Abstract
In 2002, the American Heart Association guidelines established that routinary preoperative studies in low-risk patients (ASA I and II) are unnecessary. This fact has been supported by many other publications after that. However, the medical adherence to these recommendations in clinical practice is low. The aim of this review is to identify the reasons associated with a poor guideline’s adherence.
Articles published between 2002 and 2022 reporting data on “preoperative test”, “routine preoperative test”, and “low-risk surgery” were identified through a computerized literature research using Pubmed, Scopus, Medigraphic and Cochrane databases and by selecting all of the articles related to adherence to clinical guidelines. The full text of relevant articles was reviewed by all authors.
This review found that some of the causes of the limited adherence to clinical guidelines are: lack of awareness regarding current recommendations or lack of familiarity with them; physician attitudes about the guidelines (including outcome expectancy, lack of agreement, poor motivation to modify previous practice, question efficacy); and environmental labor factors of medical institutions, including lack of communication among the consultants involved in the perioperative care, and medicolegal concerns and fear of litigation.
Hence, in order to propose effective alternatives to improve guidelines adherence, this review discuss some of the main reasons why in clinical practice there is still a poor compliance to surgical preoperative guidelines, even when more than 20 years have passed since the concept of routinary preoperative studies in low risk patients was eliminated by a myriad of clinical guidelines and medical associations.