A Survey of Surgical Trainees in Trinidad & Tobago Using a Robotic Laparoscopic Camera Holder

Main Article Content

Shamir O Cawich Patrick Harnarayan Ravi Maharaj Yardesh Singh Michael J Ramdass Vijay Naraynsingh

Abstract

Background: In the year 2021, the FreeHand robotic camera holder was introduced to a hospital in Trinidad & Tobago, amid strong opposition from postgraduate trainees who were concerned about diluted training opportunities. The aim of this study was to document trainees’ opinions on this surgical tool before and after its use.


Methods: A self-administered questionnaire was completed by surgical trainees who had the opportunity to use the surgical robot in laparoscopic operations. The questionnaire sought data on three specific aspects: impact on training, technical aspects and perceived value for training.


Results: Six trainees answered the questionnaire after using the robot. The number of trainees who believed the robot negatively impacted training reduced from 100% to 33%.  All responders reported that head movements to control the robot were uncomplicated and the docked robot was not intrusive toward instrument movement. All were willing to support the use of the robot after having used the robot.


Conclusions: This survey has revealed that surgical residents’ opinions of the Freehand® robot dramatically changed after becoming familiar with its use. There is no valid reason that surgical trainees would be denied the opportunity to participate in an operation, once they have become facile with the robot.

Article Details

How to Cite
CAWICH, Shamir O et al. A Survey of Surgical Trainees in Trinidad & Tobago Using a Robotic Laparoscopic Camera Holder. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 10, n. 8, aug. 2022. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2953>. Date accessed: 07 oct. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i8.2953.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Naraynsingh V, Bahadursingh S, Maharaj R, et al. Surgery in the West Indies: A perspective from Trinidad. Curr Med Res Prac. 2014; 4: 1126-1129.
2. Cawich SO, Arulampalam T, Senasi R, et al. Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Surgery: First Report from the Caribbean. Cureus. 2021; 13(10): 18739. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.18739
3. Amin MS, Aydin A, Abbud N, et al. Evaluation of a remote‐controlled laparoscopic camera holder for basic laparoscopic skills acquisition: a randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2021; 35(8): 4183-4191. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07899-5
4. Cawich SO, Pooran S, Amow B, et al. Impact of a medical university on laparoscopic surgery in a service-oriented public hospital in the Caribbean. Risk Manag Healtc Policy. 2016; 9: 253-260. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S89724
5. Cawich SO, Simpson LK, Wilson C, et al. Healthcare Workers’ Attitudes Toward Laparoscopic Surgery for Gallbladder Disease in the Caribbean. Curr Med Res Pract. 2019; 9(1): 10-13.
6. Lane T. A Short History of Robotic Surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2018; 100 (6): 5-7.
7. Cawich SO, Harding HE, Crandon IW, et al. Leadership in Surgery for Public Sector Hospitals in Jamaica: Strategies for the Operating Room. Perm J. 2013; 17(3): 121-125. DOI: 10.7812/TPP/12-117
8. Cawich SO, Johnson PB, Dan D, et al. Surgical Leadership in the Time of Significant Generational Diversity. Surgeon. 2014; 12 (4): 235-6.
9. Money SR, O’Donnell M, Gray RJ. In the time of significant generational diversity - surgical leadership must step up! Surgeon. 2014; 12(1): 3-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.surge.2013.09.007.
10. Sbaih M, Arulampalam TH, Motson RW. Rate of skill acquisition in the use of a robotic laparoscope holder (FreeHand®). Min Inv Ther Allied Tech. 2016; 25(4): 196-202. DOI: 10.1080/13645706.2016.1182031