Wireless Neuromodulation By A Minimally Invasive Technique For Chronic Refractory Pain. Report Of Preliminary Observations.

Main Article Content

Bart Billet Roel Wynendaele Niek E. Vanquathem



Objective: Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a minimally invasive neuromodulation device to treat intractable chronic trunk and limb pain.

To report preliminary results using the wireless design and percutaneous implant system in two diverse conditions.

Methods: Two patients with intractable pain, one following a back surgery and the second one with post herpetic neuralgic pain received treatment. For both subjects, pain was refractory to pain medication, interventional pain procedures and physiotherapy. This modality delivered neuromodulation via a percutaneously implanted electrode remotely controlled by a wireless device. The back pain surgery patient received high frequency dorsal root ganglion (DRG) stimulation to cover the areas that were deemed unsuitable for conventional spinal cord stimulation methods. The second patient had our novel technology for peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) along the affected intercostal nerve. A Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D-5L Quality of Life Questionnaire and Global Impression scale (PGIC) were administered at 3, 5, 8, 12 weeks and 6 months post-implantation.

Results: In both patients there was significant relief of symptoms and reduction in pain medication during the short term follow-up. Pain levels, as reported by both patients at three months post-implantation, decreased by up to 60% with continuously applied stimulation. Stimulation remained paresthesia-free for both subjects while the disability improved by 50%. The procedure as well as the wireless system was tolerated very well and was devoid of any side effects or adverse events.

Conclusion: We have developed a novel, neuromodulation system with a minimally invasive percutaneous implantation suitable for both PNS and DRG stimulation. These preliminary results are very encouraging for the minimally invasive wireless approach for treatment of chronic, intractable back and leg pain. This was safe and also effective.

Article Details

How to Cite
BILLET, Bart; WYNENDAELE, Roel; VANQUATHEM, Niek E.. Wireless Neuromodulation By A Minimally Invasive Technique For Chronic Refractory Pain. Report Of Preliminary Observations.. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 5, n. 7, aug. 2017. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/1411>. Date accessed: 25 mar. 2023.
Neuromodulation, wireless, percutaneous, dorsal root ganglion, peripheral nerve, spinal cord stimulation
Case Reports


1. Clark JD. Chronic pain prevalence and analgesic prescribing in a general medical population. J Pain Symptom Manage 2002;23:131–137.
2. Mantyselka P, Kumpusato E, Ahonen R et al. Pain as a reason to visit the doctor: a study in Finnish primary health care. Pain 2001;89:175–180.
3. Praeger J. Estimates of annual spinal cord stimulator implant rises in the United States. Neuromodulation 2010;13:68–69.
4. Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004;100:254–267.–
5. Taylor RS,Van Buyten JP, Buchser E. Spinal cord stimulation for chronic back and leg pain and failed back surgery syndrome: a systematic review and analysis of prognostic factors. Spine 2005;30:152–160.
6. Kumar K, Taylor RS, Jacques L et al. The effects of spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain are sustained: a 24-month follow-up of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial of the effectivness of spinal cord stimulation. Neurosurgery 2008;63:762–770
7. Kemler MA, De Vet HC, Barendse GA, Van Den Wildenberg FA, Van Kleef M. Effect of spinal cord stimulation for chronic complex regional pain syndrome Type I:five-year final follow-up of patients in a randomized controlled trial. J Neurosurg 2008;108:292–298.
8. Kumar K, Hunter G, Demeria D. Spinal cord stimulation in treatment of chronic benign pain: challenges in treatment planning and present status, a 22-year experience. Neurosurgery 2006;58:481–496.
9. North RB, Kidd DH, Farrokhi F, Piantadosi SA. Spinal cord stimulation versus repeated lumbosacral spine surgery for chronic pain: a randomized, controlled trial. Neurosurgery 2005;56:98–106.
10. Holsheimer J, Khan YN, Raza SS, Khan E. Effects of electrode positioning on perception threshold and paresthesia coverage in spinal cord stimulation. Neuromodulation 2007;10:34–41.
11. Cameron T. Safety and efficacy of spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic pain: a 20-year literature review. J Neurosurg 2004;100:254–267..
12. Sapunar D, Kostic S, Banozic A, Puljak L. Dorsal root ganglion - a potential new therapeutic target for neuropathic pain. J Pain Res 2012;5:31–38.
13. Van Zundert J, Patijn J, Kessels A, Lame I, van Suijlekom H, van Kleef M. Pulsed radiofrequency adjacent to the cervical dorsal root ganglion in chronic cervical radicular pain: a double blind sham controlled randomized clinical trial. Pain 2007;127:173–182.
14. Struijk JJ, Holsheimer J, van Veen BK, Boom HBK. Epidural spinal cord stimulation: calculation of field potentials with special reference to dorsal column nerve fibers. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:104–110.
15. Kim D, Vakharyia R, Kroll HR, Shuster A. Rates of lead migration and stimulation loss in spinal cord stimulation: a retrospective comparison of laminectomy versus percutaneous implantation. Pain Physician 2011;14:513–524.
16. Tyler Perryman L, Larson P, Glaser J. Tissue depth study for a fully implantable, remotely powered and programmable wireless neural stimulator. Int J Nano Stud Technol 2016; S2: 001, 1-6.
17. Liem L., Russo M., Huygen F. J. P. M. et al. A Multicenter, Prospective Trial to Assess the Safety and Performance of the Spinal Modulation Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurostimulator System in the Treatment of Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation 2013; 16: 471–482.
18. Van Buyten JP, Smet I, Liem L, Russo M, Huygen F. Stimulation of dorsal root ganglia for the management of complex regional pain syndrome: a prospective case series. Pain Pract 2015,15,208-16.
19. Tamimi MA, Davids HR, Langston MM et al. Successful treatment of chronic neuropathic pain with subcutaneous peripheral nerve stimulation: four case reports. Neuromodulation 2009;12:210–214.
20. Yakovlev AE, Peterson AT. Peripheral nerve stimulation in treatment of intractable post herpetic neuralgia. Neuromodulation 2007;10:373–375.
21. Sator-Katzenschlager S, Fiala K, Kress HG, et al: Subcutaneous target stimulation (STS) in chronic non-cancer pain: a nationwide retrospective study. Pain Pract. 2010,10: 279-286.
22. Hamm-Faber T.E., Aukes H., van Gorp E.-J., Gültuna I. 2015. Subcutaneous Stimulation as an Additional Therapy to Spinal Cord Stimulation For the Treatment of Low Back Pain and Leg Pain in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome: Four-Year Follow-Up. Neuromodulation 2015; 18: 618–622.
23. Buiten MS, DeJongste MJ, Beese U, Kliphuis C, Durenkamp A, Staal MJ. Subcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation: A Feasible and New method for the Treatment of Patients With Refractory Angina. Neuromodulation 2011; 14: 258–265.
24. Yearwood TL, Perryman LT. Peripheral Neurostimulation with a Microsize Wireless Stimulator. Prog Neurol Surg.29:168-91, 2015.