Demographics, Diagnoses, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to a Cardiac Intensive Care Unit in a High-Volume Referral Tertiary Center in Latin America
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background
Single and multi-center studies have described substantial changes in the landscape of health care in cardiac intensive care units (CICU). Few reports have quantitatively characterized current diagnoses in a contemporary CICU in Latin America.
This study aims to describe demographics, diagnoses, care patterns, and outcomes in patients admitted to a CICU in a high-volume center in South America.
Methods
A total of 1629 consecutive patients admitted to CICU from December 2017 to April 2020 were included in a prospective registry. The variables analyzed included demographic data, admission and final diagnoses, management, and outcomes.
Results
Among 1629 participants, 32.4% were women, and the median age was 62 years (53-71). Admissions were due to primary cardiac causes in 1335 (81.9%), postsurgical care in 13.3%, and a combination of general and cardiac diagnoses in 4.8% of patients. The most frequent diagnosis on admission was acute coronary syndrome (ACS) (35.7%). Primary reasons for CICU admission were postprocedural observation (PPO) (31.8%), diagnosed or suspected ACS (31.7%), heart failure (10.1%), postsurgical management after cardiovascular surgery (8.9%), arrhythmia (5.8%), shock (4.5%) and cardiac arrest (CA) (1.2%). Advanced CICU therapy requirements were ventilatory assistance (19.3%) and vasoactive or inotropic drug use (19.6%). The overall mortality rate was 6.4%. Admission diagnoses associated with the highest mortality rates were CA (52.6%), noncardiogenic shock (39.5%), and cardiogenic shock (32.3%). Notably, patients admitted solely for PPO had a mortality rate of 0.8%.
Conclusions
In a contemporary CICU from a high-volume reference center in South America, the most frequent diagnosis was an ACS, although it represented only one-third of the admissions.
One-fifth of admissions required advanced CICU therapies. CA and shock on admission carried a poor prognosis. We identified PPO as a substantially low-risk population.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2- Katz, JN, Turer, AT, Becker, RC. Cardiology and the critical care crisis: a perspective. J Am Coll Cardiol 2007;49(12):1279-1282. 2007;49(12): 1279-1282.
3- Tubaro, M, Danchin, N, Filippatos, G, Goldstein, P, Vranckx, P. ESC textbook Textbook of Acute and Intensive Cardiac Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011.
4- Katz JN, Shah BR, Volz EM, et al. Evolution of the coronary care unit: clinical characteristics and temporal trends in healthcare delivery and outcomes. Crit Care Med.2010;38(2):375-381.
5- Ratcliffe, JA, Wilson, E, Islam, S. Mortality in the coronary care unit. Coron Artery Dis. 2014;25(1): 60-65.
6- Holland, EM, Moss, TJ Acute noncardiovascular illness in the cardiac intensive care unit. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(16): 1999-2007.
7- Watson, RA, Bohula, EA, Gilliland, TC, Sanchez, PA, Berg, DD. Editor’s Choice-Prospective registry of cardiac critical illness in a modern tertiary care Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Eur Heart J. 2019;8(8): 755-761.
8- Sinha, SS, Sjoding, MW, Sukul, D. Changes in primary non cardiac diagnoses over time among elderly cardiac intensive care unit patients in the United States. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(8)
9- Wong, GC, Van Diepen, S, Ainsworth, C. CCS Post Cardiac Arrest Guidelines Committee Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Cardiovascular Critical Care Society/Canadian Association of Interventional Cardiology position Statement on the optimal care of the postarrest patient. Can J Cardiol. 2017;33(1): 1-16.
10- Bonnefoy-Cudraz, E, Bueno, H, Casella, G. Editor’s choice—acute cardiovascular care association position paper on intensive cardiovascular care units: an update on their definition, structure, organisation and function. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;7(1): 80-95.
11- Groeger, JS, Guntupalli, KK, Strosberg, M. Descriptive analysis of critical care units in the United States: patient characteristics and intensive care unit utilization. Crit Care Med. 1993;21(2): 279-291.
12- Ruiz, C, Díaz, MA, Zapata, J. Características y evolución de los pacientes que ingresan a una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos de un hospital público. Revista médica de Chile. 2016;144(10): 1297-1304.
13- Bohula, E.A, Katz, JN, Van Diepen, S. Demographics, Care Patterns, and Outcomes of Patients Admitted to Cardiac Intensive Care Units: The Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network Prospective North American Multicenter Registry of Cardiac Critical Illness. JAMA Cardiol 2019;4(9):928-935. 2019;4(9): 928-935.
14- Casella, G, Cassin, M, Chiarella, F. Epidemiology and patterns of care of patients admitted to Italian Intensive Cardiac Care units: the BLITZ-3 registry. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2010;11(6): 450-461.
15- Morrow, DA, Fang, JC, Fintel, DJ. Evolution of critical care cardiology: transformation of the cardiovascular intensive care unit and the emerging need for new medical staffing and training models: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;126(11): 1408-1428.
16- Cohen Arazi, H, Nani, S, Giorgi, M. Catéter de Swan Ganz. Opinión de expertos [Swan Ganz catheter Experts opinion]. Medicina (B Aires). 2014;74(4): 326-332.