Chromatin research and epigenetics - historical perspectives, current research, open questions, and misconceptions

Article Sidebar

PDF Download
Published Feb 28, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i2.3600

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

Ute Deichmann
Jacques Loeb Centre for the History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer Sheva 8410500, Israel

Abstract

The concept of chromatin as a complex of nucleic acid and proteins in the cell nucleus was developed by cytologists and biochemists in the late 19th century. It was the starting point for biochemical research on DNA and nuclear proteins. Interest in chromatin declined rapidly at the beginning of the 20th century, but a few decades later a new focus on chromatin emerged, which was not only related to its structure, but also to its function in gene regulatory processes in the development of higher organisms. Since the late 20th century, research on chromatin modifications as well as DNA methylation that emerged in the 1970s have also been conducted under the label epigenetics, a term originally introduced for the complex processes between genotype and phenotype during development. These processes - in particular gene regulation - were subsequently scrutinized by molecular biologists.


Research termed epigenetics remained marginal until the end of the 20th century but experienced a rapid rise when heritability was added to its definition. This was accompanied by an increasing diversity in researchers' understanding and definitions of epigenetics. Epigenetics now includes research on histone and DNA-modifying enzymes, nucleosome remodelers, histone chaperones, chromatin-binding proteins to facilitate transcription factor and polymerase action, and the role of long non-coding RNA and small interfering RNA in transcriptional regulation.


This article highlights the major phases of chromatin and epigenetics research until the present time and illuminates how different scientific contexts changed the relevance and meaning of chromatin from the 19th century. The paper also points to misconceptions and media hype about epigenetics, for example unsupported claims about transgenerational inheritance in humans or questioning of the basic biological principles of gene regulation based on specific regulatory sequences of the genome.

Keywords: chromatin structure, diversity of epigenetics, gene regulation, transcription factors, epigenetics media hype

Article Details

How to Cite
DEICHMANN, Ute. Chromatin research and epigenetics - historical perspectives, current research, open questions, and misconceptions. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 2, feb. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/3600>. Date accessed: 03 dec. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i2.3600.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 11 No 2 (2023): February Issue, Vol.11 Issue 2
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Sturtevant A. A history of genetics. New York 1965: Harper & Row.
2. Wilson EB. The cell in development and inheritance, New York 1896: Macmillan, 1928.
3. Muller H. The production of mutations, Nobel Lecture, December 12, 1946. https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/medicine/1946/muller/lecture/
4. Passarge E. Emil Heitz and the concept of heterochromatin: longitudinal chromosome differentiation was recognized fifty years ago, Am J Hum Genet. 1979; 31(2): 106–115.
5. Jost KL, Bertulat B, Cardoso MC. Heterochromatin and gene positioning: inside, outside, any side? Chromosoma. 2012;121(6): 555–563. doi:10.1007/s00412-012-0389-2
6. Deichmann U. Early responses to Avery et al.’s Paper on DNA as hereditary material. Hist Study Phys Biol Sci 2004;34(2): 207–33.
7. Deichmann U. “Molecular" versus "colloidal": Controversies in biology and biochemistry, 1900–1940, Bull Hist Chem. 2007;32(2): 105–18.
8. Morange M. What history tells us. XXXII. The long and tortuous history of epigenetic marks, J Biosci. 2013;38(3): 451–54.
9. Davidson EH. The regulatory genome: Gene regulatory networks in development and evolution. San Diego, CA 2006: Academic Press.
10. Felsenfeld, Gary. 2014. The evolution of epigenetics, Perspect Biol Med 57(1): 132–48.
11. Olins DE, Olins AL. Chromatin history: Our view from the bridge, Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol.2003;4(10): 809–14.
12. Deichmann U. Epigenetics: the origins and evolution of a fashionable topic, Developmental Biology. 2016;416: 249–54.
13. Cedar H. Interview by U Deichmann, June 19,2014. https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/loeb/OHP/Pages/Howard_Cedar.aspx.
14. Stein R, Gruenbaum Y, Pollack Y, Razin A, Cedar, H. 1982. Clonal inheritance of the pattern DNA methylation in mouse cells, PNAS. 1982;79: 61-65.
15. Bird A. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Genes Dev. 2002;16:6–21.
16. Sanulli S, Justin N, Teissandier A, Ancelin K, Portoso M, Caron M. et al. Jarid2 methylation via the PRC2 complex regulates H3K27me3 deposition during cell Differentiation, Mol Cell. 2015; 57(5): 769–783. doi: 0.1016/j.molcel.2014.12.020
17. Bestor TH., Edwards, JR, Boulard M. Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development, PNAS. 2015;112: 6796–9.
18. Selker EU. Gene silencing: repeats that count, Cell. 1999;97: 157–60.
19. Zilberman D, Henikoff S. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation patterns. Development. 2009;134: 3959–65.
20. Edwards JR, Yarychkivska O, Boulard M, Bestor TH. DNA methylation and DNA methyltransferases, Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2017;10: 23.
21. Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447: 396-398.
22. Haig D. The (dual) origin of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2004;69: 67–70.
23. Waddington CH. The epigenotype, Endeavor. 1942;1: 18-20.
24. Waddington CH. The strategy of the genes: A discussion of some aspects of theoretical biology, London 1957: Ruskin House/George Allen and Unwin Ltd.
25. Nanney DL. Epigenetic control systems. PNAS. 1958;44: 712-717.
26. Henikoff S, Greally J. Epigenetics, cellular memory, and gene regulation. Curr Biol. 2016;26: R641–66.
27. Davidson EH. Gene activity in early development. 1968. New York: Academic Press.
28. Morange M. The relations between genetics and epigenetics A historical point of view, Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002;981: 50–60.
29. Britten RJ, Davidson EH. 1969. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory, Science 1969;165: 349-357.
30. Peter I, Davidson EH. Genomic control process: Development and evolution. Amsterdam 2015.: Academic Press.
31. Holliday, Robin, Epigenetics: a historical overview, Epigenetics. 2006;1(2): 76-80. doi: 10.4161/epi.1.2.2762.
32. Riggs AD, Russo VEA, Martienssen RA. Epigenetic mechanisms of gene regulation. Plainview 1996: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
33. Deichmann, U. The social construction of the social epigenome and the larger biological context, Epigenetics & Chromatin. 2020;13: 37.
34. Henikoff S, Strahl BD, Warburton PE. Epigenomics: a roadmap to chromatin, Science. 2008;322: 853.
35. Lappalainen T, Greally JM. Associating cellular epigenetic models with human phenotypes. Nat Rev Genet. 2017; 18:441–51.
36. Ptashne M. Epigenetics: core misconcept. PNAS. 2013;110(18): 7101–3.
37. Greally JM. A user’s guide to the ambiguous word ‘epigenetics’, Nature. 2018;19: 207–8.
38. Horsthemke B. A critical appraisal of clinical epigenetics, Clinical Epigenetics. 2022;14: 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-022-01315-6.
39. Gertz J, Varley KE, Reddy TE, Bowling KM, Pauli F, Parker SL, et al. Analysis of DNA methylation in a three-generation family reveals widespread genetic influence on epigenetic regulation, PLoS Genet. 2011;7(8): e1002228.
40. Zilberman D, Gehring M, Tran RK, Ballinger T, Henikoff S, Genome-wide analysis of Arabidopsis thaliana DNA methylation uncovers an interdependence between methylation and transcription, Nat Genet. 2007;39(1): 61–9.
41. Sugden K, Hannon EJ, Arseneault L, Belsky DW, Broadbent JM, Corcoran DL. Establishing a generalized polyepigenetic biomarker for tobacco smoking, Transl. Psychiatry. 2019;9: 1–12.
42. Marzi SJ, Sugden K, Arseneault L, Belsky DW, Burrage J, Corcoran DL,et al. Analysis of DNA Methylation in young people: limited evidence for an association between victimization stress and epigenetic variation in blood, Am J Psychiatry. 2018;175(6): 517–29.
43. Tanksley PT, Motz RT, Kail RM, Barnes JC, Liu H. The genome-wide study of human social behavior and its application in sociology. Frontiers in Sociology. 2019;4: 53.
44. Bird A. 2013. Dissolving the layers in genetics and epigenetics with Dr. Adrian Bird, Epigenie. http://epigenie.com/dissolving-the-layers-in-genetics-and-epigenetics-with-dr-adrian-bird.
45. Meloni M. Race in an epigenetic time: thinking biology in the plural. The British Journal of Sociology. Online 22 March 2017 doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12248.
46. Bird A. Interview by U Deichmann May 28, 2018. https://in.bgu.ac.il/en/loeb/OHP/Pages/Adrian-Bird.aspx.
47. Daxinger L, Whitelaw E. Understanding transgenerational epigenetic inheritance via the gametes in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13(3): 153-62. doi: 10.1038/nrg3188.
48. Bird A. Proteins that interpret genomic signals to stabilise cell identity. Paper at the Workshop "Plasticity and Constancy in Development and Evolution," Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, May 9-10, 2022.
49. Bertozzi TM, Becker JL, Blake GET, Bansal A, Nguyen DK, Fernandez-Twinn DS, et al. Variably methylated retrotransposons are refractory to a range of environmental perturbations. Nat Genet. 2021;53:1233–42.
50. Heard E, Martienssen RA. Transgenerational epigenetic inheritance: myths and mechanisms, Cell. 2014;157: 95–109.
51. Kolchinsky EI, Kutschera U, Hossfeld U, Levit GS. Russia’s new Lysenkoism. Curr Biol. 2017;27: R1037–59.
52. Posner R, Toker IA, Antonova O, Star E, Anava S, Azmon E, Hendricks M, Bracha S, Gingold H, Rechavi O. Neuronal small RNAs control behavior transgenerationally, Cell. 2019;177: 1814–26.
53. Horsthemke B. A critical view on transgenerational epigenetic inheritance in humans, Nature Communications. 2018;9: 2973.
54. Anway MD, Cupp AS, Uzumcu M, Skinner MK. Epigenetic transgenerational actions of endocrine disruptors and male fertility. Science. 2005;308:1466–9.
55. Iqbal K, Tran DA, Li AX, Warden C, Bai AY, Singh P. Epigenome reprogramming in the mammalian germline corrects deleterious effects of endocrine disruptors globally and at imprinted genes, Genome Biol. 2015;16: 619.
56. Yehuda R, Engel SM, Brand SR, Seckl J, Marcus SM, Berkowitz GS, Transgenerational effects of posttraumatic stress disorder in babies of mothers exposed to the world trade center attacks during pregnancy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;90: 4115–8.
57. Schulz LC. The Dutch Hunger Winter and the developmental origins of health and disease, PNAS. 2010;107: 16757–8.
58. Whitelaw E. Disputing Lamarckian epigenetic inheritance in mammals, Genome Biol. 2015;16(1): 60.
59. Maderspacher, F. Lysenko rising, Curr. Biol. 2-10;20: R836.
60. Kuhn TS. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago 1962: University of Chicago Press.