Characterisation of the Cardiovascular Effects of a Meal: QTcF Assessment and Further Insights into the Physiological Effects

Main Article Content

Georg Ferber, PhD Dilshat Djumanov, PhD Ulrike Lorch, MD, FFPM Edward Jackson, BSc, MSc, PhD, MBChB Joao Almeida Melo, MD James Rickard, MPharm Jorg Taubel, MD, FFPM, FESC

Abstract

The electrical activity of the heart, characterised by the QT interval on an electrocardiogram (ECG), serves as a crucial parameter for evaluating cardiac health. Variations in the QT interval, particularly when corrected for heart rate using Fridericia's formula (QTcF), have long been of interest in cardiology and play a pivotal role in assessing cardiac safety in clinical trials. Understanding the influence of meals given at different times on QTcF intervals is essential for the accurate execution of Thorough QT (TQT) studies. Moreover, it has been proposed that this meal-related QT interval shortening could serve as a valuable indicator of assay sensitivity in TQT studies or even as a potential integration of TQT investigations into in Phase I/II studies.


 


This study explores the impact of meals on QTcF intervals, specifically in the context of pharmacodynamic studies and TQT investigations. The primary goal is to gain insights into how different meals and baseline calculations affect QTcF changes and their potential implications for cardiac health and the risk of arrhythmias. Recent research has begun shedding light on the intricate relationship between meal composition, timing, and QTcF alterations. Several studies have investigated the effects of various nutrients, such as carbohydrates, fats, and proteins, on QTcF duration, as well as the implications of postprandial changes. These investigations have unveiled the complex interplay between dietary components and the cardiovascular system, raising essential questions about how our dietary choices may influence cardiac electrophysiology.


 


In this comprehensive meta-analysis, we analyse data from nine studies, all conducted in accordance with Good Clinical Practice and ethical standards. These studies were approved by Ethics Committees and Regulatory authorities. Our analysis focuses on ECG assessments, involving the use of 12-lead ECGs recorded electronically and evaluated by certified cardiologists. We apply the Fridericia formula for QT correction (QTcF), as it has been shown to provide more accurate results across different heart rates compared to other correction methods.


 


Our findings confirm existing literature into the impact of meals on QTcF intervals. We observe a consistent shortening of QTcF following breakfast, exceeding 5 milliseconds, which aligns with the positive control requirement defined by ICH E14, thus demonstrating the validity of our approach. In contrast, the effect of lunch is consistently less than 5 milliseconds across various timepoints and studies, indicating differences in the meal-related QTcF changes.


 


Furthermore, our analysis incorporates gender-based assessments, showing that women exhibit a smaller effect than men, which is significant for breakfast and the fasted condition. These results suggest that the observed QTcF effect post-breakfast is a combination of the meal itself and factors unique to the initial day of a study. This insight holds potential for improving the design and interpretation of cardiac safety studies, particularly in Phase I investigations, and may offer the opportunity to explore the removal of positive control agents like Moxifloxacin, thereby reducing exposure to harmful challenge agents and contributing to the global effort to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR).


 


In conclusion, this meta-analysis advances our understanding of meal-induced QTcF changes and their significance in cardiac safety assessment, offering the prospect of more efficient and patient-focused drug development practices. This not only contributes to enhanced safety but also supports the reduction of antibiotic consumption, a key element in the global fight against AMR.

Keywords: QTcF, electrocardiogram, cardiac health, TQT studies, meal-induced changes, clinical trials, meta-analysis, drug development, antimicrobial resistance, cardiac safety

Article Details

How to Cite
FERBER, Georg et al. Characterisation of the Cardiovascular Effects of a Meal: QTcF Assessment and Further Insights into the Physiological Effects. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 11, nov. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4748>. Date accessed: 16 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i11.4748.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Cirincione, B., Sager, P. T., & Mager, D. E. (2017). Influence of meals and glycemic changes on QT interval dynamics. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 57(8), 966-976.

2. Darpo, B., Garnett, C., Benson, C. T., Keirns, J., Leishman, D., Malik, M., ... & Wallis, R. (2014). Cardiac Safety Research Consortium: can the thorough QT/QTc study be replaced by early QT assessment in routine clinical pharmacology studies? Scientific update and a research proposal for a path forward. American heart journal, 168(3), 262-272.

3. World Health Organization. (2018). WHO competency framework for health workers’ education and training on antimicrobial resistance (No. WHO/HIS/HWF/AMR/2018.1). World Health Organization.

4. Uchil, R. R., Kohli, G. S., KateKhaye, V. M., & Swami, O. C. (2014). Strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR, 8(7), ME01.

5. Täubel, J., Ferber, G., Fernandes, S., & Camm, A. J. (2019). Diurnal Profile of the QTc Interval Following Moxifloxacin Administration. Journal of clinical pharmacology, 59(1), 35–44.

6. Ferber G, Fernandes S, Täubel J. Estimation of the Power of the Food Effect on QTc to Show Assay Sensitivity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2018;58(1):81-88

7. Garnett, C. E., Zhu, H., Malik, M., Fossa, A. A., Zhang, J., Badilini, F., ... & Rodriguez, I. (2012). Methodologies to characterize the QT/corrected QT interval in the presence of drug-induced heart rate changes or other autonomic effects. American heart journal, 163(6), 912-930.

8. Täubel, J., Ferber, G., Van Langenhoven, L., Del Bianco, T., Fernandes, S., Djumanov, D., ... & Camm, A. J. (2019). The cardiovascular effects of a meal: J‐Tpeak and Tpeak‐Tend assessment and further insights into the physiological effects. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 59(6), 799-810.

9. Taubel, J., Wong, A. H., Naseem, A., Ferber, G., & Camm, A. J. (2012). Shortening of the QT interval after food can be used to demonstrate assay sensitivity in thorough QT studies. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 52(10), 1558-1565.

10. Täubel, J., Fernandes, S., & Ferber, G. (2017). Stability of the effect of a standardized meal on QTc. Annals of Noninvasive Electrocardiology, 22(1), e12371.

11. Fisler, J. S. (1992). Cardiac effects of starvation and semistarvation diets: safety and mechanisms of action. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 56(1), 230S-234S.

12. Chrysohoou, C., Panagiotakos, D. B., Pitsavos, C., Skoumas, J., Krinos, X., Chloptsios, Y., ... & Stefanadis, C. (2007). Long-term fish consumption is associated with protection against arrhythmia in healthy persons in a Mediterranean region—the ATTICA study. The American journal of clinical nutrition, 85(5), 1385-1391.

13. Harris, W. S., Gonzales, M., Laney, N., Sastre, A., & Borkon, A. M. (2006). Effects of omega-3 fatty acids on heart rate in cardiac transplant recipients. The American journal of cardiology, 98(10), 1393-1395.

14. Taubel, J., & Ferber, G. (2015). The reproducibility of QTc changes after meal intake. Journal of electrocardiology, 48(2), 274–275.

15. Stanner, S., Coe, S., & Frayn, K. N. (Eds.). (2019). Cardiovascular disease: diet, nutrition and emerging risk factors. John Wiley & Sons.

16. Taubel, J., Wong, A. H., Naseem, A., Ferber, G., & Camm, A. J. (2012). Shortening of the QT interval after food can be used to demonstrate assay sensitivity in thorough QT studies. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 52(10), 1558-1565.

17. Salvi, V., Karnad, D. R., Panicker, G. K., Natekar, M., Hingorani, P., Kerkar, V., ... & Narula, D. (2011). Comparison of 5 methods of QT interval measurements on electrocardiograms from a thorough QT/QTc study: effect on assay sensitivity and categorical outliers. Journal of electrocardiology, 44(2), 96-104.

18. LiverTox: Clinical and Research Information on Drug-Induced Liver Injury [Internet]. Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; 2012-. Moxifloxacin. [Updated 2020 Mar 10]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK548166/

19. ICH Harmonized Tripartite Guideline E14. The clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs. 2005. https://database.ich.org/sites/default/files/E14_Guideline.pdf

20. Taubel, J., Ferber, G., Lorch, U., Batchvarov, V., Savelieva, I., & Camm, A. J. (2014). Thorough QT study of the effect of oral moxifloxacin on QTc interval in the fed and fasted state in healthy Japanese and Caucasian subjects. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 77(1), 170-179.

21. Fridericia LS. Die Systolendauer im Elektrokardiogramm bei normalen Menschen und bei Herzkranken. Acta Med Scand. 1921; 54:17–50.