Primary Prevention of Obesity: Moving Towards an Active Learning Model

Main Article Content

Arlette C. Perry

Abstract

The current review focuses on the importance of primary prevention of obesity in youth. In several elementary school programs such as Texas I-Can and the Physical Activity Across the Curriculum initiatives, physical activities are integrated into the academic lessons to help offset sedentary time during seated learning while also increasing academic performance. The purpose of such programs is to attenuate gains in body mass index and adiposity while increasing physical activity levels. In some cases, increases in physical activity were translated to after-school and weekend activities. In other cases,  improvements in time on task and academic courses were also observed. In schools monitoring BMI, those increasing physical activity levels > 75 min/wk evidenced significant decreases in BMI.   At the middle school level, programs such as Planet Health and another novel middle school curriculum in the sciences, resulted in beneficial changes in health behaviors and metabolic risk factors. These changes were accompanied by decreases in adiposity, particularly in girls.  In the most recent translational health in nutrition and kinesiology (THINK) program, a stand-alone curriculum featuring hands-on clinical experiences rooted in STEM education, resulted in significant gains in physical fitness and curricular-based knowledge with favorable but non-significant decreases in adiposity. These studies illustrate the importance of implementing innovative programs that may increase academic performance while also empowering students to increase physical activity and improve metabolic health, both of which are often accompanied by favorable reductions in adiposity.  Physically active interventions that are integrated into the academic curriculum may be the best direction to take in the primary prevention of obesity. More randomized clinical trials are needed to determine the extent to which such active interventions significantly reduce adiposity in youth. 

Keywords: physical activity, obesity prevention, novel curriculums, metabolic health, active learning, academic performance, youth

Article Details

How to Cite
PERRY, Arlette C.. Primary Prevention of Obesity: Moving Towards an Active Learning Model. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 8, n. 6, june 2020. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2152>. Date accessed: 29 mar. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v8i6.2152.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Douketis JD, Macie C, Thabane L, Williamson DF. Systematic review of long-term weight loss studies in obese adults: clinical significance and applicability to clinical practice. Int J Obes. 2005; 29:1153-1167.
2. Anderson JW,Konz EC, Frederich RC, Wood CL. Long-term weight loss maintenance: a meta-analysis of US studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001; 74:579-584.
3. Kraschnewski JL, Boan J, Esposito J, Sherwood NE, Lehman EB, Kephart DK, & Sciamanna CN. Long term weight loss maintenance in the United States. Int J Obes. 2010; 34:1644-1654.
4. Benjamin EJ, Virani SS, Chang AR, Cheng S, Chiuve SE, Cushman M, et al., Heart disease and stroke statistics-2018 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000558.
5. President’s Council of Advisors on Science and technology. Engage to excel: producing one million additional graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (Executive Office of the President of the United States, 2012).
6. Bailey DP, Locke CD. Breaking up prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking improves postprandial glycemia, but breaking up sitting with standing does not. J Sci Med Sport. 2015;18(3):294-298.
7. Restaino RM, Holwerda SW, Credeur DP, Fadel PJ, Padilla J. Impact of prolonged sitting on lower and upper limb micro‐and macrovascular dilator function. Exper Physiol. 2015;100(7):829-38. doi:10.1113/EP085238.
8. Saunders TJ, Larouche R, Colley RC, Tremblay MS. Acute sedentary behaviour and markers of cardiometabolic risk: a systematic review of intervention studies. J Nutr Metab. 2012;2012. doi:10.1155/2012/712435.
9. Stewart JA, Dennison DA, Kohl III HW, Doyle JA. Exercise level and energy expenditure in the TAKE10! ® in‐class physical activity program. J School Health. 2004; 74(10):397-400.
10. Scruggs PW, Beveridge SK, Watson DL. Increasing children’s school time physical activity using structured fitness breaks. Pediatr Exerc Science. 2003; 15:156-169.
11. Donnelly JE, Greene JL, Gibson CA, Smith BK, Washburn RA, Sullivan DK, DuBose K, Mayo MS, Schmelzle KH, Ryan JJ, Jacobsen DJ. Physical Activity Across the Curriculum (PAAC): a randomized controlled trial to promote physical activity and diminish overweight and obesity in elementary school children. Prev Med. 2009;49(4):336-41. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.022
12. Asigbee FM Whitney SD Peterson CE. The link between nutrition and physical activity in increasing academic achievement. J School Health. 2018; 88:407-415.
13. Davis CL, Tomporowski TD, Boyle CA, Waller JL, Miller PH, Naglieri JA, & Gregoski M. Effects of Aerobic exercise on overweight children’s cognitive functioning: A randomized controlled trial. Res Quart Exerc Sport. 2007; 78:518-519.
14. Resaland GK, Aadland E, Moe VG, et. al., Effects of physical activity on schoolchildren’s academic performance: The active smarter kids cluster-randomized control trial. Prev Med. 2016; 91:322-328.
15. Kibbe DL, Hackett J, Hurley M, Mcfarland A, Schubert KG, Schultz A, Harris S. Ten years of take 10!: Integrating physical activity with academic concepts in elementary school classrooms. Prev Med. 2011; 52(Suppl.1): S43-S50.
16. Bartholomew JB, Jowers EM. Physically active academic lessons in elementary children. Prev Med. 2011; 52:S51-54.
17. Grieco LA, Jowers EM, Errisuriz, Bartholomew JB. Physically active vs. sedentary academic lessons: A dose response study for elementary student time on task. Prev Med. 2016; 89:98-103.
18. Daly-Smith AJ, Zwolinsky S, Mckenna J, Tomporowski PD, Defeyter MA, Manley A. Systematic review of acute physically active learning and classroom movement breaks on children’s physical activity, cognition, academic performance and classroom behavior: Understanding critical design features. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. 2018;4e000341. doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2018-000341.
19. Mullender-Wijnsma MJ, Hartman G, de Greeff JW, Bosker RJ, Doolard S Visscher C. Improving academic performance of school-age children by physical activity in the classroom:1-year program evaluation. J School Health. 2015; 85:365-371.
20. Fedewa AL, Fettrow E, Erwin H, Ahn S, Farook M. Academic-Based and Aerobic-Only Movement breaks: Are there differential effects on physical activity and achievement? Res Quart for Exerc and Sport. 2018; 89(2):153-163.
21. Committee on Physical Activity and physical education in the school Environment: Food and Nutrition Board; institute of medicine; Kohl HW III, Cook HD, editors. Educating the Student Body. Taking Physical Activity and Physical Education to School. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US); 2013 Oct 30.
22. Eaton DK, Kann L, Kinchen S, Shanklin S, Flint KH, Hawkins J, et al. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance: United States, 2011. Morbidity and Weekly Report. Surveillance Summary. 2012; 6(4) 1-162.
23. Wiecha JL, El Ayadi AM, Fuemmeler BF, Carter JE, Handler S, Johnson S, Strunk N, Korzec-Ramirez D, Gortmaker SL. Diffusion of an integrated health education program in an urban school system: Planet Health. J Pediatr Psychol 2004; 29(6):467-74.
24. Gortmaker SL, Peterson K, Wiecha J, Sobol AM, Dixit S, Fox MK, Laird N. Reducing obesity via a school-based Interdisciplinary Intervention among youth. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.1999; 153:409-418.
25. Rosenbaum M, Nonas C, Weil R, Horlick M, Fennoy I, Vargas I, Kringas P. School-based intervention acutely improves insulin sensitivity and decreases inflammatory markers and body fatness in junior high school students. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006;92(2): 504-8.
26. Perry AC, Cruz N, Flanagan EW, Velasquez C, Zito C. A pilot study of physical fitness/literacy in the middle school curriculum using an active learning paradigm: The THINK Program. Int J Res Health Sci 2020 8(1):3-7.
27. Freeman S, Eddy SL, McDonough M, Smith MK, Okoroafor N, Jordt H, & Wenderoth MP, Active learning increases student performance in science engineering, and mathematics. PNAS. 2014; 111(23):8410-8415.
28. Bennie JA, De Cocker K, Pavey T, Stamatakis E, Biddle SJH, Ding D. muscle strengthening, aerobic exercise, and obesity: A pooled Analysis of 1.7 million US adults. Obesity. 2020; 28:371-378.
29. DeBate RD, Gabriel KP, Zwald M, Hubery J, Zhang Y. Changes in psychosocial factors and physical activity frequency among third-eighth-grade girls who participated in a developmentally focused youth sport program: A preliminary study. J School Health. 2009; 79(10): 474-478.
30. Neumark-Sztainer D., Goeden C., Story M., Wall M. Associations between body satisfaction and physical activity in adolescents: Implications for programs aimed at preventing a broad spectrum of weight-related disorders. Eat Disord. 2004;12:125–137.
31. Waaddegaard M, Davidsen M, Kjoller M. Comparison between risk behaviors for eating disorders and SF-36 and perceived stress among 16-29 year-old Danish females. Ugeskr Laeger. 2009; 171:709-712. Danish.
32. Cash TF, Jakatdar TA, Williams EF. The body image quality of life inventory: further validation with college men and females. Body Image. 2004:1:279-287.
33. Faigenbaum A.D., Rebullido T.R., MacDonald J.P. Pediatric inactivity triad: A risky pit. Curr. Sports Med. Rep. 2018;17:45–47. doi: 10.1249/JSR.0000000000000450.
34. Mavilidi MF, Ruiter M, Schmidt M, Okely AD, Loyens S, Chandler P, Paas F. A narrative review of school-based physical activity for enhancing cognition and learning: The importance of relevancy and integration. Frontiers in Psychol. 2018; 9:1-17.
35. Goldin-Meadow S, Nusbaum H, Kelly SD, Wagner S. Explaining math: gesturing lightens the load. Psychol Science 2001; 12:516-522.