Digi Post - An Impression-Free Novel Technique for Customizing Post and Core

Main Article Content

Harshitha Garapati Vemareddy Rajasekhar Seera Sudhakar Naidu Kalla Bhavana Korrai Balaraju Satya Sanyasi Vinay Kumar Darla

Abstract

Endodontic therapy is only successful in the long run if the tooth is suitably rehabilitated. Although countless studies on various types of post and core have been conducted, there is a paucity of studies on customizing post and core with digitalization to eliminate the hassle of impression-making emphasizing the need for the development of strategic techniques. 


This article aims to present a novel technique that combines the advantages of pre-fabricated post, in terms of saving clinical time, yet achieving the custom fit of post and core utilizing a digital approach. Further, this study emphasizes two case reports employing the same technique of customizing post and core utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography.


A compact run-through for the fabrication of a Digi Post prologues with the preparation of the post space, Standard Tessellation Language (STL) file is attained by converting the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file of a Cone Beam Computed Tomography scan, in which the post can be designed digitally. This innovative technique allows practitioners to perform post-endodontic rehabilitation with greater confidence, simplicity and precision.

Keywords: Esthetics, Computer-aided Designing, Computer-aided Manufacturing, Cone Beam Computed Tomography, Standard Tessellation Language (STL), post and core

Article Details

How to Cite
GARAPATI, Harshitha et al. Digi Post - An Impression-Free Novel Technique for Customizing Post and Core. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 8, aug. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4249>. Date accessed: 21 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i8.4249.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Burke FJ. Tooth fracture In vivo and in vitro. J Dent. 1992; 20:131-139
2. Heydecke G, Peters MC. The restoration of endodontically treated, single-rooted teeth with cast or direct posts and cores: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87(4):380-386.
3. Sarkis-onofre R, pereira-cenci T, Opdam N, Demarco F. Preference for using posts to restore endodontically treated teeth: findings from a survey with dentists. Braz Oral Res. 2014; 29(1):1-6.
4. Franklin S. Weine endodontic therapy. Therapie Publisher St. Louis: Mosby Collection 6th ed.:553-561.
5. Balkenhol M, Wostmann B, Rein C, Ferger P. Survival time of cast post and cores: a 10-year retrospective study. J Dent. 2007; 35:50-58.
6. Martinez-Gonzales A, Amigo-Borras V, Fons-Font A, Selva-Otaolaurruchi E, and Labaig-Rueda C. Response of three types of cast posts and cores to static loading. Quintessence International. 2001; 32(7): 552–560.
7. Pinto A, Arcuri L, Carosi P, Nardi R, Libonati A, Ottria L, Campanella V. In vitro evaluation of the post-space depth reading with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to a traditional silicon impression. Oral Implantol. 2017 Jan 21; 10(4): 360-368
8. Ray HA, Trope M. Periapical status of endodontically treated teeth in relation to the technical quality of the root filling and the coronal restoration, International Endodontic Journal. 1995; 28(1): 12-18.
9. Bada NZ. Contemporary Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth Quintessence Publishing, Hanover Park, Ill, 2013.
10. Gomez-Polo M, Llido B, Rivero A, Del Río J, Celemin. A 10-year retrospective study of the survival rate of teeth restored with metal prefabricated posts versus cast metal posts and cores. J Dent. 2010.
11. Lee JH. Fabricating a custom zirconia post-and-core without a post-and-core pattern or a scan post. J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug; 120(2): 186-189
12. Special Committee to Revise the Joint AAE/AAOMR Position Statement on use of CBCT in Endodontics. AAE and AAOMR Joint Position Statement: Use of Cone Beam Computed Tomography in Endodontics 2015 Update. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Oct; 120(4): 508-512
13. Kolsuz ME, Bagis N, Orhan K, Avsever H, Demiralp KO. Comparison of the influence of FOV sizes and different voxel resolutions for the assessment of periodontal defects. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(7).
14. Kwon SM, Min BK, Kim YK, Kwon TY. Influence of Sandblasting Particle Size and Pressure on Resin Bonding Durability to Zirconia: A Residual Stress Study. Materials (Basel). 2020 Dec 10;13(24):5629. doi: 10.3390/ma13245629.
15. Kermanshah H, Torkamani MJ, Ranjkesh B, Bahrami G, Farahmandpour N. Effect of different surface treatments of presintered or sintered zirconia on bond strength to dentine. J Conserv Dent. 2021;24:599-605.
16. Skienhe H, Habchi R, Ounsi H, Ferrari M, Salameh Z. Evaluation of the effect of different types of abrasive surface treatment before and after Zirconia sintering on its structural composition and bond strength with resin cement. BioMed Research International. 2018;2018:1-12. doi:10.1155/2018/1803425
17. Tanis MC, Akay C, Karakis D. Resin cementation of zirconia ceramics with different bonding agents. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2015 Mar 4;29(2):363-367. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2014.996606.
18. R, Wang C, Ma SQ, et al. High bonding strength between zirconia and composite resin based on combined surface treatment for dental restorations. Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials. 2020;18. doi:10.1177/2280800020928655
19. Baldissara, Paolo & Querzè, Marco & Monaco, Carlo & Scotti, Roberto & Fonseca, Renata. Efficacy of Surface Treatments on the Bond Strength of Resin Cements to Two Brands of Zirconia Ceramic. The journal of adhesive dentistry. 2013. DOI: 10.3290/j.jad.a28729
20. Ozkurt Z, Iseri U, Kazazoglu E. Zirconia ceramic post systems: a literature review and a case report. Dental Materials Journal 2010;29(3):233-245.
21. Queiroz PM, Santaella GM, Groppo FC, Freitas DQ. Metal artifact production and reduction in CBCT with different numbers of basis images. Imaging Sci Dent. 2018 Mar;48(1):41-44.