Repercussions of The Development of Neuroscience in the Field of Psychology
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Neuroscience has made new combinations with the most different specialties, causing conceptual redefinitions and generating new fields that may or may not become new specialties. These are recombination efforts between specialties from different disciplines (and not between entire disciplinary fields), which face the challenge of working in an interdisciplinary way.
Objective: The purpose of the article is to answer the research problem: in the case of psychology, what consequences has neuroscience generated in its disciplinary territory?
Methods: Two hypotheses were formulated to answer the problem. One of them, internal to the discipline, proposes to investigate possible redefinitions around the concept of social cognition. And the other one, external, verifies the reception that psychologists have given to social neuroscience. Three journals from three different psychological specialties were chosen to carry out the investigation in the period from 2000 to 2023: the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, representing social psychology, the Journal of Cognitive Psychology, cognitive psychology and the Neuropsychology Review, corresponding to the field of neuropsychology.
The systematic analysis technique was used to elaborate a search protocol from some strings.
Results: The two formulated hypotheses were not supported and, to account for this, some explanations were given, as well as new research hypotheses.
Conclusions: Among the repercussions generated by the development of neuroscience in psychology, it seems that the external repercussions are felt within the discipline in a more visible way than an internal repercussion such as the reformulation around the concept of social cognition.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
(2) MacLead, M. What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Synthese. 2018; 195: 697-720.
(3) Turner, S. What are disciplines? And how is interdisciplinarity different? in Weingart, P. & Stehr, N. (Ed.). Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
(4) Weingart, P & Stehr, N. Interdisciplinarity: the paradoxical discourse. Practising Interdisciplinarity. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2000.
(5) Lacerda, ALR. Sob o Espectro da Neurociência: a Neurossociologia, a Psicologia Social e as Abordagens Biossociais. Psicologia, Ciência e Profissão, 2021; 41: 1-13.
(6) Schutt, RK., Seidman, LJ & Keshavan, MS. (Eds.). Social Neuroscience: Brain, Mind, and Society. Harvard University Press, 2015.
(7) Cacioppo, JT, & Berntson, GG. Social psychological contributions to the decade of the brain: Doctrine of multilevel analysis. American Psychologist. 1992; 47(8), 1019–1028.
(8) Fiske, S & Taylor, SE. Social Cognition, from brains to culture. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oak, CA: Sage, 2013.
(9) Franks, DD & Turner, JH. (Eds.). Handbook of neurosociology. New York: Springer, 2013.
(10) Sternberg, RJ & Sternberg, K. Psicologia Cognitiva, S.Paulo: Cengage Learning, 2016.
(11) Bryman, A. Social Research Methods. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press, 2016.
(12) Bekkali, S et al. Is the putative mirror neuron system associated with empathy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review. 2021; 31: 14-57.
(13) Campos, C et al. Neuroplastic changes following social cognition training in schizopherinia: A systematic review. Neuropsychology Review. 2016; 26:310-328.
(14) Chisholm, AK et al. Social function and autism spectrum disorder in children and adults with fibromatosis type 1: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuropsychology Review. 2018; 28: 317-340.
(15) Chaves, R & Wagner, DD. The neural representation of self is recapitulated in the brains of friends: a round-robin fMRI study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2019; 118 (3): 407-416.
(16) Burns, SM et al. Making Social Neuroscience Less WEIRD: Using fNIRS to Measure Neural Signatures of Persuasive Influence in a Middle East Participant Sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2019; 116 (3): e1–e11.
(17) Bartholow, B et al . Effects of alcool on person perception: a social cognitive neuroscience approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85(4): 627-638.
(18) Beer, JS et al. The Regulatory Function of Self-Conscious Emotion: Insights From Patients With Orbitofrontal Damage. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85(4): 594–604.
(19) Cacioppo, JT et al. Just because you’re imaging the brain doesn’t mean uou can stop using your head: a primer and set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85 (4): 650-661.
(20) Harmon-Jones, E & Devine, PG. Introduction to the Special Section on Social Neuroscience: Promise and Caveats.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2003, 85, (4): 589–593.
(21) Willingham, D & Dunn, E. What neuroimaging and brain localization can do, cannot do, and shoud not do for social psychology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85 (4): 662-671.
(22) Balconi, M & Molteni, E. Past and future of near-infrared spectroscopy in studies of emotion and social neuroscience. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2016; 28 (2): 129-146.
(23) Patil, I & Silani, G. Alexithymia increases moral acceptability of accidental harms. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2014; 26 (5): 597-614
(24) Van Den Stock, J et al. Current potential for clinical optimization of social cognition assessment for frontotemporal dementia and primary psychiatric desorder. Neuropsychology Review. 2022; August.
(25) Palmer, BW et al. What do we know about neuropsychological aspects of schzophernia? Neuropsychology Review, 2009; 19: 365-384.
(26) Sheridan, M et al. Early institucionalization: neurobiological consequences and genetic modifiers. Neuropsychology Review. 2010; 20: 414-429.
(27) Seabury, RD & Cannon, TD. Memory impairments and psychosis prediction: a scoping review and theoretical overview. Neuropsychology Review. 2020; 30: 521-545.
(28) Birch, RC et al. Understanding the neuropsychiatric phenotype of fragile x-associated tremor ataxia syndrome: a systematica review. Neuropsychology Review. 2014; 24: 491-513.
(29) Wittemberg, D et al. The early neuropsychological and behavioral characteristics of frontotemporal dementia. Neurospychology Review, 2008; 18: 91-102.
(30) Izuma, K et al. Neural activity in the reward-related brain regio predicts implicit self-esteem: a novel validity test of psychological measures using neuroimaging. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2018;11 (3): 343-357.
(31) Rule, N et al. Accuracy and consensus in judgments of trustwrthiness from faces: behavioral and neural correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2013; 104 (3): 409-426.
(32) Harmon-Jonnes, E et al. Left frontal cortical activation and spreading of alternatives: tests of the action-based model of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2008;94 (1):1-15.
(33) Cunningham, WA. et al. Neural components of social evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85 (4): 639-649.
(34) Dolcos, F et al. Neural correlates of emotion–cognition interactions: A review of evidence from brain imaging investigations. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2011; 23, (6): 669-694.
(35) Taylor, SE et al. Are self-enhancing cognitions associated with healthy or unhealthy biological profiles?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003; 85(4): 605–615.
(36) Ito, TA & Urland, GR. Race and Gender on the Brain: Electrocortical Measures of Attention to the Race and Gender of Multiply Categorizable Individuals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2003;85(4): 616–626.
(37) Franks, DD. Neurosociology: The nexus between neuroscience and social psychology. Springer, 2010