Health Policies & Nudges: Reflections Before the Next Pandemic

Main Article Content

Ronald Cárdenas Krenz

Abstract

What has been experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic, especially in the most vulnerable populations, has revealed the need for a new health model, much more fair, efficient and inclusive; However, defining and applying it is particularly a complex task.


When the pandemic arrived, health systems in different parts of the world revealed their precariousness and inequality, exacerbating the vulnerability of some groups. To make matters worse, the international response once the crisis arrived revealed limited solidarity in the most difficult moments of the crisis.


Although the arrival of vaccines months later offered hope, demonstrating the importance of collective work and not the fate of nations, many people, for reasons of the most diverse nature, were reluctant to get vaccinated. So, governments, faced with the urgency of confronting the virus in the most massive and rapid way, dictated different measures, sometimes correct, sometimes controversial, with the purpose of promoting vaccination.


This intervention, beyond its results, should raise questions about the scope and limits of state intervention in health, what are the terms that the relationship between the individual and the State should have, the need for subtle measures to motivate vaccination and the possibility of applying nudges as a strategy for the effect.


The experience of the pandemic, with its millions of victims, raises the need for a global and autonomous model, taking advantage of globalization to access knowledge, produce medicines and vaccines, as well as distribute them in the most efficient way.


In this purpose, science plays a crucial role, even when its postulates are provisional. States must rebuild lost trust in their governments, and know how to balance health and the economy. The pandemic has highlighted the importance of global public goods and the need to reconcile personal and collective interests instead of opposing them.


Lessons include the need for universal health systems, balanced measures by the State and the promotion of both a culture of responsibility and an ethic of care, with persuasion preferable to imposition.


This article certainly does not seek to propose what this system should be, which requires deeper and more interdisciplinary work, but it does seek to propose some guidelines that serve as guidance in this task, based on reflection on the experiences lived in the fateful days of the pandemic.

Article Details

How to Cite
KRENZ, Ronald Cárdenas. Health Policies & Nudges: Reflections Before the Next Pandemic. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 12, dec. 2023. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/4839>. Date accessed: 15 may 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i12.4839.
Section
Research Articles

References

(1) Martín, M. “Restrictions on the Free Movement of Persons in the EU During the COVID-19 Era: Towards an Uncertain Future”. Araucaria. Ibero-American Journal of Philosophy, Politics, Humanities and International Relations, year 22, no. 45. Third quarter of 2020: 312.

(2) Gates,B. How to avoid the next pandemic. Penguin Random House Publishing Group. 2022: 15.

(3) Lamo de Espinosa, E. “Like a snail inside its shell. Society, Family and the State in Times of Pandemic". In: Salidó, O. and Massó, M. (eds). Sociology in times of pandemic. Social impacts and challenges of the COVID-19 crisis. Spanish Federation of Sociology. 2022: 42.

(4) Boyer, R. Capitalisms in the face of the challenge of the pandemic. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana. 2022: 46, 301, 307, 239, 35-36, 43-44.

(5) Sebastian, M. The never-ending virus. Barcelona: Penguim Random House Grupo Editorial. 2022: 55, 216,217.

(6) Jorqui Azofra, M. “Referential ethical-legal framework for clinical decision-making in the face of resource scarcity in times of pandemic.” In Luquín, R. Covid-19: Current legal conflicts and other challenges. Madrid. Wolters Kluwer. 2020: 202.

(7) Ten Have, H. Perspectives of Conversion: Covid-19 and Global Bioethics. In: Pontifical Academy for Life. Public health in global perspective. 2022: 111, 121.

(8) Alvarez, V. The year of the Covid-19 pandemic (Law Firms). Iustel. 2020: 25.

(9) Valdez, F. Rehearsal for after the shipwreck. Democracy, Rights and the State in the Time of Anger. Penguim Random House Grupo Editorial. 2023: 24.

(10) Beltrán, J.L. “Mandatory vaccination: basis and legal regime.” In Arcos, M.L. (Director) and Elizari, L. (Coordinator). The protection of health against the risk of contagion. Madrid. Bosch. 2022: 323.

(11) Kosciuczyk, V. "The Contribution of Behavioural Economics to Public Policy: An Approach to the Case of the Real Consumer". Palermo Business Review(7). 2017: 23. https://www.palermo.edu/economicas/PDF_2012/PBR7/PBR_02VeraKosciuczyk.pdf (Accessed on 20.04.23).

(12) Sunstein, C and Thaler, R. A little nudge. The boost you need to make better decisions about health, money, and happiness. (2nd ed.). Taurus. 2018: 253.

(13) Innerarity, D. The society of ignorance. Gutenberg Galaxy. 2022: 11, 18 and 20.

(14) Armenta, L. Oriented public policies in Nudge. 2010: 5.
https://es.scribd.com/document/333055195/Lilia-Armenta-0 (Accessed on 02.03.22).

(15) Montalvo Jaaskelainen, F. de. “Fight against infectious diseases and ethical-legal alternatives: nudges, obligation and compulsion.” In Arcos, M.L. (Director) and Elizari, L. (Coordinator). The protection of health against the risk of contagion. Madrid. Bosch. 2022: 59.

(16) Padrón, H. J. “Beyond legal paternamism.” In Andruet, A. (editor). Medical information and informed consent. Cordova. Villa María National University and Advocatus. 2020: 206, pp. 197-209.

(17) Arcos, M.L. “Uninformed consent: reflections on the existence of a “right not to know” applied to clinical information.” In: Arcos, M.L. (Director). Patient autonomy and interests of third parties: limits. Navarra. Thomson Reuters – Aranzadi. 2016: 64.

(18) Sandel, M. Justice. Do we do what we must? 5th. Reprint. Penguim Random House Grupo Editorial. 2018: 295.

(19) Snead, C. What it means to be human: The case for the body im public bioethics. Harvard University Press. 2020: 74.

(20) Cuello Díaz, H. “How to change behaviors during a pandemic: The use of nudges to confront COVID-19.” In GAPP, no. March 25, 2021: 83.

(21) Chau, C; Vilela, P, & Sánchez, J. "Health and Health Promotion in Times of Pandemic." In Velásquez, T. Mental health and covid 19. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 2022: 135, pp. 119-139.

(22) Cierco Seira, C. “Vaccination against COVID-19 and its main legal debates” In Yearbook of the Faculty of Law of the Autonomous University of Madrid, ISSN 1575-8427, No. Extra 1, 2021: 329

(23) Illia, S. The year of the pandemic. From the state of alarm to the start of vaccination. Peninsula Editions. 2022: 104, 303.

(24) Lai, S; Ruktanonchai, N.W. et al. Effect of non-pharmaceutical interventions to contain COVID-19 in China. Nature 585. 2020: 411 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2293-x (Accessed on 30.12.2022).

(25) Ombudsman (Spain). Actions against the covid-19 pandemic. Madrid: Ombudsman. 2022: 88.

(26) Andruet, A. State of health exception. Buenos Aires. Astrea Editorial. 2020: 82.

(27) Andruet, A. “The human body and personal autonomy in clinical relationships.” In Andruet, A. (editor). Medical information and informed consent. Cordova. Villa María National University and Advocatus. 2020: 126, pp. 123-175.

(28) Illia, S. The year of the pandemic. From the state of alarm to the start of vaccination. Peninsula Editions. 2022: 104, 303.

(29) Cuello, H. “How to change behaviors during a pandemic: The use of nudges to confront COVID-19”. 2021. In: GAPP, 2021: 25. https://revistasonline.inap.es/index.php/GAPP/article/view/10873/11905#:~:text=Nudges%20basados%20en%20mostrar%20una,el%20efecto%20contrario%20al%20deseado (Accessed on 02.10.22).