Traffic and Air Pollution: How Can Public Participation and Speed Limit Legislation Benefit Health Outcomes in Germany
Main Article Content
Abstract
The increase of automobile traffic and expansions of highways is driving air pollution globally. This article takes an interdisciplinary approach looking at health, policy, public participation, and legislation and applies it to the context of Germany. In the context of a world grappling with the compounding challenges of the climate crises, fuel scarcity, and geopolitical tensions, the discourse around a general speed limit for the German Autobahn has gained unprecedented momentum. Despite Germany's unique absence of a speed limit on highways, the imperatives of climate action and public health are driving the urgency of re-evaluating this tradition. This article engages with the complex intersection of public health, environmental impact, and democratic decision-making to address the compelling case for a speed limit on German highways.
Amidst the global call for sustainable solutions, the interdisciplinary nature of this research is paramount. By exploring the intricate relationships between the automotive industry, public health, and environmental degradation, we shed light on the critical role that transportation policies play in shaping our collective future. Our investigation delves into diverse models of public participation, spotlighting the Citizens Assembly as a promising platform for democratic engagement. Beyond mere tokenism, we emphasize the necessity for actionable outcomes that genuinely empower citizens to influence policy directions.
A key aspect are the evidence-based recommendations as a way forward in the German speed limit debate. Evidence reveals that public opinion in Germany favours a speed limit. Beyond the ecological gains, we underscore the underappreciated health co-benefits intrinsic to speed reduction—a dimension pivotal in shaping the discourse on comprehensive societal well-being. Progressive action, guided by informed democratic participation, is the cornerstone of sustainable change. We urge Germany to overcome inertia and propose concrete legislative measures that are in line with the aspirations of its citizens and the imperatives of global sustainability. Given the magnitude of the climate emergency, the adoption of pragmatic interventions, including a speed limit, assumes the character of a paramount step forward in Germany's commitment to a greener and healthier future.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Liu NM, Grigg J. Diesel, children and respiratory disease. BMJ Paediatr Open. 2018;(24):2. doi:10.1136/bmjpo-2017-000210.
3. Eguiluz-Gracia I, Mathioudakis AG, Bartel S, et al. The need for clean air: The way air pollution and climate change affect allergic rhinitis and asthma. Allergy. 2020;75(9):2170-2184. doi:doi: 10.1111/all.14177
4. Han K, Ran Z, Wang X, et al. Traffic-related organic and inorganic air pollution and risk of development of childhood asthma: A meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2021;194:110493. doi:doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2020.110493.
5. Laville S. Air pollution a cause in girl’s death, coroner rules in landmark case. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/dec/16/girls-death-contributed-to-by-air-pollution-coroner-rules-in-landmark-case. Published 2020. Accessed August 18, 2022.
6. Weimann E. ISSOP e-Bulletin N°49 - 4.1 Air Pollution: a case for legal action? Air Pollution verdict shines light on UK’s and world’s largest killer. ISSOP e-Bulletin. 2021;49:7.
7. Gross M. Speed tourism: The German Autobahn as a tourist destination and location of “unruly rules.” Tourist Studies. 2020;20(3):298-313. doi:10.1177/1468797620905786
8. Antretter G. Die Angst vor dem “A8-Monster”: Der Streit um den Ausbau der Autobahn A8 im Chiemsee. MUH. 2021:68-72.
9. BR24 live Tagesgespräch: Warum haben wir noch kein Tempolimit? Published online March 11, 2022. https://www.br.de/nachrichten/deutschland-welt/br24-live-tagesgespraech-warum-haben-wir-noch-kein-tempolimit,SzkluLm
10. YOUGOV Umfrage: Grossteil der Deutschen für Tempolimit. Published online April 19, 2022. https://www.mdr.de/brisant/tempolimit-deutschland-100.html
11. Bürgerrat Klima. Citizens’ Climate Report: Recommendations for German climate policy. Bürgerrat Klima Deutschland. 2021;1(1):101.
12. Puls T. Verkehr auf der Autobahn: Schneller als 130 – Regel oder Ausnahme? IW-Kurzbericht Institut der Deutschen Wirtschaft. 2021;61:4.
13. Grahn K, Gustavsson P, Andersson T, et al. Occupational exposure to particles and increased risk of developing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): A population-based cohort study in Stockholm, Sweden. Environ Res. 2021;200:111739. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.111739
14. Ma T, Yazdi MD, Schwartz J, et al. Long-term air pollution exposure and incident stroke in American older adults: A national cohort study. Glob Epidemiol. 2022;4:100073. doi:10.1016/j.gloepi.2022.100073
15. Zundel CG, Ryan P, Brokamp C, et al. Air pollution, depressive and anxiety disorders, and brain effects: A systematic review. Neurotoxicology. 2022;93:272-300. doi:10.1016/j.neuro.2022.10.011
16. Amigou A, Sermage-Faure C, Orsi L, et al. Road Traffic and Childhood Leukemia: The ESCALE Study (SFCE). Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(4):566-572. doi:10.1289/ehp.1002429
17. Hansen J, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Olsen JH. Increased risk of lung cancer among different types of professional drivers in Denmark. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55(2):115-118. doi:10.1136/oem.55.2.115
18. Raaschou-Nielsen O, Olsen JH, Hertel O, et al. Exposure of Danish children to traffic exhaust fumes. Sci Total Environ. 1996;189-190:51-55. doi:10.1016/0048-9697(96)05190-x
19. Wing SE, Larson TV, Hudda N, et al. Aircraft noise and vehicle traffic-related air pollution interact to affect preterm birth risk in Los Angeles, California. Sci Total Environ. 2022;829:154678. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154678
20. Zhang Q, Meng X, Shi S, Kan L, Chen R, Kan H. Overview of particulate air pollution and human health in China: Evidence, challenges, and opportunities. Innovation (Camb). 2022;3(6):100312. doi:10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100312
21. Zhu X, Zhang Q, Du X, et al. Respiratory Effects of Traffic-Related Air Pollution: A Randomized, Crossover Analysis of Lung Function, Airway Metabolome, and Biomarkers of Airway Injury. Environ Health Perspect. 2023;131(5):057002. doi:10.1289/EHP11139
22. Matz CJ, Egyed M, Hocking R, Seenundun S, Charman N, Edmonds N. Human health effects of traffic-related air pollution (TRAP): a scoping review protocol. Syst Rev. 2019;8(1):223. doi:10.1186/s13643-019-1106-5
23. European Commission. Road Safety Thematic Report – Speeding. European Road Safety Observatory. Brussels, European Commission, Directorate General for Transport.; 2021.
24. WHO, Government of Sweden. Stockholm Declaration - Third Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety: Achieving Global Goals 2030 Stockholm, 19–20 February 2020.; 2020.
25. Bauernschuster S, Traxler C. Tempolimit 130 auf Autobahnen: Eine evidenzbasierte Diskussion der Auswirkungen. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik. 2021;22(2):86-102. doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/pwp-2021-0023
26. Deutsche Umwelthilfe. Tempolimit Jetzt! Published 2019. https://www.change.org/p/tempolimit-jetzt
27. Zentner C. Keine Mehrheit für Tempolimit. Published online 2019. https://www.bundestag.de/webarchiv/presse/hib/2019_09/659282-659282
28. Zentner C. Grüne fordern generelle Tempolimits. Published online 2021. https://www.bundestag.de/webarchiv/presse/hib/2020_06/701648-701648
29. Park E. Aber krass eigentlich, was alles passieren muss, damit Deutschland ein Tempolimit erwägt. Klimakatastrophe, Krieg und Gaskrise reichen nicht. Published March 30, 2022. https://twitter.com/ennopark/status/1509434371492786177?s=20&t=sShwGHNn9HoemjGKSNinjQ
30. Lange M. Klimaschutz durch Tempolimit. Umweltbundesamt. Published online 2020:31.
31. Arnstein SR. A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners. 1969;35(4):216-224. doi:10.1080/01944366908977225
32. Kenter JO, Bryce R, Christie M, et al. Shared values and deliberative valuation: Future directions. Ecosystem Services. 2016;21:358-371. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.10.006
33. Mattioli G, Roberts C, Steinberger JK, Brown A. The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach. Energy Research & Social Science. 2020;66:101486. doi:10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486
34. Haas T, Sander H. The European Car Lobby. A Critical Analaysis of the Impact of the Automotive Industry. Rosa Luxemburg Stifting. Published online 2019. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.20746.41921
35. Tscharaktschiew S. Why are highway speed limits really justified? An equilibrium speed choice analysis. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological. 2020;138:317-351. doi:10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.009
36. Schmidt U. Generelles Tempolimit auf Autobahnen: Hohe volkswirtschaftliche Kosten sind zu berücksichtigen. Kiel Policy Brief, Kiel Institute for the World Economy. 2020;145:11.
37. Reed MS, Vella S, Challies E, et al. A theory of participation: what makes stakeholder and public engagement in environmental management work?: A theory of participation. Restor Ecol. 2018;26:S7-S17. doi:10.1111/rec.12541
38. Devaney L, Torney D, Brereton P, Coleman M. Irelands Citizens Assembly on Climate Change - Lessons for Deliberative Public Engagement and Communication. Environmental Communications. 2020;14(2):141-146.
39. Farrell DM, Suiter J, Harris C. ‘Systematizing’ constitutional deliberation: the 2016–18 citizens’ assembly in Ireland. Irish Political Studies. 2019;34(1):113-123. doi:10.1080/07907184.2018.1534832
40. Deutscher Bundestag P. Bürgerrat übergibt Gutachten mit Handlungsempfelungen für die Politik. Deutscher Bundestag Textarchiv. Published March 2021. https://www.bundestag.de/dokumente/textarchiv/2021/kw11-buergerrat-829372
41. Feld LP, Hessami Z, Reil L. Direkte Demokratie in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland? – Ergebnisse einer Umfrage zur Einführung direkter Volksrechte auf Bundesebene. In: Feld LP, Huber PM, Jung O, Welzel C, Wittreck F, eds. Jahrbuch für direkte Demokratie 2010. Nomos; 2011:107-134. doi:10.5771/9783845231358-107