Dental Autotransplantation: The Natural Alternative to Dental Implants

Main Article Content

Robert Norris Tito, DDS


Most traumatic dental injuries occur in the preteen males, with the maxillary central incisor being the most commonly avulsed tooth.1,2 When an incisor is lost, its ability to induce growth of the surrounding alveolar bone and gingival tissues is also lost. Therefore, in the maxillary anterior region of a young and growing patient, it is advantageous to replace a missing tooth with a natural tooth that can continue the process of bone induction as the patient continues growing through their teen years. There are currently two techniques to achieve this:

1) Orthodontic substitution

2) Auto transplantation. The methodology and necessary considerations pertaining to autotransplantation are the subject of this publication, and pertinent literature suggests that:

  1. a) Ideal donor teeth should be single-rooted, such as a mandibular premolar.

  2. b) Donor teeth should be ideally harvested when there is 2/3 to ¾ root development.

  3. c) Surgical technique to avoid damaging the periodontal ligament of the donor tooth is absolutely critical.

  4. d) Newly autotransplanted teeth should be stabilized for 6-12 weeks with a light orthodontic wire allowing physiologic movement. If the aforementioned protocols are followed, then a success rate of 90% or more can be expected.

Article Details

How to Cite
TITO, Robert Norris. Dental Autotransplantation: The Natural Alternative to Dental Implants. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 5, may 2021. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 28 oct. 2021. doi:
Research Articles


1. Gassner R, Bösch R, Tuli T, et al: Prevalence of dentaltrauma in 6000 patients with facial injuries: implications for prevention. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 87:27-33, 1999
2. Andreasen JO, Ravn JJ: Epidemiology of traumatic dental injuries to primary and permanent teeth in a Danish population sample. Int J Oral Surg 1:235-239, 1972

3. Kristerson L: Autotransplantation of human premolars. A clinical and radiographic study of 100 teeth. Int J Oral Surg 14:200-213, 1985

4. Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Bjercke B, et al: Outcome of tooth transplantation: survival and success rates 17-41 years post-treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 121:110-119, 2002

5. Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Album B, et al: Autotransplantation of premolars to replace maxillary incisors. A comparison with natural incisors. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 118:592-600, 2000

6. Czochrowska EM, Stenvik A, Zachrisson B: The esthetic outcome of autotransplanted premolars replacing maxillary incisors. Dent Traumol 35:221-234, 2002

7. Kvint S, Lindsten R, Magnusson A, et al: Autotransplantation of teeth in 215 patients. Angle Orthod 80:446-451, 2010
8. Slagsvold O, Bjercke B: Applicability of autotransplantation in cases of missing upper anterior teeth. Am J Orthod 74:410-421, 1978

9. Slagsvold O, Bjercke B: Autotransplantation of premolars with partly formed roots. A radiographic study of root growth. Am J Orthod 66:355-366, 1974

10. Andreasen JO, Paulsen HU, Yu Z, et al: A long-term study of 370 autotransplanted premolars. part II. Tooth survival and pulp healing subsequent to transplantation.
Eur J Orthod 12:14-24, 1990

11. Robertsson S, Mohlin B. The congenitally missing upper lateral incisor. A retrospective study of orthodontic space closure versus restorative treatment. Eur J Orthod 2000;22:697-710.

12. Graber DA, Salama MA, Salama H. Immediate tooth replacement. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2001;22:210-8.

13. Bernard, et al, Long-term vertical changes of the anterior maxillary teeth adjacent to single implants in young and mature adults. A retrospective study. J Clin Periodontol 2004;1024-1028.