Main Article Content
During current medical X-ray diagnosis, an automatic exposure control system is widely used. The system can provide proper X-ray exposure, which varies by the patients physical type. It is difficult to measure exposure dose using a traditional dosimeter. Therefore, we proposed using a small-type OSL dosimeter for direct dose measurements. For this application, evaluation of basic properties such as angular and energy dependences is important. Moreover, even when they are derived, some ideas to apply them to using the dosimetry is needed. In this paper, we will introduce our concept; we made a calibration curve using 83 kV X-rays and proposed that an uncertainty of 15% should be added. Moreover, when the dosimeter is applied to CT examination, consideration of pitch factor is needed. We estimated that the uncertainty of PF is at most 25%, and overall uncertainty will be approximately 30%. It is also important to determine whether or not the dosimeter influences the medical image. We presented typical X-ray images of chest X-ray and CT scan of whole body, and explain that the OSL dosimeter can be applied to actual clinical examinations.
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
 Uffmann M., Schaefer-Prokop C., Digital radiography: The balance between image quality and required radiation dose, European Journal of Radiology 72, 202-208(2009). Doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.060
 Use of an Automatic Exposure Control Mechanism for Dose Optimization in Multi-Detector Row CT Examinations: Clinical Evaluation, Radiology 237, 213-223(2005). Doi: 10.1148/radiol.2363041220
 Kalra M.K., Rizzo S.M.R., Noveline R.A., Reducing radiation dose in emergency computed tomography with automatic exposure control techniques, Emergency Radiology 11, 267-274(2005). Doi: 10.1007/s10140-004-0395-7
 Pascoal A., Lawinski C.P., Maxkenzie A., et al., Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems, Radiation Protection Dosimetry 114, 273-277(2005). Doi: 10.1093/rpd/nch572
 Veldkamp W.J., Kroft L.J., Boot M.V., et al., Contrast-detail evaluation and dose assessment of eight digital chest radiography systems in clinical practice, European Radiology 16, 333-341(2006). Doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2887-6
 Matsunaga U., Kawauchi A., Kobayashi K., et al., Dose Estimation for Exposure Conditions of Diagnostic Radiology Acquired by a 2011 Questionnaire in a Phantom Study, Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 69, 1372-1378(2013). Doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2013_JSRT_69.12.1372
 Klevenhagen S.C., Experimentally determined backscatter factors for x-rays generated at voltages between 16 and 140 kV, Physics in Medicine and Biology 34, 1871-1882(1989). Doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/34/12/010
 Grosswendt B., Backscatter factors for x-rays generated at voltages between 10 and 100 kV, Physics in Medicine and Biology 29, 579-591(1984). Doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/29/5/010
 Grosswendt B., Dependence of the photon backscatter factor for water on source-to-phantom distance and irradiation field size. Physics in Medicine and Biology 35, 1233-1245(1990). Doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/35/9/004
 Kato H., Method of calculating the backscatter factor for diagnostic X-rays using the differential backscatter factor, Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 57, 1503-1510(2001).
 Jursinic P.A., Characterization of optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters, OSLDs, for clinical dosimetric measurements, Medical Physics 34, 4594-4604(2007). Doi: 10.1118/1.2804555
 Al-Senan R.M., Hatab M.R., Characteristics of an OSLD in the diagnostic energy range, Medical Physics 38, 4396-4405(2011). Doi: 10.1118/1.3602456
 Hayashi H., Nakagawa K., Okino H., et al., High accuracy measurements by consecutive readings of OSL dosimeter, Medical Imaging and Information Science 31, 28-34(2014). Doi: 10.11318/mii.31.28
 Nakagawa K., Hayashi H., Okino H., et al., Fabrication of Annealing Equipment for Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL) Dosimeter, Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 70, 1135-1142(2014). Doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2014_JSRT_70.10.1135
 Kerns J.R., Kry S.F., Sahoo N., et al., Angular dependence of the nanoDot OSL dosimeter, Medical Physics 38, 3955-3962(2011). Doi: 10.1118/1.3596533
 Lehmann J., Dunn L., Lye J.E., et al., Angular dependence of the response of the nanoDot OSLD system for measurements at depth in clinical megavoltage beams, Medical Physics 41, 061712-1-9(2014). Doi: 10.1118/1.4875698
 Jursinic P.A., Angular dependence of dose sensitivity of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescent dosimeters in different radiation geometries, Medical Physics 42, 5633-5641(2015). Doi: 10.1118/1.4929558
 Hayashi H., Takegami K., Okino H., et al., Procedure to measure angular dependences of personal dosimeters by means of diagnostic X-ray equipment, Medical Imaging and Information Science 32, 8-14(2015). Doi: 10.11318/mii.32.8
 Reft C.S., The energy dependence and dose response of a commercial optically stimulated luminescent detector for kilovoltage photon, megavoltage photon, and electron, proton, and carbon beams, Medical Physics 36, 1690-1699(2009). Doi: 10.1118/1.3097283
 Takegami K., Hayashi H., Okino H., et al., Energy dependence measurement of small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter by means of characteristic X-rays induced with general diagnostic X-ray equipment, Radiological Physics and Technology 9, 99-108(2016). Doi: 10.1007/s12194-015-0339-9
 Gasparian P.B.R., Vanhavere F., Yukihara E.G., Evaluating the influence of experimental conditions on the photon energy response of Al2O3:C optically stimulated luminescence detectors, Radiation Measurements 47, 243-249(2012). Doi: 10.1016/j.radmeas.2012.01.012
 Okazaki T., Hayashi H., Takegami K., et al., Fundamental Study of nanoDot OSL Dosimeters for Entrance Skin Dose Measurement in Diagnostic X-ray Examinations, Journal of Radiation Protection and Research 41, 229-236(2016). Doi: 10.14407/jrpr.2016.41.3.229
 Takegami K., Hayashi H., Okino H., et al., Practical calibration curve of small-type optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimeter for evaluation of entrance skin dose in the diagnostic X-ray region, Radiological Physics and Technology 8, 286-294(2015). Doi: 10.1007/s12194-015-0318-1
 Takegami K., Hayashi H., Yamada K., et al., Entrance surface dose measurements using a small OSL dosimeter with a computed tomography scanner having 320 rows of detectors, Radiological Physics and Technology, in press. Doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0366-1
 Tappouni R., Mathers B., Scan Quality and Entrance Skin Dose in Thoracic CT: A Comparison between Bismuth Breast Shield and Posteriorly Centered Partial CT Scans, ISRN Radiology 2013, 457396-1-6(2013). Doi: 10.5402/2013/457396
 Chetlen A.L., Brown K.L., King S.H., et al., Scatter Radiation Dose From Digital Screening Mammography Measured in a Representative Patient Population, American Journal of Roentgenology 206, 359-365(2016). Doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.14921
 Okazaki T., Hayashi H., Okino H., et al., Calculation of energy and angular dependences of the small-type OSL dosimeter in the diagnostic and nuclear medicine regions using the Monte-Carlo simulation code, International Conference on Medical Physics (ICMP2016), Thailand, Dec. 9-12 (2016).
 Ariga E., Ito S. Deji S. et al., Determination of half value layers of X-ray equipment using computed ragiography imaging plates, Physica Medica 28, 71-75(2012). Doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2011.01.001
 Takegami K., Hayashi H., Konishi Y., et al., Development of multistage collimator for narrow beam production using filter guides of diagnostic X-ray equipment and improvement of apparatuses for practical training, Medical Imaging and Information Sciences 30, 101-107(2013). Doi: 10.11318/mii.30.101
 Maehata I., Hayashi H., Kimoto N. et al., Practical method for determination of air kerma by use of an ionization chamber toward construction of a secondary X-ray field to be used in clinical examination rooms, Radiological Physics and Technology 9, 193-201(2016). Doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0352-7
 Hirayama H., Namito Y., Bielajew A.F., et al., The EGS5 Code System, SLAC Report number: SLAC-R-730, KEK Report number: 2005-8. (2007).
 Kishida M., Hayashi H., Kuboyabu T., et al., Fabrication of a Visualization Equipment for Scattered X-rays in the Diagnosis Domain and Proposal of a Practical Training, Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 69, 500-507(2013). Doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2013_JSRT_69.5.500
 Maehata I., Hayashi H., Takegami K., et al., Fabrication of Improved Multi-slit Equipment to Obtain the Input-output Characteristics of Computed Radiography Systems: Correction of the Heel Effect, and Application to High Tube-voltage Experiments, Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 70, 867-876(2014). Doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2014_JSRT_70.9.867
 Kimoto N., Hayashi H., Maehata I., et al., Development of All-in-one Multi-slit Equipment for Measurements of the Input-output Characteristic of a Phosphor Plate, Japanese Journal of Radiological Technology 69, 1165-1171(2013). Doi: 10.6009/jjrt.2013_JSRT_69.10.1165
 Takegami K., Hayashi H., Okino H., et al., Estimation of identification limit for a small-type OSL dosimeter on the medical images by measurement of X-ray spectra, Radiological Physics and Technology 9, 286-292(2016). Doi: 10.1007/s12194-016-0362-5