Can Gram-Stained Sputum Be an Effective Therapeutic Marker of Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Agents in Bacterial Pneumonia and Bronchitis?

Main Article Content

Ryuichi Fujisaki Toshimori Yamaoka Hajime Nishiya

Abstract

Gram staining is one of the most crucial staining techniques in microbiology.


The use of Gram stain facilitates rapid use of appropriate antimicrobial agents. In bacterial pneumonia, the most useful sample which reflects the status of inflammation in the lung is supposed to be sputum from the infectious areas in the lung. The changing patterns of Gram-stained sputa can be used as the therapeutic marker of effectiveness of antimicrobial agents. When the first administered antimicrobial agent is effective against the target pathogen; S. pneumoniae, M. catarrhalis or Haemophilus influenzae, a decrease in number of the pathogen in the sputa was clear and almost no or little pathogen were seen in the sputum obtained several-hours after the first administration of antimicrobial agent or before the second administration, which is mostly administered 8-12 hours-after the first one, showing that Gram-stained sputum is a definite effective marker of the effectiveness of the agent. In pneumococcal pneumonia, a loss of gram-positive-staining of pneumococci was another early marker of the effectiveness of the agent. We can expect the effectiveness at least 1 h after completion of the first administration of the agent, when a loss of gram-positive-staining of pneumococci with a decrease in the number of cocci is found in the sputa. The reason for the loss of staining is supposed to be by reduction in peptidoglycan synthesis induced by antimicrobial agents distributed in the sputa. To find effective marker showing the effectiveness of administered antimicrobial agent in bacterial pneumonia or bronchitis, we compared the white blood cell count (WBC), serum C-reactive protein (CRP) level, and the decrease in the bacterial density in gram-stained sputa in which the administered antimicrobial agents were effective. The data showed that at least 2 to 4 days were needed to evaluate the effectiveness when the WBC or CRP level was used as a therapeutic marker, but the median duration needed to determine the effectiveness of the agent was 6.5 hours (range, 1 to 12 hours) in Gram-stained sputa, which showed that Gram-stained sputum after the first administration of antimicrobial agents can be used as the quickest therapeutic marker in treating bacterial respiratory infections. We showed that Gram staining of sputum is a useful and effective tool to check the effectiveness of administered antimicrobial agents in bacterial pneumonia and bronchitis.

Keywords: bacterial pneumonia, gram staining, therapeutic marker

Article Details

How to Cite
FUJISAKI, Ryuichi; YAMAOKA, Toshimori; NISHIYA, Hajime. Can Gram-Stained Sputum Be an Effective Therapeutic Marker of Effectiveness of Antimicrobial Agents in Bacterial Pneumonia and Bronchitis?. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 12, n. 3, july 2024. ISSN 2375-1924. Available at: <https://esmed.org/MRA/mra/article/view/5110>. Date accessed: 22 july 2024. doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v12i3.5110.
Section
Research Articles

References

1. Karakioulaki M, Stolz D. Biomarkers in Pneumonia—Beyond Procalcitonin. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Apr; 20(8): 2004. 2019Apr 24.Doi: 10.3390/ijms20082004
2. Zarabi N, Aldev`en M, Sj``olander S, Wahl HF, et.al. Clinical and economic burden of pneumococcal disease among adults in Sweden: A population-based register study. PLoSOne.2023Jul7;18(7):e0287581. Doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0287581
3. Dinh A, Ropers J, Duran C, et.al. Discontinuing β-lactam treatment after 3 days for patients with community-acquired pneumonia in non-critical care wards (PTC): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2021 Mar 27;397(10280):1195-1203.
4. Mamishi S, Moradkhani S, Mahmoudi S, Sadeghi RH. Penicillin-Resistant trend of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Asia: A systematic review. Iran J Microbiol. 2014 Aug;6(4):198-210.
5. Tripathi N , Amit Sapra A. Gram Staining. StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.
6. Richard Coico R. Gram staining Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2005 Oct;Appendix 3:Appendix 3C. Doi: 10.1002/9780471729259.mca03cs00
7. Fujisaki R, Yamaoka T, Yamamura M, et.al. Usefulness of gram-stained sputum obtained just after administration of antimicrobial agents as the earliest therapeutic indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of empiric therapy in community-acquired pneumonia caused by pneumococcus or Moraxella catarrhalis. J Infect Chemother. 2013; 19(3):517-523.
8. Fujisaki R, Yamaoka T, Yamamura M, et.al. Case of pneumococcal (PRSP) bronchitis: Gram staining as the earliest and useful indicator for evaluating the effectiveness of antimicrobial therapy in outpatient. Medical Research Archives, [S.l.], v. 11, n. 8, sep. 2023. . Doi: https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v11i8.4207
9. O'Toole GA. Classic Spotlight: How the Gram Stain Works. J Bacteriol. 2016; 198(23): 3128. Doi:10.1128/JB.00726-16
10. PandeyN, Cascella M. Beta-Lactam Antibiotics. StatPearls Publishing; 2024.
11. Morley D, Torres A, Cillóniz C, Martin-Loeches I. Predictors of treatment failure and clinical stability in patients with community acquired pneumonia. Ann Transl Med. 2017;5(22): 443. Doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.06.54
12. Christ-Crain M, Müller B. Procalcitonin and Pneumonia: Is it a useful marker? Current Infectious Disease Reports. 2007; 9:233–240.
13. Savvateeva EN, Rubina AY, Gryadunov DA. Biomarkers of Community-Acquired Pneumonia: A key to disease diagnosis and management. Biomed Res Int. 2019; 2019: 1701276. Doi: 10.1155/2019/1701276
14. Zhou B, Lou B, Liu J, et.al. Serum metabolite profiles as potential biochemical markers in young adults with community-acquired pneumonia cured by moxifloxacin therapy. Scientific Reports. 2020; 10: 4436.
15. Dulfono MJ. Sputum, fundamentals and clinical pathology. Charles C Thomas Publisher;1973.
16. Lloberes P, Montserrat E, Montserrat JM, et. al. Sputum sol phase proteins and elastase activity in patients with clinically stable bronchiectasis. Thorax 1992; 47:88-92.
17. Nagaoka S. Sputum, fundamentals and clinical pathology. Shin kakutann-gaku. Article in Japanese. Life Science; 1994.
18. Atsukawa Y , Kawakami S, Asahara M, et.al. The usefulness of changing focus during examination using Gram staining as initial diagnostic clue for infective tuberculosis. J Infect Chemother. 2011;17(4):571-574.
19. Atsukawa Y, Kawakami S, Ono Y, et.al.Three cases of mycobacterium tuberculosis infection initially recognized by focus changing examination in gram staining. Insight and control of infectious disease in global scenario. 2012.261-270. www.intechopen.com
20. Kawakami S, Kawamura Y, Nishiyama K, et.al. Case of Mycobacterium tuberculosis meningitis: Gram staining as a useful initial diagnostic clue for tuberculous meningitis. J Infect Chemother. 2012;18(6):931-936.