Implementation of Telemedicine Services for Safe Abortion Access During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Colombia

Main Article Content

Paola Montenegro Nury Alejandra Rodríguez Diana Marcela Zambrano Elías Jose Mejía


Background: Covid-19 represented a health, humanitarian and economic crisis that affected the world's population, causing changes in the dynamics, structure and behavior of society. Health services were reorganized or interrupted due to the change in the prioritization of health needs and tele-abortion was one of the alternatives to ensure access to safe abortion during the pandemic.

Aim: To identify the challenges and opportunities for the provision of tele-abortion services in Colombia, specifically in the Profamilia Association during and after the Covid-19 health emergency. 

Methods: Qualitative exploratory-descriptive research, based on the methodology of systematization of experiences, developed in three stages: the review of public policy documents, the use of manuscript and oral primary sources, and the analysis of the information collected. 

Results: In Colombia, the health crisis led to a more accelerated implementation of telemedicine and telehealth standards. The implementation of tele-abortion services in Profamilia began in 2020 through the "Mía Kit" as part of a strategy to expand the right to self-managed abortion. The organization faced challenges and opportunities at the organizational, socio-political and cultural levels. The challenges were related to the need for training in the effective use of Information and Communication Technologies, the lack of guidelines for the provision of tele-abortion services and social imaginaries about the suitability of face-to-face care. Opportunities were found to be related to national coverage, protocols, programs and organizational policies on abortion care, and the preference of some users to receive abortion care in a non-face-to-face setting. 

Conclusion: Tele-abortion represents an opportunity to reduce the stigma associated with this intervention, allowing women to access this service in an environment they consider adequate and safe. Virtual advising and accompaniment are essential for this practice to be effective.

Keywords: Safe abortion, Tele-abortion, Telemedicine, Covid-19, Sexual and reproductive health and rights

Article Details

How to Cite
MONTENEGRO, Paola et al. Implementation of Telemedicine Services for Safe Abortion Access During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Colombia. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 1, jan. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <>. Date accessed: 20 may 2024. doi:
Review Articles


1. OMS. COVID-19: cronología de la actuación de la OMS. Published 2020. Accessed January 18, 2022.
2. Enríquez A, Sáenz C. Primeras Lecciones y Desafíos de La Pandemia de COVID-19 Para Los Países Del SICA.; 2021. Accessed November 27, 2022.
3. Resolución No. 1/2020 Pandemia y Derechos Humanos En Las Américas. Comisión Interamericana de derechos Humanos; 2020. Accessed January 18, 2022.
4. Naciones Unidas. El Impacto Del COVID-19 En América Latina y El Caribe.; 2020. Accessed January 18, 2022.
5. IPPF. How will the coronavirus affect access to safe abortion? Published 2020. Accessed January 18, 2022.
6. UNFPA. COVID-19: Un Enfoque de Género. Proteger La Salud y Los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos y Promover La Igualdad de Género.; 2020. Accessed January 18, 2022.
7. SISMA Mujer. Boletín Especial No. 20. Comportamiento de Violencias Contra Las Mujeres En El Marco de La Pandemia Covid-19 En Colombia.; 2020. Accessed January 18, 2022.
8. Todd-Gher J, Shah PK. Abortion in the context of COVID-19: a human rights imperative. 2020;28(1):1. doi:10.1080/26410397.2020.1758394
9. Desarrollo P, Sostenible R. Aprendiendo a sistematizar Las experiencias como fuentes de conocimiento Manual autoinstructivo. Programa Desarrollo Rural Sostenible. Published online 2009:90. Accessed January 18, 2022.
10. Alejandro Acosta L. Guía práctica para la sistematización de proyectos y programas de cooperación técnica Oficina Regional de la FAO para América Latina y el Caribe.
11. Sentencia C-355 de 2006. Corte Constitucional de Colombia; 2006. Accessed January 18, 2022.
12. C-055-22 Corte Constitucional de Colombia. Accessed November 23, 2022.
13. Ley 1419 de 2010. Congreso de Colombia Accessed November 27, 2022.
14. Bojovic N, Stanisljevic J, Giunti G. The impact of COVID-19 on abortion access: Insights from the European Union and the United Kingdom. Health Policy (New York). 2021;125:841-858. doi:10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.05.005
15. Grossman D, Grindlay K. Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2017;130(4):778-782. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000002212
16. Grindlay K, Grossman D. Telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Alaska: Through the provider’s lens. J Telemed Telecare. 2017;23(7):680-685. doi:10.1177/1357633X16659166
17. Grossman D, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Lane K, Blanchard K. Effectiveness and acceptability of medical abortion provided through telemedicine. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2011;118(2):296-303. doi:10.1097/AOG.0B013E318224D110
18. Grossman DA, Grindlay K, Buchacker T, Potter JE, Schmertmann CP. Changes in service delivery patterns after introduction of telemedicine provision of medical abortion in Iowa. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(1):73-78. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.301097
19. Zamberlin N, Romero M, Ramos S. Latin American women’s experiences with medical abortion in settings where abortion is legally restricted. Reprod Health. 2012;9(1). doi:10.1186/1742-4755-9-34
20. FIGO. FIGO endorses the permanent adoption of telemedicine abortion services. FIGO Statement. Published March 18, 2021. Accessed December 22, 2022.
21. Aiken ARA, Starling JE, Gomperts R, Scott JG, Aiken CE. Demand for self-managed online telemedicine abortion in eight European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic: a regression discontinuity analysis. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47(4):238-245. doi:10.1136/BMJSRH-2020-200880
22. Hyland P, Raymond EG, Chong E. A direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in Australia: Retrospective analysis of the first 18 months. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2018;58(3):335-340. doi:10.1111/AJO.12800
23. Naciones Unidas. El COVID-19 trajo 1,4 millones de embarazos no deseados en los países en desarrollo. Noticias ONU. Published 2021. Accessed November 27, 2022.
24. Porter Erlank C, Lord J, Church K. Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine during Covid-19: analysis of patient-reported outcomes. BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021;47(4):261-268. doi:10.1136/BMJSRH-2020-200954
25. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO recommendations on self-care interventions self-management of medical abortion. Published online 2020. Accessed December 22, 2022.
26. CEPAL, UNFPA. Los Riesgos de La Pandemia de COVID-19 Para El Ejercicio de Los Derechos Sexuales y Reproductivos de Las Mujeres 1.; 2020. Accessed November 27, 2022.
27. UNFPA. Consecuencias Socioeconómicas Del Embarazo En La Adolescencia En Seis Países de América Latina. Implementación de La Metodología Milena En Argentina, Colombia, Ecuador, Guatemala, México y Paraguay.; 2020.