THE USE OF SURGICAL SUTURE AS AN IMPLANT PLACEMENT GUIDE – A RETROSPECTIVE OVER VIEW OF OVER TWO DECADES OF IMPLANT THERAPY

Article Sidebar

PDF Download
Published Oct 25, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i10.4428

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Author Registration

Join the Society

The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.

Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.

Membership

Main Article Content

M. Lanka
Private practitioner, New Delhi, India.
M. Glenn
Private practitioner, Mumbai, India.
S. Sagrika
Private practitioner, New Delhi, India.
P. Tanvi
Sr. lecturer, K D dental college and hospital, UP, India.
D. Zara
Private practitioner, New Delhi, India.

Abstract

In the era of digital dentistry, positioning of implants can by designed with the help of CBCT and CAD CAM. Surgical guide can be made to direct the implant placement in bone. Although various researchers showed the importance of 3D planning but because of chances of errors at various levels of digital protocols may lead to deviations. Even no data is available to confirm the accuracy of GBR with digital workflow. This retrospective analysis of simple suture placement technique in anterior edentulous region will make clinicians to understand the positioning of drills, anatomical variations, directions and placements of implants, need of bone grafting and implant emergence.

Keywords: suture guide, implant placement technique retrospective analysis, esthetic zone

Article Details

How to Cite
LANKA, M. et al. THE USE OF SURGICAL SUTURE AS AN IMPLANT PLACEMENT GUIDE – A RETROSPECTIVE OVER VIEW OF OVER TWO DECADES OF IMPLANT THERAPY. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 10, oct. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4428>. Date accessed: 21 nov. 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i10.4428.
ABNT APA BibTeX CBE EndNote - EndNote format (Macintosh & Windows) MLA ProCite - RIS format (Macintosh & Windows) RefWorks Reference Manager - RIS format (Windows only) Turabian
Issue
Vol 11 No 10 (2023): October Issue, Vol.11, Issue 10
Section
Research Articles

The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.

 

References

1. Branemark R, Branemark PI, Rydevik B, Myers RR. Osseointegration in skeletal reconstruction and rehabilitation. A review. JRRD 2001; 38(2), 175-81.

2. P.I. Branemark. Osseointegration and its experimental background. JPD 1983; 50: 399-410.

3. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, et al. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg 1981; 10:387-416.

4. Fu JH, Hsu YT, Wang HL. Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. Eur J Oral Implantology 2012; 5(Su

5. Buser D, Martin W, Belser UC. Optimizing esthetics for implant restorations in the anterior maxilla: Anatomic and surgical considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004; 19(Suppl.):43-61.

6. Bashutski JD, Wang HL. Common implant esthetic complications. Implant Dent 2007; 16:340-348:S91-S103

7. Grunder, Ueli & Gracis, Stefano & Capelli, Matteo. Influence of 3-D Bone-to-Implant Relationship on Esthetics. The International journal of periodontics & restorative dentistry 2005; 25:113-9.

8. Chappuis V, Rahman L, Buser R, Janner SFM, Belser UC, Buser D. Effectiveness of contour augmentation with guided bone regeneration: 10-year results. J Dent Res. 2018; 97(3):266–74.

9. Chappuis V, Araujo MG, Buser D. Clinical relevance of dimensional bone and soft tissue alterations post-extraction in esthetic sites. Periodontol 2000. 2017; 73(1):73–83.

10. Pal US, Chand P, Dhiman NK, Singh RK, Kumar V. Role of surgical stents in determining the position of implants. Natl J Maxillofac Surg. 2010 Jan; 1(1):20-3.

11. Talwar N, Singh BP, Chand P, Pal US. Use of diagnostic and surgical stent: a simplified approach for implant placement. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2010 Dec; 10(4):234-9.

12. Patil PG. Problems of Guided Implant Surgery. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2020; 10 (4):138–139

13. Orentlicher G, Horowitz A, Goldwaser B, et al. Ten myths of guided implant surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2017; 38 (8):552–557

14. Tatakis DN, Chien HH, Parashis AO. Guided implant surgery risks and their prevention. Periodontol 2000, 2019;81(1): 194–208.

15. D’haese J, Ackhurst J, Wismeijer D, et al. Current state of the art of computer-guided implant surgery. Periodontol 2000 2017; 73 (1):121– 133

16. Sarkar A, Hoda MM, Malick R, Kumar A. Surgical Stent Guided Versus Conventional Method of Implant Placement. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2022 Jun 21(2):580-589.