False Positive Results on Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography: A New Marker of Risk for Ischemic Events
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Although dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE) has a high specificity, there is still a subset of patients with false positive tests (FP); whether these results have prognostic value remains unclear.
Aims: To identify the clinical and echocardiographic predictors of FP on DSE and to evaluate the prognostic impact of FP on DSE.
Methods: Retrospective study of 355 consecutive patients who underwent DSE for ischemia assessment over a one-year period: 134 (37,7%) women, 70,3 ± 0,57 years. Demographics, risk factors, clinical and laboratorial parameters and DSE variables were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups regarding the presence (FP+) or the absence (FP0) of a FP result on DSE and a comparative analysis was performed to characterize the groups and identify potencial predictors of FP results. Patients were followed for 2 years to assess acute myocardial infarction, hospitalization for acute heart failure (HF) and mortality.
Results: The FP rate was 4,5%. Comparing to FP0, patients in group FP+ were younger, baseline wall motion abnormalities were more frequent, had higher mean blood pressure values at rest and at peak stage and more often hypertensive response. There were no significant differences regarding previous coronary artery disease, medication or complete left bundle branch block. By multivariate analysis, only mean blood pressure values at rest (OR 0,01; 95%CI 0,005-0,02; p=0,003) and at peak stage (OR 0,02; 95%CI 0,000-0,004; p=0,003) were independent predictors of FP. During follow-up was observed: acute myocardial infarction (FP+: 12,5% vs FP0: 1,8%, p=0,046), HF (FP+: 6,3% vs FP0: 11,5%, p=0,44) and mortality (FP+: 6,3% vs FP0: 6,2%, p=0,65). After adjustment for age, sex and comorbidities, there were no diferences between the groups regarding HF and mortality, but the group FP+ mantained a higher rate of acute myocardial infarction (OR 0,21; 95%CI 0,065-0,354; p=0,005).
Conclusion: A FP result on DSE was associated with higher mean blood pressure values during the test and with higher rates of acute myocardial infarction during follow-up. This result on DSE should therefore be faced as a risk marker for ischemic events and can identify patients that may benefit from aggressive risk factor control and careful clinical follow-up.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2 Rachwan RJ, Mshelbwala FS, Dardari Z, Batal O. False-positive stress echocardiograms: Predictors and prognostic relevance. International journal of cardiology. 2019; 296: 157-163.
3 From AM, Kane G, Bruce C, Pellikka PA, Scott C, McCully RB. Characteristics and outcomes of patients with abnormal stress echocardiograms and angiographically mild coronary artery disease (< 50% stenoses) or normal coronary arteries. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2010; 23(2): 207-214.
4 Qamruddin S. False-positive stress echocardiograms: a continuing challenge. Ochsner Journal. 2016; 16(3): 277-279.
5 Bach DS, Muller DW, Gros BJ, Armstrong WF. False positive dobutamine stress echocardiograms: characterization of clinical, echocardiographic and angiographic findings. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 1994; 24(4): 928-933.
6 Lauer MS, Levy D, Anderson KM, Plehn JF. Is there a relationship between exercise systolic blood pressure response and left ventricular mass? The Framingham Heart Study. Annals of internal medicine. 1992; 116(3): 203-210.
7 Patel MR, Peterson ED, Dai D, Brennan JM, Redberg RF, Anderson HV, Douglas PS. Low diagnostic yield of elective coronary angiography. New England Journal of Medicine. 2010; 362(10): 886-895.
8Labovitz AJ. The “myth” of the false positive stress echo. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography. 2010; 2(23): 215-216.
9 Gilchrist I, Foy A, Davidson W. A false-positive stress echocardiogram is not the same as a negative result. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2017; 69(11S): 1426-1426.
10 Sicari R, Palinkas A, Pasanisi EG, Venneri L, Picano E. Long-term survival of patients with chest pain syndrome and angiographically normal or near-normal coronary arteries: the additional prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography test (DET). European heart journal. 2005; 26(20): 2136-2141.