Trends in Surgical Management of Uterine Rupture

Main Article Content

Talitha Lisa-Marie Bruney


Introduction: Uterine rupture remains one of the top catastrophic events in the field of Obstetrics. Management options are often surgical and limited to either fertility sparing versus complete loss of reproductive function. In the developing world, uterine rupture can have devastating maternal and/or fetal outcomes due to delayed recognition and/or intervention.  With medical advancements over the years as well as the significant increase in cesarean delivery rates worldwide, it is beneficial to determine how the management of uterine rupture has evolved worldwide.

Methods: A literature review was conducted in PubMed database over the last 30 years. Journal articles that described the surgical management of uterine rupture were selected and reviewed. The incidence of uterine rupture was noted, as well as the most common etiologies and management strategies.

Results: The incidence of uterine rupture ranged from 0.015 to 3.76% across various countries. The two most common etiologies of uterine rupture were obstructed or neglected labor and a scarred uterus. Prior to 2010, uterine rupture involved a scarred uterus in 6.2 to 46.7% of cases. Reviews from 2010 onward reported prior scarred uteri as a cause of uterine rupture 66-100% of the time. Hysterectomy was overall the most common surgical method employed in greater than 50% of the cases prior to 2010. From 2010 onward, 77-100% of uterine ruptures were managed with uterine repair with or without bilateral tubal ligation.

Conclusion:As cesarean deliveryrates have increased worldwide, the etiology of uterine rupture has shifted from that of obstructed labor to that of the scarred uterus. As a result surgical management of uterine rupture has also shifted from primarily hysterectomy to mostly uterine repair, as the presentation of these ruptures are less catastrophic.

Article Details

How to Cite
BRUNEY, Talitha Lisa-Marie. Trends in Surgical Management of Uterine Rupture. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 5, may 2019. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 25 sep. 2022. doi:
Review Articles


1. UpToDate. Uterine rupture: After previous cesarean delivery. Available from:
[Access 28th April 2019].

2. ACOG Practice Bulletin. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Number 205, 2019

3. Fofie C, Baffoe P. A two-year review of uterine rupture in a regional hospital.
Ghana Med J. 2010 Sep;44(3):98-102.

4. Thakur A, Heer MS, Thakur V, Heer GK, Narone JN, Narone RK. Subtotal hysterectomy for uterine rupture. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001 Jul;74(1):29-33.

5. Kidantou HL, Mwampagatwa I, Van Roosmalen J. Uterine rupture: a retrospective analysis of causes, complications and management outcomes at Muhimbili National Hospital in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. Tanzan J Health Res. 2012 Jul;14(3):220-5.

6. Turgut A, Ozler A, Siddik Evsen M, Ender Soydinc H, Yaman Goruk N, Karacor T, Gul T. Uterine rupture revisited: Predisposing factors, clinical features, management and outcomes from a tertiary care center in Turkey. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences. 2013 May-Jun; 29(3): 753-757.

7. Al Sakka M, Hamsho A, Khan L. Rupture of the pregnant uterus--a 21-year review.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1998 Nov;63(2):105-8.

8. Nagarkatti RS, Ambiye VR, Vaidya PR. Rupture uterus: changing trends in etiology and management. J Postgrad Med. 1991 Jul;37(3):136-9.

9. Aboyeji AP, Ijaiya MD, Yahaya UR. Ruptured uterus: a study of 100 consecutive cases in Ilorin, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2001 Dec;27(6):341-8.

10. Diab AE. Uterine ruptures in Yemen. Saudi Med J. 2005 Feb;26(2):264-9.

11. Qazi Q, Akhtar Z, Khan K, Khan AH. Woman health; uterus rupture, its complications and management in teaching hospital Bannu, Pakistan. Maedica (Buchar). 2012 Jan;7(1):49-53.

12. Alemayehu W, Ballard K, Wright J. Primary repair of obstetric uterine rupture can be safely undertaken by non-specialist clinicians in rural Ethiopia: a case series of 386 women. BJOG. 2013 Mar;120(4):505-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12098.

13. Osaikhuwuomwan JA, Ande AB. Reappraisal of ruptured uterus in an urban tertiary center in the Niger-delta region of Nigeria. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2011 Apr;24(4):559-63. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2010.497880. Epub 2011 Jan 13.

14. Ali AA, Adam I. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of uterine rupture in the Kassala Hospital, east Sudan: 2006-2009. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011;31(1):48-9. doi:10.3109/01443615.2010.522268.

15. Soltsman S, Perlitz Y, Ben Ami M, Ben Shlomo I. Uterine rupture after previous low segment transverse cesarean is rarely catastrophic. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2018 Mar;31(6):708-712.
doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1297401. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

16. Aziz N, Yousfani S. Analysis of uterine rupture at university teaching hospital Pakistan. Pak J Med Sci. 2015 Jul-Aug;31(4):920-4.
doi: 10.12669/pjms.314.7303.

17. Rizwan N, Abbasi RM, Uddin SF. Uterine rupture, frequency of cases and fetomaternal outcome. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Apr;61(4):322-4.

18. Chuni N. Analysis of uterine rupture in a tertiary center in Eastern Nepal: lessons for obstetric care. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2006 Dec;32(6):574-9.

19. Veena P, Habeebullah S, Chaturvedula L. A review of 93 cases of ruptured uterus over a period of 2 years in a tertiary care hospital in South India. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012 Apr;32(3):260-3.

20. Sinha M, Gupta R, Gupta P, Rani R, Kaur R, Singh R. Uterine Rupture: A Seven Year Review at a Tertiary Care Hospital in New Delhi, India. Indian J Community Med. 2016 Jan-Mar;41(1):45-9.
doi: 10.4103/0970-0218.170966.