Partner Weight as a Moderator of Exercise Motivation in an Obese Sample

Main Article Content

Stephen Samendinger Joelle Beckles Samuel T Forlenza Karin A Pfeiffer Deborah L Feltz


OBJECTIVE: Köhler motivation gain principles were utilized (based on the group dynamics principles of upward social comparison and indispensability) to explore increasing exercise duration in an obese community sample (mean BMI = 38 kg∙m-2) with a lighter versus same weight virtually-presented interactive exergame partner.

METHODS: Community adults (N = 48; age = 45.3 ± 15.86 years) completed the first block of three isometric abdominal exercises alone. After resting, participants completed the second block either alone (Control), with a lighter weight (LW), or with a same weight partner (SW). Partners were actually confederates recorded earlier and presented virtually as live, from another lab. Exercise persistence, self-efficacy beliefs, enjoyment, perceived exertion, perceptions of one’s own and relative partner ability, and body image were collected.

RESULTS: Mean persistence was greater for participants in the LW (23.2 sec) condition than for those in the Control condition (-12.44 sec; 95% CI: 11.57, 59.3, p < 0.002). Mean persistence was also greater for participants in the SW (21 sec) condition than for those in the Control condition (-12.44 sec; 95% CI: 8.74, 58.14, p < 0.006). Despite persisting longer than Controls, SW participants rated their own ability lower than Controls (p = 0.027). Body image assessment choice correlated with BMI (r =.69), but was not significantly related to persistence.

CONCLUSIONS: The Köhler motivation effect increased persistence with abdominal isometric exercises in obese adults and was not moderated by the relative weight of one’s partner.

Article Details

How to Cite
SAMENDINGER, Stephen et al. Partner Weight as a Moderator of Exercise Motivation in an Obese Sample. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], n. 3, july 2015. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 03 oct. 2022.
conjunctive; exergame; motivation; obesity; social comparison; Kohler
Research Articles


(US), N. O. E. I. E. P. on the I., Evaluation, and Treatment of Obesity in Adults. (1998). Clinical Guidelines on the Identification, Evaluation, and Treatment of Overweight and Obesity in Adults. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.

Borg, G. (1998). Borg’s perceived exertion and pain scales (Vol. viii). Champaign, IL, US: Human Kinetics.

Boutcher, S. H. (2011). High-Intensity Intermittent Exercise and Fat Loss. Journal of Obesity, 2011.

Dishman, R. K. (2001). The Problem of Exercise Adherence: Fighting Sloth in Nations With Market Economies. Quest, 53(3), 279–294.

Dunstan, D. W., Puddey, I. B., Beilin, L. J., Burke, V., Morton, A. R., & Stanton, K. G. (1998). Effects of a short-term circuit weight training program on glycaemic control in NIDDM. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 40(1), 53–61.

Ede A, Forlenza ST, Feltz DL. (in press). Buddy up for exergames: how group dynamics principles can be applied to active health games. In: Novak D, Tulu B, Brendryen H (eds). Holistic Perspectives in Gamification for Clinical Practice.

Feltz, D. L., Forlenza, S. T., Winn, B., & Kerr, N. L. (2014). Cyber Buddy Is Better than No Buddy: A Test of the Köhler Motivation Effect in Exergames. Games for Health Journal, 3(2), 98–105.

Feltz, D. L., Irwin, B., & Kerr, N. (2012). Two-player partnered exergame for obesity prevention: using discrepancy in players’ abilities as a strategy to motivate physical activity. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 6(4), 820-827.

Feltz, D. L., Kerr, N. L., & Irwin, B. C. (2011). Buddy up: the Köhler effect applied to health games. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 33(4), 506–526.

Forlenza, S. T., Kerr, N. L., Irwin, B. C., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Is My Exercise Partner Similar Enough? Partner Characteristics as a Moderator of the Köhler Effect in Exergames. Games for Health Journal, 1(6), 436–441.

Gourlan, M. J., Trouilloud, D. O., & Sarrazin, P. G. (2011).
Interventions promoting physical activity among obese populations: a meta-analysis considering global effect, long-term maintenance, physical activity indicators and dose characteristics. Obesity Reviews, 12(7), e633–e645.

Hertel, G., Kerr, N. L., & Messé, L. A. (2000). Motivation gains in performance groups: paradigmatic and theoretical developments on the Köhler effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(4), 580–601.

Irwin, B. C., Scorniaenchi, J., Kerr, N. L., Eisenmann, J. C., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). Aerobic exercise is promoted when individual performance affects the group: a test of the Kohler motivation gain effect. Annals of Behavioral Medicine: A Publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 44(2), 151–159.

Irwin, B.C., & Feltz, D.L. (in press). Interpersonal influences and motivation in physical activity. In Schinke, R., McGannon, K., & Smith, B. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Sport Psychology.

Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.

Kerr, N. L., & Hertel, G. (2011). The Köhler Group Motivation Gain: How to Motivate the “Weak Links” in a Group. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5(1), 43–55.

Kerr, N. L., Forlenza, S. T., Irwin, B. C., & Feltz, D. L. (2013). “… been down so long …”: Perpetual vs. intermittent inferiority and the Köhler group motivation gain in exercise groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(2), 67–80.

Kerr, N. L., & Seok, D.H. (2010). “...with a little help from my friends”: friendship, effort norms, and group motivation gain. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26(3), 205–218.

Maher, C. A., Mire, E., Harrington, D. M., Staiano, A. E., & Katzmarzyk, P. T. (2013). The independent and combined associations of physical activity and sedentary behavior with obesity in adults: NHANES 2003-06. Obesity, 21(12), E730–E737.

Napolitano, M. A., Papandonatos, G. D., Borradaile, K. E., Whiteley, J. A., & Marcus, B. H. (2001). Effects of weight status and barriers on physical activity adoption among previously inactive women. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 19(11), 2183–2189.

Pearson, E. S. (2012). Goal setting as a health behavior change strategy in overweight and obese adults: A systematic literature review examining intervention components. Patient Education and Counseling, 87(1), 32–42.

Raedeke, T. D. (2007). The Relationship Between Enjoyment and Affective Responses to Exercise. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 19(1), 105–115.

Schmitz, K. H., Jensen, M. D., Kugler, K. C., Jeffery, R. W., & Leon, A. S. (2003). Strength training for obesity prevention in midlife women. International Journal of Obesity, 27(3), 326–333.

Schwartz, M. B., Vartanian, L. R., Nosek, B. A., & Brownell, K. D. (2006). The Influence of One’s Own Body Weight on Implicit and Explicit Anti-fat Bias. Obesity, 14(3), 440–447.

Smits, J. A. J., Tart, C. D., Presnell, K., Rosenfield, D., & Otto, M. W. (2010). Identifying Potential Barriers to Physical Activity Adherence: Anxiety Sensitivity and Body Mass as Predictors of Fear During Exercise. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy, 39(1), 28–36.

Trapp, E. G., Chisholm, D. J., Freund, J., & Boutcher, S. H. (2008). The effects of high-intensity intermittent exercise training on fat loss and fasting insulin levels of young women. International Journal of Obesity, 32(4), 684–691.

Tucker, J. M., Welk, G. J., & Beyler, N. K. (2011). Physical activity in U.S.: adult’s compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 40(4), 454–461.

Williamson, D. A., Womble, L. G., Zucker, N. L., Reas, D. L., White, M. A., Blouin, D. C., & Greenway, F. (2000). Body image assessment for obesity (BIA-O): development of a new procedure. International Journal of Obesity and Related Metabolic Disorders: Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 24(10), 1326–1332.