Prejudice, against GMO crops and Golden Rice, in US Academia drove unethical behaviour, with global and detrimental consequences for vitamin A deficiency alleviation.
Article Sidebar
Downloads
Submit your own article
Register as an author to reserve your spot in the next issue of the Medical Research Archives.
Author RegistrationJoin the Society
The European Society of Medicine is more than a professional association. We are a community. Our members work in countries across the globe, yet are united by a common goal: to promote health and health equity, around the world.
Join Europe’s leading medical society and discover the many advantages of membership, including free article publication.
MembershipMain Article Content
Abstract
In 2015, Tang et al 2012 was retracted. The paper concerned human research, relevant to public health, conducted in China in 2008. Retraction represents the most severe criticism of a scientific article. This article recounts events over a four-year period and challenges the justification for retraction based on the Committee on Publication Ethics principles.
This research focuses on analysing contemporary (2012–2015) documentary evidence, organised by key narrative participants: Greenpeace, the Chinese Government, Tufts University, the American Society for Nutrition, the US National Institutes of Health, and the US Office for Human Research Protections.
The analysis indicates that technological bias within a university and a learned society, which is also a publisher, led to unethical behaviour and the subsequent retraction. In the USA, oversight of an Institutional Review Board falls under the Office for Human Research Protections. Despite being the principal funder, the NIH's reliance on this office for the retracted paper's research to be publicly available, suggests ineffective oversight.
The retracted paper detailed a crucial nutritional study relevant to combating vitamin A deficiency, a significant cause of child mortality and blindness in Low- and Middle-Income countries. The retraction likely heightened suspicion around this vital public health intervention.
Recommendations are made which are designed to partially ameliorate the injustices perpetrated.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Dubock, A. The present status of Golden Rice. J Huazhong Agric Univ. 33, 69–84 (2014).
3. Editorial. Reburnishing Golden Rice. Nat Biotechnol 23, 395 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt0405-395
4. Enserink, M. Golden Rice not so Golden for Tufts, Science Insider (2013). http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/2013/09/golden-rice-not-so-golden-tufts
5. Gostin, L. O. Global Health: Shared Obligations and Mutual Respect. Ann. Glob. Heal. 85, 80 (2019)
6. Grune T., Lietz G., Palou A., Ross A. C., Stahl W., Tang G., Thurnham D., Yin S., and Biesalski H. K. β-Carotene is an important vitamin A source for humans. J. Nutr. (2010). doi: 10.3945/jn.109.119024
7. Hvistendahl, M. & Enserink, M. Charges Fly, Confusion Reigns Over Golden Rice Study in Chinese Children. Science 1281 (2012). DOI: 10.1126/science.337.6100.1281
8. Miller, H. The-Greenpeace-motto-save-the-whales-let-the- children-die. Forbes (2015). https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2015/08/11/blood-on-their-hands-withdrawal-of-golden-rice-study-for-non-science-reasons-feeds-anti-gmo-fervor/ accessed December 8 2023
9. Online document. Anon. Institutional review board. Retrieved November 13, 2023 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Institutional_review_board
10. Online document. Anon. Diane Souvaine. Retrieved November 14, 2023 from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diane_Souvaine
11. Roberts, R., et al., 2016, Laureates letter supporting precision agriculture (GMOs). https://www.supportprecisionagriculture.org/nobel-laureate-gmo-letter_rjr.html Accessed February 9 2024.
12. Stevens G.A., Beal T., Mbuya M.N.N., Luo H., Neufeld L.M. Micronutrient deficiencies among preschool-aged children and women of reproductive age worldwide: a pooled analysis of individual-level data from population-representative surveys. Lancet Global Health (10) e1590-e1599 (2022). www.thelancet.com/lancetgh
13. Tang, G. Using plant foods rich in β-carotene to combat vitamin A deficiency. Sight Life 27, (2013).
14. Tang, G., Jian, Q., Dolnikowski, G. G., Russell, R. M. & Grusak, M. A. Golden rice is an effective source of vitamin A. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 89, 1776–1783 (2009).
15. Tang, G., Hu Y., Yin S., Wang Y., Dallal G. E., Grusak M. A., and Russell R. β -Carotene in Golden Rice is as good as β -carotene in oil at providing vitamin A to children. Am J Clin Nutr 96, 658–664 (2012).
16. Tang, G., Hu Y., Yin S., Wang Y., Dallal G. E., Grusak M. A., and Russell R. Retracted: β-Carotene in Golden Rice is as good as β-carotene in oil at providing vitamin A to children. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (2012) 96 (658-664)). 4x egasin Ref 14 e 15 vol.102715(2015). DOI:https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.111.030775
17. Wu, F., Wesseler, J., Zilberman, D., Russell, R. M., Chen, C., and Dubock, A. C. Allow Golden Rice to save lives. PNAS 118, 51 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas 2120901118 (2021).