Article Test

“Lock the doors.” uttered by LeRoy Cain, the flight director of STS-107, meant the complete loss of Space Shuttle Columbia. Locking the doors initiated the protocol to preserve data and logs for the impending investigation. Some hard lessons were learned from the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster 17 years earlier, one of which was that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) should not be put in a position to investigate itself. The interagency Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) was formed to learn what we could from the fate of Columbia. Had NASA been the investigating agency, given the culture, it is possible the concluding cause would have been a random event such as bird strike after takeoff or micrometeoroid in orbit. “We are convinced that the management practices overseeing the Space Shuttle Program were as much a cause of the accident as the foam that struck the left wing.”[1] Those management practices point to lock-stepping, where dissenting opinions are discouraged or suppressed. NASA’s opinion was that foam is safe. When Bob Page, chair of NASA’s Intercenter Photo Working Group, saw foam strike the wing he raised an alarm that the heat shield may be compromised. He and two members of the Debris Assessment Team made a total of three requests to the Department of Defense (DoD) to obtain high-resolution images of Columbia’s left wing. A request that, by all accounts, the DoD was willing and able to fulfill. Those requests were subsequently canceled by the shuttle program managers. The CAIB report went on to say, “[t]he Board was also influenced by discussions with members of Congress, who suggested that this nation needed a broad examination of NASAʼs Human Space Flight Program, rather than just an investigation into what physical fault caused Columbia to break up during re-entry.” There are two vitally important lessons we have learned from NASA. The first is that a government agency should not be able to investigate itself. The second is that lock-stepping is lethal.

The most advanced population health surveillance in the United States couldn’t find a single healthy child who died of COVID-19. Zero is a powerful number. Zero is also the number of vaccines that impart superior immunity over that of natural immunity. If we could choose one feature that the emergent 5^th endemic cold virus could have, it would unequivocally be a minimal effect on children – safeguarding our future and allowing the progression of natural immunity.

There is nothing mild about pediatric myocarditis. Even with the best medical management, 1/3rd of all patients never completely recovers, and will live with dilated cardiomyopathy. If untreated, 80% of children will develop chronic heart disease. These children are subject to a high risk of sudden death and may require an urgent heart transplant[2].