Global Trends in Clinical Psychology Research (1990-2023)

Global Research in Clinical Psychology Domain: A Scientometric Assessment Based on Web of Science

Pooja¹ & Prof. Meera²

  1. PhD Research scholar – Department of Library & Information Science, University of Delhi, India, 110007
  2. Professor – Department of Library & Information Science, University of Delhi, India, 110007

OPEN ACCESS

PUBLISHED: 31 December 2024

CITATION: Pooja & Meera, 2024. Global Research in Clinical Psychology Domain: A Scientometric Assessment Based on Web of Science. Medical Research Archives, [online] 12(12).
https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i12.6090

COPYRIGHT: © 2024 European Society of Medicine. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

DOI https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i12.6090

ISSN 2375-1924


ABSTRACT

This paper attempts to examine the global research productivity and trends of clinical psychology based on Web of Science data and also highlights it from an Indian viewpoint. The study reveals a growing global interest in mental health issues. Overall, the volume of publications has increased, with the highest number produced in the form of articles. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a drop in publications, with the relative growth rate decreasing and the doubling time increasing from 1990 to 2023. Countries like the United States, the UK, and Germany dominate the field due to their strong academic institutions and substantial funding. India collaborates most with the USA, England, and Australia. The interdisciplinary nature of clinical psychology, with overlap in neuroscience, psychiatry, and public health, has led to more comprehensive research outcomes addressing complex mental health issues. Key research areas, such as psychiatry, neuropsychology, psychopathology, family studies, health psychology, Substance abuse, and Rehabilitation, continue to drive innovation and inform evidence-based practices for advancing mental health care globally. The United States Department of Health and Human Services USA has funded the maximum number of publications globally, while the National Council on Science and Technology and the Indian Council of Medical Research have funded the most publications from India. Zvolensky Michael J has produced the maximum publications globally and Andrade Chittaranjan is the topmost Indian author. The University of California System is the top affiliation globally and the National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences is the topmost affiliation from India.

Keywords: Clinical Psychology; Scientometrics; Web of Science; World.

1. Introduction

Clinical psychology is defined as “a branch of psychology that focuses on the assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental disorders and psychological distress”¹. This field integrates theory, research, and clinical practice to understand and alleviate psychological problems affecting individuals across the lifespan².

Clinical psychology, as a discipline dedicated to understanding and alleviating mental health disorders through empirical research and evidence-based practice, occupies a pivotal role in modern healthcare¹. This discipline encompasses a broad spectrum of studies focused on psychological assessment, diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of mental disorders, catering to diverse populations and contexts globally³. The field continually evolves, driven by the collective efforts of researchers worldwide who publish their findings in scholarly journals. A scientometric analysis offers a systematic approach to quantitatively and qualitatively assess this vast body of literature, providing insights into its growth, trends, and impact over time³⁴.

Clinical psychologists apply evidence-based interventions in various settings such as therapeutic settings, hospitals, clinics, private practices, and academic institutions⁵. Their work aims to promote mental health and well-being through comprehensive assessment and therapeutic techniques tailored to individual needs.

The Web of Science database stands as a cornerstone in the realm of scientometrics, offering a comprehensive repository of peer-reviewed journals spanning various disciplines, including clinical psychology⁶. Utilizing this platform allows for an in-depth exploration of the publications, citations, collaborations, and thematic developments within clinical psychology research⁷⁸.

This scientometric study aims to delve into the intricate landscape of clinical psychology literature as indexed in Web of Science. By employing bibliometric methods, this analysis will uncover patterns in publication output, identify key authors and institutions shaping the field, elucidate emerging research themes, and assess the impact of seminal works⁹. Such insights not only contribute to understanding the current state of clinical psychology research but also inform future directions for scientific inquiry, policy development, and clinical practice.

Through this investigation, we aim to provide a vast perspective on how clinical psychology as a discipline has evolved within the scholarly community, highlighting its contributions to advancing knowledge, addressing societal challenges, and improving mental health outcomes globally. This analysis will serve as a valuable resource for researchers, practitioners, and stakeholders seeking to understand the historical context, current state, and future directions of clinical psychology research.

The literature reviewed for clinical psychology scientometrics involves examining the scholarly literature that applies scientometric methods to analyze and understand the landscape of clinical psychology research. Possibly there are no studies that have examined the scientometric aspects of the clinical psychology domain. Still, there are certain similar studies related to the psychology domain that have been reviewed so far.

Hamidi et al. examined the psychological literature on COVID-19 to shed light on the viewpoint, fields of study, and global partnerships using information from the Web of Science. The findings suggest that researchers were interested in the following areas: anxiety, mental health, delirium, loneliness, and suicide. Considering the unique circumstances that COVID-19 brought about for human cultures, psychological research is arguably one of the most significant topics in the field of health¹⁰.

Wang et al. analysed research trends from 1999 to 2021 by conducting a scientometric evaluation of Positive psychology papers using the Web of Science database and found that Positive psychology is steadily expanding. The most productive countries and institutions were the United States and Harvard University, respectively.


The journal with the most co-citations was the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, while Frontiers in Psychology had the highest productivity. With 3,350 citations and 5,020 co-citations, Seligman was the author with the greatest impact. Research and development advancements in this field are centered around the COVID-19 epidemic, positive psychology intervention, character strengths, linguistic enjoyment, and systematic review¹¹.

Grover et al. used bibliometric techniques with Scopus to analyze the publication output of Indian authors on Covid-19 and psychology. Regarding citations per paper and relative citation index, authors from Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, had the greatest influence. The National Institute of Mental Health and Allied Sciences (NIMHANS) produced the most publications. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, with 158 papers published, was the journal with the most publications. According to the frequency with which keywords appeared, the most frequently researched themes were mental health (93), anxiety (80), and mental disease (68). They concluded that a significant amount of research on COVID-19 and psychology from India has been published¹².

Hulloli, performed scientometric assessment of the psychology literature produced in India using the Web of Science database during 2001–2020 and revealed that the maximum literature was produced during 2019, with a slight decrement during the year 2020. Most of the papers were published in Psychiatry, and Grover S was the most productive author¹³. He also used Web of Science to compare the quality of psychology research output between 2001 and 2020 in two different countries: South Africa and India. In terms of publishing growth, document type, language, and Activity Index, both countries were compared and it was found that 12,543 papers published in India have received 96,871 citations. South Africa, on the other hand, has published the most papers (9,938 total citations; 1,21,385)¹⁴.

Liu and Oakland, carried out research to determine the expansion and evolution of academic writing that explicitly makes mention to the word ‘school psychology’ in the Science Citation Index between 1907 and 2014 using the Web of Science database and found that even though the database contained publications from all around the world, the majority of the articles were written by Americans. Journal of School Psychology was the most productive journal and the University of Minnesota-Twin Cities was the topmost producer¹⁵.

Naveed et al. employed the Web of Science to demarcate the overall patterns of publication as well as seminal theories and areas of focus in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry. Their findings indicated a growing trend of research in this area. Research on attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), depression, PTSD, social phobia, checklists, psychopharmacology, and the design of psychometric instruments were the main areas of focus for psychiatric research, and in the field of child and adolescent psychiatry, there has been a notable surge in both innovation and development of study fields between 1980 and 2016¹⁶.


2. Methodology

The present study examines the clinical psychology literature produced from 1989 to 2023 with the data extracted from the Web of Science database. The Web of Science Category ‘Clinical psychology’ was selected for analysis and the publications were refined selecting the timeframe 1989–2023. Various bibliometric components were considered while extracting the data like year-wise data, publication type, authors, publication source, top-cited papers, institutions, funding agencies, countries, etc. The data has been downloaded, organized, tabulated, and analyzed using Ms-Excel software which is then shown in tables and graphs for interpretation.


3. Objectives

The following are the objectives for carrying out the scientometric study of global clinical psychology literature using Web of Science:

  1. To analyze the publication trend of clinical psychology literature and identify the growth rate and doubling period of publications over a specific period.
  2. To identify the type of clinical psychology publications, prolific authors, institutions, journals, top countries producing the maximum literature in clinical psychology.
  3. To assess the citation impact of clinical psychology publications by identifying highly cited papers and influential authors contributing to the field.
  4. To identify the core research areas, and emerging trends in clinical psychology research through keyword analysis.
  5. To identify the maximum fund-providing agencies for clinical psychology researchers.

4. Data Analysis and Interpretation

As reflected in the Web of Science database, during 35 years, i.e., 1989–2023, 276800 publications have been produced in clinical psychology globally with 1018 publications from India.


Table 1: Chronological Distribution of the Global Publications in Clinical Psychology

Publication Year Publication Count % Cumulative RGR (Relative Growth Rate) Doubling time (Dt) Mean Relative Growth Rate Mean Doubling Time
1989 3713 1.341 3713        
1990 4319 1.56 8032 0.772 0.082    
1991 4316 1.559 12348 0.430 0.146    
1992 3956 1.429 16304 0.278 0.227    
1993 4486 1.621 20790 0.243 0.259 0.345 0.143
1994 4529 1.636 25319 0.197 0.320    
1995 5225 1.888 30544 0.188 0.336    
1996 5334 1.927 35878 0.161 0.391    
1997 5429 1.961 41307 0.141 0.447    
1998 5450 1.969 46757 0.124 0.508 0.162 0.400
1999 6333 2.288 53090 0.127 0.496    
2000 5826 2.105 58916 0.104 0.605    
2001 5999 2.167 64915 0.097 0.650    
2002 5648 2.04 70563 0.083 0.755    
2003 6805 2.458 77368 0.092 0.684 0.101 0.638
2004 6062 2.19 83430 0.075 0.835    
2005 7209 2.604 90639 0.083 0.760    
2006 6493 2.346 97132 0.069 0.911    
2007 7632 2.757 104764 0.076 0.833    
2008 7703 2.783 112467 0.071 0.888 0.075 0.845
2009 7863 2.841 120330 0.068 0.932    
2010 9002 3.252 129332 0.072 0.873    
2011 9591 3.465 138923 0.072 0.881    
2012 9527 3.442 148450 0.066 0.950    
2013 10148 3.666 158598 0.066 0.953 0.069 0.918
2014 10110 3.652 168708 0.062 1.019    
2015 10121 3.656 178829 0.058 1.081    
2016 10745 3.882 189574 0.058 1.080    
2017 10187 3.68 199761 0.052 1.204    
2018 10314 3.726 210075 0.050 1.251 0.056 1.127
2019 14141 5.109 224216 0.065 0.967  
Publication Year Publication Count % Cumulative RGR (Relative Growth Rate) Doubling time (Dt) Mean Relative Growth Rate Mean Doubling Time
2020 13049 4.714 237265 0.057 1.114    
2021 14737 5.324 252002 0.060 1.045    
2022 12702 4.589 264704 0.049 1.281    
2023 12096 4.37 276800 0.045 1.410 0.055 1.163
Total

276800

Table 1 and Figure 1 present the chronological distribution of clinical psychology publications produced globally from 1989 to 2023. It can be depicted that the maximum no. of publication have been produced during the year 2021 i.e., 14737 (5.324%), followed by 2019 (14141, 5.109%), and 2020 (13049, 4.714%). The lowest number of publications was produced in 1989, i.e., 3713 (1.341%). Though fluctuations in the data have been observed throughout the time frame, the noticeable no. of publications drop after the year 2019 could be attributed to several potential factors such as many research activities being disrupted due to lockdowns, which affected data collection, participant recruitment, and overall research progress.


Figure 1: Chronological Distribution of the Global publications in Clinical Psychology

Funding and research priorities shifted to address the pandemic, which may have diverted attention and resources away from clinical psychology research. The peer review and publication process itself may have experienced delays due to the increased volume of submissions related to COVID-19 and the adjustments made by journals and publishers to handle the crisis.


Figure 1.1: Chronological Distribution of the Indian Publications in Clinical Psychology

The chronological distribution of the Indian publications is visible in figure 1.1. The maximum no. of papers produced in the year 2021 (107 papers), followed by 2022 (103), and 2023 (90), with least number of publications in 1991 (2 publications). No publications have been produced during 1992 from India in the field of clinical psychology reason being that Web of Science may not have comprehensive coverage of all journals, especially older ones. Some journals from 1992 might not be included in their database or might not have been indexed at that time.


Table 1 and Figure 1.3 represent the relative growth rate and doubling time of the global publications in clinical psychology. It can be depicted that the Relative Growth Rate of publications has decreased from 0.772 in 1990 to 0.045 in 2023.


Figure 1.3: Relative Growth Rate and Doubling time of publications

On the other hand the Doubling time for the publications has been increased from 0.082 in 1990 to 1.410 in 2023. Both the RGR and Doubling time show fluctuations in between. The mean RGR is least during the time-frame 2019-2023 i.e., 0.056 and maximum during 1989-1992 i.e., 0.345. The mean doubling time for the publications is maximum during the years 2019 to 2023 i.e., 1.163 while it is minimum during the years 1989 to 1992 i.e., 0.143. This also depicts that the RGR is inversely proportional to the doubling time.


Table 2: Type of Publications

Sr. no.Type of PublicationsPublication count% of Count
1Article19431070.199
2Meeting Abstract3321812.001
3Book Review160625.803
4Review Article123094.447
5Editorial Material121654.395
6Proceeding Paper66942.418
7Letter40361.458
8Note12060.436
9Biographical-Item5450.197
10Book Chapters4070.147
11News Item2210.080
12Item About an Individual1090.039
13Bibliography880.032
14Software Review430.016
15Retracted Publication400.014
Others (13)

Table 2 and figure 2 represents the type of publications produced in the clinical psychology domain. A total of 28 document types have been recorded including articles, book reviews, abstracts, review papers, editorials, proceeding papers, letters, notes, biographical items, book chapters, news items, retracted publications, and many more.


Figure 2: Type of publications

The maximum no. of publications has been produced in the form of articles i.e., 194310 (70.199%), followed by meeting abstracts i.e., 33218 (12.001%), and book reviews (16062, 5.803).


Table 3: Top Authors of Clinical Psychology

RankTop AuthorsAffiliationCountryPublications%h-index
1Zvolensky Michael JUniversity of HoustonUSA4650.16871
2Traussnig BernhardVoestalpine AGAustria4430.1638
3Petermann FranzUniversity of BremenGermany3980.14453
4Brahler ElmarUniversity of LeipzigGermany3740.13582
5Treasure JKing’s College LondonEngland3440.12499
6Joiner TEFlorida State UniversityUSA3420.12497
7Rief WinfriedPhilipps University MarburgGermany3300.11980
8Schmidt Norman BFlorida State UniversityUSA3170.11569
9Bulik Cynthia MUniversity of North CarolinaUSA3160.11478
10Crosby Ross DSanford UniversityUSA2870.10490

The top ten writers globally who have contributed the most papers in clinical psychology are shown in Table 3. Zvolensky Michael J from the University of Houston, USA has produced the maximum number of publications i.e., 465 (0.168%, Rank 1) having an h-index value equivalent to 71, followed by Strauss Bernhard from Voestalpine AG, Austria (443 publications, 0.16%, Rank 2) having h-index -38, and Petermann Franz from University of Bremen, Germany having 398 publications (0.144%, Rank 3) having an h-index equal to 53. Brahler Elmar from the University of Leipzig, Germany, possesses Rank 4 contributing (374 publications, 0.135%) and has an h-index value of 83, is found to be the highly cited award recipient from the year 2019–2023, in the subject categories Psychology, Psychiatry, Public, Environmental & Occupational Health and Oncology with 34,860 total citations. Rief Winfried from Philipps University Marburg, Germany (Rank 7, 330 publications, 0.199% publications) also got a highly cited researcher award from the year 2021–2023 in subject categories Psychology, Psychiatry, Neurosciences & Neurology, and Pharmacology & Pharmacy with 30,197 total citations and h-index equal to 80.


Table 3.1: Top Indian Authors

Indian RankGlobal RankAuthor NameAffiliationPapers%h-Index
172Andrade ChittaranjanNational Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences15915.61%35
26381Ghosh, AbhishekPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh212.06%16
311111Basu, DebasishPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh141.37%20
411306Dhikav, VikasICMR – National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases (NIIRNCD)141.37%13
512025Sarkar, SiddharthAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi141.37%21
614402Kumar, DevartaNational Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences – India121.17%9
714537Mattoo, Surendra KPost Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh121.17%22
814853Sagar, RajeshAll India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) New Delhi121.17%67
918728Janardhan Reddy, Y. C.National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences – India100.98%42
1019063Telles, ShirleyNational Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences – India100.98%29

Table 3.1 lists the leading Indian authors who have made the maximum contributions to clinical psychology, along with their rankings both domestically and globally. Rank 1 is possessed by Andrade Chittaranjan (Global rank 72, h-index 35), affiliated with the National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, contributing 159 papers, i.e., 15.61% of the Indian publications followed by Ghosh, Abhishek with rank 2, (Global rank 6381, h-index 16), and Basu, Debasish with rank 3, (Global rank 11111, h-index 20) from Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, contributing 21 i.e., 2.06% and 14 i.e., 1.37% publications respectively. Among the top 10 Indian authors 4 authors are affiliated to National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, 3 are affiliated to PGIMER, Chandigarh, 2 are affiliated to AIIMS, New Delhi and 1 is affiliated to ICMR – National Institute for Implementation Research on Non-Communicable Diseases (NIIRNCD).


Table 4: Top International Affiliations of Clinical Psychology

RankAffiliationsCountryPublications%
1University of California SystemUSA113624.188
2University of LondonEngland87773.235
3US Department of Veterans AffairsUSA80922.983
4Harvard UniversityUSA79702.938
5Veterans Health Administration VHAUSA79282.922
6Pennsylvania Commonwealth System of Higher Education (PCSHE)USA66852.464
7State University System of FloridaUSA66002.433
8University System of OhioUSA65622.419
9King’s College LondonEngland51021.881
10University of Texas SystemUSA49251.815

Table 4 depicts the top most productive international affiliations of clinical psychology. Rank 1 is occupied by University of California System, USA contributing 11362 i.e., 4.18% publications, Rank 2 by University of London, England, with 8777, 3.23% papers and rank 3 by US Department of Veterans Affairs, USA with 8092, i.e., 2.98% publications. Rank 4 is occupied by Harvard University, USA with 7970, i.e., 2.93% publications and rank 5 is occupied by Veterans Health Administration, USA with 7928, i.e., 2.92% publications. Among top 10 most productive affiliations of the world 8 affiliations belong to USA and remaining 2 from England.

The US institutions dominate clinical psychology research due to significant funding, high-quality education, state-of-the-art research facilities, interdisciplinary collaboration, access to prestigious journals and conferences, diverse research opportunities, strong professional networks, and historical leadership. The US also encourages collaboration across disciplines, leading to more comprehensive research outcomes. The US has also been a leader in the development of psychology, with many foundational theories and practices originating from American researchers.


Table 4.1: Top Indian Affiliations

Indian RankWorld rankName of the AffiliationStatePublications%
1507National Institute of Mental Health & NeurosciencesKarnataka24924.45
21193All India Institute of Medical SciencesDelhi636.18
31751Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education & ResearchChandigarh353.43
41920Indian Institute of Technology SystemWest Bengal313.04
52256University of DelhiDelhi242.35
62296Manipal Academy of Higher EducationKarnataka232.25
72514National Drug Dependence Treatment CentreUttar Pradesh201.96
82602Tata Institute of Social SciencesMaharashtra191.86
92636Christian Medical College HospitalTamil Nadu181.76
103087Banaras Hindu UniversityUttar Pradesh141.37

Table 4.1 lists the top affiliations of India contributing maximum research in clinical psychology domain. It can be clearly depicted that the researchers from the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Karnataka contributes maximum papers i.e., 249 publications (0.24.45% of the Indian publications), world rank 507. This can conclude to the fact that it is a leading center for mental health research, education, and clinical services in India. Its significant contribution to clinical psychology research is attributed to its specialized focus on mental health and neuroscience, comprehensive facilities, interdisciplinary approach, high volume of clinical cases, government support, advanced training programs, collaborations with national and international research organizations, universities, and healthcare institutions, and a focus on relevant issues in the Indian context. Rank 2 is occupied by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Delhi with 63 publications i.e., 6.18%, and Rank 3 is occupied by Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education Research, Chandigarh, with 35 publications i.e., 3.43%.


Table 5: Top Journals of Clinical Psychology

RankJournal TitlesPublisherPublications%(JCI)
1Archives of Clinical NeuropsychologyOxford University Press, United Kingdom110593.9950.83
2Journal of Clinical PsychiatryPhysicians Postgraduate Press, United Kingdom108323.9131.15
3Psychological MedicineCambridge University Press, United Kingdom85573.0912.36
4International PsychogeriatricsCambridge University Press, United Kingdom75032.7111.38
5Addictive BehaviorsPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Netherlands68872.4881.34
6International Journal of Behavioral MedicineSpringer, USA65152.3540.71
7Clinical NeuropsychologistTaylor & Francis Inc, United Kingdom58872.1271.11
8Behaviour Research and TherapyPergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd, Netherlands49811.7991.5
9Archives of Sexual BehaviorSpringer, USA48691.7591.31
10Journal of Clinical and Experimental NeuropsychologyTaylor & Francis Inc, U.K48221.7420.61

JCI = Journal Citation Indicator, recorded from Web of Science.


Table 5 enlists the top journals in which most research has been published related to clinical psychology topics. Rank 1 is occupied by Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (JCI = 0.83), published by Oxford University Press, United Kingdom with 11059 i.e., 3.99% publications, rank 2 is occupied by Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (JCI = 1.15), published from Physicians Postgraduate Press, United Kingdom, with 10832 i.e., 3.91% publications, and rank 3 is occupied by Psychological Medicine (JCI = 2.36), published by Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom with 8557 i.e., 3.09% publications. Among the top 10 journals 6 of the journals are published in the UK, 2 from the USA, and the remaining 2 from the Netherlands.


Table 6: Top Countries Contributing Maximum Research in Clinical Psychology

RankCountries/RegionsPublications%
1USA13758549.706
2England257399.299
3Germany200977.260
4Canada179006.467
5Australia150395.433
6Netherlands103773.749
7Spain59502.150
8Peoples R China50091.810
9Italy48801.763
10Israel39321.421
India10180.368

Table 6 enlists the top nations contributing maximum publications in the clinical psychology domain. The USA holds rank 1 contributing 137585 papers i.e., 49.70% of the total, rank 2 is occupied by England contributing 25739 i.e., 9.29% of the total papers, rank 3 is occupied by Germany with 20097 papers, i.e., 7.26%. These nations are followed by Canada and Australia with 17900 (6.46%) and 15039 (5.43%) publications. Due to their robust academic institutions, significant financing, historical roots, multidisciplinary collaboration, worldwide influence, and strong public backing, the United States, England, and Germany are the top three nations in the world for clinical psychology research. Prominent research and academic institutions in these nations, like the University of Oxford, Stanford, and Harvard, offer strong academic settings for training and research. A significant amount of funding is provided for psychological research by organizations like the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) in Germany, the Medical Research Council (MRC) in the United Kingdom, and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States. In these nations, interdisciplinary cooperation enables clinical psychology to interact with other disciplines, such as neuroscience, medicine, and social sciences, producing more thorough and significant research results. Strong professional networks are offered by associations such as the American Psychological Association (APA), the British Psychological Society (BPS), and the German Psychological Society (DGPs), which encourage research, establish ethical guidelines, and assist in the communication of results.


Table 6.1: Top Collaborating Countries with India

RankCountryCollaborated Publications%
1USA20319.941
2England12512.279
3Australia595.796
4Canada494.813
5Netherlands403.929
6Peoples R China393.831
7Italy363.536
8Brazil353.438
9Switzerland343.34
10Germany313.045

Table 6.1 depicts the top collaborating countries with India for contributing publications of clinical psychology. Maximum collaborated publications with India are from the USA i.e., 203 publications (19.94%), followed by England, 125 publications i.e., 12.27%, and Australia with 59 (5.79% publications). By partnering with organizations in these nations, Indian researchers gain access to state-of-the-art techniques, resources, and knowledge that improve the caliber and significance of their work. The fact that English is widely spoken among scholars in these nations makes communication and cooperation easier. Mental health conditions including depression, anxiety, and trauma are typically of interest to researchers from these nations, and through cooperative endeavors, they address these problems from several angles and provide appropriate interventions.


Table 7: Most Cited Papers of Clinical Psychology

RankPublication TitleAuthorsJournalCitationsYear
1The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10Sheehan, DV et al.Journal of Clinical Psychiatry183661998
2The structure of negative emotional states – comparison of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS) with the beck depression and anxiety inventoriesLovibond, PF; Lovibond, SHBehaviour Research and Therapy80531995
3Clinical-significance – a statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy-researchJacobson, NS; Truax, PJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology75351991
4Short screening scales to monitor population prevalences and trends in non-specific psychological distressKessler, RC et al.Psychological Medicine67412002
5Measuring emotion – the self-assessment mannequin and the semantic differentialBradley, MM; Lang, PJJournal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry58141994
6Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness ScalePatton, JH; Stanford, MS; Barratt, ESJournal of Clinical Psychology57491995
7Development of a new resilience scale: The Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC)Connor, KM; Davidson, JRTDepression and Anxiety56552003
8The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validationSullivan, MJL; Bishop, SR; Pivik, JPsychological Assessment55751995
9Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scaleGratz, KL; Roemer, LJournal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment50722004
10Development of the World Health Organization WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessmentHarper, A; Power, MPsychological Medicine48761998

Table 7 presents the top most cited papers during the period of study in the clinical psychology domain. The most cited paper is entitled as “The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)…” (1998) by Sheehan, DV et al is published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry have 18366 citations. This indicates that it has provided significant information or a well accepted approach, as evidenced by the fact that researchers often cite the publication in their own research. It is followed by “The structure of negative emotional states…” (1995) by Lovibond, PF and Lovibond, SH published in Behaviour Research and Therapy have 8053 citations and “Clinical-significance – a statistical approach…” (1991) by Jacobson, NS and Truax, P published in Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology have 7535 citations. Papers with groundbreaking findings, novel methodologies, or significant advancements are often used as foundational references for subsequent research. The paper’s broad applicability, collaboration, and high-quality research enhance its credibility and attracts more citations. Additionally, papers with cross-cultural or global relevance are more likely to be cited by a diverse range of researchers worldwide.


Table 8: Top Research Areas of Clinical Psychology

Sr. no.Subject categoriesPublications%
1Psychology276800100.000
2Psychiatry9218933.305
3Neurosciences Neurology242838.773
4Substance Abuse174796.315
5Family Studies168996.105
6Social Sciences Other Topics143655.190
7Geriatrics Gerontology75032.711
8Nutrition Dietetics57142.064
9Criminology Penology43241.562
10Pharmacology Pharmacy40521.464
11Rehabilitation37321.348
12Public Environmental Occupational Health27630.998
13Obstetrics Gynecology19690.711
14Health Care Sciences Services16940.612
15Education Educational Research12950.468
16Pediatrics11350.410
17Biomedical Social Sciences7240.262
18Medical Informatics5630.203
19Behavioral Sciences4120.149
20Science Technology Other Topics1300.047
21Music610.022
22Toxicology100.004

Table 8 enlists the subject categories that illustrate the broad scope and interdisciplinary connections of clinical psychology research, highlighting its relevance to a wide range of scientific and applied fields. Maximum publications relate to psychology i.e., 276800 (100%) because this broad category encompasses research that spans various psychological disciplines, including the whole clinical psychology along with others like cognitive, developmental and social psychology. This category is followed by psychiatry with 92189 publications i.e., 33.30%. This field of research focuses on mental health disorders: their diagnosis, treatment, and prevention. Psychiatry and clinical psychology often intersect, particularly in research about mental health issues and therapeutic approaches. Next comes the Neurosciences and Neurology with 24283 publications, i.e., 8.77% which frequently focuses on the biological causes of psychiatric illnesses. Research in this field may include examinations using neuroimaging, evaluations using neuropsychology, and the effects of neurological disorders on mental health.


Table 9: Top International Funding Agencies

RankFunding AgenciesCountryFunded publications%
1United States Department of Health Human ServicesUSA3106211.222
2National Institutes of HealthUSA3019810.910
3National Institute of Mental HealthUSA114194.125
4National Institute on Drug AbuseUSA71782.593
5National Institute on Alcohol Abuse AlcoholismUSA33981.228
6National Institute of Child Health Human DevelopmentUSA28291.022
7UK Research InnovationUK24690.892
8National Institute on AgingUSA22310.806
9Medical Research CouncilUK18590.672
10Canadian Institutes of Health ResearchCanada18430.666

Table 9 represents the world’s top funding agencies that provide funds to carry out research work in the clinical psychology domain. United States Department of Health Human Services USA has funded the maximum number of publications i.e., 31062 (11.22%) and holds rank 1, followed by the National Institutes of Health, USA with 30198 (10.91%) funded publications, and the National Institute of Mental Health, USA with 11419 (4.12%) funded publications. Among the top 10 funding agencies, 7 are from the USA and 2 & 1 from the UK and Canada, respectively.


Table 9.1: Top Indian Funding Agencies

RankTop Funding Agencies in IndiaFunding count%
1National Council on Science and Technology323.14
2Indian Council of Medical Research171.66
3Ministry of Health and Welfare90.88
4Department of Science Technology India90.88
5University Grants Commission India70.68
6Department of Biotechnology70.68
7All India Institute of Medical Sciences New Delhi40.39
8Indian Statistical Institute20.19
9Ramanujan Fellowship20.19
10Council of Scientific and Industrial Research20.19

Table 9.1 represents the top funding agencies of India for clinical psychologists based on WoS data. National Council on Science and Technology holds rank 1, funding 32 publications i.e., 3.14% of the Indian publications, followed by the Indian Council of Medical Research which funded 17 publications (1.66%), and the Ministry of Health and Welfare with 9 funded publications i.e., 0.88%.


Table 10: Top Keywords

RankCitation Topics MesoCount%Citation Topics MicroCount%
1Psychiatry & Psychology5029418.17Ptsd140185.064
2Psychiatry4572316.518Eating Disorders134604.863
3Nutrition & Dietetics172126.218Psychotherapy114734.145
4Substance Abuse118584.284Parenting105693.818
5Neuroscanning110363.987Depression88183.186
6Autism & Development Disorders105913.826Schizophrenia67092.424
7Social Psychology81542.946Methadone62862.271
8Neurodegenerative Diseases70982.564Dementia60912.201
9Palliative Care49661.794Mindfulness60072.170
10Gender & Sexuality Studies43381.567Autism54241.960

Table 10 shows the most popular keywords that were found through a combination of focused analysis of the individual elements such as particular publications, contributors, or their citations and an intermediate analysis of the patterns and trends in relation to broader groupings like communities, institutions, or other subfields. This analysis provided in-depth insights into the use and impact of individual research contributions. Understanding the complete range of research influence and citation patterns requires both levels of analysis, which provide insights at various granularities. While analyzing the broader terms i.e., Meso, the most popular topics found are psychiatry and psychology which relate to 50294 (18.17%) of the publications, followed by psychiatry, nutrition and dietetics, substance abuse, and neuroscanning with 45723 (16.51%), 17212 (6.21%), 11858 (4.28%) and 11036 (3.98%) respectively. While analyzing detailed individual elements i.e., micro, the popular topics found are Ptsd (14018 i.e., 5.06%), eating disorders (13460 i.e., 4.86%), psychotherapy (11473 i.e., 4.14%), parenting (10569 i.e., 3.81%) and depression (8818 i.e., 3.18%). The most often recurring keywords throughout the time suggest a greater amount of research in that specific subject, indicating a greater level of interest in such topics among scholars.


5. Results

  1. Globally the maximum no. of publications has been produced during the year 2021 i.e., 14737 (5.324%), followed by 2019 (14141, 5.109%), and 2020 (13049, 4.714%). The lowest number of publications was produced in 1989, i.e., 3713 (1.341%). From India the maximum no. of papers produced in the year 2021 (107 papers), followed by 2022 (103), and 2023 (90), with least number of publications in 1991 (2 publications). No publications have been produced during 1992.
  2. Relative Growth Rate of publications has decreased from 0.772 in 1990 to 0.045 in 2023. Doubling time for the publications has been increased from 0.082 in 1990 to 1.410 in 2023. Both the RGR and Doubling time show fluctuations in between.
  3. The maximum no. of publications has been produced in the form of articles i.e., 194310 (70.199%), followed by meeting abstracts i.e., 33218 (12.001%), and book reviews (16062, 5.803).
  4. Globally Zvolensky Michael J from the University of Houston, USA has produced the maximum number of publications i.e., 465 (0.168%) and Andrade Chittaranjan (Global rank 72, h-index 35), affiliated with the National Institute of Mental Health & Neurosciences, contributing 159 papers i.e., 15.61% is the top author from India.
  5. Internationally Rank 1 is occupied by the University of California System, USA contributing 11362 i.e., 4.18% publications and the National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Karnataka contributes maximum papers i.e., 249 publications (24.45% of the Indian publications), world rank 507.
  6. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology (JCI = 0.83), published by Oxford University Press, United Kingdom with 11059 i.e., 3.99% publications is the topmost journal in terms of publication counts.
  7. The USA is the topmost country contributing 137585 papers i.e., 49.70% of the total publications and also collaborates maximum publications with India i.e., 203 publications.
  8. The most cited paper is entitled as “The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)… (1998)” by Sheehan, DV et al is published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry have 18366 citations.
  9. Maximum publications relate to psychology i.e., 276800 (100%) followed by psychiatry with 92189 publications i.e., 33.30%. Next comes the Neurosciences and Neurology with 24283 publications i.e., 8.77%.
  10. Globally United States Department of Health Human Services USA has funded the maximum number of publications i.e., 31062 (11.22%), and National Council on Science and Technology is the topmost from India, funding 32 publications i.e., 3.14% of the publications.
  11. The most popular topics found are psychiatry and psychology with 50294 (18.17%) of the publications, followed by psychiatry, nutrition and dietetics, substance abuse, and neuroscanning with 45723 (16.51%), 17212 (6.21%), 11858 (4.28%) and 11036 (3.98%) respectively. While analyzing detailed individual elements (micro), the popular topics found are Ptsd (14018, 5.06%), eating disorders (13460, 4.86%), psychotherapy (11473, 4.14%), parenting (10569, 3.81%) and depression (8818, 3.18%).

6. Discussion and Conclusion

The scientometric assessment of global clinical psychology publications, based on Web of Science data, reveals significant trends in the field. Overall, the volume of publications has increased, indicating a growing global interest in mental health issues. Though fluctuations in the data have been observed throughout the time frame, the noticeable no. of publications drop after the year 2019 could be attributed to COVID-19. The Relative Growth Rate of global publications decreased and the doubling time for the publications increased from 1990 to 2023. Countries like the United States, the UK, and Germany dominate the field due to their strong academic institutions and substantial funding. India collaborates the most with the USA, England and Australia. The interdisciplinary nature of the field, with overlap in neuroscience, psychiatry, and public health, has led to more comprehensive research outcomes addressing complex mental health issues. Key research areas, such as psychiatry, neuropsychology, psychopathology, family studies, health psychology, Substance abuse and Rehabilitation continue to drive innovation and inform evidence-based practices for advancing mental health care globally.

In conclusion, this scientometric assessment demonstrates that clinical psychology is a dynamic and evolving field with a broadening scope and increasing global participation. The insights gained from this analysis provide a valuable foundation for guiding future research directions, fostering international collaborations, and addressing the diverse mental health needs of populations worldwide. Similar studies can be conducted in other fields too, to analyze dynamic research trends in terms of publications, authors, institutions, funding agencies, subject research areas, keywords etc.


Conflict of Interest:

None.

Funding Statement:

None.

Acknowledgements:

None.


ORCID ID:

Pooja
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7133-1614
E-mail: [email protected]

Prof. Meera
ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7937-5574
E-mail: [email protected]

References

1. Clinical Psychology. American Psychological Association. Published 2024. https://www.apa.org/ed/graduate/specialize/clinical

2. Kazdin AE. Clinical Psychology: science, practice, and culture. Oxford University Press; 2008. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16826215

3. Moed HF. Citation analysis in research evaluation.; 2005. doi:10.1007/1-4020-3714-7

4. Zhang J, Rousseau R. The International Comparative Performance of the Medical Sciences in PLOS ONE and Web of Science. PLOS ONE. 2019;14(9).

5. Pomerantz AM. Clinical Psychology: science, practice, and culture. 3rd ed. SAGE Publications; 2013. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16826215

6. Web of Science, Clarivate. Academia and Government. Published 2024. https://clarivate.com/webofsciencegroup/solutions/web-of-science/

7. Waltman L, Van Eck NJ. A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection. The European Physical Journal B. 2013; 86(11). doi:10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0

8. Leydesdorff L, Bornmann L. The operationalization of “fields” as WoS subject categories (WCs) in evaluative bibliometrics: The cases of “library and information science” and “science & technology studies.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;67(3):707-714. doi:10.1002/asi.23408

9. Aarts AA, Anderson JE, Anderson CJ, et al. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science. 2015;349(6251). doi:10.1126/ science.aac4716

10. Hamidi A, Khosravi A, Hejazi R, FatemehTorabi N, Abtin A. A scientometric approach to psychological research during the COVID-19 pandemic. Current Psychology. 2023;43(1):155-164. doi:10.1007/s12144-023-04264-2

11. Wang F, Guo J, Yang G. Study on positive psychology from 1999 to 2021: A bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Psychology. 2023;14. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1101157

12. Grover S, Gupta B, Bansal M, Ahmed KKM. Covid-19 and Psychology: A Scientometric Assessment of India’s Publications during 2020-21. International Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2022;12 (1):01-07. doi:10.5530/ijmedph.2022.1.1

13. Hulloli PB. Research on subject area of psychology in India: Scientometric study. International Journal of Education and Psychological Research. 10:76-79. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Praveen-Hulloli/publication/358604738_Research_on_Subject_area_of_Psychology_in_India_Scientometric_Study/links/620b3493afa8884cabe4a58c/Research-on-Subject-area-of-Psychology-in-India-Scientometric-Study.pdf

14. Hulloli PB. Research on Psychology in India and South Africa A comparative scientometric study. Library Philosophy and Practice (E-journal). Published online 2021. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5828

15. Liu S, Oakland T. The emergence and evolution of school psychology literature: A scientometric analysis from 1907 through 2014. School Psychology Quarterly. 2016;31(1):104-121. doi:10.1037/spq0000141

16. Naveed S, Waqas A, Majeed S, Zeshan M, Jahan N, Sheikh MH. Child psychiatry: A scientometric analysis 1980-2016. F1000Research. 2017;6:1293. doi:10.12688/f1000research.12069.1

17. Barlow DH. The Oxford Handbook of Clinical Psychology.; 2014. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/978019 9328710.001.0001

Interested in publishing your own research?
ESMED members can publish their research for free in our peer-reviewed journal.
Learn About Membership

Call for papers

Have a manuscript to publish in the society's journal?