↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Background: Well-conducted peer observation of teaching (POT) can be an effective tool in enhancing teaching quality and educator development in healthcare teaching including dentistry. Experience suggests that its effectiveness depends on the environment in which it is undertaken.  A previous study investigated engagement with POT by a dental school faculty in the UK and identified barriers to its routine use for educator development. These barriers are particularly problematic for part-time educators who play an increasingly significant, but frequently underestimated role, in undergraduate dental teaching, complementing the teaching of full-time clinical academics.  Owing to the part-time nature of their roles, opportunities for their teaching development are limited. This can lead to dissatisfaction and a lack of fulfillment, and ultimately their loss from teaching faculty.

Aims: This study explores POT’s utility for the development of part-time dental educators’ (PTDEs).  Specifically it (i) audited their engagement with POT, (ii) reviewed the design(s) employed, (iii) assessed participant’s perceived value of it and (iv) explored methods to maximize its utility for their teaching development.

Method: Teaching roles and experience, current engagement and experience of POT of part-time educators employed in a UK dental school were explored using a mixed methodology survey. Free-text responses were subjected to thematic analysis and emerging themes were subsequently explored iteratively by undertaking observations of seven part-time educators in various dental teaching environments. A developmental POT approach was used to assess utility.

Results: Of 44 surveys distributed, 27 (61%) completed surveys were returned. 24 (89%) respondents reported that POT was of some or high value and resulted in enhanced teaching quality. Respondents experienced difficulties undertaking POT annually with only 14 (52%) achieving this.  Observer choice emerged as fundamental to its utility. Additionally, the study identified a number of barriers to its effective use. 

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 11 No 3 (2023): March issue, Volume 11, Issue 3
SectionResearch Articles
Published31 March 2023
DOI10.18103/mra.v11i3.3662
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗