Intensive care challenges for the next pandemic
Main Article Content
Abstract
Experience during the COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the need for crisis preparedness, particularly in intensive care units (ICUs). Addressing key challenges is vital for improving readiness and response, as well as ensuring better protection for vulnerable populations.
Our review focuses on the recent literature examining the challenges in acute care settings during the pandemic. We aimed to identify lessons that could improve our ability to handle similar situations.
Studies have highlighted the critical role of intensive care, responsiveness, and preparedness. The key challenges identified include a shortage of trained personnel to meet high demand without compromising care quality or overburdening healthcare workers. Resource scarcity during the pandemic emphasizes the importance of reasonable resource allocation to ensure sufficient care provision.
Additionally, addressing post-ICU syndrome and early rehabilitation is crucial, as ICU treatment can lead to long-term physical, psychological, and cognitive issues that can affect patients' quality of life. Finally, fostering a culture of data sharing and research collaboration is essential for knowledge exchange and improving crisis management across healthcare centers.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. The territorial impact of COVID-19 Managing the crisis and recovery across levels of government - OECD. Accessed March 14, 2024. https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/view/?ref=1095_1095253-immbk05xb7&title=The-territorial-impact-of-COVID-19-Managing-the-crisis-and-recovery-across-levels-of-government
3. Clark H, Cárdenas M, Dybul M, et al. Transforming or tinkering: the world remains unprepared for the next pandemic threat. The Lancet. 2022;399(10340):1995-1999. doi:10.1 016/S0140-6736(22)00929-1
4. Lal A, Erondu NA, Heymann DL, Gitahi G, Yates R. Fragmented health systems in COVID-19: rectifying the misalignment between global health security and universal health coverage. The Lancet. 2021;397(10268 ):61-67. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32228-5
5. Arabi YM, Azoulay E, Al-Dorzi HM, et al. How the COVID-19 pandemic will change the future of critical care. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(3):282-291. doi:10.1007/s00134-021-06352-y
6. Mello MM, Parmet WE. Public Health Law after Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021;385(13):1153-1155. doi:10.10 56/NEJMP2112193
7. Health workforce policy and management in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic response Interim guidance. Published online 2020.
8. World Health Organization. Risk Assessment and Management of Exposure of Health Care Workers in the Context of COVID-19: Interim Guidance.; 2020.
9. Báscolo E, Houghton N, Del Riego A, et al. Aportes del nuevo marco para las funciones esenciales de salud pública a la lucha contra la pandemia de COVID-19. Revista panamericana de Salud Pública. 2022;46. doi:10.26633/RPSP.2022.8
10. OECD P. Panorama de La Salud 2021: Indicadores de La OCDE. OECD; 2021. doi:10.1787/ae3016b9-en
11. Wahlster S, Sharma M, Lewis AK, et al. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic’s Effect on Critical Care Resources and Health-Care Providers: A Global Survey. Chest. 2021;159(2):619-633. doi:10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.070
12. WHO Guidance on Research Methods for Health Emergency and Disaster Risk Management.
13. Dargin J, Stempek S, Lei Y, Gray A, Liesching T. The effect of a tiered provider staffing model on patient outcomes during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: A single-center observational study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2021;11(3):156-160. doi:10.4103/IJCII S.IJCIIS_37_21
14. Harris G, Adalja A. ICU preparedness in pandemics: Lessons learned from the coronavirus disease-2019 outbreak. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2021;27(2):73-78. doi:10.1097/ MCP.0000000000000749
15. Saurin TA, Wachs P, Bueno WP, et al. Coping with complexity in the COVID pandemic: An exploratory study of intensive care units. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries. 2022;32(3 ):301-318. doi:10.1002/HFM.20947
16. Spencer SA, Adipa FE, Baker T, et al. A health systems approach to critical care delivery in low-resource settings: a narrative review. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(7):772-784. doi:10.1007/S00134-023-07136-2/TABLES/3
17. Gupta N, Kumar R. Implementation of Total Quality Management in Higher Education Institutions.; 2021. www.maims.ac.in
18. Bakhsh A, Asiri R, Alotaibi H, Alsaeedi R, Shahbar R, Boker A. Rapid cycle training for non-critical care physicians to meet intensive care unit staff shortage at an academic training center in a developing country during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):1-6. doi:10.1186/S12909-023-044 78-9/TABLES/2
19. Vera M, Kattan E, Cerda T, et al. Implementation of Distance-Based Simulation Training Programs for Healthcare Professionals. Simulation in Healthcare: The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2021;Publish Ah(00):1-6. doi:10.1 097/sih.0000000000000550
20. Seruwagi G, Nakidde C, Otieno F, et al. Healthworker preparedness for COVID-19 management and implementation experiences: a mixed methods study in Uganda’s refugee-hosting districts. Confl Health. 2021;15(1). doi:10.1186/S13031-021-00415-Z
21. Farooq M, Ahmad S, Hanjra FK, Zafar O, Bashir K. Interprofessional On-floor Education on Oxygen Therapy in COVID-19 Patients, Cardiac Arrest, and Procedural Sedation: Perception of Health-care Workers in Emergency Setting. Open Access Emerg Med. 2022;14:535-543. doi:10.2147/OAEM.S349656
22. Sabbagh AY, Alzaid HM, Almarshed AA, et al. A Newly Developed Interprofessional In-Situ Simulation-Based Training for Airway Management of COVID-19 Patients: Identification of Challenges and Safety Gaps, and Assessment of the Participants’ Reaction. J Clin Med Res. 2022;14(9):377-387. doi:10.1 4740/JOCMR4756
23. Papazian L, Hraiech S, Loundou A, Herridge MS, Boyer L. High-level burnout in physicians and nurses working in adult ICUs: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(4):387-400. doi: 10.1007/S00134-023-07025-8/FIGURES/5
24. Babapour AR, Gahassab-Mozaffari N, Fathnezhad-Kazemi A. Nurses’ trust in managers and its relationship with nurses’ performance behaviors: a descriptive- correlational study. Published online 2021. doi:10.1186/s12912-022-00852-y
25. Bourgeault IL, Maier CB, Dieleman M, et al. The COVID-19 pandemic presents an opportunity to develop more sustainable health workforces. Hum Resour Health. 2020;18(1). doi:10.1186/S12960-020-00529-0
26. Bali S, Dhatt R, Lal A, Jama A, Van Daalen K, Sridhar D. Off the back burner: diverse and gender-inclusive decision-making for COVID-19 response and recovery. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5(5):e002595. doi:10.1136/BMJGH-202 0-002595
27. Hermann B, Benghanem S, Jouan Y, Lafarge A, Beurton A, Beurton Alexandra A. REVIEW Open Access The positive impact of COVID-19 on critical care: from unprecedented challenges to transformative changes, from the perspective of young intensivists. Ann Intensive Care. 2023;13:28. doi:10.1186/s13613-023-01118-9
28. Braithwaite J. Changing how we think about healthcare improvement. BMJ. 2018;36 1. doi:10.1136/BMJ.K2014
29. Delbon P, Maghin F, Falconi B, Conti A. Resource scarcity and allocation criteria during the Covid-19 pandemic: Ethical issues. https://doi.org/101177/22799036221106659 .2022;11(2).doi:10.1177/22799036221106659
30. Hortal-Carmona J, Padilla-Bernáldez J, Melguizo-Jiménez M, et al. [Efficiency is not enough. Ethical analysis and recommendations for the allocation of scarce resources in a pandemic situation]. Gac Sanit. 2021;35(6):525-533. doi:10.1016/J.GACETA.2020.07.006
31. Cabre Lluis, Casado María. Recommendations for making ethical decisions about patient access to intensive care units in pandemic situauions. Observatoria de Bioética, cátedra UNESCO. Published online March 1, 2020. Accessed February 2, 2024. www.bioeticayderecho.ub.edu
32. Rubio O, Estella A, Cabre L, et al. Recomendaciones éticas para la toma de decisiones difíciles en las unidades de cuidados intensivos ante la situación excepcional de crisis por la pandemia por COVID-19: revisión rápida y consenso de expertos PALABRAS CLAVE. Med Intensiva. 2020;44(7):439-445. doi:10.1016/j.medin.2020.04.006
33. Maglio I, Valdez P, Cámera L, et al. GUÍAS ÉTICAS PARA LA ATENCIÓN DURANTE LA PANDEMIA COVID-19. RECOMENDACIONES MULTISOCIETARIAS PARA ASIGNACIÓN DE RECURSOS. 2020;80:12.
34. Downar J, Seccareccia D. Palliating a pandemic: “all patients must be cared for.” J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010;39(2):291-295. doi:10.1016/J.JPAINSYMMAN.2009.11.241
35. Weng L, Phua J, Weng L, et al. Fast and Chronic Programmes Intensive care management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): challenges and recommendations. Review Lancet Respir Med. 2020;8:506-523. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2
36. García-Alegría J, Abarca Buján B, Íñiguez Romo A, Garrido López P. La Formación Médica Continuada de las Sociedades Científicas en España: análisis de la situación actual y propuestas de futuro. Med Clin (Barc). 2022;159(1):47-52. doi:10.1016/J.MEDCLI.2022.02.005
37. Wensing M, Grol R. Knowledge translation in health: How implementation science could contribute more. BMC Med. 2019;17(1):1-6. doi:10.1186/S12916-019-132 2-9/TABLES/1
38. Needham DM, Davidson J, Cohen H, et al. Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders’ conference. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(2):502-509. doi:10.1097/CCM.0B013E318232DA75
39. Zhang Y. The epidemiological characteristics of an outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) in China. Chinese Journal of Epidemiology. 2020;41(2): 145-151. doi:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2 020.02.003
40. Grasselli G, Zangrillo A, Zanella A, et al. Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy. JAMA. 2020;323(16):1574-1581. doi:10. 1001/JAMA.2020.5394
41. Wang Y, Lu X, Li Y, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of 344 intensive care patients with COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2020;201(11):1430-1434. doi:10.1164/rccm.202003-0736LE
42. Troyer EA, Kohn JN, Hong S. Are we facing a crashing wave of neuropsychiatric sequelae of COVID-19? Neuropsychiatric symptoms and potential immunologic mechanisms. Brain Behav Immun. 2020;87:34 -39. doi:10.1016/J.BBI.2020.04.027
43. Patterson BK, Francisco EB, Yogendra R, et al. Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 Months Post-Infection. Front Immunol. 2022;12. doi:10.338 9/FIMMU.2021.746021
44. Patterson BK, Francisco EB, Yogendra R, et al. Persistence of SARS CoV-2 S1 Protein in CD16+ Monocytes in Post-Acute Sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) up to 15 Months Post-Infection. Front Immunol. 2022;12(January):1-11. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.746021
45. Writing Committee for the COMEBAC Study Group; Luc Morin, Laurent Savale, Tài Pham, Romain Colle, Samy Figueiredo, Anatole Harrois, Matthieu Gasnier, Anne-Lise Lecoq, Olivier Meyrignac, Nicolas Noel, Elodie Baudry, Marie-France Bellin, Antoine Beurnier, W XM. Four-Month Clinical Status of a Cohort of Patients After Hospitalization for COVID-19. JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2021;325(15):1525-1534.
46. Martillo MA, Dangayach NS, Tabacof L, et al. Postintensive Care Syndrome in Survivors of Critical Illness Related to Coronavirus Disease 2019: Cohort Study from a New York City Critical Care Recovery Clinic∗. Crit Care Med. Published online 2021:1427-1438. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005014
47. Van Gassel RJJ, Bels J, Remij L, et al. Functional Outcomes and Their Association With Physical Performance in Mechanically Ventilated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Survivors at 3 Months Following Hospital Discharge: A Cohort Study. Crit Care Med. 2021;49(10):1726-1738. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005089
48. Lorusso R, Piero ME De, Mariani S, et al. In-hospital and 6-month outcomes in patients with COVID-19 supported with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation ( EuroECMO-COVID ): a multicentre , prospective observational study. Published online 2023:151-162.
49. Biehl M, Sese D. Post-intensive care syndrome and COVID-19 — Implications post pandemic. Cleve Clin J Med. Published online 2020:19-21. doi:10.3949/ccjm.87a.ccc055
50. Nakanishi N, Liu K, Kawakami D, et al. Post-Intensive Care Syndrome and Its New Challenges in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic: A Review of Recent Advances and Perspectives. J Clin Med. 2021;10(17). doi:10.3390/JCM10173870
51. Nakamura K, Nakano H, Naraba H, Mochizuki M, Hashimoto H. Early rehabilitation with dedicated use of belt-type electrical muscle stimulation for severe COVID-19 patients. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):10-11. doi:10.1186/s13054-020-03080-5
52. Beck K, Vincent A, Becker C, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with psychological burden in COVID-19 patients and their relatives: A prospective observational cohort study. PLoS One. 2021;16(5). doi:10.13 71/JOURNAL.PONE.0250590
53. Cattelan J, Castellano S, Merdji H, et al. Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic. J Intensive Care. 2021;9(1). doi:10.1186/S4056 0-020-00520-W
54. Kiekens C. Follow-up services for improving long-term outcomes in intensive care unit (ICU) survivors – A Cochrane review summary with commentary. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(11). doi:10.2340/16501977-2626
55. Ministerio de Salud. Protocolo De Rehabilitación En Personas Covid-19 Grave Y Crítico Desde La Etapa Aguda a La Post Aguda. Published online 2020:1-28.
56. Cook NL, Lauer MS. Biomedical Research COVID-19 Impact Assessment: Lessons Learned and Compelling Needs. NAM Perspectives. 2021;2021. doi:10.31478/202107E
57. Mer M, Aryal D, Nielsen ND, et al. Critical Care Pandemic Preparation: Considerations and Lessons Learned from COVID-19. Crit Care Clin. 2022;38(4):761-774. doi:10.1016/J. CCC.2022.07.002
58. Stallard N, Hampson L, Benda N, et al. Efficient Adaptive Designs for Clinical Trials of Interventions for COVID-19. Stat Biopharm Res. 2020;12(4):483. doi:10.1080/19466315.2 020.1790415
59. Serpa Neto A, Hodgson C. Will Evidence-based Medicine Survive the COVID-19 Pandemic? Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020;17(9):1 060-1061. doi:10.1513/ANNALSATS.202006-587ED/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
60. Schinkel M, Virk HS, Nanayakkara PWB, van der Poll T, Wiersinga WJ. What Sepsis Researchers Can Learn from COVID-19. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021;203(1):125-127. doi:10.1164/RCCM.202010-4023LE/SUPPL_FILE/DISCLOSURES.PDF
61. Vázquez-Calatayud M, Fernández-Moreno I, Alvarez-Lerma F. ¿Cómo hemos adaptado las recomendaciones de los Proyectos Zero durante la pandemia? Enferm Intensiva. 2022;33:S8-S16. doi:10.1016/J.EN FI.2022.05.004
62. Yepes-Temiño MJ, Callejas González R, Álvarez Avello JM. Un momento para la reflexión. Aspectos éticos en la pandemia SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19 en nuestra práctica clínica. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2021;68(1) :28-36. doi:10.1016/J.REDAR.2020.09.004
63. Yeoh KW, Shah K. Research ethics during a pandemic (COVID-19). Int Health. 2021;13(4 ):374-375. doi:10.1093/INTHEALTH/IHAA054
64. Da Silva R, Chammas R, Novaes H. Rethinking approaches of science, technology, and innovation in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic: the challenge of translating knowledge infrastructures to public needs. Health Res Policy Syst. 2021;19(1). doi:10.1186/s12961-021-00760-8
65. Fineberg H V. Pandemic Preparedness and Response — Lessons from the H1N1 Influenza of 2009. New England Journal of Medicine. 2014;370(14):1335-1342. doi:10.10 56/NEJMRA1208802/SUPPL_FILE/NEJMRA1208802_DISCLOSURES.PDF
66. World Health Organization. ACT-Accelerator Strategic Review An independent report prepared by Dalberg.2021.
67. Valencia Morales DJ, Bansal V, Heavner SF, et al. Validation of automated data abstraction for SCCM discovery VIRUS COVID-19 registry: practical EHR export pathways (VIRUS-PEEP). Front Med (Lausanne). 2023;10. doi:10.3389/FMED.2023.1089087
68. Boncyk C, Butler P, McCarthy K, Freundlich RE. Validation of an Intensive Care Unit Data Mart for Research and Quality Improvement. J Med Syst. 2022;46(11). doi:1 0.1007/S10916-022-01873-5
69. Fleuren LM, Dam TA, Tonutti M, et al. The Dutch Data Warehouse, a multicenter and full-admission electronic health records database for critically ill COVID-19 patients. Published online 2020. doi:10.1186/s13054-021-03733-z
70. Grosman-Rimon L, Wegier P, Rodriguez R, et al. A command centre implementation before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in a community hospital. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024;24(1). doi:10.1186/S12911-023-02394-Y
71. Andrew NE, Beare R, Ravipati T, et al. Developing a linked electronic health record derived data platform to support research into healthy ageing. Int J Popul Data Sci. 2023;8 (1). doi:10.23889/IJPDS.V8I1.2129
72. P H, WS L, JR E, et al. Dexamethasone in Hospitalized Patients with Covid-19. N Engl J Med. 2021;384(8):693-704. doi:10.1056/NEJ MOA2021436
73. Kotfis K, Olusanya S, Modra L. WHAT’S NEW IN INTENSIVE CARE Equity in patient care in the intensive care unit. Published online 2024. doi:10.1007/s00134-023-07310-6
74. Kotfis K, Olusanya S, Modra L. Equity in patient care in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. Published online January 18, 2024:1-3. doi:10.1007/S00134-023-07310 -6/FIGURES/1
75. Todorov A, Kaufmann F, Arslani K, et al. Gender differences in the provision of intensive care: a Bayesian approach. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(5):577-587. doi:10.1007/S 00134-021-06393-3
76. Modra LJ, Higgins AM, Pilcher D V., Bailey MJ, Bellomo R. Sex Differences in Mortality of ICU Patients According to Diagnosis-related Sex Balance. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2022;206(11):1353-1360. doi: 10.1164/RCCM.202203-0539OC
77. Merdji H, Long MT, Ostermann M, et al. Sex and gender differences in intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49(10):11 55-1167. doi:10.1007/S00134-023-07194-6
78. McHenry RD, Moultrie CEJ, Quasim T, Mackay DF, Pell JP. Association between Socioeconomic Status and Outcomes in Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Crit Care Med. 2023;51(3):347-356. doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000005765
79. Strandberg G, Lipcsey M. Association of socioeconomic and demographic factors with limitations of life sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med. 2023;49:1249-1250. doi:10.1007/s00134-023 -07177-7
80. Lone NI, McPeake J, Stewart NI, et al. Influence of socioeconomic deprivation on interventions and outcomes for patients admitted with COVID-19 to critical care units in Scotland: A national cohort study. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 2021;1:1000 05. doi:10.1016/J.LANEPE.2020.100005
81. Kovacevic P, Meyer FJ, Gajic O. Challenges, obstacles, and unknowns in implementing principles of modern intensive care medicine in low-resource settings: an insider’s perspective. Intensive Care Med. 2023;50(1):141-143. doi:10.1007/S00134-023 -07270-X/FIGURES/1