Main Article Content
Among the components of Life’s Essential 8, body mass index is the anthropometric used in the scoring algorithm of cardiovascular health. Concerning myocardial infarction, the waist-to-hip ratio may show more predictive value than body mass index, waist circumference, and waist-to-height ratio, and has showed a greater excess risk of myocardial infarction in women than in men. However, bias has occurred in global research because of inadequate comparisons with the high-risk body composition. Hence, cardiology may have been confused for a long time because bias-related errors were always overlooked. This situation occurred when risk association was distorted by over- or under-estimating some simple measurements over others. Our aim was to determine whether the historical risk associated with some anthropometrics might provide a bias in causal inferences. Our study design was a review on data of the body of literature. We created new anthropometric variables, which were always omitted in previous large studies. In most studies, mathematical inequalities between the simple measurements in anthropometrically healthy subjects were overlooked, including disparities between lean and fat masses. That way, in omitting the difference in means between the simple measurements of length and body mass components, association findings and causality cannot be assumed. No anthropometric will be equivalent for estimating the same high-risk body composition if the difference in means between the simple measurements present an unbalanced distribution, and besides, being associated as confounding factors. Therefore, after describing new anthropometric variables termed as “x” and demonstrating that the simple measurements showed means of differences differentially distributed between healthy and unhealthy cases worldwide, association biases for the body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio or waist circumference alone may be endorsed, indicating the importance of these results. From a new anthropometric perspective, the waist-to-height ratio may indicate the concrete volume of an abdominal three-dimensional disc in direct-inverse relationship with waist-body height without showing association biases. This index may represent a new construct by defining a risk abdominal volume and avoiding potential confounding factors. In a paradigm shift, only the waist-to-height ratio meets causality criteria as the optimal index to predict myocardial infarction risk and to promote cardiovascular health.
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
2. Yusuf S, Hawken S, Ounpuu S, et al. Obesity and the risk of myocardial infarction in 27,000 participants from 52 countries: a case-control study. Lancet. 2005; 366; 1640-9.
3. Egeland GM, Igland J, Vollset SE, et al. High population attributable fractions of myocardi-al infarction associated with waist-hip ratio. Obesity. 2016; 24 (5):1162-9.
4. Cao Q, Yu S, Xiong W, et al. Waisthip ratio as a predictor of myocardial infarction risk. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medi-cine. 2018; 27- 30:e11639. DOI: doi.org/10.1097/ MD.0000000000011639
5. Peters SAE, Bots SH, Woodward M. Sex Dif-ferences in the Association Between Measures of General and Central Adiposity and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction: Results From the UK Biobank. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7(5). pii: e008507. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008507.
6. Joseph P, Yusuf S, Lee SF, et al. Prognostic validation of a non-laboratory and a labora-tory based cardiovascular disease risk score in multiple regions of the world. Heart. 2018; 104(7): 581-7. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311609
7. Powell-Wiley, Powell-Wiley TM, Poirier P, et al. Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021; 25; 143 (21):e984e1010. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000973
8. Castellanos AM. Anthropometrics in Predicting Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Our Research Work Mathematically Demonstrates that Car-diovascular Sciences Were Always Confused for a Long Time. In: Gaze, D. C., editor. Car-diovascular Diseases [Working Title] [Internet]. London: IntechOpen; 2022 [cited 2022 Jun 04]. https://www.intechopen.com/online-first/82078 doi: 10.5772/intechopen.105098
9. Castellanos AM. Anthropometric measures in predicting myocardial infarction risk. Do we know what we are measuring? Bias in research occurred worldwide when the true unhealthy body composition was not well compared. Medical Research Archives. 2021; 9 (6): 1-19. https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/2447. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v9i6.2447.
10. WHO. Obesity and overweight; 2014 [up-dated June 9, 2021; accessed Jul 20, 2022]. Available in: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/obesity-and-overweight
11. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Har-monizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint in-terim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009; 120 (16): 1640-5.
12. Liu J, Tse LA, Liu Z, et al. PURE (Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology) study in China. Predictive Values of Anthropometric Measure-ments for Cardiometabolic Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Diseases Among 44 048 Chi-nese. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8(16): e010870. doi: 10.1161/JAHA. 118.010870.
13. Rost, S, Freuer D, Peters A, et al. New indexes of body fat distribution and sex-specific risk of total and cause-specific mortality: a prospec-tive cohort study. BMC Public Health. 2018; 18(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5350-8.
14. Ashwell M, Gunn P, Gibson S. Waist-to-height ratio is a better screening tool than waist cir-cumference and BMI for adult cardiometabolic risk factors: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2012; 13 (3): 275-86.
15. Song X, Jousilahti P, Stehouwer CD, et al. Comparison of various surrogate obesity indi-cators as predictors of cardiovascular mortali-ty in four European populations. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013; 67 (12): 1298-302. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2013.203.
16. Corrêa MM, Thumé E, De Oliveira ER, et al. Performance of the waist-to-height ratio in identifying obesity and predicting non-communicable diseases in the elderly popula-tion: A systematic literature review. Arch Ger-ontol Geriatr. 2016; 65:174-82. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2016.03.021.
17. Martín-Castellanos A, Cabañas MD, Martín-Castellanos P, et al. The body composition and risk prediction in myocardial infarction men. Revealing biological and statistical error bias for both general obesity and waist-to-hip ra-tio. Card Res Med. 2018; 2: 13-20.
18. Ladeiras-Lopes R, Sampaio F, Bettencourt N, et al. The Ratio Between Visceral and Subcu-taneous Abdominal Fat Assessed by Computed Tomography Is an Independent Predictor of Mortality and Cardiac Events. Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2017; 70 (5): 331-7.
19. Howell CR, Mehta T, Ejima K, et al. Body Composition and Mortality in Mexican Ameri-can Adults: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018; (8):1372-80. doi: 10.1002/oby.22251.
20. Martín-Castellanos A, Martín-Castellanos P, Martín E, et al. Abdominal obesity and myo-cardial infarction risk: We demonstrate the anthropometric and mathematical reasons that justify the association bias of waist-to-hip ra-tio. Nutr Hosp. 2021; 38 (3): 502-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.20960/nh.03416.
21. Rexrode K, Buring J, & Manson J. Abdominal and total adiposity and risk of coronary heart disease in men. Int J Obes. 2001, 25, 1047–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ijo.0801615
22. Chen Y, Jiang J, Shi J, et al. Association of Visceral Fat Index and percentage Body Fat and Anthropometric Measures with Myocardial Infarction and Stroke. J Hypertens. 2016; 5: 235.doi: 10.4172/2167-1095.1000235.
23. Zhang X, Shu XO, Gao YT, et al. Anthropomet-ric predictors of coronary heart disease in Chi-nese women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004; 28(6):734-40. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802634.
24. Chi JH, Lee BJ. Association of myocardial in-farction and angina pectoris with obesity and biochemical indices in the South Korean popu-lation. Sci Rep. 2022; 12, 13769. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-17961-y
25. Patel AP, Wang M, Kartoun U, et al. Quantify-ing and Understanding the Higher Risk of Ath-erosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Among South Asian Individuals: Results From the UK Biobank Prospective Cohort Study. Circulation. 2021; 10; 144(6):410-22. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.052430
26. Martín-Castellanos A, Cabañas-Armesilla MD, Barca-Durán FJ, et al. Obesity and risk of My-ocardial Infarction in a Sample of European Males. Waist To-Hip-Ratio Presents Infor-mation Bias of the Real Risk of Abdominal Obesity. Nutr Hosp. 2017; 34 (1): 88-95. doi.org/10.20960/nh.982.
27. Woolcott OO, Bergman RN. Relative fat mass (RFM) as a new estimator of whole-body fat percentage ─ A crosssectional study in Ameri-can adult individuals. ScientificReports. 2018; 8 (1):10980.doi:10.1038/s41598-018-29362-1
28. Martin-Castellanos A, Martin-Castellanos P, Cabañas MD, et al. Adiposity-Associated An-thropometric Indicators and Myocardial Infarc-tion Risk: Keys for Waist to-Height-Ratio as Metric in Cardiometabolic Health. American Journal of Food, Nutrition and Health. 2018; 3 (5):100-7.
29. Heymsfield SB, Ebbeling CB, Zheng J, et al. Multi-component molecular-level body compo-sition reference methods: evolving concepts and future directions. Obes Rev. 2015; 16 (4):282-94. doi: 10.1111/obr.12261.
30. Nilsson G, Hedberg P, Leppert J, et al. Basic Anthropometric Measures in Acute Myocardial Infarction Patients and Individually Sex- and Age-Matched Controls from the General Population. J Obes. 2018; 2018:3839482. doi: 10.1155/2018/3839482. Erratum in: J Obes. 2018; 2018:3126805.
31. Dhar S, Das PK, Bhattacharjee B, et al. Predic-tive Value of Waist Height Ratio, Waist Hip Ratio and Body Mass Index in Assessing Angi-ographic Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in Myocardial Infarction Patients. Mymensingh Med J. 2020; 29 (4): 906-13.
32. Lu Z, Geurts S, Arshi B, et al. Longitudinal An-thropometric Measures and Risk of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation Among Community-Dwelling Men and Women. Mayo Clin Proc. 2022; 97 (8):1501-11. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.12.018.
33. Castellanos AM. Anthropometrics and Myo-cardial Infarction Risk: A Misleading Evidence Was Accepted by Cardiovascular Sciences When Errors of Bias Were Overlooked Worldwide. When Should We End Discussion about the Optimal Metric? Medical Research Archives. 2022; [online] 10 (7). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v10i7.2917
34. Kobel S, Kirsten J, Kelso A. Anthropometry – assessment of body composition. Dtsch Z Sportmed. 2022; 73: 106-11. doi:10.5960/dzsm.2022.527
35. Ross R, Neeland IJ, Yamashita S, et al. Waist circumference as a vital sign in clinical prac-tice: a Consensus Statement from the IAS and ICCR Working Group on Visceral Obesity. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2020; 16 (3):177-89. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0310-7.
36. Fernandez-Lazaro CI, Sayon-Orea C, Toledo E, et al. RIVANA Study Investigators. Associa-tion of ideal cardiovascular health with cardi-ovascular events and risk advancement peri-ods in a Mediterranean population-based co-hort. BMC Med. 2022; 5; 20(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02417-x.
37. World Health Organization. Waist circumfer-ence and waist-hip ratio: report of a WHO expert consultation, Geneva, 8-11 December 2008. World Health Organization. 2011. http://www.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44583.
38. Acosta A, Streett S, Kroh MD, et al. White Paper AGA: POWER - Practice Guide on Obesity and Weight Management, Education, and Resources. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017; 15(5):631-49.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.10.023.
39. Visseren FLJ, Mach F, Smulders YM, et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiovascular dis-ease prevention in clinical practice. Eur Heart J. 2021; 42(34):3227-337. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab484. Erratum in: Eur Heart J. 2022; 43(42): 4468.
40. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2022 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clin Diabetes. 2022; 40 (1):10–38. https://doi.org/10.2337/cd22-as01
41. Arnett D, Blumenthal R, Albert M, et al. 2019 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Primary Preven-tion of Cardiovascular Disease. J Am Coll Car-diol. 2019; 74 (10) e177–e232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2019.03.010
42. Stewart J, Addy K, Campbell S, et al. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Updat-ed review of contemporary guidance and lit-erature. JRSM Cardiovasc Dis. 2020; 9:2048004020949326. doi: 10.1177/2048004020949326