Original Findings Confirmed in Replication Study: Provocation with 2.4 GHz Cordless Phone affects the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) as measured by Heart Rate Variability (HRV)

Main Article Content

Magda Havas Jeffrey Marrongelle


This is a double-blind, placebo-controlled replication of a study that we previously conducted in Colorado with 25 subjects designed to test the effect of radio frequency radiation (RFR) generated by the base station of a cordless phone on heart rate variability (HRV). In this study, we analyzed the response of 69 subjects between the ages of 26 and 80 in both Canada and the USA. Subjects were exposed to radiation for 3-min intervals generated by a 2.4-GHz cordless phone base station (3–8 microW/cm2). Prior to provocation we conducted an orthostatic test to assess the state of adrenal exhaustion, which interferes with a person’s ability to mount a response to a stressor. A few participants had a severe reaction to the RFR with an increase in heart rate and altered HRV indicative of an alarm response to stress. Based on the HRV analyses of the 69 subjects, 7% were classified as being “moderately to very sensitive”, 29% were “little to moderately sensitive”, 30% were “not to a little sensitive” and 6% were “unknown”. These results are not psychosomatic and are not due to electromagnetic interference. Twenty-five percent of the subjects’ self-proclaimed sensitivity corresponded to that based on the HRV analysis, while 32% overestimated their sensitivity and 42% did not know whether or not they were electrically sensitive. Of the 39 participants who claimed to experience some electrical hypersensitivity, 36% claimed they also reacted to a cordless phone and experienced heart symptoms and, of these, 64% were classified as having some degree of electrohypersensitivity (EHS) based on their HRV response. Novel findings include documentation of a delayed response to radiation. This protocol underestimates the reaction to electromagnetic radiation and may provide a false negative for those with a delayed reaction and/or with adrenal exhaustion. Orthostatic HRV testing combined with provocation testing may provide a useful diagnostic tool for some sufferers of EHS when they are exposed to electromagnetic radiation. It can be used to confirm EHS but not to reject EHS as a diagnosis since not everyone with EHS has an ANS reaction to electromagnetic radiation. 

Keywords: heart rate variability, mobile phone, tachycardia, arrhythmia, microwave radiation, radio frequency radiation, electrohypersensitivity, autonomic nervous system

Article Details

How to Cite
HAVAS, Magda; MARRONGELLE, Jeffrey. Original Findings Confirmed in Replication Study: Provocation with 2.4 GHz Cordless Phone affects the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) as measured by Heart Rate Variability (HRV). Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 11, nov. 2021. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2605>. Date accessed: 27 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9i11.2605.
Research Articles


1. Belyaev I, Dean A, Eger H, et al. Europeam EMF Guideline 2016 for the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of EMF-related health problems and illnesses, Rev. Environ Health. 2016; 31(3):363-397. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2016-0011
2. Bevington M. Electromagnetic-sensitivity and electromagnetic-hypersensitivity also known as asthenic syndrome, EMF intolerance syndrome, idiopathic environmental intolerance–EMF, microwave syndrome, radio wave sickness: a summary. London, UK: Capability Books; 2010. http://www.es-uk.info/electromagnetic-sensitivity-and-electromagnetic-hypersensitivity/
3. McCarty DE, Carrubba S, Chesson AL, Frilot C, Gonzalez-Toledo E, Marino AA. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: evidence for a novel neurological syndrome. Int. J. Neurosci. 2011;121 :670–676. https://doi.org/10.3109/00207454.2011.608139
4. Eltiti S, Wallace D, Zougkou K, et al. Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics 2007; 28:137–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20279
5. Johansson O. Electrohypersensitivity: state-of-the-art of a functional impairment. Electromagn. Biol. Med. 2006; 25:245–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/15368370601044150
6. Havas M, Marrongelle J, Pollner B, Kelley E, Rees CRG, Tully L. Provocation study using heart rate variability shows microwave radiation from 2.4 GHz cordless phone affects autonomic nervous system. Eur. J. Oncol. 2010; 5:273–300. https://bemri.org/publications/dect/341-provocation-study-using-heart-rate-variability-shows-microwave-radiation-from-2-4ghz-cordless-phone/file.html
7. Andrzejak R, Poreba R, Poreba M, et al. The influence of the call with a mobile phone on heart rate variability parameters in healthy volunteers. Ind. Health 2008; 46:409–417. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.46.409
8. Havas M, Marrongelle J. Replication of heart rate variability (HRV) provocation study with 2.4 GHz cordless phone. Proceedings 7th International Workshop on Biological Effects of EMF, 8–12 October, 2012, Malta. https://www.um.edu.mt/events/emf2012/presentations
9. Riftine A. Quantitative assessment of the autonomic nervous system based on heart rate variability analysis:Theoretical review and clinical use. Heart Rhythm Instruments, Edison, NJ, 2002; 54p. www.nervexpress.com
10. Rubin GJ, Das Munshi J, Wessely S. Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies. Psychosomatic Med. 2005; 67:224–232. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.psy.0000155664.13300.64
11. Rubin GJ, Hillert L, Nieto-Hernandez R, van Rongen E, Oftedal G. Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2011; 32: 593–609. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20690
12. Rubin GJ, Nieto-Hernandez R, Wessely S. Review: idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (formerly “electromagnetic hypersensitivity”): an updated systematic review of provocation studies. Bioelectromagnetics 2010; 31:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20536
13. Schooneveld H, Kuiper J. Electrohypersensitivity (EHS) in the Netherlands–A Questionnaire Survey. 2007; Stichting EHS (Dutch EHS Foundation), https://stichtingehs-nl.translate.goog/downloads/publicaties-stichting-ehs/electrohypersensitivity-ehs-in-the-netherlands?_x_tr_sl=nl&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en&_x_tr_pto=nui,sc
14. Cleary SF, Editor. Biological effects and health implications of microwave radiation. Symposium proceedings, Richmond, Virginia, September 17–19, 1969 U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Environmental Health Service, 149 pp. https://zoryglaser.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Biological_Effects_and_Health_Implications_of_Microwave_Radiation.pdf