Home > Medical Research Archives > Issue 149 > A novel method using vital signs information for assistance in making a discharge decision from the intensive care unit: identification of those patients at highest risk of mortality on the floor or discharge to a hospice
![](https://esmed.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/MRA-cover-150x150.png)
Published in the Medical Research Archives
Dec 2017 Issue
A novel method using vital signs information for assistance in making a discharge decision from the intensive care unit: identification of those patients at highest risk of mortality on the floor or discharge to a hospice
Published on Dec 15, 2017
DOI
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Intensivists face a difficult decision deciding when a patient should be discharged from the intensive care unit (ICU) to a unit of lesser acuity. Accurate algorithms don’t exist to aid in that decision. Therefore, we developed and validated a stratification tool using physiologic data obtained from a patient’s electronic medical record for assignment to risk categories of mortality or hospital discharge to hospice.
Population: 33,039 admissions at 41 adult ICUs using an electronic medical record from 1/1/2012-6/30/2017.
Outcome: Mortality on a unit of lesser acuity or discharge to a hospice after leaving the ICU (“mortality/hospice”).
Methods: Vital signs from three hours to one hour before actual discharge were obtained. We used the 12 most proximate values for heart rate, respiratory rate, and mean arterial pressure, respectively. A letter was assigned to the median of every three measurements based on the underlying distribution of the vital sign. Four consecutive letters were concatenated to form a pattern, which were candidates for triggers (i.e. risk alerts). A patient could have three triggers, one for whether or not each vital sign contained a word that increased risk, along with a fourth trigger if a patient received mechanical ventilation. Using a genetic algorithm that weighted the outcome of mortality/hospice, we acquired a set of patterns that maximally increased risk. Those patterns were then validated as triggers for increased risk.
Results: The overall mortality/hospice rate was 4.7%. Fifteen patterns were identified that increased risk. Patients without triggers had a mortality/hospice rate of 3.2%, while patients with one, two, and three to four triggers had rates of 7.5%, 13.3%, and 27.5%, respectively,
Conclusion: It’s possible to use vital signs proximate to when a discharge decision is made to identify patients with an increased risk of either mortality or discharge to hospice after leaving the ICU.
Author info
Author Area
Have an article to submit?
Submission Guidelines
Submit a manuscript
Become a member