West African College of Surgeons Basic Ophthalmology Resource: Development and Initial Evaluation
Main Article Content
Abstract
Purpose: To describe the process of development of the West African College of Surgeons (WACS) Basic Ophthalmology Educational Resource and to report the feedback from the first five cohorts to utilise the resource at the commencement of their training in ophthalmology.
Methods: After initial meetings topics considered essential foundations for training in ophthalmology were identified. Faculty members subsequently searched the internet to identify suitable online open source learning materials relevant to each topic, which were then collated and cataloged. Where suitable quality learning materials could not be identified, materials were created or re-used from existing WACS courses. Following the creation of the resource, questions were developed for a summative assessment, taken by learners upon completion of the resource.
Results: The resource went 'live' on 10th July 2019. As of March 2024, a total of 203 learners in 5 cohorts had completed the course. The feedback responses of 150 (74%) learners from the first 5 cohorts are described in this report. Regarding their overall assessment of the course, 64 (43%) learners rated the resource as very good', 63 (42%) as 'good', and 23 (15%) as 'satisfactory’. Most (>98%) respondents reported that the course met their expectations and that the content was relevant to their learning needs.
Conclusion: The WACS Basic Ophthalmology Resource appears to be a valuable opportunity for acquiring foundational knowledge.
Article Details
The Medical Research Archives grants authors the right to publish and reproduce the unrevised contribution in whole or in part at any time and in any form for any scholarly non-commercial purpose with the condition that all publications of the contribution include a full citation to the journal as published by the Medical Research Archives.
References
2. Musa, K.O., Idowu, O.O., Aribaba, O.T. et al. Sub-specialization among Nigerian ophthalmologists: status, disposition and barriers. Int Ophthalmol 42, 3005–3015 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-022-02286-6
3. Mortensen P, Enzor R, Keppel K, Williamson R, Jones P, Nkrumah G, Safiullah Z, Michelson S, Nadimpalli S, Shue A, Waxman E. The Ophthalmology Mini-Elective Gives Vision to Preclinical Medical Students. MedEdPORTAL. 2020 Nov 23;16:11024. doi: 10.15766/mep_2374-8265.11024.
4. Elved Roberts, Rosemary Morgan, Debra King, Louis Clerkin, Funduscopy: a forgotten art?, Postgraduate Medical Journal, Volume 75, Issue 883, May 1999, Pages 282-284, https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.75.883.282
5. Yang, C., Luo, L., Vadillo, M. A., Yu, R., & Shanks, D. R. (2021). Testing (quizzing) boosts classroom learning: A systematic and meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 147(4), 399–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000309
6. Tsai ASH, Yeo BSY, Anaya Alaminos R, Wong CW, Tham CC, Fang SK, Lam DSC, González-Andrades M, Ang M. Survey of Ophthalmology Training Experiences Among Young Ophthalmologists in the Asia-Pacific. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022 Sep 1;11(5):434-440. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000556.
7. Grover AK, Honavar SG, Azad R, Verma L. A national curriculum for ophthalmology residency training. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jun;66(6):752-783. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_327_18.
8. Anaya-Alaminos R, Rassmussen ML, Fung SSM, Potic J, González-Andrades M. Comparative analysis of European residency programs: benchmarking and harmonizing ophthalmology training in Europe. Eye (Lond). 2023 Mar;37(4):725-731. doi: 10.1038/s41433-022-02040-3. Epub 2022 Mar 30.
9. Masanganise R, Samkange C, Mukona D, Aagaard E. Competency based ophthalmology training curriculum for undergraduate medical students in Zimbabwe. Cent Afr J Med. 2015 May-Aug;61(5-8):44-8. PMID: 29144080.
10. Kogan, J. R., & Shea, J. A. (2007). Course evaluation in medical education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(3), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.12.0206 –
11. Koh JHL, Daniel BK. Shifting online during COVID-19: A systematic review of teaching and learning strategies and their outcomes. Int J Educ Technol High Educ. 2022;19(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s41239-022-00361-7. Epub 2022 Nov 9. PMID: 36404984; PMCID: PMC9643977.
12. Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
13. Michael G. Moore (1989) Editorial: Three types of interaction, , 3:2, 1-7, DOI: 10.1080/08923648909526659
14. Ahmed, S. K., Mitchell, P., & Trevitt, J. (2021). Rapid review of effective practice principles in the design and delivery of digital resources for teachers. Australian Council for Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.37517/978-1-74286-671-0