THE USE OF SURGICAL SUTURE AS AN IMPLANT PLACEMENT GUIDE – A RETROSPECTIVE OVER VIEW OF OVER TWO DECADES OF IMPLANT THERAPY

Main Article Content

M. Lanka M. Glenn S. Sagrika P. Tanvi D. Zara

Abstract

In the era of digital dentistry, positioning of implants can by designed with the help of CBCT and CAD CAM. Surgical guide can be made to direct the implant placement in bone. Although various researchers showed the importance of 3D planning but because of chances of errors at various levels of digital protocols may lead to deviations. Even no data is available to confirm the accuracy of GBR with digital workflow. This retrospective analysis of simple suture placement technique in anterior edentulous region will make clinicians to understand the positioning of drills, anatomical variations, directions and placements of implants, need of bone grafting and implant emergence.

Keywords: suture guide, implant placement technique retrospective analysis, esthetic zone

Article Details

How to Cite
LANKA, M. et al. THE USE OF SURGICAL SUTURE AS AN IMPLANT PLACEMENT GUIDE – A RETROSPECTIVE OVER VIEW OF OVER TWO DECADES OF IMPLANT THERAPY. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 10, oct. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4428>. Date accessed: 19 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i10.4428.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Branemark R, Branemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation. A review. JRRD 2001; 38(2), 175-81.

2. P.I. Branemark. Osseointegration and its experimental background. JPD 1983; 50: 399-410.

3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387-416.

4. Fu JH, Hsu YT, Wang HL. Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. Eur J Oral Implantology 2012; 5(Su

5. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(Suppl.):43-61.

6. Bashutski JD, Wang HL. Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent 2007; 16:340-348:S91-S103

7. Grunder, Ueli & Gracis, Stefano & Capelli, Matteo. Influence of 3-D Bone-to-Implant Relationship on Esthetics. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry 2005; 25:113-9.

8. Chappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, Janner SFM, Belser UC, Buser D. Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. J Dent Res. 2018; 97(3):266–74.

9. Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73(1):73–83.

10. Pal US, Chand P, Dhiman NK, Singh RK, Kumar V. Role of surgical stents in determining the position of implants. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan; 1(1):20-3.

11. Talwar N, Singh BP, Chand P, Pal US. Use of diagnostic and surgical stent: a simplified approach for implant placement. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Dec; 10(4):234-9.

12. Patil PG. Problems of Guided Implant Surgery. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2020; 10 (4):138–139

13. Orentlicher G, Horowitz A, Goldwaser B, et al. Ten myths of guided implant surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017; 38 (8):552–557

14. Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000, 2019;81(1): 194–208.

15. D’haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73 (1):121– 133

16. Sarkar A, Hoda MM, Malick R, Kumar A. Surgical Stent Guided Versus Conventional Method of Implant Placement. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Jun 21(2):580-589.