Adequacy of Ultraviolet Protection of Children’s Sunglasses

Article Sidebar

PDF Download
Published Mar 20, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v7i3.1861

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

Tamara Kahan Sharnendra Sidhu, B.S. Andrew Adesman, M.D.
Steven & Alexandria Cohen Children's Medical Center of New York

Abstract

ABSTRACT


Background: The American Academy of Pediatrics cautions against excessive exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation because of known long-term risks for skin cancer and eye disease such as macular degeneration and cataracts. For this reason, the AAP recommends that children wear sunglasses that protect against 97%-100% of UV-A and UV-B rays. In previous studies, many children’s sunglasses failed to provide adequate UV protection and/or had inaccurate labeling; however, these studies were conducted more than 25 years ago. The objective of the present study


Methods: 126 distinct pairs of children’s sunglasses reflecting varying styles/manufacturers were purchased from national retailers in the United States (price range: $1-$32; 94% <$10). UV transmission for the right and left lens of each pair of sunglasses was independently measured using two different calibrated photometers designed for opticians/optometrists: a Vision UV-400 Meter and a Digital Light Meter 4000.


 Results: All 126 pairs of sunglasses transmitted 0% UV radiation. No differences were noted between right/left lenses or between the two UV meters. In terms of labeling, 107 pairs (84.9%) stated they provide 100% UV protection, 17 (13.5%) indicated UV protection but no other details, and two (1.6%) had no information regarding UV protection.


 Conclusion: In contrast to previous studies of children’s sunglasses, all sunglasses tested blocked 100% of UV radiation and no inaccurate labels were identified. Our results suggest even the least expensive children’s sunglasses now meet the recommended safety criteria for filtering UV radiation and that parents can trust labeling claims regarding UV protection.

Keywords: sunglasses, ultraviolet light, ultraviolet radiation, prevention, eye health

Article Details

How to Cite
KAHAN, Tamara; SIDHU, Sharnendra; ADESMAN, Andrew. Adequacy of Ultraviolet Protection of Children’s Sunglasses. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3, mar. 2019. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/1861>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v7i3.1861.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 7 No 3 (2019): Vol.7 Issue 3, March, 2019
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Balk, S.J., 2011. Ultraviolet radiation: a hazard to children and adolescents. Pediatrics, 127(3), pp.e791-e817.
2. Van Kuijk, F.J., 1991. Effects of ultraviolet light on the eye: role of protective glasses. Environmental health perspectives, 96, p.177.
3. Bergmanson, J.P.G. and Söderberg, P.G., 1995. The significance of ultraviolet radiation for eye diseases. A review with comments on the efficacy of UV‐blocking contact lenses. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 15(2), pp.83-91.
4. Cruickshanks, K.J., Klein, B.E. and Klein, R., 1992. Ultraviolet light exposure and lens opacities: the Beaver Dam Eye Study. American journal of public health, 82(12), pp.1658-1662.
5. Whiteman, D.C., Whiteman, C.A. and Green, A.C., 2001. Childhood sun exposure as a risk factor for melanoma: a systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Cancer causes & control, 12(1), pp.69-82.
6. Oliveria SA, Saraiya M, Geller AC, et al Sun exposure and risk of melanoma Archives of Disease in Childhood 2006;91:131-138.
7. Abney, J.R. and Scalettar, B.A., 1998. Saving your students' skin. Undergraduate experiments that probe UV protection by sunscreens and sunglasses. Journal of chemical education, 75(6), p.757.
8. AAP, 2017. Sun-and-Water-Safety-Tips. American Academy of Pediatrics, American Academy of Pediatrics
9. Werner, J.S., 1991. Children's sunglasses: caveat emptor. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 68(4), pp.318-320.
10. Segre, G., Reccia, R., Pignalosa, B. and Pappalardo, G., 1981. The efficiency of ordinary sunglasses as a protection from ultraviolet radiation. Ophthalmic Research, 13(4), pp.180-187.
11. Rosenthal, F.S., Bakalian, A.E., Lou, C.Q. and Taylor, H.R., 1988. The effect of sunglasses on ocular exposure to ultraviolet radiation. American journal of public health, 78(1), pp.72-74.
12. Leow, Y.H. and Tham, S.N., 1995. UV‐protective Sunglasses for UV-A Irradiation Protection. International journal of dermatology, 34(11), pp.808-810.
13. Dongre, A.M., Pai, G.G. and Khopkar, U.S., 2007. Ultraviolet protective properties of branded and unbranded sunglasses available in the Indian market in UV phototherapy chambers. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprology, 73(1), p.26.
14. Abdulrahim, S., Abubakar, Y.M. and Bello, I.T., 2015. Evaluation of the level of transmission of solar radiation by eyeglasses (spectacles) and its effects on the human eye. Journal of Asian Scientific Research, 5(10), p.489.
15. Trang, N., Lalonde, G., Dubé, Y., Bourgault, S. and Rochette, P.J., 2018. Short wavelengths filtering properties of sunglasses on the Canadian market: are we protected?. Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology, 53(2), pp.104-109.
16. Dain, S.J., Hearne, G. and Pepper, L., 1985. The performance of toy sunglasses and children's sunglasses. Clinical and Experimental Optometry, 68(5), pp.183-186.
17. Godar, D.E., Urbach, F., Gasparro, F.P. and van der Leun, J.C., 2003. UV doses of young adults. Photochemistry and photobiology, 77(4), pp.453-457.
18. Tuchinda, C., Srivannaboon, S. and Lim, H.W., 2006. Photoprotection by window glass, automobile glass, and sunglasses. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 54(5), pp.845-854.
19. Cokkinides, V.E., Johnston-Davis, K., Weinstock, M., O'Connell, M.C., Kalsbeek, W., Thun, M.J. and Wingo, P.A., 2001. Sun exposure and sun-protection behaviors and attitudes among US youth, 11 to 18 years of age. Preventive medicine, 33(3), pp.141-151.
20. O’Riordan, D.L., Glanz, K., Gies, P. and Elliott, T., 2008. A Pilot Study of the Validity of Self‐reported Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure and Sun Protection Practices Among Lifeguards, Parents and Children. Photochemistry and photobiology, 84(3), pp.774-778.
21. Maddock, J.E., O'Riordan, D.L., Lee, T., Mayer, J.A. and McKenzie, T.L., 2009. Use of sunglasses in public outdoor recreation settings in Honolulu, Hawaii. Optometry and vision science: official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 86(2), p.165.
22. Lagerlund, M., Dixon, H. G., Simpson, J. A., Spittal, M., Taylor, H. R., & Dobbinson, S. J. (2006). Observed use of sunglasses in public outdoor settings around Melbourne, Australia: 1993 to 2002. Preventive medicine, 42(4), 291-296.
23. Balk, S.J., O’Connor, K.G. and Saraiya, M., 2004. Counseling parents and children on sun protection: a national survey of pediatricians. Pediatrics, 114(4), pp.1056-1064.
24. Sliney, D.H., 2001. Photoprotection of the eye–UV radiation and sunglasses. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology, 64(2-3), pp.166-175.