Cerebral Aneurysms Repair Using Direct Carotid Artery Cutdown: A Case Series
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Cerebral Aneurysms (CA) including dissecting pseudoaneurysms are treated endovascularly through a trans-radial or trans-femoral approach. When these options are not available, a trans-carotid approach via Direct Carotid Artery Cutdown (DCAC) may be used as the last option. However, the safety and feasibility of DCAC is not well studied or defined in these contexts. Our objective is to present our four unique patients who were treated by the DCAC approach for their cerebral aneurysm and/or internal carotid artery dissecting pseudoaneurysm using flow diversion.
Method: This is a report of a case series and retrospective review.
Results: Patient 1; A 75-year-old woman with known left internal carotid artery (ICA) petrocavernous aneurysm that enlarged from 6 mm to 10 mm resulting in double vision and headaches. Trans-femoral approach failed due to the tortuosity in the common carotid artery (CCA). A multidisciplinary team was formed; A vascular surgeon began the surgery followed by FD by a neuroendovascular surgeon. A 6 French sheath was placed on the right common carotid artery via DCAC then brought to right ICA by vascular surgeon, and a neuroendovascular surgeon confirmed the placement with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). The DSA confirmed a large 10 x 8 x 5mm broad-based aneurysm. Flow diversion was performed with pipeline flex measuring 5 x 30mm. Patient was discharged home and achieved baseline modified Rankin Scale (mRS )1 which sustained in 5 years with aneurysm obliteration. Patient 2; A 65- year-old woman with multiple symptomatic left ICA-Para-ophthalmic artery aneurysm measuring 9 mm. Both femoral and radial arteries were occluded and underwent DCAC and flow diversion with pipeline flex of 4x30 mm using the similar technique described above. Patient discharged home in 48 hours with National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 0 and achieved her baseline mRS. However, this patient refused to have any further follow-up studies done. Patient 3; A 67-year-old man with aortic arch endograph with stent graft after previous aortic dissection and diagnosed with bilateral internal carotid artery dissecting pseudoaneurysm (ICADP) by computed topographic angiography (CTA). The right ICADP measured 19 x 15 x 20 mm, was multilevel, extending from skull base to the internal carotid artery (ICA) origin. The left ICADP was 16 x 9 x 22 mm with inflow-zone stenosis. The DSA was attempted but failed due to the aortic stent. The right ICADPA was repaired first using Surpass streamline (Stryker Neurovascular, Irving, CA) device measuring 4 x 50 mm x2 and 5 x 40 mm covering the entire dissecting artery. Patient was discharged home in 48 hours. Three months after the first procedure, using similar technique the left ICADPA was treated with a 5 x 50 mm Surpass evolve flow diverter. Patient achieved mRS 0. In 24-months follow up CTA demonstrated complete resolution of left ICDAP, but occlusion of the right ICA without impairing his mRS 0. Patient 4; a 76-year-old-woman with tinnitus, headaches and dizziness; DSA demonstrated RICA dissecting large 16 x 8 mm pseudoaneurysm. Trans-femoral approach failed and underwent DCAC, and flow diversion with a single surpass evolve flow diverter 4.5 x3 0 mm. Patient was discharged with NIHSS 0 and achieved her baseline mRs 0.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Chen ML, Gupta A, Chatterjee A, et al. Association Between Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Downstream Stroke. Stroke. Sep 2018;49(9):2029-2033.
doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021985
3. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet. Jul 12 2003;362(9378):103-10. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(03)13860-3
4. Juvela S, Porras M, Poussa K. Natural history of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: probability of and risk factors for aneurysm rupture. J Neurosurg. Sep 2000;93(3):379-87. doi:10.3171/jns.2000.93.3.0379
5. Touze E, Randoux B, Meary E, Arquizan C, Meder JF, Mas JL. Aneurysmal forms of cervical artery dissection : associated factors and outcome. Stroke. Feb 2001;32(2):418-23. doi:10.1161/01.str.32.2.418
6. Alvord EC, Jr., Loeser JD, Bailey WL, Copass MK. Subarachnoid hemorrhage due to ruptured aneurysms. A simple method of estimating prognosis. Arch Neurol. Oct 1972;27(4):273-84. doi:10.1001/archneur.1972.00490160001001
7. Starke RM, Komotar RJ, Otten ML, et al. Predicting long-term outcome in poor grade aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage patients utilising the Glasgow Coma Scale. J Clin Neurosci. Jan 2009;16(1):26-31.doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2008.02.010
8. Raps EC, Rogers JD, Galetta SL, et al. The clinical spectrum of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Arch Neurol. Mar 1993;50(3):265-8. doi:10.1001/archneur.1993.00540030031010
9. Tawk RG, Hasan TF, D'Souza CE, Peel JB, Freeman WD. Diagnosis and Treatment of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms and Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Mayo Clin Proc. Jul 2021;96(7):1970-2000. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2021.01.005
10. Ajiboye N, Chalouhi N, Starke RM, Zanaty M, Bell R. Unruptured Cerebral Aneurysms: Evaluation and Management. ScientificWorldJournal. 2015;2015:954954. doi:10.1155/2015/954954
11. Naggara ON, Lecler A, Oppenheim C, Meder JF, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of intracranial unruptured aneurysms: a systematic review of the literature on safety with emphasis on subgroup analyses. Radiology. Jun 2012;263(3):828-35. doi:10.1148/radiol.12112114
12. Seward CJ, Dumont TM, Levy EI. Endovascular therapy of extracranial carotid artery pseudoaneurysms: case series and literature review. J Neurointerv Surg. Sep 2015;7(9):682-9. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011252
13. Phogat V, Gandhi A, Srivastava T, Mishva K. Endovascular management of intracranial pseudoaneurysm: an institutional experience. J Cerebrovasc Endovasc Neurosurg. Dec 2020;22(4):211-215. doi:10.7461/jcen.2020.E2019.11.001
14. Ghosh R, Chalouhi N, Sweid A, et al. Carotid cutdown for mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator: A technical report. J Clin Neurosci. Nov 2020;81:302- 305.
doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2020.10.003
15. Takano I, Matsumoto Y, Fujii Y, et al. Carotid surgical cut-down technique for neuroendovascular therapy. Interv Neuroradiol. Jun 2019;25(3):348-352. doi:10.1177/1591019918815920
16. Bowen A, Soltani A, Cloud A, Polavarapu H, Lodi Y. Direct Carotid Artery Cutdown and flow diversions for the bilateral Internal Carotid Artery Dissecting Pseudoaneurysms: A Case Report. Medical Research Archives. 2023-05-26 2023;11(5)doi:10.18103/mra.v11i5.3864
17. Dorfer C, Standhardt H, Gruber A, Ferraz-Leite H, Knosp E, Bavinzski G. Direct percutaneous puncture approach versus surgical cutdown technique for intracranial neuroendovascular procedures: technical aspects. World Neurosurg. Jan 2012;77(1):192-200. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2010.11.007
18. Nii K, Kazekawa K, Onizuka M, et al. Direct carotid puncture for the endovascular treatment of anterior circulation aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Aug 2006;27(7):1502-4.
19. Blanc R, Piotin M, Mounayer C, Spelle L, Moret J. Direct cervical arterial access for intracranial endovascular treatment. Neuroradiology. Dec 2006;48(12):925-9. doi:10.1007/s00234-006-0157-1
20. Kuhn AL, Singh J, Massari F, de Macedo Rodrigues K, Gounis MJ, Puri AS. Flow Diverter Reconstruction of Internal Carotid Artery (Loop) Dissections with or without Associated Pseudoaneurysms. World Neurosurg. Jun 2022;162:e65-e72. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.073
21. Maybaum J, Henkes H, Aguilar-Perez M, et al. Flow Diversion for Reconstruction of Intradural Vertebral Artery Dissecting Aneurysms Causing Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-A Retrospective Study From Four Neurovascular Centers. Front Neurol. 2021;12:700164. doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.700164
22. Raymond J, Iancu D, Boisseau W, et al. Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Sep 2022;43(9):1244-1251. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A7597
23. Kan P, Siddiqui AH, Veznedaroglu E, et al. Early postmarket results after treatment of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline embolization device: a U.S. multicenter experience. Neurosurgery. Dec 2012;71(6):1080-7; discussion 1087-8. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31827060d9
24. Kallmes DF, Hanel R, Lopes D, et al. International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. Jan 2015;36(1):108-15. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4111