Main Article Content
In the most recent Covid-19 pandemic, there was historical economic pressure placed on the world. Countries and governments were required to prepare themselves for the upcoming economic shock that would close the doors to businesses, halt gross domestic product (GDP) growth, and spike inflation rates. The four countries of the United States, the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Australia all produced some methods of early economic response to the Covid-19 Pandemic. However, not all parameters taken towards mitigating the pandemic economic effects proved effective. In order to understand how effective some of these responses were, each country's Gross Domestic Product, Inflation Rate, Gross National Income, Unemployment Rate, and Manufacturing output were tracked along with the recorded cases and deaths from Covid-19. In addition, each country's pre-pandemic responses were also identified to understand how these countries reacted in preparation for the pandemic and to determine if those responses were effective. The data shows in the varying conditions that countries which was suffering from a falling gross domestic product growth rate and a relatively meager inflation rate were significantly bolstered by the pandemic to much more favorable levels without much shock to unemployment. The research also discovered the negative relationship between the pandemic prevention polices and potential economic growth.
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, CDC Museum COVID-19 Timeline. 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/museum/timeline/covid19.html
3. Ministry of Health (Singapore). Singapore Ministry of Health COVID-19 Situation Report 2020. Singapore, Singapore: Ministry of Health (Singapore).
4. Tan, J. B., Cook, M. J., Logan, P., Rozanova, L., & Wilder-Smith, A. (2020). Singapore's Pandemic Preparedness: An Overview of the First Wave of COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(1), 252. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010252
5. Van Nguyen, H., Lan Nguyen, H., Thi Minh Dao, A., Van Nguyen, T., The Nguyen, P., Mai Le, P., Duy Vu, K., Thi Ngoc Tran, A., Kim Dao, P., Thi Nguyen, C., & Debattista, J. (2022). The COVID-19 pandemic in Australia: Public health responses, opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 37(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.3326
6. Thomas Hale, Tilbe Atav, Laura Hallas, Beatriz Kira, Toby Phillips, Anna Petherick, Annalena Pott. “Variation in US states’ responses to COVID-19.” Blavatnik School of Government Working Paper. Available: www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/covidtracker
7. Reserve Bank of Australia, Supporting the Economy and Financial System in Response to COVID-19. (n.d.). 2021, https://www.rba.gov.au/covid-19/
8. Labonte, Marc, The Federal Reserve’s Response to COVID-19: Policy Issues. Congressional Research Service Report R46411. 2021, https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R46411