Bridging the Diagnostic Gap between Emergency Medicine and Neuro-Ophthalmic Disorders with Technology and Telehealth
Main Article Content
Abstract
Patients presenting with neuro-ophthalmic disorders pose a diagnostic challenge when they present to community hospital emergency departments (ED) where expertise in neuro-ophthalmology is often limited. Many have no ophthalmology coverage or have a call group composed of general ophthalmologists who are not comfortable managing neuro-ophthalmic disorders. The limited familiarity with neuro-ophthalmology and the lack of essential equipment, such as a fundus camera or optical coherence tomography (OCT), contribute to a substantial gap in accurate and timely diagnosis and treatment. This deficiency results in patients making multiple visits to the emergency department, where they receive limited or no treatment, and this overall increases the risk of disease progression and potentially blindness.
Advocating for standardized protocols and integrating technological advancements will aid non-ophthalmologist physicians and mid-level physician extenders in the initial assessment and management of patients with acute visual issues. Additionally, improving the accessibility of neuro-ophthalmological services through telehealth, and diagnostic aids (such as smartphone-based fundus cameras) in emergency department settings is essential to avoid overlooked or misdiagnosed neuro-ophthalmological disorders.
We describe two common scenarios that illustrate the diagnostic journey of patients. One is a young patient presenting with headache and vague visual symptoms and the other is an elderly patient with unilateral visual loss and vague headaches. We will focus on the crucial role of the fundus camera/OCT in identifying disc edema but also discuss the key questions that help guide diagnosis.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Okrent Smolar AL, Ray HJ, Dattilo M, et al. Neuro-ophthalmology Emergency Department and Inpatient Consultations at a Large Academic Referral Center. Ophthalmology (Rochester, Minn). Published online 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.07.028
3. Mishra C, Tripathy K. Fundus Camera. Nih.gov. Published August 22, 2022. Accessed November 22, 2022. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK585111/#:~:text=The%20fundus%20camera%20is%20an
4. Tarbert D. What Is Optical Coherence Tomography? American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published April 27, 2018. https://www.aao.org/eye-health/treatments/what-is-optical-coherence-tomography
5. Fujimoto JG, Petri’s C, Boppart SA, Brezinski ME. Optical Coherence Tomography: An Emerging Technology for Biomedical Imaging and Optical Biopsy. Neoplasia. 2000;2(1-2):9-25. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.neo.7900071
6. Liu GT, Volpe NJ, Galetta SL. Liu, Volpe, and Galetta’s Neuro-Ophthalmology: Diagnosis and Management. 3rd edition. Elsevier; 2018
7. Milea D, Najjar RP, Jiang Z, et al. Artificial Intelligence to Detect Papilledema from Ocular Fundus Photographs. New England Journal of Medicine. 2020;382(18):1687-1695. doi:https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1917130