↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the long-term cardiovascular outcomes associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), antiplatelets and No-Treatment compared to warfarin beyond 90-days after atrial fibrillation (AF) catheter ablation.

Methods: We identified 12,010 AF patients undergoing first-time ablation in Denmark (2002-2018) and analyzed stroke, serious bleeding, cardiovascular death and the composite of these three endpoints (MACE) by incidence rates (IR) per 1000 person-years and Cox proportional-hazard models.

Results: The median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 54-68 years); 28.8% were female, 7225 (60.2%) patients were younger than 65-years, and 6927 (57.7%) patients had CHA2DS2-VASc score≥2. Over a total of 65,990 person-years follow-up commencing 90-days after first-time ablation, warfarin, DOACs, antiplatelets and ‘No-treatment’ exposures covered 30,877 (46.8%), 9,452 (14.3%), 6,003 (9.1%) and 19,657 (29.8%) person-years, respectively. There was no difference between DOACs vs warfarin (HR 1.04 [0.77-1.42]95%CI) while antiplatelets (HR 1.50 [1.11-2.05]95%CI) and No-Treatment (HR 1.50 [1.15-1.94]95%CI) were associated with a significantly higher rate of stroke. DOACs (HR 0.70 [0.54-0.92]95%CI), antiplatelets (HR 0.58 [0.41-0.82]95%CI) and No-Treatment (HR 0.52 [0.39-0.69]95%CI) were associated with a significantly lower rate of serious bleeding compared with warfarin. We found no difference between DOACs and warfarin (HR 0.87 [0.61-1.25]95%CI) while Antiplatelets (HR 1.42 [1.04-1.94]95%CI) and No-treatment (HR 2.77 [2.16-3.56]95%CI) were associated with a significantly higher rate of cardiovascular death. We observed no difference with DOACs (HR 0.86 [0.70-1.05]95%CI), antiplatelets (HR 1.04 [0.84-1.27]95%CI) or No-Treatment (HR 1.10 [0.93-1.31]]95%CI) compared to warfarin in multivariable analyses regarding the composite endpoint of MACE.

Conclusions: Our study indicates a better bleeding risk profile associated with DOACs than warfarin in patients undergoing AF ablation, but no difference for the endpoints of stroke, cardiovascular death, or the composite endpoint of MACE. Despite the favourable bleeding risk, antiplatelets and No-Treatment compared with warfarin appear hazardous due to a higher rate of stroke and cardiovascular death.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 10 No 6 (2022): Vol.10 Issue 6 June 2022
SectionResearch Articles
Published20 June 2022
DOI10.18103/mra.v10i6.2837
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

DK

Deniz Karasoy

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark

GG

Gunnar Hilmar Gislason

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Denmark ; The Danish Heart Foundation, Copenhagen, Denmark

MA

Matteo Anselmino

Division of Cardiology, “Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino” Hospital, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Italy

PF

Patricia Fruelund

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark

JL

Jacob Moesgaard Larsen

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark

SR

Sam Riahi

Department of Cardiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗