk L, Vyas S. Inflammation in Parkinson’s disease: role of glucocorticoids. Front Neuroanat. 2015;9:32. doi:1 0.3389/fnana.2015.00032
113. Sun L, Shen R, Agnihotri SK, Chen Y, Huang Z, Büeler H. Lack of PINK1 alters glia innate immune responses and enhances inflammation-induced, nitric oxide-mediated neuron death. Scientific Reports. 2018/01/10 2018;8(1):383. doi:10.1038/s41598-01 7-18786-w
114. Kim J, Byun JW, Choi I, et al. PINK1 Deficiency Enhances Inflammatory Cytokine Release from Acutely Prepared Brain Slices. Exp Neurobiol. Mar 2013;22(1):38-44. doi:10.5607/en.2013.22.1.38
115. Akundi RS, Huang Z, Eason J, et al. Increased mitochondrial calcium sensitivity and abnormal expression of innate immunity genes precede dopaminergic defects in Pink1-deficient mice. PLoS One. Jan 13 2011;6(1):e16038. doi:10.1371/ journal.pone.0016038
116. Berg D, Borghammer P, Fereshtehnejad S-M, et al. Prodromal Parkinson disease subtypes — key to understanding heterogeneity. Nature Reviews Neurology. 2021/06/01 2021;17(6):349-361. doi:1 0.1038/s41582-021-00486-9
117. Oliveira BdS, Toscano ECdB, Abreu LKS, et al. Nigrostriatal Inflammation Is Associated with Nonmotor Symptoms in an Experimental Model of Prodromal Parkinson’s Disease. Neuroscience. 202 4/06/21/ 2024;549:65-75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.05.011
118. Terkelsen MH, Klaestrup IH, Hvingelby V, Lauritsen J, Pavese N, Romero-Ramos M. Neuroinflammation and immune changes in prodromal Parkinson’s disease and other synucleinopathies. Journal of Parkinson’s disease. 2022;12(s1):S149-S163.
119. Tansey MG, Wallings RL, Houser MC, Herrick MK, Keating CE, Joers V. Inflammation and immune dysfunction in Parkinson disease. Nature Reviews Immunology. 2022/11/01 2022;22(11):657 -673. doi:10.1038/s41577-022-00684-6
120. Yacoubian TA, Fang Y-HD, Gerstenecker A, et al. Brain and Systemic Inflammation in De Novo Parkinson’s Disease. Movement Disorders. 2023; 38(5):743-754. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.29363
121. Parrella E, Bellucci A, Porrini V, et al. NF-κB/c-Rel deficiency causes Parkinson’s disease-like prodromal symptoms and progressive pathology in mice. Transl Neurodegener. 2019;8:16. doi:10.118 6/s40035-019-0154-z
122. Wrangel Cv, Schwabe K, John N, Krauss JK, Alam M. The rotenone-induced rat model of Parkinson’s disease: Behavioral and electrophysiological findings. Behavioural Brain Research. 2015/02/15/ 2015;279:52-61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.002
123. Cheng Y, Tong Q, Yuan Y, et al. α-Synuclein induces prodromal symptoms of Parkinson’s disease via activating TLR2/MyD88/NF-κB pathway in Schwann cells of vagus nerve in a rat model. Journal of Neuroinflammation. 2023/02/14 2023; 20(1):36. doi:10.1186/s12974-023-02720-1
124. Glass TJ, Kelm-Nelson CA, Szot JC, Lake JM, Connor NP, Ciucci MR. Functional characterization of extrinsic tongue muscles in the Pink1-/- rat model of Parkinson disease. PLoS One. 2020;15(10 ):e0240366-e0240366. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240366
125. Mazzotti AL, Coletti D. The Need for a Consensus on the Locution “Central Nuclei” in Striated Muscle Myopathies. Front Physiol. 2016;7:577. doi:10.3389/fphys.2016.00577
126. Hastings RL, Massopust RT, Haddix SG, Lee Yi, Thompson WJ. Exclusive vital labeling of myonuclei for studying myonuclear arrangement in mouse skeletal muscle tissue. Skeletal Muscle. 2020/05/07 2020;10(1):15. doi:10.1186/s13395-020-00233-6
127. Kelm-Nelson CA, Gammie S. Gene expression within the periaqueductal gray is linked to vocal behavior and early-onset parkinsonism in Pink1 knockout rats. BMC Genomics. 2020;21(1):625-625. doi:10.1186/s12864-020-07037-4
128. Lechner SA, Kletzien H, Gammie SC, Kelm-Nelson CA. Thyroarytenoid Muscle Gene Expression in a Rat Model of Early-Onset Parkinson’s Disease. Laryngoscope. May 31 2021;doi:10.1002/lary.29661
129. Calsolaro V, Edison P. Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer’s disease: Current evidence and future directions. Alzheimer’s & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer’s Association. Jun 2016;12 (6):719-32. doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2016.02.010
130. Countryman S, Hicks J, Ramig LO, Smith ME. Supraglottal Hyperadduction in an Individual With Parkinson Disease. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology. 1997;6(4):74-84. doi:doi:10.1 044/1058-0360.0604.74
131. Lechner SA, Barnett DGS, Gammie SC, Kelm-Nelson CA. Prodromal Parkinson disease signs are predicted by a whole-blood inflammatory transcriptional signature in young Pink1(-/-) rats. BMC Neurosci. Mar 4 2024;25(1):11. doi:10.1186/s12868-024-00857-0
132. Manfredsson FP, Burger C, Sullivan LF, Muzyczka N, Lewin AS, Mandel RJ. rAAV-mediated nigral human parkin over-expression partially ameliorates motor deficits via enhanced dopamine neurotransmission in a rat model of Parkinson’s disease. Exp Neurol. Oct 2007;207(2):289-301. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2007.06.019
133. Liu B, Traini R, Killinger B, Schneider B, Moszczynska A. Overexpression of parkin in the rat nigrostriatal dopamine system protects against methamphetamine neurotoxicity. Exp Neurol. Sep 2013;247:359-72. doi:10.1016/j.expneurol.2013.01.001
134. Wadan AS, Shaaban AH, El-Sadek MZ, et al. Mitochondrial-based therapies for neurodegenerative diseases: a review of the current literature. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. Sep 2025;398(9) :11357-11386. doi:10.1007/s00210-025-04014-0