Review of key findings from the OPTIWIN trial: Implications and future directions for medical weight management using total diet replacement

Main Article Content

Shenelle A. Edwards-Hampton Ruth Bernstein Amy Rothberg Laura Laura Sarah S. Cohen Sally L. Coburn Walter J. Pories Judy Loper Kristina H. Lewis Jamy D. Ard


Over the past century, obesity and obesity-related comorbidities have become one of the greatest public health threats, and rates of morbidity and mortality continue to grow at alarming rates across the globe.  Even modest amounts of weight loss from baseline can lead to significant improvements in quality of life, physical functioning, and remission of co-morbid conditions. Interventions to reduce excess weight vary from nutrition and surgical interventions, to pharmacotherapy, to lifestyle behavioral therapy. Findings related to the efficacy of various lifestyle behavioral interventions for the treatment of obesity continue to be mixed. The purpose of this article is to review key findings from the OPTIWIN obesity treatment trial, which tested the long-term effectiveness of a total meal replacement dietary intervention compared to a gold standard food-based lifestyle behavioral treatment for obesity. Overall, participants in the total meal replacement group lost significantly more excess weight and total fat mass, and demonstrated greater reductions in waist circumference during the active weight loss phase (baseline to 26 weeks), compared to the food-based group. These differences were maintained during the maintenance phase (26-52 weeks). The food-based group also had a higher proportion of non-responders (e.g., failure to lose ≥ 3% of their initial body weight) than the meal replacement group at 26 and 52 weeks. Implications for findings and future directions for medical weight management using lifestyle interventions and meal replacement methods are also discussed.

Article Details

How to Cite
EDWARDS-HAMPTON, Shenelle A. et al. Review of key findings from the OPTIWIN trial: Implications and future directions for medical weight management using total diet replacement. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 2, feb. 2021. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 14 may 2021. doi:
Review Articles


1. 1. Heymsfield, S.B. and T.A. Wadden, Mechanisms, pathophysiology, and management of obesity. New England Journal of Medicine, 2017. 376(3): p. 254-266.
2. 2. Members, E.P., et al., Executive summary: guidelines (2013) for the management of overweight and obesity in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Obesity Society published by the Obesity Society and American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Based on a systematic review from the The Obesity Expert Panel, 2013. Obesity, 2014. 22(S2): p. S5-S39.
3. 3. Courcoulas, A.P., et al., Weight change and health outcomes at 3 years after bariatric surgery among individuals with severe obesity. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2013. 310(22): p. 2416-2425.
4. 4. Sadhasivam, S., et al., Refusals, denials, and patient choice: Reasons prospective patients do not undergo bariatric surgery. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, 2007. 3(5): p. 535-536.
5. 5. Kakkar, A.K. and N. Dahiya, Drug treatment of obesity: Current status and future prospects. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 2015. 26(2): p. 89-94.
6. 6. Li, M. and B.M. Cheung, Pharmacotherapy for obesity. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2009. 68(6): p. 804-810.
7. 7. Sweeting, A.N. and I.D. Caterson, Approaches to obesity management. Internal Medicine Journal, 2017. 47(7): p. 734-739.
8. 8. Wadden, T.A., et al., Randomized trial of lifestyle modification and pharmacotherapy for obesity. New England Journal of Medicine, 2005. 353(20): p. 2111-2120.
9. 9. Carvajal, R., et al., Managing obesity in primary care practice: A narrative review. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2013. 1281: p. 191-206.
10. 10. Yanovski, S.Z. and J.A. Yanovski, Long-term drug treatment for obesity: A systematic and clinical review. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 2014. 311(1): p. 74-86.
11. 11. Shiau, J.Y., D.Y. So, and R.R. Dent, Effects on diabetes medications, weight and glycated hemoglobin among adult patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes: 6-month observations from a full meal replacement, low-calorie diet weight management program. Canadian journal of diabetes, 2018. 42(1): p. 56-60.
12. 12. Mulholland, Y., et al., Very-low-energy diets and morbidity: A systematic review of longer-term evidence. British Journal of Nutrition, 2012. 108(5): p. 832-851.
13. 13. Rolland, C., M. Hession, and S. Murray, Randomized clinical trial of standard dietary treatment versus a low-carbohydrate/high-protein diet or the LighterLife Programme in the management of obesity. Journal of Diabetes, 2011. 3(4): p. 356-356.
14. 14. Ard, J.D., et al., Effectiveness of a Total Meal Replacement Program (OPTIFAST Program) on weight loss: results from the OPTIWIN Study. Obesity, 2019. 27(1): p. 22-29.
15. 15. Group, D.P.P.R., The Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP): Description of lifestyle intervention. Diabetes Care, 2002. 25: p. 2165-2171.
16. 16. Keogh, J.B. and P.M. Clifton, The role of meal replacements in obesity treatment. Obesity Reviews, 2005. 6(3): p. 229-234.
17. 17. Ard, J.D., et al., Differences in treatment response to a total diet replacement intervention versus a food‐based intervention: A secondary analysis of the OPTIWIN trial. Obesity Science & Practice, 2020: p. 1-10.
18. 18. Rothberg, A.E., et al. Effect of total meal replacement program compared with a reduced-energy food-based diet plan on glycemic status: Results from the OPTIWIN study. in American Diabetes Association 78th Scientific Session. 2018. Orlando, FL.
19. 19. Loper, J., et al., Level of engagement in participants completing meal replacement program is related to weight change, in Obesity Week. 2020: Atlanta, GA.
20. 20. LeBlanc, E.S., et al., Behavioral and pharmacotherapy weight loss interventions to prevent obesity-related morbidity and mortality in adults: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama, 2018. 320(11): p. 1172-1191.
21. 21. Wadden, T.A., et al., Liraglutide 3.0 mg and intensive behavioral therapy (IBT) for obesity in primary care: The Scale IBT randomized controlled trial. Obesity, 2020. 28(3): p. 529-536.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.