Development and Theoretical-Semantic Validation of the Spiritist Involvement Form (FENE) as an Instrument for Mental Health Assessment
Main Article Content
Abstract
To present the development and theoretical-semantic validation of the Spiritist Involvement Form, a novel instrument designed to assess the level of involvement with Spiritism and its interface with mental health. Method: This methodological study, of an applied nature and mixed-methods approach, was grounded in psychometric criteria across three stages: 1. theoretical construction of the instrument based on Spiritist and scientific literature; 2. development of items organized into three blocks (sociodemographic data, psychological state and mental health care, and Spiritist involvement); and 3. theoretical-semantic validation with experts and lay judges (pilot test). The digital version of the FENE was administered to a purposive sample of 50 participants for semantic evaluation and calculation of the Spiritist Involvement Level score. Results: Expert evaluation demonstrated high agreement regarding clarity (92.5%), relevance (92.5%), and doctrinal pertinence (97.5%) of the items. Testing with lay judges indicated high semantic acceptance (>90% for clarity, comprehension, and relevance). The stratification logic of weights and values enabled the construction of the Spiritist Involvement Level, ranging from 3 to 77 points. Pilot test results demonstrated the usefulness of the score in discriminating different gradients of involvement, from incipient affiliation to deep engagement, including institutional, doctrinal, and subjective practices. Conclusion: The instrument demonstrates conceptual coherence, accessible language, and cultural adequacy to Spiritism, addressing a methodological gap in relation to generalist spirituality instruments. It shows potential for application in clinical, psychosocial, epidemiological, and academic contexts, particularly at the interface with mental health. Future studies should advance psychometric validation, seeking reliability and stronger validity evidence, as well as exploring its applicability in broader and more heterogeneous populations.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Sales TM. Magnitude e fatores associados ao envolvimento espírita, transtornos mentais comuns e ideação suicida: um estudo seccional no Cearátese. Fortaleza: Universidade Federal do Ceará; 2023. Disponível em: http://www.repositorio.ufc.br/handle/riufc/73964
3. Abdala GA, Moreira-Almeida A, Lotufo Neto F. Espiritualidade, cultura e saúde mental: revisões conceituais e desafios metodológicos. Rev Psiquiatr Clin. 2023;50(1):1-10.
4. Alexandre NMC, Coluci MZO. Validade de conteúdo nos processos de construção e adaptação de instrumentos de medidas. Cien Saude Colet. 2011;16(7):3061-8.
5. Barros DF, Lima PV. O impacto multidimensional da violência na saúde mental: uma revisão sistemática. Rev Bras Psiquiatr Psicol. 2024;46(2):112-28.
6. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine. 2000; 25(24):3186-91.
7. Boateng GO, Neilands TB, Frongillo EA, Melgar-Quiñonez HR, Young SL. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149.
8. Borsa JC, Damásio BF, Bandeira DR. Adaptação e validação de instrumentos psicológicos entre culturas: algumas considerações. Paideia. 2012; 22(53):423-32.
9. Brasil. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2012.
10. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Política Nacional de Práticas Integrativas e Complementares no SUS: PNPIC em rede. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2018.
11. Dalgalarrondo P. Religião, psicopatologia e saúde mental. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2007.
12. Dalgalarrondo P. Religião e saúde mental: estudos clínicos, epidemiológicos e culturais. São Paulo: Paulinas; 2007.
13. Denis L. Depois da morte. 37 ed. Rio de Janeiro: FEB; 1927.
14. DeVellis RF. Scale development: theory and applications. 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2017.
15. DeVellis RF, Thorpe CT. Scale development: theory and applications. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2021.
16. Dos Reis LC, Ribeiro SD. Impacto do transtorno do luto prolongado na saúde mental. Rev Foco. 2024;17(11):e6597.
17. Federação Espírita Brasileira. O espiritismo e as suas práticas. Brasília: FEB; 2006.
18. Federação Espírita Brasileira. Orientação ao Centro Espírita. Brasília: FEB; 2017.
19. Fetzer Institute, National Institute on Aging Working Group. Multidimensional measurement of religiousness/spirituality for use in health research. Kalamazoo: Fetzer Institute; 1999.
20. Gomes LAO. O papel do uso de substâncias psicoativas no desencadeamento de transtornos mentais. J Bras Psiquiatr. 2024;73(1):55-62.
21. Hair JF, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE. Multivariate data analysis. 9th ed. Harlow: Pearson; 2022.
22. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. Censo demográfico 2022: religião e pertencimento religioso no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2022.
23. Kardec A. O livro dos espíritos. Paris: Didier; 1857.
24. Koenig HG. Religion, spirituality, and health: the research and clinical implications. San Diego: Academic Press; 2012.
25. Koenig HG. Religion and mental health: research and clinical applications. 2nd ed. San Diego: Academic Press; 2022.
26. Lucchetti G, Lucchetti ALG, Moreira-Almeida A. Spirituality and health in Brazil: historical roots and current challenges. Front Psychol. 2024;15:1-12.
27. Lucchetti G, Granero AL, Bassi RM, Latorraca R, Nacif SAP, Moreira-Almeida A. Measuring spirituality and religiosity in clinical research: a systematic review of instruments available in the Portuguese language. Sao Paulo Med J. 2013;131(2):112-22.
28. Lucchetti G, Lucchetti ALG, Bassi RM, Nobre MRC. Spirituality in health care: an integrative review of the literature. Med Express. 2012;1(3):26-31.
29. Mathieu JE, Richardson HA, Gibson CB. Virtual methods in organizational research: relevance, rigor, and future directions. Organ Res Methods. 2021;24(3):422-45.
30. McGilton KS. Development and psychometric testing of the Patient Satisfaction and Participation Scale. Nurs Res. 2003;52(6):349-56.
31. Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, et al. COSMIN methodology for systematic reviews of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs). Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1147-57.
32. Moreira-Almeida A, Lotufo Neto F. Espiritualidade e saúde mental: fundamentos científicos e clínicos. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2023.
33. Moreira-Almeida A, Lotufo Neto F. Espiritualidade e saúde: evidências científicas e implicações clínicas. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2007.
34. Moreira-Almeida A, Lotufo Neto F, Koenig HG. Religiousness and mental health: a review. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2006;28(3):242-50.
35. Moreira-Almeida A, Pargament KI, Lucchetti G. Religiousness and mental health: what we know and what we need to know. Braz J Psychiatry. 2020;42(5):507-14.
36. Oliveira PHC, Santos EA. O impacto das doenças crônicas na qualidade de vida e saúde mental de pacientes adultos. Rev Saude Publica. 2024;58:1-10.
37. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Integrating spirituality into health systems: WHO framework for holistic care. Geneva: WHO; 2021.
38. Panzini RG, Rocha NS. Religiosidade e espiritualidade na saúde mental: avanços empíricos e implicações clínicas. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021;34(4):1-15.
39. Panzini RG et al. Escala de coping religioso-espiritual (CRE): validação no contexto brasileiro. Porto Alegre: PUC-RS; 2017.
40. Pargament KI. Spiritually integrated psychotherapy: understanding and addressing the sacred. New York: Guilford Press; 2007.
41. Pasquali L. Psicometria: teoria dos testes na psicologia e na educação. 4 ed. Petrópolis: Vozes; 2016.
42. Peteet JR. Spirituality and psychiatry: clinical and research frontiers. Lancet Psychiatry. 2022; 9(8):641-53.
43. Peterman AH, Fitchett G, Brady MJ, Hernandez L, Cella D. Measuring spiritual well-being in people with cancer: the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp). Ann Behav Med. 2002;24(1):49-58.
44. Piedmont RL, Wilkins TA. The assessment of spirituality and religious sentiments (ASPIRES): recent psychometric findings. Religions. 2020; 11(9):1-13.
45. Polit DF, Beck CT. Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice. 11th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer; 2021.
46. Rocha TA, Ferreira LC. Consequências psicossociais da pandemia de COVID-19 e o legado para a saúde mental. Psicol Soc. 2024;36:e269223.
47. Silva A et al. Conflitos familiares: impactos na saúde emocional e a importância de buscar ajuda especializada. Rev Saude Foco. 2024;10(2):115-30.
48. Skevington SM, Gunson KS, O’Connell KA. Introducing the WHOQOL-SRPB BREF. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(5):1073-83.
49. Souza AC, Alexandre NMC, Guirardello EB. Propriedades psicométricas na avaliação de instrumentos: avaliação da confiabilidade e da validade. Epidemiol Serv Saude. 2017;26(3):649-59.
50. Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. 5th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2015.
51. Xavier FC. Nos domínios da mediunidade. Rio de Janeiro: FEB; 1955.
52. Zanon C, Dellazzana-Zanon LL, Wechsler SM, Fabretti RR, Rocha KN. COVID-19 and mental health: the role of stress, resilience, and spirituality. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:586.