Ontogenes and the genetics of intraspecific similarity

Main Article Content

B. F. Chadov N. B. Fedorova


The experiments by Gregor Mendel, which formed the background for genetics, were performed with the characters of intraspecific difference (alternative characters). Mendelian protein-coding genes are responsible for these characters. Until recently, these genes were regarded as the only and main hereditary factors responsible for ontogenesis and phylogenesis. The review outlines the information about another category of biological characters (the characters of intraspecific similarity) and, correspondingly, of a special category of genes responsible for these characters (ontogenes). The study into mutations of ontogenes in drosophila experiments suggests that (1) ontogenes control the construction of cell ensembles and trigger protein-coding genes in cells; (2) the program of individual development is encoded in ontogenes and “edited” in germline cells; (3) ontogenes fulfill a regulatory function without any contacts and chemical intermediaries, which suggests a kind of biophysical activity; and (4) two categories of cells—stem cells and terminally differentiated cells—correspond to these two categories of genes. Ontogenes are active in stem cells and protein-coding genes, in terminally differentiated cells.

Article Details

How to Cite
CHADOV, B. F.; FEDOROVA, N. B.. Ontogenes and the genetics of intraspecific similarity. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 4, apr. 2021. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2366>. Date accessed: 14 may 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9i4.2366.
Research Articles


1. Kondakov NI. Logicheskii slovar’– spravochnik (Logical Dictionary–Handbook). Moscow, IN: Nauka; 1975:477.
2. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Kopyl SA, Artemova EV, Khotskina EA, Fedorova NB. From genetics of intraspecific differences to genetics of intraspecific similarity. Russ. J. Genet. 2004;40(9):945–958.
3. Chadov BF. Mutations capable of inducing speciation. In: Stegnij VN, ed. Evolution Biology. Tomsk: Tomsk State University Press;
2001:138–162. http://www.evolbiol.ru.
4. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Kopyl SA, Fedorova NB. A new class of mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Dokl. Biol. Sci. 2000; 373:423–426.
5. Chadov BF, Fedorova NB, Chadova EV, Khotskina EA. Conditional mutations in Drosophila. J Life Sci. 2011;5: 224-240.
6. Chadov BF, Fedorova NB, Chadova EV. Conditional mutations in Drosophila melanogaster: On the Occasion of the 150th Anniversary of G. Mendel’s Report in Brünn. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 2015; 765:40–55. doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2015.06.001.
7. Fedorova NB, Chadova EV, Chadov BF. Genes and Ontogenes in Drosophila: The Role of RNA Forms. Transcriptomics. 2016; 4:137. doi: 10.4172/2329-8936.1000137.
8. Venter J., Adams MD, Myers EW et al. The sequence of the human genome. Science. 2001; 291:1304-1351.
9. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Fedorova NB. Epigenetic phenomenology in conditional mutants of Drosophila melanogaster: morphoses and modifications, IN: Zakijan SM, Vlasov SM, Dement’eva EV, eds. Epigenetics. Novosibirsk: SD RAN; 2012:499–533 (in Russian).
10. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Fedorova NB. Images of morphoses and modifications in Drosophila melanogaster conditional mutants. 2015. http://www.researchgate. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.1.2721.9042.
11. Chadov BF, Fedorova NB, Chadova EV. Parental effects of conditional mutations and their explanations. Russian Journal of Genetics. 2013; 49:141-50. doi:10.1134/S1022795413020038.
12. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Fedorova NB. The Genetics of Conditional Mutations and Individual developmental Programs in D. Melanogaster. SCIOL Genet Sci. 2017; 1:3-21.
13. Chadov BF, Fedorova NB. The Mutations Disturbing the Bilateral Symmetry in Drosophila. SCIOL Genet Sci. 2019; 2:139-152.
14. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Fedorova NB. Conditional Mutations in Drosophila: Concept of Genes That Control Individual Development. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2018; 9:243-272.
15. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Fedorova NB. A Novel Type of Gene Interaction in D. melanogaster. Mutation Research. Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. 2017; 795:27-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2017.01.002.
16. Russo VEA, Martienssen RA, Riggs AD, Briggs AD, eds. Epigenetic Mechanisms of Gene Regulation. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 1996: 693 pp.
17. Chadov B.F. A New Stage in the Development of Genetics and Term Epigenetics. Russian Journal of Genetics, 2006, Vol. 42, N9, 1053-65.
18. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Khotskina EA, Artemova EV, Fedorova NB. The main effect of chromosomal rearrangement is changing the action of regulatory genes. Russ. J. Genet. 2004;40 (7):723–731.
19. Chadov BF, Fedorova NB. Zygotic selection in Drosophila melanogaster and a new edition of Darwin’s concept of speciation. In: Podobina VM, ed. Evolution of Life on the Earth: Proceedings of the V International Symposium; November 12-16. Tomsk: Publishing House of TSU. 2018: 49-51.
20. Chadov BF, Chadova EV, Fedorova NB. Ontogenes and the Problem of Speciation. Journal of Evolutionary Science. 2019;1(1):3-47.
21. Chadov BF. The Ontogenes in Drosophila and the Problem of Fertility. Ann. Infert. Rep. Endocrin. 2018;1(1):1004.
22. Korochkin LI. Biology of Individual Development (Genetical Aspect). Moscow: MGU Press; 2002:121 (in Russian).
23. Fedorova NB, Chadov BF. Gene interactions in Drosophila without contacts and chemical intermediaries. Abstracts Book of: International Conference on Cell and Experimental Biology (Virtual Conference); December 9-11, 2020:6. https://cellexpbiol.unitedscientificgroup.org/proceedings/CEB-2020_Abstracts.pdf>.
24. Chadov BF, Fedorova NB. Ontogenes and the Paradox of Homologous Pairing. Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnology. 2021; 12:1-9. https://doi.org/10.4236/abb.2021.121001.
25. Panshin IB. The second system of hereditary variation as a consequence of quantitative regularities of heterochromatic gene position effect, IN: Khvostova VV, ed. The Gene Position Effect in the Studies. Novosibirsk: ICG SO RAN; 1992:23–98 (in Russian).
26. Korochkin LI. Stem Cells: What are they? Priroda (Nature). 2005; 6:3-11 (in Russian).
27. Orgel LE & Crick FHC. Selfish DNA: the ultimate parasite. Nature. 1980; 284:604–607.
28. Zakijan SM, Vlasov SM, Dement’eva EV, eds. Epigenetics. Novosibirsk: SD RAN. 2012: pp 5 (in Russian).

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.