↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Objectives: Hypertension is the leading risk factor for cardiovascular disease. While treatment of high blood pressure is essential in cardiovascular disease prevention or slowing it down once cardiovascular disease occurred, it is assumed that pharmacological effectiveness may be hampered by sex differences. The aim is to evaluate sex-stratified effects for angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) on blood pressure and cardiac function in hypertensive participants.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed for studies on ACEIs from 1945 to May 2020. Studies had to present both baseline and follow-up measurements of the interested outcome variables and present sex stratified data. Mean differences were calculated using a random-effects model. 45 studies with 976 participants were used in this review.

Results: In females as compared to males, systolic blood pressure decreased by 19.9 mmHg (95% CI, -26.8; -13.0) vs. 15.1 mmHg (95% CI, -19.5; -10.8), diastolic blood pressure by 14.5 mmHg (95% CI, -17.2; -11.8) vs. 8.5 mmHg (95% CI, -11.4; -5.7), heart rate by -3.5 bpm (95% CI, -6.1; -0.9) vs. -2.5 bpm (95% CI, -4.8; -0.2). Only diastolic blood pressure lowered significantly more in females as compared to males. Left ventricular ejection fraction increased by 2.3% (95% CI, 0.8; 3.7) vs. 1.5% (95% CI, 0.6; 2.3), but without reaching statistical significance.

Conclusion: Although hypertensive treatment effects of ACEIs are comparable between sexes, diastolic blood pressure response is stronger in females, which may guide treatment choices in systolic or diastolic hypertension. It may be that other pharmacological different antihypertensive compounds show sex-specific differences in effectiveness.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 11 No 11 (2023): November Issue, Vol.11, Issue 11
SectionReview Articles
Published30 November 2023
DOI10.18103/mra.v11i11.4306
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

DM

Daniek A. M. Meijs, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands;

MV

Maud A. M. Vesseur, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands;

EV

Esmée W. P. Vaes, BSc

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands;

NW

Nick Wilmes, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands;

SD

Sander de Haas, MSc, MD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands;

MS

Marc E. A. Spaanderman, MD, PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Radboud University Medical Center, the Netherlands;

CG

Chahinda Ghossein-Doha, MD, PhD

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands; Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), the Netherlands;

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗