Diversity of learning-induced synaptic plasticity at dorsal CA1 synapses: a possible underlying mechanism of contextual memory formation

Main Article Content

Paw-Min Thein-Oo Dai Mitsushima Yuya Sakimoto

Abstract

We expose various kinds of context in our everyday lives and hence contextual memory is critically important for us. Since hippocampus is a major area for processing contextual memory, it needs to encode different components of various contexts such as ‘what’, ‘where’ and ‘when’, etc. However, the underlying mechanism by which the hippocampus differentially encodes various kinds of contextual information is interesting but not yet revealed completely. Since long-term potentiation (LTP) had been discovered and believed to be mechanism of learning, many studies were conducted to investigate the underlying detailed mechanism of memory formation by using various LTP induction protocols. By combining HSV-mediated in vivo gene delivery with in vitro patch-clamp recordings, it was found that LTP can induce plastic changes such as delivery of GluA1-containing AMPA receptor to the dorsal CA1 synapses of the hippocampus and also the causal relationship between this AMPA receptor delivery and learning was discovered. Then it was found that learning induced synaptic plasticity with diverse pattern highlighting the importance of this diversity in contextual memory formation. Here, we mostly review the studies which used hippocampal-dependent learning paradigm (inhibitory avoidance task) for better comparison and mapping of the concept about how learning induced diversity of synaptic plasticity at dorsal hippocampal CA1 synapses and how this diversity may become responsible as an underlying mechanism of contextual memory formation. We found that contextual learning induces synaptic plasticity at CA1 neurons with synapse-specific diversity, input-specific diversity, subregion- or subfield-specific diversity, episode-specific diversity but only a few studies revealed their functional significance. For complete understanding of learning-induced diversity of synaptic plasticity, it demands further studies for investigation of their functional correlation to learning performance by using new highly promising approaches like optogenetic techniques and cell-specific self-entropy analysis, etc.

Article Details

How to Cite
THEIN-OO, Paw-Min; MITSUSHIMA, Dai; SAKIMOTO, Yuya. Diversity of learning-induced synaptic plasticity at dorsal CA1 synapses: a possible underlying mechanism of contextual memory formation. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 1, jan. 2022. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2623>. Date accessed: 28 nov. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i1.2623.
Section
Review Articles

References

1. Andersen P, Morris R, Amaral D, Bliss T, O'Keefe J. The Hippocampus Book (1st ed., 2007). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
2. Mitsushima D, Ishihara K, Sano A, Kessels HW, Takahashi T. Contextual learning requires synaptic AMPA receptor delivery in the hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011; 108(30):12503-12508. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1104558108
3. Mitsushima D, Sano A, Takahashi T. A cholinergic trigger drives learning
induced plasticity at hippocampal synapses. Nat Commun. 2013; 4: 1-10.
https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3760
4. Sakimoto Y, Mizuno J, Kida H, Kamiya Y, Ono Y, Mitsushima D. Learning promotes subfield-specific synaptic diversity in hippocampal CA1 neurons. Cereb Cortex. 2019; 29(5): 2183-2195. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhz022
5. Ishikawa J, Tomokage T, Mitsushima D. A possible coding for experience: ripple-like events and synaptic diversity. BioRxiv. 2019; 12(30): 891259. https://doi.org/10.1101/2019.12.30.891259
6. Paw-Min-Thein-Oo, Sakimoto Y, Kida H, Mitsushima D. Proximodistal Heterogeneity in Learning-promoted Pathway-specific Plasticity at Dorsal CA1 Synapses. Neuroscience. 2020; 437: 184-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2020.04.040
7. Lømo T. Frequency potentiation of excitatory synaptic activity in the dentate
area of the hippocampal formation. Acta Physiol. Scand. 1966; 68(suppl. 277):128
8. Morris RGM, Anderson E, Lynch GS, Baudry M. Selective impairment of learning and blockade of long-term potentiation by an N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, AP5. Nature. 1986; 319: 774-776.
9. Bliss TV and Lømo T. Long-lasting potentiation of synaptic transmission in
the dentate area of the anaesthetized rabbit following stimulation of the perforant path.
J. Physiol. 1973; 232: 331-356.
10. Whitlock JR, Heynen AJ, Shuler MG, Bear MF. Learning induces long-term potentiation in the hippocampus. Science. 2006; 313(5790): 1093-1097.
11. Goto A, Bota A, Miya K, et al. Stepwise synaptic plasticity events drive the early phase of memory consolidation. Science 2021; 374: 857-863.
12. Fisahn A, Pike FG, Buhl EH, Paulsen O. Cholinergic induction of network oscillations at 40Hz in the hippocampus in vitro. Nature. 1998; 394: 186-189.
13. Auerbach JM and Segal M. Muscarinic receptors mediating depression and long-term potentiation in rat hippocampus. J. Physiol. 1996; 492: 479-493.
14. Shi SH, Hayashi Y, Petralia RS, et al. Rapid spine delivery and redistribution of AMPA receptors after synaptic NMDA receptor activation. Science. 1999; 284: 1811-1816.
15. Hayashi Y, Shi SH, Esteban JA, Piccini A, Poncer JC, Malinow R. Driving AMPA
receptors into synapses by LTP and CaMKII: requirement for GluR1 and PDZ domain interaction. Science. 2000; 287: 2262-2267.
16. Penn AC, Zhang CL, Georges F, et al. Hippocampal LTP and contextual learning require surface diffusion of AMPA receptors. Nature. 2017; 549:384-388.
17. Scoville WB and Milner B. Loss of recent memory after bilateral hippocampal lesions. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry. 1957; 20:11-21.
18. Sakimoto Y, Kida H, Mitsushima D. Temporal dynamics of learning-promoted synaptic diversity in CA1 pyramidal neurons. FASEB J. 2019; 33(12): 14382-14393.
19. Choi JH, Sim SE, Kim JI, et al. Interregional synaptic maps among engram cells underlie memory formation. Science. 2018; 360(6387):430-435.
20. Steward O and Scoville SA. Cells of origin of entorhinal cortical afferents to the
hippocampus and fascia dentata of the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1976;169(3): 347-370. https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.901690306
21. Kajiwara R, Wouterlood F, Sah A, Boekel A, Baks-Te Bulte L, Witter M. Convergence of Entorhinal and CA3 inputs onto pyramidal neurons and interneurons in hippocampal area CA1–an anatomical study in the rat. Hippocampus. 2008;18(3), 266-280. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20385
22. Swanson LW and Cowan WM. An autoradiographic study of the organization of the efferent connections of the hippocampal formation in the rat. J Comp Neurol. 1977;172:49-84.
23. Moser MB and Moser EI. Functional differentiation in the hippocampus. Hippocampus. 1998;8:608-619.
24. Strange BA, Witter MP, Lein ES, Moser EI. Functional organization of the hippocampal longitudinal axis. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2014;15:655-669.
25. Henke PG. Hippocampal pathway to the amygdala and stress ulcer development. Brain Res Bull. 1990;25:691-695.
26. Kjelstrup KG, Tuvnes FA, Steffenach HA, Murison R, Moser EI, Moser MB. Reduced fear expression after lesions of the ventral hippocampus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:10825-10830.
27. Igarashi K, Ito H, Moser E, Moser M. Functional diversity along the transverse axis of hippocampal area CA1. FEBS Lett. 2014;588(15): 2470-2476. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.06.004
28. Ng CW, Elias GA, Asem JSA, Allen TA, Fortin NJ. Nonspatial sequence coding varies along the CA1 transverse axis. Behav Brain Res. 2018;354: 39-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2017.10.015