↓ Read PDF
01 · ABSTRACT

Abstract

Moral distress is the situation in which nurses know the moral principles that should guide their actions but are not allowed by the constraints of the health system. Moral sensitivity is the ability of nurses to perceive the moral dimensions of certain situations or actions. Safe care is a range of services provided to patients by nurses and consequently nurses with the aim of monitoring, promoting, maintaining or restoring the health of patients. Moral distress negatively affects safe health care, and moral sensitivity is the solution to moral distress. This study investigates the relationship between both moral distress and moral sensitivity of nurses with safe nursing care. A total of 163 nurses from a General Greek Hospital participated in the research. The protocol included the Moral Resilience (RMRS), Moral Distress (MMD-HP) and Moral Sensitivity Control (Byrd's NEST) scales.

For the Moral Resilience scale, higher scores are recorded for the moral efficacy dimension. Moderate scores are recorded for the Moral Distress scale, so nurses are characterized by moderate moral sensitivity. None of the nurses had left or considered leaving the clinic due to moral distress, up to the time of the present study. Health professionals based on Byrd's NEST scale are characterized by moderate moral sensitivity. The greater the integrity of the relationships, the greater the reactions to moral adversity. The greater the moral distress, or the better the perceptions of the security offered by management, the greater nurses’ personal integrity. As relational integrity or the distress decreased, moral efficacy increased. The higher the moral distress of the nurses, the greater the integrity of the relationships. Nurses who had children also felt more secure about working conditions than those who did not. The greater the dynamics of the clinic, the less reactions to moral adversity. Finally, greater moral deadlock was associated with both greater personal integrity and greater relational integrity, and less moral efficacy. Increased moral sensitivity prevents the occurrence of moral distress and has a positive effect on the provision of safe health care.

↓ Read PDF
02 · PUBLICATION RECORD

Article details

JournalMedical Research Archives
IssueVol 12 No 1 (2024): January Issue, Vol.12, Issue 1
SectionResearch Articles
Published30 January 2024
DOI10.18103/mra.v12i1.4930
ISSN2375-1924
03 · RIGHTS & REUSE

Rights & reuse

This article is published under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0) and may be shared or distributed by anyone as long as attribution is given to the journal.

Authors & affiliations

VG

Vaios Grammatis

Master of Healthcare Administration, Hellenic Open University, Greece

IK

Ioannis Kouroutzis

Master of Healthcare Administration, Hellenic Open University, Greece; Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Greece

IV

Ilda Vako

Master of Healthcare Administration, Hellenic Open University, Greece

VR

Vasiliki Roka

Master of Healthcare Administration, Hellenic Open University, Greece

PS

Pavlos Sarafis

Master of Healthcare Administration, Hellenic Open University, Greece; Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Greece

MM

Maria Malliarou

Master of Healthcare Administration, Hellenic Open University, Greece; Department of Nursing, University of Thessaly, Greece

Medical Research Archives

Submit your own article

Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.

Start your submission  ↗