Main Article Content
Learning objectives guide an academic course with measurable behaviors a strategic result. The process of course mapping may explicate gaps in curriculum content that when offered to the student may appear more manageable when course content is partitioned into modules. Learning objectives for each module can further differentiate deeper understanding of the curriculum. However, students seldom articulate how their learning satisfies the objectives. Teaching online courses presen
Learning objectives guide an academic course with measurable behaviors a strategic result. The process of course mapping may explicate gaps in curriculum content that when offered to the student may appear more manageable when course content is partitioned into modules. Learning objectives for each module can further differentiate deeper understanding of the curriculum. However, students seldom articulate how their learning satisfies the objectives. Teaching online courses presents technologies useful for both faculty and student assessment. The use of the wiki technology mechanism as a student assessment tool is useful to demonstrate how students, through self - reflection, identify the intersection between individual learning, module objectives, and clinical practice application. In this paper, the author describes how online education and assessment with a technology such as wiki illuminate how course objectives are met and student learning occurs.
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
2. Dringus LP. Towards active online learning: A dramatic shift in perspective for learners. Internet and Higher Education. 2000; 2:189. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/94245/
3. Rogers DL. A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. AACE Journal. 2000; 1:119-33. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/8058/
4. Kelly R. Ideas for active online learning. Online Classroom. 2011; 12:1-3.
5. Ferrer D. History of online education. The Best Schools. 2019. Accessed 6 May 2020 https://thebestschools.org/magazine/online-education-history/
6. Parini J. The art of teaching. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2005.
7. Palmer P. The courage to teach: Exploring the inner landscape of a teacher’s life (10th Anniversary Ed). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 1998.
8. Bain K What the best college teachers do. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2004.
9. Bok D. Higher education in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2013
10. Boice R. First-order principles for college teachers. Bolton, CT: Anker; 1996b
11. Boyer E. From scholarship reconsidered to scholarship assessed. Quest. 1996; 48: 129-139.
12. Lang JM. Small teaching – Everyday lessons from the science of learning. SanFrancisco, CA: Jossey – Bass; 2016.
13. Bonham E. My online course revision. Presentation to Online Course Development Program, Spring cohort. University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN; 2017a.
14. Major CH. Teaching online – A guide to theory, research, and practice. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2015.
15. Bourke M, Ihrke B. (2016). Introduction to the evaluation process. In: Billings D, Halstead J, eds. Teaching in Nursing – A guide for faculty, 5th ed. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2016:385-397.
16. Bloom B, Englehart M, Furst E, Hill W, Krathwohl, D. Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans, Green; 1956.
17. Shabatura J. Using Bloom’s taxonomy to write effective learning objectives. Teaching Innovation and Pedagogical Support, University of Arkansas. Accessed 5 July 2020 https://tips.uark.edu/using-blooms-taxonomy/
18. Thorman J, Zimmerman IK. The complete step-by-step guide to designing and teaching online courses. New York, NY: Teachers College Press Columbia University; 2012.
19. Slagter van Tryon P. The instructional designer’s role in forming university-community partnerships in digital literacy. Tech Trends: Linking Research & Practice to Improve Learning. 2013; 57:52-58.
20. Winer A, Geri N. Learning analytics performance improvement design (LAPID) in higher education: Framework and concerns. Online Journal of Applied Knowledge Management, 2019;7:41-55. https://doi.org/10.36965/OJAKM.2019.7(2)41-55
21. Beckham R, Riedford K, Hall M. Course mapping: Expectations visualized. JNP. 2017;13: E471-E476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nurpra.2017.07.021
22. Farrell T. Critical reflection in a TESL course: Mapping conceptual change. ELT Journal. 2009; 63: 221-229. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn058
23. Wang C-L. Mapping or tracing? Rethinking curriculum mapping in higher education. Studies in Higher Education. 2015; 40:1550-1559. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.899343
24. Webb S, McKeon L. A model for preparing faculty to teach Model C clinical nurse leader students. Journal of Nursing Education. 2014; 53: 421-425.
25. Menendez-Varela J, Gregori-Giralt E. The reliability and sources of error of using rubrics-based assessment for student projects. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education. 2018; 43:488-499. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1360838
26. Grainger R, Osborne E, Dai W, Kenwright D. The process of developing a rubric to assess the cognitive complexity of student-generated multiple-choice questions in medical education. The Asia-Pacific Scholar. 2018; 3:19-24. https://doi.org/10.29060/TAPS.2018-3-2/OA1049
27. Bonham E. How rubrics contribute to scholarly writing. 21st Annual Nursing and Health Professions Educator Conference. University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN; 2016.
28. Quality Matters. Accessed 25 May 2020 https://www.qualitymatters.org/why-quality-matters/about-qm
29. Copeland W, Birmingham C, de La Cruz E, Lewin B. (1993). The reflective practitioner in teaching: Toward a research agenda. Teaching and Teacher Education. 1993; 9(4):347-359.
30. Schon DA. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books; 1983.
31. Gibbs G. Learning by doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Oxford Polytechnic: Oxford; 1988.
32. Freshwater D. Reflective practice: The state of the art. In Freshwater D, Taylor B, Sherwood G, eds. International textbook of reflective practice in nursing Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing; 2008:1-18.
33. Enuku, C., & Evawoma-Enuku, U. Importance of reflective practice in nursing education. West African Journal of Nursing. 2015; 26: 52-59.
34. Sherwood G, Horton-Deutsch S. Reflective practice-transforming education and improving outcomes. Indianapolis, IN: Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing; 2012.
35. Wiki. History of wikis. Accessed 15 June 2020 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_wikis
36. Bonham E. How I use Wikis in my classroom. Online Learning - This Is How I Teach Series. University of Southern Indiana, Evansville, IN; 2017b.
37. Bonham E. Using online wikis for assessment transforms student articulation of learning. AACN Master’s Education Conference. Tampa, FL; 2019.
38. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3: 77-101.
39. Rogers RR. Reflection on higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative Higher Education. 2001; 26:37-57.
40. Rogers J, Peecksen S, Douglas M, Simmons M. Validation of a reflection rubric for higher education. Reflective Practice. 2019; 20:761-776. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1676712
41. Bharuthram S. Reflecting on the process of teaching reflection in higher education. Reflective Practice-International and Multidisciplinary Perspectives. 2018; 19: 806-817. 10.1080/14623943.2018.1539655
42. Kim HK. Critical reflective inquiry for knowledge development in nursing practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 1999; 29:1205-1212.