The effect of multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment on spouses of patients with non-specific chronic pain

Article Sidebar

PDF Download
Published Jun 15, 2017

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

Mercèdès I.M. Vossenberg-Terlaak
‘Revalidatie Friesland’ Center for Rehabilitation, Beetsterzwaag, The Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
Henrica R. Schiphorst Preuper
Department of Rehabilitation, Center for Rehabilitation, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
Maria G. Beldsnijder
‘Revalidatie Friesland’ Center for Rehabilitation, Beetsterzwaag
Roy E. Stewart
Department of Health Sciences, Community & Occupational Medicine, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen
Anne M. Boonstra
‘Revalidatie Friesland’ Center for Rehabilitation, Beetsterzwaag

Abstract

Background: Research has revealed the influence of spouses on the complaints of patients with non-specific chronic pain, and vice versa. The effect of multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment (MRT) on patients’ spouses has not been studied yet.
Methods: Prospective cohort study. Patients with chronic pain admitted to an outpatient rehabilitation treatment and their spouses filled out questionnaires at pre-treatment (T0), start of treatment (T1), end of treatment (T2), and three months after treatment (T3). Primary outcome measure was psychological distress of the spouses (SCL-90-R). Secondary outcome measures were life satisfaction (Lisat-9), health-related quality of life (RAND-36), catastrophizing (PCS), self-efficacy (DGSES) and strain (CSI) of spouses.
Results: The analysis included 39 couples. Mean scores (SD) of the spouses on the SCL-90-R at T0–T3 were 112 (SD 21), 119 (SD 27), 114 (SD 33) and 107 (SD 17), respectively (differences non-significant). The PCS scores of the spouses and their mean scores on the social domain of the RAND-36 improved significantly, as did the score for the physical domain of the RAND-36 before treatment and the DGSES score after treatment. No differences were found in the spouses’ scores on the CSI and most Lisat-9 or other domains of the RAND-36. The patients benefited from the treatment, with significant changes in scores on the SCL-90-R and most domains of the RAND-36.
Conclusions: Spouses had favourable changes in their scores on social life and catastrophizing tendency.  Our study also confirms that patients with non-specific chronic pain benefit from MRT.

Article Details

How to Cite
VOSSENBERG-TERLAAK, Mercèdès I.M. et al. The effect of multidisciplinary rehabilitation treatment on spouses of patients with non-specific chronic pain. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 6, june 2017. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/1365>. Date accessed: 16 dec. 2024.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Keywords
Chronic pain, musculoskeletal pain, multidisciplinary rehabilitation, spouses
Issue
Vol 5 No 6 (2017): Vol.5 Issue 6, June, 2017
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Boonstra, AM, Reneman, MF, Stewart, RE, Post, MW, Schiphorst Preuper, HR. Life satisfaction in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain and its predictors. Quality of life research 2013, 22 (1),93-101.

2. Lousberg, R, Schmidt, AJ, Groenman, NH . The relationship between spouse solicitous and pain behavior: searching for more experimental evidence. Pain 1992, 51 (1),75-79.

3. Romano, JM, Turner, JA, Friedman, LS, Bulcrof, RA, Jensen, MP, Hops, H, Wright, SF. Sequential analysis of chronic pain behaviors and spouse responses. J Consult Clin Psychol 1992, 60 (5),777-782.

4. Smith, SJA, Keefe, FJ, Caldwell, DS, Romano, J, Baucom, D. Gender differences in patient-spouse interactions: a sequential analysis of behavioral interactions in patients having osteoarthritic knee pain. Pain 2004, 112 (1-2),183-187.

5. Schwartz, L, Slater, MA, Birchler, GR. The role of pain behaviours in the modulation of marital conflict in chronic pain couples. Pain 1996, 65 (2-3), 227-233.

6. Cunningham, JL, Hayes, SE, Townsend, CO, Laures, HJ, Hooten, WM. Associations between spousal or significant other solicitous responses and opioid dose in patients with chronic pain. Pain Med 2012, 13 (8),1034-1049.

7. Taylor, AG, Lorentzen, LJ, Blank, MB. Psychological distress of chronic pain sufferers and their spouses. J Pain Symptom Manage 1990, 5 (1), 6-10.

8. Geisser, ME, Cano, A, Leonard, MT. Factors associated with marital satisfaction and mood among spouses of persons with chronic back pain. J Pain 2005, 6 (8),518-525.

9. Leonard, MT, Cano, A. Pain affects spouses too: Personal experience with pain and catastrophizing as correlates of spouse distress. Pain 2006, 126 (1-3),139-146.

10. Strunin, L, Boden, LI . Family consequences of chronic back pain. Soc Sci Med 2004, 58 (7),1385-1393.

11. Schwartz, L, Slater, MA, Birchler, GR, Atkinson, JH . Depression in spouses of chronic pain patients: the role of patient pain and anger, and marital satisfaction. Pain 1991, 44 (1),61-67.

12. Flor, H, Turk, DC, Scholz, OB. The impact of chronic pain on the spouse: martial, emotional and physical consequences. Journal of Psychosomatic research 1987, 31 (1),63-71.

13. Turk, DC, Wilson, HD, Cahana, A. Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain, part 2. The Lancet 2011, 25 (377) , 2226-2234.

14. Hardt, J, Gerbershagen, HU, Franke, P. The symptom checklist, SCL-90-R-R: its use and characteristics in chronic pain patients. Eur J Pain 2000, 4 (2),137-48.

15. Fugl-Meyer, AR, Bränholm, IB, Fugl-Meyer, KS. Happiness and domain-specific life satisfaction in adult northern Swedes. Clin Rehabil 1991, 5 (1),25-33.

16. Hays, RD, Sherbourne, CD, Mazel, RM. The RAND-36 Item Health Survey 1.0. Health economics 1993, 2 (3),217-227.

17. Van der Zee, KI, Sanderman, R. Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36, een handleiding. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondheidsvragenlijsten. (1992).

18. Robinson, BC. Validation of A Caregiver Strain Index. Journal of Gerontology 1983, 38 (3),344-348.

19. Sherer, M, Maddux, JE, Mercandante, B, Prentice-Dunn, S, Jacobs, B, Rogers, RW. The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation. Psychological Reports 1982, 51 (2),663-671.

20. Sullivan, MJL, Bishops, SC, Pivik, J. The Pain Catastrophizing Scale: Development and validation. Psychol. Assess 1995, 7 (4),524-532.

21. Osman, A, Barrios, FX, Kopper, BA, Hauptmann, W, Jones, J, O'Neill, E. Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Behav Med 1997, 20 (6),589-605.

22. Samsa, G, Edelman, D, Rothman, ML, Williams, GR, Lipscomb, J, Matchar, D. Determining clinically important differences in health status measures: a general approach with illustration to the Health Utilities Index Mark II. Pharmacoeconomics 1999, 15 (2),141-155.

23.Ali FM, Cueva AC, Vyas J, Atwan AA, Salek MS, Finlay AY, Piguet V. Systematic review of the use of quality-of-life instruments in randomized controlled trials for psoriasis. Br J Dermatol. 2017,176 (3),577-593

24. Glassman, SD, Coapy, AG, Berven, SH, Polly, DW, Subach, BR, Carreon, LY. Defining substantial clinical benefit following lumbar spine arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg am 2008, 90 (9),1839-1847.

25. Boonstra, AM, Reneman, MF, Waaksma, BR, Schiphorst Preuper, HR, Stewart, RE. Predictors of multidisciplinary treatment outcome in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Disability and Rehabilitation 2015, 37 (14),1242-1250.

26. Volker, G, Van Vree, F, Wolterbeek, R, Van Gestel, M, Smeets, R, Köke, A, Vliet Vlieland, T. Long-term outcomes of multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic musculoskeletal pain. Musculoskelet. Care 2017, 15 (1), 59-68

27.Sjöström, R, Asplund, R, Alricsson, M. Evaluation of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation program with emphasis on musculoskeletal disorders: A 5-year follow-up. Work 2013, 45 (2),175-182

28. Singer JD, Willet JB. Applied longitudinal data analysis, Modeling change and event occurrence. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc; 2003.