↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Coronary stent evaluation remains one of the most demanding applications of coronary CT angiography (CCTA) because metallic struts, blooming artifact, image noise, and cardiac motion may reduce lumen interpretability. Reconstruction strategy therefore plays a critical role in determining diagnostic confidence. In this retrospective single-center technical note, we compared deep learning reconstruction (DLR), hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR), and model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) for coronary stent assessment on a 320-row whole-heart CT platform. Twenty patients with 35 evaluable coronary stents were included. For each examination, three reconstruction sets were generated using vendor-available HIR, MBIR, and DLR algorithms. Stents were classified as proximal or distal according to coronary location. An experienced cardiothoracic radiologist assessed diagnostic confidence on a 5-point Likert scale, considering in-stent lumen visibility, evaluation of relevant residual or recurrent stenosis, and delineation of stent edges. Ordinal data were analyzed using a cumulative link mixed model with reconstruction type and stent location as fixed effects and patient/stent clustering as random effects. DLR achieved significantly higher diagnostic confidence than both HIR and MBIR (both p < 0.001), whereas no significant difference was observed between HIR and MBIR (p = 0.957). The superiority of DLR was maintained in both proximal and distal stents. These preliminary findings suggest that DLR may offer a practical advantage for routine coronary stent evaluation at CCTA, although larger multicenter studies with invasive reference standards are needed to confirm its impact on diagnostic accuracy and clinical decision-making.
↓ Read PDF
02 · OJS METADATA

Keywords

Coronary CT angiographycoronary stentdeep learning reconstructioniterative reconstruction
03 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 14 No 6 (2026): Vol.14 Issue 6 June 2026
SectionResearch Articles
Published03 July 2026
DOI10.18103/mra.2026.0165
ISSN2375-1924
04 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗