Relationship between Positive Attitude and Marital Separation: The US Evidence
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The study tests the hypothesis that positive attitude of an individual influences his/her decision for marital separation negatively. It extends this analysis to investigate whether these two variables may affect each other simultaneously. Finally, it examines whether the marital separation decision of men differs from that of women.
Methods: Using two samples from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth, 1979 (NLSY79), a longitudinal data set from the United States, the study estimates marital separation equation by probit in both cross-sectional and longitudinal frameworks. To test for the presence of a simultaneous relationship between positive attitude and marital separation, the study further estimates these two equations by an appropriate two-stage probit procedure. In addition, the study estimates these equations for males and females separately and draws interesting conclusions.
Results: Results obtained by single-equation methods under both cross-sectional and longitudinal frameworks indicate that positive attitude is a significant covariate of an individual’s marital separation decision regardless of whether he/she is a younger adult or a mature adult. Following Maddala’s two-stage probit procedure, the study further demonstrates that an individual’s marital status and positive attitude are simultaneously related among mature adult women only. The evidence of a recursive relationship between these two variables in both younger and mature adult samples indicate to a large extent that positive attitude may in fact have a causal effect on marital separation. The study further finds the evidence that covariates of marital separation and positive attitude differ significantly between men and women.
Conclusion: Evidence of a strong negative correlation between positive attitude and marital separation demonstrated in this study indicates that any policy to improve the attitude of an individual may have a favorable effect on marital relationship.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Angrist J, Pischke J. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: How better research design is taking the con out of Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2010;24(2):3–30.
3. Cleek MG, Pearson TA. Perceived Causes of Divorce: An Analysis of Interrelationships. Journal of Marriage and Family. 1985;47(1):179- 183.
4. Horwitz A, Mclaughlin J, White H. How the Negative and Positive Aspects of Partner Relationships Affect the Mental Health of Young Married People. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 1998;39(2):124-136.
5. Kessler RC, Walters EE, Forthofer MS. The Social Consequences of Psychiatric disorders, III: Probability of Marital Stability. American Journal of Psychiatry. 1998;155(8):1092-1096.
6. Kim H, McKenry P. The Relationship between Marriage and Psychological Well-Being: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Family Issues. 2002;23(8): 885-911.
7. Lee C, Kim HS. The Relationship between Mental Health and Marital dissolution: The Prior Depression and the Following Divorce. 2009. https://paa2009.princeton.edu/abstracts/91053. https://paa2009.populationassociation.org/papers/91053.
8. Greene W. LIMDEP, Econometric Software, Inc, Plainview, New York. 2016.
9. Maddala GS. Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge University Press, New York. 1983.
10. Mastekaasa A. Psychological Well-Being and Marital Dissolution: Selection Effects? Journal of Family Issues. 1994;15 (2):208-228.
11. Mohanty MS. Effects of Positive Attitude on Happiness and Wage: Evidence from the US Data. Journal of Economic Psychology. 2009;30(6):884-897.
12. Mohanty MS. Effects of Positive Attitude and Optimism on Wage and Employment: A Double Selection Approach. Journal of Socio-Economics. 2012;41(3):304-316.
13. Mohanty MS. What Determines Happiness? Income or Attitude: Evidence from the US Longitudinal Data. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology and Economics. 2014;7(2):80-102.
14. Mohanty MS. Relationship between Positive Attitude and Job Satisfaction: Evidence from the US Data. Eastern Economic Journal. 2016;42(3):349-372.
15. Mohanty MS. Role of Psychological Variables in the Determination of the Worker’s Wage: Further Evidence from the United States. Australian Economic Papers. 2019;58(1):54-77.
16. Mohanty MS, Ullah A. Why Does Growing Up in an Intact Family during Childhood Lead to Higher Earnings during Adulthood? American Journal of Economics and Sociology. 2012;71(3):662-95.
17. Shaw G. These are the 11 most common reasons people get divorced, ranked. INSIDER (January 31, 2019).
18. Simon RW. Revisiting the relationships among gender, marital status, and mental health. American Journal of Sociology. 2002;107(4):1065-1096.
19. Strotz RH, Wold HOA. Recursive vs. non-recursive systems: An attempt at synthesis. Econometrica. 1960;28(2):417–427.
20. Strotz RH, Wold HOA. The causal interpretability of structural parameters: A reply. Econometrica. 1963;31(3):449–450.
21. Umberson D. Gender, marital status and the social control of health behavior. Social Science and Medicine. 1992;34(8):907-917.
22. Waddell GR. Labor-Market Consequences of Poor Attitude and Low Self-Esteem in Youth. Economic Inquiry. 2006;44(1):69-97.
23. Wade TJ, Pevalin DJ. Marital Transitions and Mental Health. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2004;45(2):155-170.
24. Willoughby BJ, Yorgason J, James S, Holmes EK. What Does Marriage Mean to Us? Marital Centrality among Newlywed Couples. Journal of Family Issues. 2020;42(7):1631-1654.