Developing the Teaching Skills of Part-Time Dental Educators
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Well-conducted peer observation of teaching (POT) can be an effective tool in enhancing teaching quality and educator development in healthcare teaching including dentistry. Experience suggests that its effectiveness depends on the environment in which it is undertaken. A previous study investigated engagement with POT by a dental school faculty in the UK and identified barriers to its routine use for educator development. These barriers are particularly problematic for part-time educators who play an increasingly significant, but frequently underestimated role, in undergraduate dental teaching, complementing the teaching of full-time clinical academics. Owing to the part-time nature of their roles, opportunities for their teaching development are limited. This can lead to dissatisfaction and a lack of fulfillment, and ultimately their loss from teaching faculty.
Aims: This study explores POT’s utility for the development of part-time dental educators’ (PTDEs). Specifically it (i) audited their engagement with POT, (ii) reviewed the design(s) employed, (iii) assessed participant’s perceived value of it and (iv) explored methods to maximize its utility for their teaching development.
Method: Teaching roles and experience, current engagement and experience of POT of part-time educators employed in a UK dental school were explored using a mixed methodology survey. Free-text responses were subjected to thematic analysis and emerging themes were subsequently explored iteratively by undertaking observations of seven part-time educators in various dental teaching environments. A developmental POT approach was used to assess utility.
Results: Of 44 surveys distributed, 27 (61%) completed surveys were returned. 24 (89%) respondents reported that POT was of some or high value and resulted in enhanced teaching quality. Respondents experienced difficulties undertaking POT annually with only 14 (52%) achieving this. Observer choice emerged as fundamental to its utility. Additionally, the study identified a number of barriers to its effective use.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Knott G, Crane L, Heslop, I and Glass BD. Training and support of sessional staff to improve quality of teaching and learning at Universities. Am J Pharm Ed. 2015; 79(5): 1-8.
3. Patston, P, Holmes D, Maalhagh-Fard A et al. Maximising the potential of part-time clinical teachers. Clin Teach. 2010; 7:247-250.
4. Dornan T, Littlewood S, Margolis SA et al. How can experience in clinical and community settings contribute to early medical education? BEME Guide 6; Med Teach. 2006; 28(1):3-18.
5. Livingstone HM, Dellinger TM, Hyde JC and Holder R. The aging and diminishing dental faculty. J Dent Educ. 2004; 68 (3): 345- 354.
6. Buchanan JAG and Parry D. Engagement with peer observation of teaching by a dental school faculty in the United Kingdom. Eur J Dent Educ. 2019 Feb;23(1):42-53. doi: 10.1111/eje.12391. Epub 2018 Aug 31.PMID: 30171662
7. Cunningham IM and Lynch CD. Peer review of teaching in UK dental schools. Is it happening? How successful is it? BDJ. 2016; 220: 645-649.
8. Gosling D. Models of Peer Observation of Teaching. 2002; www.researchgate.net/publications/267687499
9. Hendry GD, Oliver, GR. Seeing is believing: the benefits of peer observation. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice. 2012; 9(1). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.9.1.7
10. Sullivan PB, Buckle A, Nicky G and Atkinson SH. Peer observation of teaching as a faculty development tool. BMC Med Educ. 2012; 4; 12: 26. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-12-26.
11. Dahlgren LO, Eriksson BE, Gyllenhammar H et al. To be and to have a critical friend in medical teaching. Med Educ. 2006; 40:72-78.
12. Cruchley D, Nield K and Jordan F. Moving on from peer observation of teaching: a collaborative development utilising the principle of peer-support. Higher Education. 2005; 6(1): 1-5.
13. O’Keefe M, Lecouteur A, Miller J and McGowan U. The colleague development program: a multidisciplinary program of peer observation partnerships. Med Teach. 2009; 31: 1060-1065.
14. Cairns AM, Bisell V and Bovill C. Evaluation of a pilot peer observation of teaching scheme for chair-side tutors at Glasgow University Dental School. BDJ. 2013; 213: 573-576.
15. Trujillo JM, DiVall MV, Barr J, Gonyeau M, Van Amburgh JA, Mathews JM and Qualters D. Development of a peer teaching-assessment program and a peer observation and evaluation tool. Am J Pharm Ed. 2008; 72(6):1-9.
16. Meyer J. Chapter 11 Action research in qualitative research in health care. Eds Pope, C and Mays, M. Third Edition. BMJ Books Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2006.
17. Sandars J, Singh G, and MacLeod S. Are we missing the potential for action research for transformative change in medical education? Ed Prim Care. 2012; 23:239-41.
18. Siddiqui ZS, Jonas-Dwyer D and Carr SE. Twelve tips for peer observation of teaching. Med Teach. 2007; 29: 297-300.
19. Boynton P.B. Administering, analyzing, and reporting your questionnaire. BMJ. 2004; 328: 1372-1375.
20. Strauss A and Corbin J. Basics of qualitative research. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
21. Braun V and Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3(2): 77-101.
22. Martin GA and Double JM. Developing higher education teaching skills through peer observation and collaborative reflection. Innovat Educ and Train Int. 1998; 35(2), 161-170. doi:10.1080/1355800980350210
23. Pendleton D, Scofield T, Tate P, Havelock P. The consultation: an approach to learning and teaching. Oxford. Oxford University Press; 1984.
24. Shortland S. Observing teaching in HE: A case study of classroom observation within peer observation. Int J Educ Manag. 2004; 4(2): 3-15.
25. Richard CL, Lillie E, Mathias K, McFarlane T. Review of teaching in a Canadian pharmacy school. Am J Pharm Ed. 2019; 83(6): 1290-1299.
26. Martsolf DS, Dieckman BC, Cartechine KA et al. Peer review of teaching: instituting a program in a college of nursing. J Nurs Educ. 1999; 38(7): 326-332.
27. Pierce JR, Rendón P, Rao D. Peer observation of rounds leads to collegial discussion of teaching. 2018; Teach Learn Med. 2018; Apr-Jun; 30(2):233-238.
28. Bell AE, Meyer SE and Maggio LA. Getting better together: A website review of peer coaching initiatives for medical educators. Teach Learn Med. 2020; 32 (1): 53-60.
29. Freeth D, Reeves S, Koppel I et al. Evaluating interprofessional education: A self-help guide. Higher Education Academy Learning and Teaching Support Network for Health Sciences and Practice; 2005.
30. Kraft MA, Blazar D, Hogan D. The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: a meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2018; 88(4):547-588.
31. Kohut GF, Burnap C and Yon MG. Peer observation of teaching: Perceptions of the observer and the observed. College Teaching. 2007; 55(1): 19-25.
32. Hammersley-Fletcher L and Orsmond P. Evaluating our peers: is peer observation a meaningful process? Studies in Higher Education. 2004; 29:4, 489-503.
33. Kolb DA. The process of experiential learning. Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. 1984:20-38.
34. MacDougall J and Drummond MJ. The development of medical teachers: an enquiry into the learning histories of 10 experienced medical teachers. Med Educ. 2005; 39 (12):1213-1220.
35. Finn K, Chiappa V, Puig A, and Hunt DP. How to become a better clinical teacher: A collaborative peer observation process. Med Teach. 2011; 33 (2):151-155.
36. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK. Cambridge University Press; 1991.
37. Vygotsky L S. Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. In: M. Cole & V. John-Steiner & S. Scribner & E. Souberman (Eds.), Mind in Society. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press; 1978.