↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background: Surgeons are expected to teach students, residents and colleagues about surgical skills. The critical assumption that a “first-learner” will default to teaching a “second-learner” what they were taught, in the way they were taught, was investigated.

Methods: Thirty-six medical students without experience tying a locking, sliding knot were divided into 18 pairs of first- and second-learners. 4 pairs were assigned to the “traditional teaching” (T) protocol group, 5 pairs were assigned to the “operant-teaching” (O) group and 9 pairs were “informed of the importance of the operant teaching strategy” before instruction and assigned to the “operant-informed” (OI) group. First-learners were taught to tie the locking, sliding knot according to one teaching protocol (T, O, or OI). Successful first-learners were asked to teach a second-learner. For the first-learners, time from the start of their instruction to the first constructed knot, time to tie 10 consecutive knots, and accuracy of knots (number of incorrectly constructed knots) were recorded. For second-learners, time from start of instruction to the first constructed knot, time to tie 10 knots, and accuracy of knots were recorded.

Results: All first-learners, in all groups, were able to accurately tie a locking, sliding knot. During self-practice, all T-group first-learners lost the ability to tie the knot. Between the 5 O- and 9 OI- first-learners, only one OI-group first-learner lost the ability to tie the knot. After instruction from the 16 successful first-learners, 16 second-learners were able to tie to the knot. The error rate for second learners was 93% for the T-group, 20% in O-group and 12.5% in OI-group. Time to tie the first knot were different between the three teaching groups for both the first and second-learners (p=0.007 and p=0.041, respectively). The average time to tie the 10 knots was similar between first-learner (p=0.336) and second-learner O- and OI-groups (p=0.788).

Conclusion: Demonstration-based teaching results in incomplete skills which deteriorate. Contrary to the assumption that successful first-learners would teach the way they were taught, first-learners abandon the teaching strategy when tasked with teaching a second-learner. Our results emphasize the importance of incorporating teaching curriculums into surgical education.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 11 No 2 (2023): February Issue, Vol.11 Issue 2
SectionResearch Articles
Published28 February 2023
DOI10.18103/mra.v11i2.3618
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

JC

John Cole, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA

BS

Benjamin Saks, MD

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA

YL

Yungtai Lo, PhD

Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA

CB

Carl Binder, PhD

The Performance Thinking Network, LLC, 281 Shepard Way NW, Bainbridge Island, WA USA 98110

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗