Political Considerations in Implementing Initiatives to Improve the Mental Well-Being of Employees in the Workplace

Main Article Content

Ashley Weinberg, AFBPsS., FHEA

Abstract

Relatively recently governments have begun to show some of the leadership required to incorporate well-being within their calculations about work-related behaviour. This is important not only for fulfilling our individual potential, but also in signalling recognition of the central role of well-being – both physical and psychological – within equations about productivity and performance. This article considers notable national examples of good practice from Denmark, UK and Canada, as well as highlighting a range of organisational factors that help explain slow progress within workplaces, even when government-level support for improving mental well-being of employees already exists.


Such organisational factors include political considerations and so this paper shines a spotlight on organisational politics surrounding mental well-being at work. In this way, I describe the potential for practitioners in occupational psychology, health and well-being roles and in human resources to develop further and utilise positive political skills to facilitate positive change. Furthermore, examples of political skills in action at all levels of an organisation are considered, ranging from harnessing the active commitment of senior management teams, to campaigning for appropriate training for middle managers, as well as raising awareness of mental health across all employees in the workplace.


There is great potential for positive economic as well as individual health outcomes where organisations give far greater priority to psychological health than previously. The emergence of research-based guidance to improve psychological health at work, as well as recent commitment by some governments around the world to well-being priorities, has signposted new directions for mental well-being in the workplace. What remains concerning is that uptake of such guidance varies and its implementation often lags behind awareness.


This paper considers a range of readily applicable and cost-effective organisational strategies which can be championed by practitioners for improving the mental well-being of the workforce, while it also makes explicit the role of political behaviour in seeking improvements to psychosocial aspects of the workplace.

Article Details

How to Cite
WEINBERG, Ashley. Political Considerations in Implementing Initiatives to Improve the Mental Well-Being of Employees in the Workplace. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 5, may 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/3725>. Date accessed: 25 apr. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i5.3725.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. United Nations. Universal Declaration of Human Rights. December 1948. Accessed March 22, 2023 https://www.un.org/en/about-us/universal-declaration-of-human-rights
2. Danish Working Environment Authority. Executive order on psychosocial working environment. September 2020. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://at.dk/en/regulations/executive-orders/psychosocial-working-environment-1406/
3. British Psychological Society. Psychology at work: Improving wellbeing and productivity in the workplace. November 2017. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.europeanbrainsatwork.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Psychology-at-Work-improving-wellbeing-and-productivity-in-the-workplace.pdf
4. Mental Health Commission of Canada. National Standard. January 2013. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://mentalhealthcommission.ca/national-standard/
5. Health and Safety Executive. What are the Management Standards? Accessed March 22, 2023: https://www.hse.gov.uk/stress/standards/
6. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Mental well-being at work. March 2022. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng212
7. Weinberg A, Hudson J, Pearson A and Chowdhury SB. Organisational uptake of NICE guidance in promoting employees’ psychological health. Occ Med. 2019;69(1):47–53. https://academic.oup.com/occmed/article/69/1/47/5164095
8. Preece R, Williams S, Jones S, Peel P, Roughton M. Measuring implementation of evidence-based guidance on promoting workers’ health. Occ Med. 2012;62:627–631.
9. Rössler, W. The stigma of mental disorders: A millennia‐long history of social exclusion and prejudices. EMBO Rep. 2016;17(9):1250–1253.
10. Office for National Statistics. Sickness absence in the UK labour market: 2021. Accessed March 22, 2023: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/labourproductivity/articles/sicknessabsenceinthelabourmarket/2021#reasons-for-sickness-absence
11. Mental Health Commission of Canada. Workplace mental health. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://mentalhealthcommission.ca/what-we-do/workplace/
12. Deloitte. Mental Health and employers. Refreshing the case for investment. January 2020. Accessed March 22, 2023. file:///C:/Users/cxs035/Downloads/deloitte-uk-mental-health-and-employers.pdf
13. Goh J, Pfeffer J, Zenios SA. The relationship between workplace stressors and mortality and health costs in the United States. Manag Sci 2016;62:608–628.
14. Matrix Insight. Economic analysis of workplace mental health promotion and mental disorder prevention programmes and of their potential contribution to EU health, social and economic policy objectives. November 2012. Accessed March 22, 2023. http://www.mentalhealthpromotion.net/?i=portal.en.enmhp-news.2900
15. Hassard J, Teoh K, Thomson L, Blake H. Understanding the cost of mental health at work: an integrative framework. In: Wall, T, Cooper CL and Brough P, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Wellbeing. SAGE Publications; 2021:9-25.
16. Weinberg A, Creed F. Sources of stress in the NHS workforce. The Lancet, 2000;355:533-537.
17. Bajorek Z, Bevan S. Demonstrating the effectiveness of workplace counselling: Reviewing the evidence for wellbeing and cost effectiveness outcomes. Institute for Employment Studies. July 2020. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.employment-studies.co.uk/system/files/resources/files/553.pdf
18. Weinberg A, Sutherland VJ, Cooper CL. Organizational stress management: A strategic approach. Palgrave Macmillan; 2010.
19. Nielsen K, Axtell C, Taylor S. National approaches to wellbeing interventions: The UK Man-agement Standards as an example. In Wall T, Cooper CL and Brough P, eds. The SAGE Handbook of Organisational Wellbeing. SAGE Publications. 2021:368-382.
20. International Labour Organization. Workplace well-being. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.ilo.org/safework/areasofwork/workplace-health-promotion-and-well-being/WCMS_118396/lang--en/index.htm
21. Edmans A. Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. J of Fin Econ. 2011;101(3):621-640.
22. Richardson KM, Rothstein HR. Effects of occupational stress management intervention programs: a meta-analysis. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13(1):69-93.
23. Nielsen K. Review Article: How can we make organizational interventions work? Employees and line managers as actively crafting interventions. Human Relations, 2013;66(8):1029–1050.
24. Lawrence P. How to deal with resistance to change. Harvard Bus Rev. 1969(Jan). Accessed March 22, 2023. https://hbr.org/1969/01/how-to-deal-with-resistance-to-change
25. National Health Service. Growing occupational health and wellbeing together: our roadmap for the future. January 2023. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.england.nhs.uk/long-read/growing-occupational-health-and-wellbeing-together-our-roadmap-for-the-future/#4-our-evidence-base-for-change
26. Meister J. The future of work is employee well-being. Forbes Magazine. August 4, 2021. Accessed March 22, 2023. https://www.forbes.com/sites/jeannemeister/2021/08/04/the-future-of-work-is-worker-well-being/?sh=37b73c904aed
27. Raile AN, Raile ED, Post LA. Analysis and action: The political will and public will approach. Action Research. 2021;19(2):237–254.
28. Montano D, Hoven H, Siegrist J. Effects of organisational-level interventions at work on employees’ health: A systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2014;14:135.
29. Ferris GR, Treadway DC, Kolodinsky RW, Hochwarter WA, Kacmar CJ, Douglas C, Frink DD. Development and Validation of the Political Skill Inventory. J of Manag. 2005;31(1):126–152.
30. Ferris GR. Treadway DC, Perrewé PL, Brouer RL, Douglas C, Lux S. J of Manag. 2007;33(3):290-320.
31. Ferris, GR, Perrewe, PL, Treadway D, McAllister C, Parker E. Political Skill at Work (revised and updated): How to influence, motivate, and win support. Nicholas Brealey Publishing; 2020.
32. Silvester J. The good, the bad, and the ugly: Politics and politicians at work. In: Hodgkinson GP, Ford JK, eds. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. John Wiley & Son Ltd; 2008: 107-148.
33. Wu A, Roemer EC, Kent KB, Ballard DW, Goetzel, RZ. Organizational best practices supporting mental health in the workplace. J Occup Environ Med. 2021 Dec; 63(12): e925–e931.
34. Karasek R, Theorell T. Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. Basic Books; 1990.
35. McCambridge J, Witton J, Elbourne DR. Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Mar; 67(3): 267–277.
36. Aust B, Ducki A. Comprehensive health promotion interventions at the workplace: experiences with health circles in Germany. J of Occup Health Psychol. 2004;9(3):258-270.
37. Wood S. Job characteristics, employee voice and well-being in Britain. Ind Relations Journal. 2008;39:153-168.
38. World Health Organization. World Mental Health Day. Accessed March 23, 2023. https://www.who.int/campaigns/world-mental-health-day/2022