Blended Learning in Healthcare Education

Main Article Content

S. J. Leinster J. H. Pereira S. Down A.D. Simpson

Abstract

Blended learning is an approach to learning that combines face-to-face instruction with e-learning experiences. It draws on the advantages of each approach while seeking to mitigate their recognised disadvantages. The Master in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery programme at UEA is aimed at advanced surgical trainees working in approved training units in the UK and internationally. It comprises a series of complex cases discussed by the students in an on-line, asynchronous discussion forum moderated by a member of faculty. Students can participate at their convenience despite varied clinical rotas and different time zones. A case-based, flipped learning course for surgical trainees was piloted. Instructional materials for each case were provided. Students joined in an asynchronous, moderated discussion forum.  64 trainees randomised into 2 groups participated. They sat a pre-test Script Concordance Test (SCT). Group A then commenced the on-line course while Group B continued with their usual hospital-based teaching. After 8 weeks, they sat the same SCT. Group B then joined the on-line course along with Group A. After week 16, they sat another SCT. Pre-test scores for both groups were the same (A 6.45; B 6.59 p=0.78). At 8 weeks Group A’s scores had improved significantly (7.96 p<0.001) while Group B’s remained unchanged (6.54). At 16 weeks the scores had equalised (A 7.13; B 7.18). The trainees self-rating of confidence in managing 8 common surgical emergencies followed a similar pattern. Our experience suggests that on-line learning that is highly interactive can add value to the usual postgraduate clinical training. We are exploring its utility in other settings such as training nurse associates, and in breast care nursing in the UK and developing countries. We have introduced 3600 filming and virtual reality in teaching practical skills and providing induction training for complex clinical environments.

Keywords: Blended Learning, Surgical Training, Healthcare Education

Article Details

How to Cite
LEINSTER, S. J. et al. Blended Learning in Healthcare Education. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 8, aug. 2021. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2527>. Date accessed: 31 jan. 2023. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9i8.2527.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. General Medical Council Outcomes for graduates (2020) available at https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/outcomes-for-graduates-2020_pdf-84622587.pdf?la=en&hash=35E569DEB208E71D666BA91CE58E5337CD569945 (last accessed 07/06/2021)

2 Duffy TP. The Flexner report―100 years later. The Yale journal of biology and medicine. (2011) Sep;84(3): 269.

3 Han H, Resch DS & Kovach RA Educational Technology in Medical Education (2013) Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 25:sup1, S39-S43, DOI:10.1080/10401334.2013.842914

4 Ellaway R, Masters K. AMEE Guide 32: e-Learning in medical education Part 1: Learning, teaching and assessment. Medical Teacher. 2008 Jan 1; 30(5): 455-73.

5 Arkorful V, Abaidoo N. The role of e-learning, advantages and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. (2015) Jan; 12(1): 29-42.

6 Regmi K, Jones L A systematic review of the factors–enablers and barriers–affecting e-learning in health sciences education BMC Medical Education (2020) 20:91 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-020-02007-6

7 Cleveland-Innes MF, Emes C. Social and academic interaction in higher education contexts and the effect on deep learning. NASPA Journal. 2005; Mar 1; 42(2): 241-62.

8 Mann KV. Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities. Medical Education. 2011; 45(1): 60-8.

9 Racionero S, Valls R. Dialogic learning: A communicative approach to teaching and learning. The Praeger handbook of education and psychology. 2007; 3: 548-57.

10 Kreijns K, Kirschner PA, Jochems W. Identifying the pitfalls for social interaction in computer-supported collaborative learning environments: a review of the research. Computers in human behavior. 2003 May 1; 19(3): 335-53.

11 Garrison DR, Kanuka H. Blended learning: uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. Internet and Higher Education 2004 7: 95-105

12 Liu Q; Peng W, Zhang F, Hu Rong, Li Y, Yan W. The effectiveness of blended learning in health professions: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2016;18(1):e2 doi: 10.2196/jmir.4807

13 Milheim WD. Strategies for the design and delivery of blended learning courses. Educational Technology 2006; 46(6): 44-47

14 Hege I, Tolks D, Adler M, Hartl A. Blended learning: ten tips on how to implement it into a curriculum in healthcare education GMS J Med Educ 2020; 37(5): 1 -12 doi: 10.3205/zma001338.

15 Westerlaken M, Christiaans-Dingelhoff I, Filius RM, de Vries B, de Bruijne M, van Dam M. Blended learning for postgraduates; an interactive experience. BMC Medical Education 2019; 19: 289 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1717-5

16 Oren O, Gersh BJ, Bhatt DL. On the pearls and perils of sub-subspecialization. The American Journal of Medicine. 2020 Feb 1;133(2):158-9.

17 Baildam AD. Oncoplastic surgery of the breast. British Journal of Surgery. 2002 May;89(5):532-3.

18 Joint Committee on Surgical Training Oncoplastic Breast Surgery 2020 available at https://www.jcst.org/training-interface-groups/oncoplastic-breast-surgery/ (last accessed 07/06/2021)

19 Down SK, Pereira JH, Leinster S, Simpson A. Training the oncoplastic breast surgeon-current and future perspectives. Gland Surg. 2013;2(3):126-127. doi:10.3978/j.issn.2227-684X.2013.06.02

20 Schmidt HG. Problem‐based learning: Rationale and description. Medical Education. 1983 Jan;17(1):11-6.

21 Nouh T, Boutros M, Gagnon R, Reid S, Leslie K, Pace D, Pitt D, Walker R, Schiller D, MacLean A, Hameed M. The script concordance test as a measure of clinical reasoning: a national validation study. The American Journal of Surgery. 2012 Apr 1;203(4):530-4.

22 Patrício MF, Julião M, Fareleira F, Carneiro AV. Is the OSCE a feasible tool to assess competencies in undergraduate medical education?. Medical Teacher. 2013 Jun 1;35(6):503-14.

23 Khan KZ, Ramachandran S, Gaunt K, Pushkar P. The objective structured clinical examination (OSCE): AMEE guide no. 81. Part I: an historical and theoretical perspective. Medical Teacher. 2013 Sep 1;35(9):e1437-46.

24 General Medical Council. Training Environments 2017: key findings from the National Training Surveys 2017 available at https://www.gmc-uk.org/about/what-we-do-and-why/data-and-research/-/media/documents/nts-report-20173_pdf-72689147.pdf (last accessed 07/06/2021)

25 Hurtubise L, Hall E, Sheridan L, Han H. The flipped classroom in medical education: engaging students to build competency. Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development. 2015 Jan;2:JMECD-S23895.

26 Ferrel MN, Ryan JJ. The impact of COVID-19 on medical education. Cureus. 2020 Mar;12(3).

27 Cleland J, McKimm J, Fuller R, Taylor D, Janczukowicz J, Gibbs T. Adapting to the impact of COVID-19: Sharing stories, sharing practice. Medical Teacher. 2020 Jul 2;42(7):772-5.

28 Iyer P, Aziz K, Ojcius DM. Impact of COVID‐19 on dental education in the United States. Journal of Dental Education. 2020 Jun;84(6):718-22.

29 Adesoye T, Davis CH, Del Calvo H, Shaikh AF, Chegireddy V, Chan EY, Martinez S, Pei KY, Zheng F, Tariq N. Optimization of Surgical Resident Safety and Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic–Lessons Learned. Journal of Surgical Education. 2021 Jan 1;78(1):315-20.

30 Robbins T, Hudson S, Ray P, Sankar S, Patel K, Randeva H, Arvanitis TN. COVID-19: A new digital dawn? https://doi.org/10.1177/2055207620920083

31 Dedeilia A, Sotiropoulos MG, Hanrahan JG, Janga D, Dedeilias P, Sideris M. Medical and Surgical Education Challenges and Innovations in the COVID-19 Era: A Systematic Review. In Vivo. 2020 Jun;34(3 Suppl):1603-1611. doi: 10.21873/invivo.11950. PMID: 32503818.

32 Rose S. Medical student education in the time of COVID-19. JAMA. 2020 Jun 2;323(21):2131-2.

33 Hall AK, Nousiainen MT, Campisi P, Dagnone JD, Frank JR, Kroeker KI, Brzezina S, Purdy E, Oswald A. Training disrupted: practical tips for supporting competency-based medical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Medical Teacher. 2020 Jul 2;42(7):756-61.

34 Foronda C, Godsall L, Trybulski J. Virtual clinical simulation: the state of the science. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2013 Aug 1;9(8):e279-86.

35 Fogg N, Wilson C, Trinka M, Campbell R, Thomson A, Merritt L, Tietze M, Prior M. Transitioning from direct care to virtual clinical experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2020 Nov 1;36(6):685-91.

36 Reddy-Kolanu12 NK, Pathmakanthan11 S, Arlt10 W, Kempegowda16 P. Utility of Simulation via Instant Messaging–Birmingham Advance (SIMBA) in medical education during COVID-19 pandemic. JR Coll Physicians Edinb. 2021;51:168-72.

37 Peters M, ten Cate O. Bedside teaching in medical education. A literature review. Perspect Med Educ. 2013;. doi:10.1007/s40037-013-0083-y.

38 Aggarwal R, Black SA, Hance JR, Darzi A, Cheshire NJ. Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons' endovascular skills. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2006 Jun 1;31(6):588-93.

39 Ryan A, Carson A, Reid K, Smallwood D, Judd T Fully online OSCEs: a large cohort study MedEdPublish https://doi.org/10.15694/mep.2020.000214.1

40 Craig C, Kasana N, Modi A. Virtual OSCE Delivery-the way of the future?. Medical Education. 2020 Jul 5.