Altered neural reward processing is associated with reward-related decision-making in adolescents with severe obesity

Main Article Content

Laya Rajan Alaina L Pearce Xiaozhen You Eleanor Mackey Evan P Nadler Chandan J Vaidya

Abstract

Obesity is associated with altered food-related reward processing, but its impact on non-food reward remains unclear. This question is both timely due to rising rates of severe obesity and important because adolescence is a period of heightened reward seeking behavior. We used computational modeling and functional magnetic resonance imaging to examine monetary reward processing using classic experimental tasks in 35 adolescents (14-18 years-old, 13 male) with severe obesity (n=18) and without obesity (n=17). Participants completed the Balloon Analog Risk Taking Task to assess reward-related decision-making and the Monetary Incentive Delay task to assess neural correlates of reward anticipation. Reward-related decision-making model parameters revealed no differences in reward sensitivity but less adaptive decision-making (response consistency) in those with obesity compared to without obesity. Other metrics (e.g., number of balloons popped, number of pumps, and total points) did not differ between groups. During reward anticipation, those with obesity had lower activation than without obesity in ventral tegmental area and prefrontal cortex, canonical regions for reward and cognitive control, respectively. Weight status moderated associations between ventral tegmental area activation and reward-related decision-making metrics such that higher ventral tegmental area activation was associated with more risky decision-making (more popped balloons) in those with but not without obesity. Functional connectivity of ventral tegmental area with right inferior frontal gyrus and left superior temporal gyrus was greater higher in OB than nonOB. Associations between value-related ventral tegmental area-superior temporal gyrus connectivity and reward-related decision-making metrics were moderated by weight status such that higher connectivity was associated with greater number of pumps and points for without obesity and less risky decision-making for those with obesity. Therefore, differences in activation and connectivity between groups may suggest differences in decision-making strategies. Together, findings reveal that ventral tegmental area, prefrontal, and temporal engagement during monetary reward anticipation differs between adolescents with and without obesity and may contribute to individual differences in reward-related decision-making. Such domain-general alteration of reward processing may have far reaching consequences, not only for food intake but also functions central to motivational behavior such as learning and socialization during adolescence, a sensitive period in development. These findings highlight the importance of considering reward more broadly when designing and tailoring behavioral interventions in adolescent obesity.

Keywords: obesity, Altered neural reward processing, reward-related decision-making, severe obesity

Article Details

How to Cite
RAJAN, Laya et al. Altered neural reward processing is associated with reward-related decision-making in adolescents with severe obesity. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 11, dec. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4728>. Date accessed: 16 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i11.4728.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Liang J, Matheson BE, Kaye WH, Boutelle KN. Neurocognitive correlates of obesity and obesity-related behaviors in children and adolescents. Int J Obes. 2014; 38(4):494-506. doi:10.1038/ijo.2013.142

2. Author et al., 2018

3. Berthoud HRR, Munzberg H, Morrison CD. Blaming the Brain for Obesity: Integration of Hedonic and Homeostatic Mechanisms. Gastroenterology. 2017; 152(7):1728-1738. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.12.050

4. Kral TVE, Moore RH, Chittams J, Jones E, O’Malley L, Fisher JO. Identifying behavioral phenotypes for childhood obesity. Appetite. 2018;127:87-96. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.021

5. World Obesity Federation, World Obesity Atlas 2023. World Obesity Federation https://data.worldobesity.org/publications/?cat=19

6. Hales CM, Fryar CD, Carroll MD, Freedman DS, Ogden CL. Trends in Obesity and Severe Obesity Prevalence in US Youth and Adults by Sex and Age, 2007-2008 to 2015-2016. JAMA. 2018; 319(16):1723-1725. doi:10.1001 /jama.2018.3060

7. Casey BJ, Jones RM, Hare TA. The Adolescent Brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2008; 1124(1):111-126. doi:10.1196/annals.1440.010

8. Galván A. The Teenage Brain: Sensitivity to Rewards. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2013; 22(2):88-93. doi:10.1177/0963721413480859

9. Lowe CJ, Morton JB, Reichelt AC. Adolescent obesity and dietary decision making—a brain-health perspective. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 2020; 4(5):388-396. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(19)30404-3

10. Modi AC, Loux TJ, Bell SK, Harmon CM, Inge TH, Zeller MH. Weight-specific Health-related Quality of Life in Adolescents With Extreme Obesity. Obesity. 2008; 16(10):2266-2271. doi:10.1038/oby.2008.347

11. Geier CF. Adolescent cognitive control and reward processing: Implications for risk taking and substance use. Hormones and Behavior. 2013; 64(2):333-342. doi:10.1016/j. yhbeh.2013.02.008

12. Zeller MH, Becnel J, Reiter-Purtill J, Peugh J, Wu YP. Associations Among Excess Weight Status and Tobacco, Alcohol, and Illicit Drug Use in a Large National Sample of Early Adolescent Youth. Prev Sci. 2016; 17(4):483-492. doi:10.1007/s11121-016-0639-2

13. Author et al., 2022

14. Matyjek M, Meliss S, Dziobek I, Murayama K. A Multidimensional View on Social and Non-Social Rewards. Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:818. doi:10.3389/fpsyt. 2020.00818

15. Carter RM. Activation in the VTA and nucleus accumbens increases in anticipation of both gains and losses. Front Behav Neurosci. 2009; 3. doi:10.3389/neuro.08.021. 2009

16. Kenny PJ. Reward Mechanisms in Obesity: New Insights and Future Directions. Neuron. 2011; 69(4):664-679. doi:10.1016/ j.neuron.2011.02.016

17. Egecioglu E, Skibicka KP, Hansson C, et al. Hedonic and incentive signals for body weight control. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2011; 12(3):141-151. doi:10.1007/s11154-011-9166-4

18. Swanson’ LW. The Projections of the Ventral Tegmental Area and Adjacent Regions: A Combined Fluorescent Retrograde Tracer and Immunofluorescence Study in the Rat.

19. Fields HL, Hjelmstad GO, Margolis EB, Nicola SM. Ventral Tegmental Area Neurons in Learned Appetitive Behavior and Positive Reinforcement. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007; 30(1):289-316. doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro. 30.051606.094341

20. Author et al., 2017

21. Verdejo‐Román J, Vilar‐López R, Navas JF, Soriano‐Mas C, Verdejo‐García A. Brain reward system’s alterations in response to food and monetary stimuli in overweight and obese individuals. Human Brain Mapping. 2017; 38(2):666-677. doi:10.1002/hbm.23407

22. Verdejo-Román J, Fornito A, Soriano-Mas C, Vilar-López R, Verdejo-García A. Independent functional connectivity networks underpin food and monetary reward sensitivity in excess weight. NeuroImage. 2017;146:293-300. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage .2016.11.011

23. Lejuez CW, Aklin W, Daughters S, Zvolensky M, Kahler C, Gwadz M. Reliability and Validity of the Youth Version of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART–Y) in the Assessment of Risk-Taking Behavior Among Inner-City Adolescents. Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. 2007; 36(1):106-111. doi:10.1080/15374410709336 573

24. Lejuez CW, Read JP, Kahler CW, et al. Evaluation of a behavioral measure of risk taking: The Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied. 2002;8(2):75-84. doi:10.1037//1076-898X.8.2.75

25. Knutson B, Adams CM, Fong GW, Hommer D. Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens. The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience. 2001; 21(16):preprint no.-RC159.

26. Tsoi MF, Li HL, Feng Q, Cheung CL, Cheung TT, Cheung BMY. Prevalence of Childhood Obesity in the United States in 1999–2018: A 20-Year Analysis. Obes Facts. 2022; 15(4):560-569. doi:10.1159/000524261

27. Pinhas-Hamiel O, Hamiel U, Bendor CD, Bardugo A, Twig G, Cukierman-Yaffe T. The Global Spread of Severe Obesity in Toddlers, Children, and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Obes Facts. 2022; 15(2):118-134. doi:10.1159/000521913

28. Wechsler D, Hsiao-pin C. WASI-II: Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence. Pearson; 2011.

29. Psychology Software Tools, Inc. E-Prime 2.0.

30. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Guo SS, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z. 2000 CDC growth charts for the United States: Methods and Development. Vital and Health Statistics. Published online 2002:1-203.

31. Ogden CL, Flegal KM. Changes in Terminology for Childhood Overweight and Obesity. 2010;(25):6.

32. Flegal KM, Wei R, Ogden CL, Freedman DS, Johnson CL, Curtin LR. Characterizing extreme values of body mass index–for-age by using the 2000 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth charts. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90(5):1314-1320. doi:10.3945/ajcn.2009.28335

33. Kelly A, Barlow SE, Rao G, et al. Severe Obesity in Children and Adolescents: Identification, Associated Health Risks, and Treatment Approaches: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013; 128(15):1689-1712. doi:10.1161/CIR.0b013e3182a5cfb3

34. Wilke M. An alternative approach towards assessing and accounting for individual motion in fMRI timeseries. NeuroImage. 2012; 59(3):2062-2072. doi:10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.043

35. Behzadi Y, Restom K, Liau J, Liu TT. A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage. 2007; 37(1):90-101. doi:10 .1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042

36. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2014. http://www.R-project.org/

37. Wallsten TS, Pleskac TJ, Lejuez CW. Modeling Behavior in a Clinically Diagnostic Sequential Risk-Taking Task. Psychological Review. 2005; 112(4):862-880. doi:10.1037/ 0033-295X.112.4.862

38. Author et al., 2018

39. Cox RW, Chen G, Glen DR, Reynolds RC, Taylor PA. FMRI Clustering in AFNI: False Positive Rates Redux. Brain connectivity. Published online February 2017:1-50. doi:10.1089/brain.2016.0475.

40. Bishara AJ, Pleskac TJ, Fridberg DJ, et al. Similar processes despite divergent behavior in two commonly used measures of risky decision making. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. 2009; 22(4):435-454. doi:10 .1002/bdm.641

41. Rolison JJ, Hanoch Y, Wood S. Risky decision making in younger and older adults: The role of learning. Psychology and Aging. 2012; 27(1):129-140. doi:10.1037/a0024689

42. Gearhardt AN, Yokum S, Stice E, Harris JL, Brownell KD. Relation of obesity to neural activation in response to food commercials. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2014; 9(7):932-938. doi:10.1093/scan/nst059

43. Bruce AS, Lepping RJ, Bruce JM, et al. Brain Responses to Food Logos in Obese and Healthy Weight Children. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2013; 162(4):759-764.e2. doi:10. 1016/j.jpeds.2012.10.003

44. Brooks SJ, Cedernaes J, Schiöth HB. Increased Prefrontal and Parahippocampal Activation with Reduced Dorsolateral Prefrontal and Insular Cortex Activation to Food Images in Obesity: A Meta-Analysis of fMRI Studies. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8(4). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060393

45. Meng X, Huang D, Ao H, Wang X, Gao X. Food cue recruits increased reward processing and decreased inhibitory control processing in the obese/overweight: An activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis of fMRI studies. Obesity Research & Clinical Practice. Published online February 22, 2020. doi:10.1016/j.orcp.2020.02.004

46. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain. 2006; 129(3) : 564-583. doi:10.1093/brain/awl004

47. Kantak SS, Winstein CJ. Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research. 2012; 228(1):219-231. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2011 .11.028

48. Ramkumar P, Dekleva B, Cooler S, Miller L, Kording K. Premotor and Motor Cortices Encode Reward. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11(8) :e 0160851. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0160851

49. Roesch MR, Olson CR. Impact of Expected Reward on Neuronal Activity in Prefrontal Cortex, Frontal and Supplementary Eye Fields and Premotor Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology. 2003; 90(3):1766-1789. Doi :10.1152/jn.00019.2003

50. Morrison KM, Cairney J, Eisenmann J, Pfeiffer K, Gould D. Associations of Body Mass Index, Motor Performance, and Perceived Athletic Competence with Physical Activity in Normal Weight and Overweight Children. Journal of Obesity. 2018; 2018:1-10. doi:10.1155/2018/3598321

51. Chambers CD, Garavan H, Bellgrove MA. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews. 2009; 33(5):631-646. doi:10.1016/ j.neubiorev.2008.08.016

52. Paulus MP, Feinstein JS, Leland D, Simmons AN. Superior temporal gyrus and insula provide response and outcome-dependent information during assessment and action selection in a decision-making situation. NeuroImage. 2005; 25(2):607-615. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.055

53. Carnell S, Benson L, Pantazatos SP, Hirsch J, Geliebter A. Amodal brain activation and functional connectivity in response to high-energy-density food cues in obesity. Obesity. 2014;22(11):2370-2378. doi:10.1002/oby.20859

54. Horstmann A, Fenske WK, Hankir MK. Argument for a non-linear relationship between severity of human obesity and dopaminergic tone. Obesity Reviews. 2015; 16(10):821-830. doi:10.1111/obr.12303

55. Beeler JA, Daw N, Frazier CRM, Zhuang X. Tonic Dopamine Modulates Exploitation of Reward Learning. Front Behav Neurosci. 2010;4. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2010.00170

56. Schmitz F, Manske K, Preckel F, Wilhelm O. The Multiple Faces of Risk-Taking: Scoring Alternatives for the Balloon-Analogue Risk Task. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. 2016; 32(1):17-38. doi:10.1027/ 1015-5759/a000335

57. Shrewsbury V, Wardle J. Socioeconomic status and adiposity in childhood: A systematic review of cross-sectional studies 1990-2005. Obesity. 2008; 16(2):275-284. doi: 10.1038/oby.2007.35

58. Freidl EK, Sysko R, Devlin MJ, Zitsman JL, Kaplan SC, Walsh BT. School and cognitive functioning problems in adolescent bariatric surgery candidates. Surgery for obesity and related diseases : official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2013; 9(6):991-996. doi:10.1016/j.soard.2013.04. 018

59. Rademacher L, Krach S, Kohls G, Irmak A, Gründer G, Spreckelmeyer KN. Dissociation of neural networks for anticipation and consumption of monetary and social rewards. NeuroImage. 2010; 49(4):3276-3285. doi:10. 1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.089