Academic Freedom, COVID-19 and Other Challenges to Academic Debate

Main Article Content

D Gareth Jones


COVID-19 has raised issues of academic freedom, principally where there are divergences of opinion over the legitimacy of COVID-related vaccination. This, in turn, has cast the spotlight onto the nature of academic freedom in other contentious areas within society and therefore within the academy. While the notion of academic freedom has wide acceptance in theory, it regularly encounters obstacles when it appears to give academics a platform to oppose government policy or even university policy. Two areas are highlighted.

The first considers COVID vaccines in academic debate, where the challenge is to balance the freedom not only for academics to speak out in support of vaccination, but also against it. The demands posed by vaccine mandates have brought this tension into prominence. Additional issues include the protection of academics acting as quasi spokespeople for governments, plus the temptation to critique other academics promulgating minority viewpoints based on dubious scientific credentials. This raises the need to protect academics with unpalatable viewpoints.

The second dimension explored is that of the status of indigenous concepts of science. While this discussion has no relationship to COVID-19, it brings to the surface a similar range of tensions related to academic freedom. Although the details will vary between indigenous groups in different cultures, they raise a fundamental consideration: ‘what is science?’ For some there are elements of science that are culture dependent; others vigorously disagree. The question is how a university copes with such fundamental disagreements, and what may and may not be acceptable within academia. Does academic freedom allow approaches that appear to be at fundamental odds with one another? The way in which this question is answered has a bearing on approaches adopted to COVID-19 debates.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
JONES, D Gareth. Academic Freedom, COVID-19 and Other Challenges to Academic Debate. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 4, apr. 2022. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 19 may 2022. doi:
Research Articles


1. Jones DG, Galvin K, Woodhouse D. Universities as Critic and Conscience of Society: The Role of Academic Freedom. Wellington: New Zealand Universities Academic Audit Unit; 2000.
2. Education Act 1989. New Zealand Government, Wellington. Accessed March 16, 2022. The significance of academic freedom is reiterated in the Education and Training Act 2020, Accessed March 16, 2022.
3. Swinnerton-Dyer P. The importance of academic freedom. Nature 1995; 373: 186-188.
4. BBC. Oxford professor given protection following threats from trans activists. January 25, 2020. Accessed March 14, 2022.
5. Lambert H. How Sussex University failed Kathleen Stock. The New Statesman November 4, 2021. Accessed 14 March 2022.
6. Jones DG, Whitaker MI. Speaking for the Dead: The Human Body in Biology and Medicine. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate; 2009.
7. Jones DG. The ethical awakening of human anatomy: Reassessing the past and envisioning a more ethical future. In: Squires K, Errickson D, Marquez-Grant N. eds. Ethical Approaches to Human Remains. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature; 2020:73-94.
8. Jones G. If expertise is discounted, we are on a perilous path. Otago Daily Times. November 23,2021. Accessed November 23, 2021.
9. Portes R. “I think the people of this country have had enough of experts.” May 9, 2017. Accessed November 17, 2021.
10. Lavazza A, Farina M. The role of experts in the Covid-19 pandemic and the limits of their epistemic authority in democracy. Frontiers in Public Health. July 14, 2020; 8: doi: 10.3389/fpubh. 2020.00356.
11. Kearnes M, Cook B, Kuch D, et al. We should listen to coronavirus experts, but local wisdom counts too. The Conversation. April 1, 2020. Accessed February 28, 2022.
12. Editorial. COVID-19 vaccines: acting on the evidence. Nature Medicine. 27: 183, 2021.
13. Global Public Policy Institute. COVID-19 and Academic Freedom: What’s the Connection? September 2021. Accessed March 4, 2022.
14. Brock AR, Thornley S. Rapid communication: Spontaneous abortions and policies on COVID-19 mRNA vaccine use during pregnancy. Science, Public Health Policy and the Law. 2021; 4:130-143.
15. Bridle B. An open letter to the president of the University of Guelph. Accessed March 1, 2022.
16. Mitchell C. The scientist and the rabbit hole: How epidemiologist Simon Thornley became an outcast of his profession. Stuff, May 21, 2021. Accessed January 17, 2022.
17. Russell M. Are New Zealand’s universities doing enough to define the limits of academic freedom? The Conversation. November 23, 2021. Accessed February 24, 2022.
18. Pierson A. Byram Bridle’s claim that COVID-19 vaccines are toxic fails to account for key differences between the spike protein produced during infection and vaccination, misrepresents studies. Health Feedback. May 28, 2021. are-toxic-fails-to-account-for-key-differences-between-the-spike-protein-produced-during-infection-and-vaccination-misrepresents-studies/. Accessed November 1, 2021.
19. Kapitan C. Shaun Hendy, Siouxie Wiles file complaint against University of Auckland. New Zealand Herald. January 3, 2022. Accessed March 2, 2022.
20. Heinemann J. What does ‘academic freedom’ mean in practice? Why the Siouxie Wiles and Shaun Hendy employment case matters? Stuff. January 14, 2022. Accessed March 2, 2022.
21. MacLean H. Otago Covid-19 experts copping abuse. Otago Daily Times. January 6, 2022. Accessed March 2, 2022.
22. Wakefield AJ, Murch SH, Anthony A, et al. Ileal-lymphoid-nodular hyperplasia, non-specific colitis, and pervasive developmental disorder in children. The Lancet 1998; 351:637-641 (retracted)
23. Deer B. The Doctor Who Fooled the World. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2020.
24. Murch SH, Anthony A, Casson DH, et al. Retraction of an interpretation. The Lancet. 2004; 363:750.
25. Ross J. New Zealand academics investigated over Māori knowledge letter. Times Higher Education. December 6, 202; over-maori-knowledge-letter. Accessed February 28, 2022.
26. Clements K, Cooper G, Corballis M, et al. In defence of science. Listener. July 31, 2021: 4.
27. Griffin P. The meaning of science. Listener. August 6, 2021; 16-21.
28. May S. 2021. Dismissing mātauranga Māori: Racism and arrogance in academia. Ideas Room. August 1, 2021. Accessed August 4, 2021.
29. Wiggins A. Experts Shaun Hendy and Siouxsie Wiles among those rejecting claim Māori knowledge isn’t science as ‘scientific racism’. New Zealand Herald. July 29, 2021; Accessed March 4, 2022.
30. New Zealand Association of Scientists. Mātauranga and science. July 27, 2021.ātauranga%20and%20Science.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2022.
31. Royal Society. Joint statement from president and chair of academy executive committee. Royal Society of New Zealand. 2021 Accessed August 4, 2021.
32. Atkins P. Tumu whakarae, message from chief executive of Royal Society of New Zealand, December 17, 2021. Accessed March 3, 2022.
33. University of Auckland. Vice-Chancellor comments. July 26, 2021; . Accessed August 4, 2021.
34. University of Auckland. Statement from the Vice-Chancellor on mātauranga Māori and science. December 14, 2021; Accessed March 4, 2022.
35. Sachdeva S. Royal Society investigation into mātauranga Māori letter sparks academic debate. 2021; Accessed November 18, 2021.
36. Royal Society. Statement in relation to complaints about a letter to the New Zealand Listener. March 11, 2022; Accessed March 15, 2022.
37. Stewart GT. Defending science from what? Educational Philosophy and Theory. 2021;
38. Ross J. Auckland plans dialogue on Māori knowledge and science. Times Higher Education. December 15, 2021; Accessed February 28, 2022.
39. Russell M. Are New Zealand’s’ universities doing enough to define the limits of academic freedom? The Conversation. November 23, 2021; Accessed November 24, 2021.