Moral distress and Moral Sensitivity and their correlation with Safe nursing care
Article Sidebar
Downloads
Submit your own article
Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.
Author RegistrationJoin the Society
The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.
Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.
MembershipMain Article Content
Abstract
Moral distress is the situation in which nurses know the moral principles that should guide their actions but are not allowed by the constraints of the health system. Moral sensitivity is the ability of nurses to perceive the moral dimensions of certain situations or actions. Safe care is a range of services provided to patients by nurses and consequently nurses with the aim of monitoring, promoting, maintaining or restoring the health of patients. Moral distress negatively affects safe health care, and moral sensitivity is the solution to moral distress. This study investigates the relationship between both moral distress and moral sensitivity of nurses with safe nursing care. A total of 163 nurses from a General Greek Hospital participated in the research. The protocol included the Moral Resilience (RMRS), Moral Distress (MMD-HP) and Moral Sensitivity Control (Byrd's NEST) scales.
For the Moral Resilience scale, higher scores are recorded for the moral efficacy dimension. Moderate scores are recorded for the Moral Distress scale, so nurses are characterized by moderate moral sensitivity. None of the nurses had left or considered leaving the clinic due to moral distress, up to the time of the present study. Health professionals based on Byrd's NEST scale are characterized by moderate moral sensitivity. The greater the integrity of the relationships, the greater the reactions to moral adversity. The greater the moral distress, or the better the perceptions of the security offered by management, the greater nurses’ personal integrity. As relational integrity or the distress decreased, moral efficacy increased. The higher the moral distress of the nurses, the greater the integrity of the relationships. Nurses who had children also felt more secure about working conditions than those who did not. The greater the dynamics of the clinic, the less reactions to moral adversity. Finally, greater moral deadlock was associated with both greater personal integrity and greater relational integrity, and less moral efficacy. Increased moral sensitivity prevents the occurrence of moral distress and has a positive effect on the provision of safe health care.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Jameton AA. Nursing practice: the moral issues. (1984); Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall, 1984. Print cover
3. Jameton AA. Reflection on moral distress in nursing together with a current application of the concept. Journal of bioethical inquiry (2013); 10(3): 297-308. doi.org/10.1007/s11673-013-9466-3
4. Leonard HD, Campbell K, Gonzalez VM. The relationships among clinician self-report of empathy, mindfulness, and therapeutic alliance. Mindfulness. (2018); 9:1837-44.
5. Pérez-Fuentes M, Gázquez Linares JJ, Molero Jurado M, Del Mar Simón Márquez M, Martínez AM. The mediating role of cognitive and affective empathy in the relationship of mindfulness with engagement in nursing. BMC Public Health (2020); 20:16. doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-8129-7
6. Kraaijeveld MI, Schilderman J, van Leeuwen E. Moral sensitivity revisited. Nursing ethics. (2021); 28(2): 179-189. doi.org/10.1177/0969733020930407
7. Luther B, Barra J, Martial, MA. Essential nursing care management and coordination roles and responsibilities. Professional Case Management. (2019). 24:249-258. doi: 10.1097/ncm.0000000000000355
8. Robertson HD, Elliott AM, Burton C, Iversen L, Murchie P, Porteous T, Matheson C. Resilience of primary nurses: a systematic review. British Journal of General Practice. (2016); 66(647):e423-33. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X685261
9. Bahadir Yilmaz E. Resilience as a strategy for struggling against challenges related to the nursing profession. Chinese Nursing Research (2017); 4:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.cnre.2017.03.004
10. Karatuna I., Jonsson S, Muhonen T. Workplace bullying in the nursing profession: a cross-cultural scoping review. International Journal of Nursing Studies. (2020); 103628. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103628
11. Lachman VD. Moral Resilience: Managing and preventing moral distress and moral residue. Medsurg nursing. Official Journal of the Academy of Medical-Surgical Nurses. (2016); 25(2):121-4.
12. Ineichen C, Christen M, Tanner C. Measuring value sensitivity in medicine. BMC Medical Ethics. (2017); 18(1). doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0164-7
13. Burhans L, Alligood M. Quality nursing care in the words of nurses. Journal of Advanced Nursing. (2010); 66:1689-97. doi:10.1111/j.13652648.2010.05344.x
14. Sarafis P, Rousaki E, Tsounis A, Malliarou M, Lahana L, Bamidis P, Niakas D, Papastavrou E. The impact of occupational stress on nurses’ caring behaviors and their health related quality of life. BMC Nursing. (2016); 15(1):1-9
15. Malliarou M, Nikolentzos A, Papadopoulos D, Bekiari T, Sarafis, P. ICU nurse's moral distress as an occupational hazard threatening professional quality of life in the time of pandemic covid 19. Materia Sociomedica. (2021); 33(2):88-93. doi.org/10.5455/msm.2021.33.88-93
16. Creswell J. Research in education: Designing, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (2012). 4th Edition. ISBN: 9780134519395
17. Heinze KE, Hanson G, Holtz H, Swoboda SM, Rushton CH. Measuring health care interprofessionals' moral resilience: Validation of the Rushton moral resilience scale. Journal of Palliative Medicine. (2021); 24(6):865-872. doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2020.0328
18. Rushton CH, Thomas TA, Antonsdottir IM, Nelson KE, Boyce D, Vioral A, Swavely D, Ley CD, Hanson GC. Moral injury and moral resilience in health care workers during covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Palliative Medicine. (2022); 25(5): 712-719. doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2021.0076
19. Epstein EG, Whitehead PB, Prombahakul C, Thacker LR, Hamric AB. Enhancing understanding of moral distress: The measure of moral distress for health care professionals, AJOB Empirical Bioethics. (2019); 10(2):113-124. doi: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1586008
20. Sexton JB, Helmreich RL, Neilands TB, Rowan K, Vella K, Boyden J, Roberts, PR, Thomas EJ. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire: psychometric properties, benchmarking data, and emerging research. BMC Health Services Research. (2006); 6: 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-6-44
21. Byrd LM. Development of an instrument to identify the virtues of expert nursing practice: Byrd’s healthcare professional’s moral sensitivity test. (2006). Mississippi: The University of Southern Mississippi
22. Salari N, Shohaimi S, Khaledi-Paveh B, Kazeminia M, Bazrafshan MR, Mohammadi M. The severity of moral distress in nurses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine. (2022); 17(1):13. doi.org/10.1186/s13010-022-00126-0
23. Shahriari M, Mohammadi E, Abbaszadeh A, Bahrami M, Fooladi MM. Perceived moral values by Iranian nurses. Nursing ethics. (2012); 19(1):30-44. doi.org/10.1177/0969733011408169
24. Musto LC, Rodney PA, Vanderheide R. Toward interventions to address moral distress: navigating structure and agency. Nursing Ethics. (2015); 22(1):91-102. doi.org/10.1177/0969733014534879
25. Bayat M, Shahriari M, Keshvari M. The relationship between moral distress in nurses and moral climate in selected hospitals of the Iranian social security organization. Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine. (2019); 12:8. https://doi.org/10.18502/jmehm.v12i8.1339
26. Haahr A, Norlyk A, Martinsen B, Dreyer, P. Nurses experiences of moral dilemmas: A review. Nursing Ethics. (2020); 27(1):258-272, doi.org/10.1177/0969733019832941
27. Arries-Kleyenstüber EJ. Moral resilience in nursing education: exploring undergraduate nursing student’s perceptions of resilience in relation to moral ideology. SAGE Open Nursing. (2021); 7. doi.org/10.1177/23779608211017798
28. Llop-Gironés A, Vračar A, Llop-Gironés G. et al. Employment and working conditions of nurses: where and how health inequalities have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic? Human Resources for Health. (2021); 19:112 doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00651-7
29. Kim EY, Chang SO. Exploring nurse perceptions and experiences of resilience: a meta-synthesis study. BMC Nursing. (2022); 21:26. doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00803-z